In article <xn0okrm90ata3to001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>The Doctor wrote:
>
>> In article <xn0okrbssaf0qei000@post.eweka.nl>,
>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>> > The Doctor wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Might have to check your favoutire archive to check your
>> >> assertion.
>> >
>> > My Usenet service provider has retention of rec.arts.drwho
>> > back to 1st July 2003, that's 747,979 messages (as of
>> > today)... IF I had the time and patience to go through them
>> > all I am pretty sure that I could find thousands of messages
>> > where you were wrong and a way way smaller percentage of
>> > messages where you was right!
>> >
>> > In fact I doubt if the messages where you was right would
>> > total 1% of those 747,979 messages! But of course, that is
>> > only a wild guess.
>>
>> Does it have a searchable feature?
>
>Of course, but why would I search through 21 years of messages
>to RADW? I'm not a glutton for punishment... or a masochist.
>
>RADW is a newsgroup where the discussions generally go round and
>round in circles, so anything that I've missed through the years
>will surely be round again at some stage!

Searchable is what rocks!!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <xn0okrn2uauc75q005@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>Daniel70 wrote:
>
>> The Doctor wrote on 20/4/24 12:09 am:
>> > In article <xn0okrbssaf0qei000@post.eweka.nl>,
>> >Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>> >
>> > > In fact I doubt if the messages where you was right would
>> > > total 1% of those 747,979 messages! But of course, that is
>> > > only a wild guess.
>> >
>> > Does it have a searchable feature?
>>
>> Well, I can tell that Blueshirt was posting via indigo.news,
>> asswipe, so YOU, asswipe, should be able to find out for
>> YOURSELF, asswipe, if they have a searchable function. YOU
>> know, asswipe, YOU should be able to communicate ISP to ISP,
>> asswipe!!
>
>Actually Indigo Internet is long gone, they run in to a bit of
>difficulty and were bought out by Telecom Eireann. Their nntp
>server is long defunct too as ISP's stopped carrying newsgroups
>by default many years ago. I just keep the old e-mail address. I
>actually use Eweka Internet Services as my Usenet service now...
>
>Either way, I wouldn't be searching 21 years of content to find
>the eight or nine posts where Dave was actually right about
>something. You're the one trawling through the RADW archives,
>you can have THAT job! ;-)

When I can get to 50 year USenet retention.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

The Doctor wrote:

> In article <xn0okrm90ata3to001@post.eweka.nl>,
> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> > The Doctor wrote:
> >
> >> In article <xn0okrbssaf0qei000@post.eweka.nl>,
> >> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > My Usenet service provider has retention of rec.arts.drwho
> >> > back to 1st July 2003, that's 747,979 messages (as of
> >> > today)... IF I had the time and patience to go through
> >> > them all I am pretty sure that I could find thousands of
> >> > messages where you were wrong and a way way smaller
> >> > percentage of messages where you was right!
> >> >
> >> > In fact I doubt if the messages where you was right would
> >> > total 1% of those 747,979 messages! But of course, that is
> >> > only a wild guess.
> >>
> >> Does it have a searchable feature?
> >
> > Of course, but why would I search through 21 years of
> > messages to RADW? I'm not a glutton for punishment... or a
> > masochist.
> >
> > RADW is a newsgroup where the discussions generally go round
> > and round in circles, so anything that I've missed through
> > the years will surely be round again at some stage!
>
> Searchable is what rocks!!

I could probably download them all in the time it takes to make
a cup of tea as they are only text messages, but what would I be
searching for in the last 21 years of RADW? The wit and wisdom
of David Yadallee? I doubt I will live long enough to ever find
satisfactory results of THAT search!

In article <xn0okrsnjb1z2rx004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>The Doctor wrote:
>
>> In article <xn0okrm90ata3to001@post.eweka.nl>,
>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>> > The Doctor wrote:
>> >
>> >> In article <xn0okrbssaf0qei000@post.eweka.nl>,
>> >> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > My Usenet service provider has retention of rec.arts.drwho
>> >> > back to 1st July 2003, that's 747,979 messages (as of
>> >> > today)... IF I had the time and patience to go through
>> >> > them all I am pretty sure that I could find thousands of
>> >> > messages where you were wrong and a way way smaller
>> >> > percentage of messages where you was right!
>> >> >
>> >> > In fact I doubt if the messages where you was right would
>> >> > total 1% of those 747,979 messages! But of course, that is
>> >> > only a wild guess.
>> >>
>> >> Does it have a searchable feature?
>> >
>> > Of course, but why would I search through 21 years of
>> > messages to RADW? I'm not a glutton for punishment... or a
>> > masochist.
>> >
>> > RADW is a newsgroup where the discussions generally go round
>> > and round in circles, so anything that I've missed through
>> > the years will surely be round again at some stage!
>>
>> Searchable is what rocks!!
>
>I could probably download them all in the time it takes to make
>a cup of tea as they are only text messages, but what would I be
>searching for in the last 21 years of RADW? The wit and wisdom
>of David Yadallee? I doubt I will live long enough to ever find
>satisfactory results of THAT search!

From 1991 onwards ...
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

On 2024-04-19 9:24 a.m., solar penguin wrote:
>
> The idiot inquired:
>
>> In article <uvtv2p$31qr2$2@dont-email.me>,
>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> The idiot inquired:
>>>
>>>> In article <uvtfk7$2uhva$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Since your crush on hypothetical female lurkers still appears
>>>>> to prevent you from answering, I’ll tell you.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nowhere.
>>>>>
>>>>> That’s the answer.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nowhere in the Bible does it say anything about the
>>>>> etymology of the English word Easter. Or any other English
>>>>> words. The English language didn’t even exist until hundreds
>>>>> of years after the Bible was written!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Still arguing for the Pagans and not the Christians Birdie?
>>>>
>>>
>>> No, I’m just stating the facts. That’s all.
>>>
>>> If your religion can’t handle them, that’s your problem.
>>>
>>
>> What facts? The skewed facts?
>
> Which facts have I skewed? How have I skewed them?
>

The irony of the asswipe talking about "skewed facts" when he tries to
twist the Bible to agree to his twisted and stunted point of view.

Besides he wouldn't know a fact if it came up and bit him on the ass.

--
Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.

George Bernard Shaw

The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
> In article <uvu2b7$32k7g$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> The idiot inquired:
>>
>>> In article <uvtv2p$31qr2$2@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The idiot inquired:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <uvtfk7$2uhva$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nowhere in the Bible does it say anything about the
>>>>>> etymology of the English word Easter. Or any other English
>>>>>> words. The English language didn’t even exist until hundreds
>>>>>> of years after the Bible was written!
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Still arguing for the Pagans and not the Christians Birdie?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> No, I’m just stating the facts. That’s all.
>>>>
>>>> If your religion can’t handle them, that’s your problem.
>>>>
>>>
>>> What facts? The skewed facts?
>>
>> Which facts have I skewed? How have I skewed them?
>>
>
> You base your research on tradition.
>

Which facts have I skewed? How have I skewed them?

--
solar penguin

The Doctor wrote on 20/4/24 8:06 am:
> In article <xn0okrm90ata3to001@post.eweka.nl>,
> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote:
>>
>>> In article <xn0okrbssaf0qei000@post.eweka.nl>,
>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Might have to check your favoutire archive to check your
>>>>> assertion.
>>>>
>>>> My Usenet service provider has retention of rec.arts.drwho
>>>> back to 1st July 2003, that's 747,979 messages (as of
>>>> today)... IF I had the time and patience to go through them
>>>> all I am pretty sure that I could find thousands of messages
>>>> where you were wrong and a way way smaller percentage of
>>>> messages where you was right!
>>>>
>>>> In fact I doubt if the messages where you was right would
>>>> total 1% of those 747,979 messages! But of course, that is
>>>> only a wild guess.
>>>
>>> Does it have a searchable feature?
>>
>> Of course, but why would I search through 21 years of messages
>> to RADW? I'm not a glutton for punishment... or a masochist.
>>
>> RADW is a newsgroup where the discussions generally go round and
>> round in circles, so anything that I've missed through the years
>> will surely be round again at some stage!
>
> Searchable is what rocks!!
>
Hey, asswipe, YOU have YOUR own Server. How long is the retention on
THAT, asswipe?? Maybe YOU, asswipe, could do a search of its files,
asswipe!!
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 20/4/24 1:05 am:
> In article <uvu02s$321qj$2@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> solar penguin wrote on 20/4/24 12:28 am:
>>> The idiot inquired:
>>>> In article <uvtfk7$2uhva$1@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
>>>> <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> The idiot insisted:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Still spinning Birdie?
>>>>>
>>>>> Since your crush on hypothetical female lurkers still appears
>>>>> to prevent you from answering, I’ll tell you.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nowhere.
>>>>>
>>>>> That’s the answer.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nowhere in the Bible does it say anything about the etymology
>>>>> of the English word Easter. Or any other English words. The
>>>>> English language didn’t even exist until hundreds of years
>>>>> after the Bible was written!
>>>>
>>>> Still arguing for the Pagans and not the Christians Birdie?
>>>
>>> No, I’m just stating the facts. That’s all.
>>>
>>> If your religion can’t handle them, that’s your problem.
>>>
>> If the a%e were any sort of 'good' at HIS religion, the a%e would
>> by able to answer these BIBLICAL questions in the blink of an
>> eye!!
>
> What about the Pagan infiltration of Christianiy, Red-Beard?

Well, there you go! Generally, YOU, asswipe, claim it was The Roman
Catholic Church that was infiltrated by Pagans, asswipe!!

Now, YOU, asswipe, claim it was the whole of Christianity, INCLUDING
YOUR MINOR SECT, asswipe, that was infiltrated by the Pagans!!

Well done, asswipe!!
--
Daniel

Idlehands wrote on 20/4/24 1:29 pm:
> On 2024-04-19 9:24 a.m., solar penguin wrote:
>> The idiot inquired:
>>> In article <uvtv2p$31qr2$2@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin  <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> The idiot inquired:

<Snip>

>>>>> Still arguing for the Pagans and not the Christians Birdie?
>>>>
>>>> No, I’m just stating the facts. That’s all.
>>>>
>>>> If your religion can’t handle them, that’s your problem.
>>>
>>> What facts? The skewed facts?
>>
>> Which facts have I skewed? How have I skewed them?
>
> The irony of the asswipe talking about "skewed facts" when he tries to
> twist the Bible to agree to his twisted and stunted point of view.
>
> Besides he wouldn't know a fact if it came up and bit him on the ass.
>
..... but the fact would get a good feed from his ass!! ;-P
--
Daniel

In article <uvvfjk$3ff18$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>> In article <uvu2b7$32k7g$1@dont-email.me>,
>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> The idiot inquired:
>>>
>>>> In article <uvtv2p$31qr2$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> The idiot inquired:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article <uvtfk7$2uhva$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nowhere in the Bible does it say anything about the
>>>>>>> etymology of the English word Easter. Or any other English
>>>>>>> words. The English language didn’t even exist until hundreds
>>>>>>> of years after the Bible was written!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Still arguing for the Pagans and not the Christians Birdie?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> No, I’m just stating the facts. That’s all.
>>>>>
>>>>> If your religion can’t handle them, that’s your problem.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What facts? The skewed facts?
>>>
>>> Which facts have I skewed? How have I skewed them?
>>>
>>
>> You base your research on tradition.
>>
>
>Which facts have I skewed? How have I skewed them?
>

SP - no discernment!

>--
>solar penguin

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <v009q9$3ks14$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>The Doctor wrote on 20/4/24 8:06 am:
>> In article <xn0okrm90ata3to001@post.eweka.nl>,
>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <xn0okrbssaf0qei000@post.eweka.nl>,
>>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Might have to check your favoutire archive to check your
>>>>>> assertion.
>>>>>
>>>>> My Usenet service provider has retention of rec.arts.drwho
>>>>> back to 1st July 2003, that's 747,979 messages (as of
>>>>> today)... IF I had the time and patience to go through them
>>>>> all I am pretty sure that I could find thousands of messages
>>>>> where you were wrong and a way way smaller percentage of
>>>>> messages where you was right!
>>>>>
>>>>> In fact I doubt if the messages where you was right would
>>>>> total 1% of those 747,979 messages! But of course, that is
>>>>> only a wild guess.
>>>>
>>>> Does it have a searchable feature?
>>>
>>> Of course, but why would I search through 21 years of messages
>>> to RADW? I'm not a glutton for punishment... or a masochist.
>>>
>>> RADW is a newsgroup where the discussions generally go round and
>>> round in circles, so anything that I've missed through the years
>>> will surely be round again at some stage!
>>
>> Searchable is what rocks!!
>>
>Hey, a%e, YOU have YOUR own Server. How long is the retention on
>THAT, a%e?? Maybe YOU, a%e, could do a search of its files,
>a%e!!

How about 50 years Red-beard?

>--
>Daniel

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <v00ae7$3l25g$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>Idlehands wrote on 20/4/24 1:29 pm:
>> On 2024-04-19 9:24 a.m., solar penguin wrote:
>>> The idiot inquired:
>>>> In article <uvtv2p$31qr2$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>> solar penguin  <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> The idiot inquired:
>
><Snip>
>
>>>>>> Still arguing for the Pagans and not the Christians Birdie?
>>>>>
>>>>> No, I’m just stating the facts. That’s all.
>>>>>
>>>>> If your religion can’t handle them, that’s your problem.
>>>>
>>>> What facts? The skewed facts?
>>>
>>> Which facts have I skewed? How have I skewed them?
>>
>> The irony of the asswipe talking about "skewed facts" when he tries to
>> twist the Bible to agree to his twisted and stunted point of view.
>>
>> Besides he wouldn't know a fact if it came up and bit him on the ass.

Lying Idlehnds lies again.

Idlehands backs Hamas!

>>
>.... but the fact would get a good feed from his ass!! ;-P
>--
>Daniel

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <v00a6v$3l25g$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>The Doctor wrote on 20/4/24 1:05 am:
>> In article <uvu02s$321qj$2@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>> solar penguin wrote on 20/4/24 12:28 am:
>>>> The idiot inquired:
>>>>> In article <uvtfk7$2uhva$1@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
>>>>> <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> The idiot insisted:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Still spinning Birdie?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Since your crush on hypothetical female lurkers still appears
>>>>>> to prevent you from answering, I’ll tell you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nowhere.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That’s the answer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nowhere in the Bible does it say anything about the etymology
>>>>>> of the English word Easter. Or any other English words. The
>>>>>> English language didn’t even exist until hundreds of years
>>>>>> after the Bible was written!
>>>>>
>>>>> Still arguing for the Pagans and not the Christians Birdie?
>>>>
>>>> No, I’m just stating the facts. That’s all.
>>>>
>>>> If your religion can’t handle them, that’s your problem.
>>>>
>>> If the a%e were any sort of 'good' at HIS religion, the a%e would
>>> by able to answer these BIBLICAL questions in the blink of an
>>> eye!!
>>
>> What about the Pagan infiltration of Christianiy, Red-Beard?
>
>Well, there you go! Generally, YOU, a%e, claim it was The Roman
>Catholic Church that was infiltrated by Pagans, a%e!!
>
>Now, YOU, a%e, claim it was the whole of Christianity, INCLUDING
>YOUR MINOR SECT, a%e, that was infiltrated by the Pagans!!
>
>Well done, a%e!!

You really need to study REvelation according to John!

>--
>Daniel

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

The King-in-Yellowbeard wrote:

> In article <uvvfjk$3ff18$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The idiot insisted:
>>> In article <uvu2b7$32k7g$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The idiot inquired:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <uvtv2p$31qr2$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The idiot inquired:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Still arguing for the Pagans and not the Christians Birdie?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, I’m just stating the facts. That’s all.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If your religion can’t handle them, that’s your problem.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> What facts? The skewed facts?
>>>>
>>>> Which facts have I skewed? How have I skewed them?
>>>>
>>>
>>> You base your research on tradition.
>>>
>>
>> Which facts have I skewed? How have I skewed them?
>>
>
> SP - no discernment!
>

DY - no answers!

Which facts have I skewed? How have I skewed them?

--
solar penguin

solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
> The King-in-Yellowbeard wrote:
>
>> In article <uvvfjk$3ff18$1@dont-email.me>,
>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> The idiot insisted:
>>>> In article <uvu2b7$32k7g$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> The idiot inquired:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article <uvtv2p$31qr2$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The idiot inquired:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Still arguing for the Pagans and not the Christians Birdie?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No, I’m just stating the facts. That’s all.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If your religion can’t handle them, that’s your problem.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What facts? The skewed facts?
>>>>>
>>>>> Which facts have I skewed? How have I skewed them?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You base your research on tradition.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Which facts have I skewed? How have I skewed them?
>>>
>>
>> SP - no discernment!
>>
>
> DY - no answers!
>
> Which facts have I skewed? How have I skewed them?
>

Since in another thread, he uses the word “skewered” when he must mean
“well-reasoned” or “brilliant”, I can only assume that when he says
“skewed” he means “well-laid-out”.

He certainly doesn’t mean either word in any of their usual senses, since
he can’t explain what he means by them.

--
“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor

The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Which facts have I skewed? How have I skewed them?
>>
>
> Since in another thread, he uses the word “skewered” when he must mean
> “well-reasoned” or “brilliant”, I can only assume that when he says
> “skewed” he means “well-laid-out”.
>
> He certainly doesn’t mean either word in any of their usual senses, since
> he can’t explain what he means by them.
>

Thanks. I’ll go with that.

--
solar penguin

In article <v00pom$3okjc$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>The King-in-Yellowbeard wrote:
>
>> In article <uvvfjk$3ff18$1@dont-email.me>,
>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> The idiot insisted:
>>>> In article <uvu2b7$32k7g$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> The idiot inquired:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article <uvtv2p$31qr2$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The idiot inquired:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Still arguing for the Pagans and not the Christians Birdie?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No, I’m just stating the facts. That’s all.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If your religion can’t handle them, that’s your problem.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What facts? The skewed facts?
>>>>>
>>>>> Which facts have I skewed? How have I skewed them?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You base your research on tradition.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Which facts have I skewed? How have I skewed them?
>>>
>>
>> SP - no discernment!
>>
>
>DY - no answers!
>
>Which facts have I skewed? How have I skewed them?
>

How thorough is your Bible reading?

>--
>solar penguin

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <v00rv0$3p34l$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The King-in-Yellowbeard wrote:
>>
>>> In article <uvvfjk$3ff18$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> The idiot insisted:
>>>>> In article <uvu2b7$32k7g$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The idiot inquired:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <uvtv2p$31qr2$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The idiot inquired:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Still arguing for the Pagans and not the Christians Birdie?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No, I’m just stating the facts. That’s all.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If your religion can’t handle them, that’s your problem.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What facts? The skewed facts?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Which facts have I skewed? How have I skewed them?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You base your research on tradition.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Which facts have I skewed? How have I skewed them?
>>>>
>>>
>>> SP - no discernment!
>>>
>>
>> DY - no answers!
>>
>> Which facts have I skewed? How have I skewed them?
>>
>
>Since in another thread, he uses the word “skewered” when he must mean
>“well-reasoned” or “brilliant”, I can only assume that when he says
>“skewed” he means “well-laid-out”.
>
>He certainly doesn’t mean either word in any of their usual senses, since
>he can’t explain what he means by them.
>

Depends how you burn it.

>--
>“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <v010dl$3q0rl$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Which facts have I skewed? How have I skewed them?
>>>
>>
>> Since in another thread, he uses the word “skewered” when he must mean
>> “well-reasoned” or “brilliant”, I can only assume that when he says
>> “skewed” he means “well-laid-out”.
>>
>> He certainly doesn’t mean either word in any of their usual senses, since
>> he can’t explain what he means by them.
>>
>
>Thanks. I’ll go with that.
>

Which way are you running?

>--
>solar penguin

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

The idiot inquired:

> In article <v00pom$3okjc$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The King-in-Yellowbeard wrote:
>>
>>> In article <uvvfjk$3ff18$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> The idiot insisted:
>>>>> In article <uvu2b7$32k7g$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The idiot inquired:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <uvtv2p$31qr2$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No, I’m just stating the facts. That’s all.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If your religion can’t handle them, that’s your problem.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What facts? The skewed facts?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Which facts have I skewed? How have I skewed them?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You base your research on tradition.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Which facts have I skewed? How have I skewed them?
>>>>
>>>
>>> SP - no discernment!
>>>
>>
>> DY - no answers!
>>
>> Which facts have I skewed? How have I skewed them?
>>
>
> How thorough is your Bible reading?
>

I’ll answer your questions when you’ve answered mine.

Which facts have I skewed? How have I skewed them?

--
solar penguin

The Doctor wrote on 20/4/24 10:52 pm:
> In article <v009q9$3ks14$1@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 20/4/24 8:06 am:
>>> In article <xn0okrm90ata3to001@post.eweka.nl>,
>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>> In article <xn0okrbssaf0qei000@post.eweka.nl>,
>>>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Might have to check your favoutire archive to check your
>>>>>>> assertion.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My Usenet service provider has retention of rec.arts.drwho
>>>>>> back to 1st July 2003, that's 747,979 messages (as of
>>>>>> today)... IF I had the time and patience to go through them
>>>>>> all I am pretty sure that I could find thousands of messages
>>>>>> where you were wrong and a way way smaller percentage of
>>>>>> messages where you was right!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In fact I doubt if the messages where you was right would
>>>>>> total 1% of those 747,979 messages! But of course, that is
>>>>>> only a wild guess.
>>>>>
>>>>> Does it have a searchable feature?
>>>>
>>>> Of course, but why would I search through 21 years of messages
>>>> to RADW? I'm not a glutton for punishment... or a masochist.
>>>>
>>>> RADW is a newsgroup where the discussions generally go round and
>>>> round in circles, so anything that I've missed through the years
>>>> will surely be round again at some stage!
>>>
>>> Searchable is what rocks!!
>>>
>> Hey, a%e, YOU have YOUR own Server. How long is the retention on
>> THAT, a%e?? Maybe YOU, a%e, could do a search of its files,
>> a%e!!
>
> How about 50 years Red-beard?

So from the 1970's, asswipe!! WOW!! So how long is the retention on
those files, asswipe??
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 20/4/24 11:00 pm:
> In article <v00a6v$3l25g$1@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 20/4/24 1:05 am:

<Snip>

>>> What about the Pagan infiltration of Christianiy, Red-Beard?
>>
>> Well, there you go! Generally, YOU, a%e, claim it was The Roman
>> Catholic Church that was infiltrated by Pagans, a%e!!
>>
>> Now, YOU, a%e, claim it was the whole of Christianity, INCLUDING
>> YOUR MINOR SECT, a%e, that was infiltrated by the Pagans!!
>>
>> Well done, a%e!!
>
> You really need to study REvelation according to John!

Why, asswipe?? Does Revelations cover the infiltration of YOUR sect,
asswipe??
--
Daniel

The Last Doctor wrote on 21/4/24 2:53 am:
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The King-in-Yellowbeard wrote:
>>> In article <uvvfjk$3ff18$1@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
>>> <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> The idiot insisted:
>>>>> In article <uvu2b7$32k7g$1@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
>>>>> <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:

<Snip>

>>>>>> Which facts have I skewed? How have I skewed them?
>>>>>
>>>>> You base your research on tradition.
>>>>
>>>> Which facts have I skewed? How have I skewed them?
>>>
>>> SP - no discernment!
>>
>> DY - no answers!
>>
>> Which facts have I skewed? How have I skewed them?
>
> Since in another thread, he uses the word “skewered” when he must
> mean “well-reasoned” or “brilliant”, I can only assume that when he
> says “skewed” he means “well-laid-out”.
>
> He certainly doesn’t mean either word in any of their usual senses,
> since he can’t explain what he means by them.
>
Has the asswipe every explained why he and his family left Great Britain??

Could it be that the asswipe was proven to be such a dunderhead that GB
kicked him out so as to drastically improve the GB IQ??
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 21/4/24 6:38 am:
> In article <v00rv0$3p34l$1@dont-email.me>, The Last Doctor
> <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:

<Snip>

>> Since in another thread, he uses the word “skewered” when he
>> must mean “well-reasoned” or “brilliant”, I can only assume
>> that when he says “skewed” he means “well-laid-out”.
>>
>> He certainly doesn’t mean either word in any of their usual
>> senses, since he can’t explain what he means by them.
>
> Depends how you burn it.

"burn it"?? What the hell are we burning??
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 21/4/24 6:37 am:
> In article <v00pom$3okjc$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The King-in-Yellowbeard wrote:
>>> In article <uvvfjk$3ff18$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:

<Snip>

>>>> Which facts have I skewed? How have I skewed them?
>>>
>>> SP - no discernment!
>>
>> DY - no answers!
>>
>> Which facts have I skewed? How have I skewed them?
>
> How thorough is your Bible reading?

"Bible reading"?? I thought this was a Doctor Who newsgroup!!
--
Daniel