I wonder how many signed??

18/06/1991 18:32:49 UTC

WHEREAS the BBC serial Doctor Who is considered a popular British
institution, WHEREAS this hiatus is getting unnecessarily drawn-out and
WHEREAS the fans of Doctor Who , im the majority, want to see the
return of Sylvester McCoy and Sophie Aldred
We the fans of Doctor Who request the BBC to
1) request the return of Sylvester McCoy for 130 episodes
2) Request an immediate decision on the show's producer
3) requset that the original contracts signed by Sylester McCoy and
Sophie Aldred be honoured

Name Address Signature

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

Dave Yadallee y***....@e****.********.**b.ca
Edmonton Remote Systems: Serving Northern Alberta since 1982

"im the majority"?? "requset"?? "Sylester"??Even back then, our
correspondent couldn't get his Spell Checker functioning correctly!!
--
Daniel

In article <v030gn$a0n5$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>I wonder how many signed??
>
>18/06/1991 18:32:49 UTC
>
>WHEREAS the BBC serial Doctor Who is considered a popular British
>institution, WHEREAS this hiatus is getting unnecessarily drawn-out and
>WHEREAS the fans of Doctor Who , im the majority, want to see the
>return of Sylvester McCoy and Sophie Aldred
>We the fans of Doctor Who request the BBC to
>1) request the return of Sylvester McCoy for 130 episodes
>2) Request an immediate decision on the show's producer
>3) requset that the original contracts signed by Sylester McCoy and
>Sophie Aldred be honoured
>
>Name Address Signature
>
>______________________________________________________________________
>
>______________________________________________________________________
>
>______________________________________________________________________
>
>______________________________________________________________________
>
>______________________________________________________________________
>
>Dave Yadallee y***....@e****.********.**b.ca
>Edmonton Remote Systems: Serving Northern Alberta since 1982
>
>"im the majority"?? "requset"?? "Sylester"??Even back then, our
>correspondent couldn't get his Spell Checker functioning correctly!!

Care to look up the followups?

>--
>Daniel

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

The Doctor wrote on 21/4/24 10:42 pm:
> In article <v030gn$a0n5$1@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> I wonder how many signed??
>>
>> 18/06/1991 18:32:49 UTC
>>
>> WHEREAS the BBC serial Doctor Who is considered a popular British
>> institution, WHEREAS this hiatus is getting unnecessarily drawn-out and
>> WHEREAS the fans of Doctor Who , im the majority, want to see the
>> return of Sylvester McCoy and Sophie Aldred
>> We the fans of Doctor Who request the BBC to
>> 1) request the return of Sylvester McCoy for 130 episodes
>> 2) Request an immediate decision on the show's producer
>> 3) requset that the original contracts signed by Sylester McCoy and
>> Sophie Aldred be honoured
>>
>> Name Address Signature
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>>
>> Dave Yadallee y***....@e****.********.**b.ca
>> Edmonton Remote Systems: Serving Northern Alberta since 1982
>>
>> "im the majority"?? "requset"?? "Sylester"??Even back then, our
>> correspondent couldn't get his Spell Checker functioning correctly!!
>
> Care to look up the followups?

No, thanks, but YOU, asswipe, supposedly have 50 years of UseNet
archives on YOUR server, asswipe, so why don't YOU, asswipe, look up the
followups, asswipe??
--
Daniel

On 2024-04-22 5:29 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
> The Doctor wrote on 21/4/24 10:42 pm:

<CHOP>

>>
>> Care to look up the followups?
>
> No, thanks, but YOU, asswipe, supposedly have 50 years of UseNet
> archives on YOUR server, asswipe, so why don't YOU, asswipe, look up the
> followups, asswipe??

Since Usenet was invented in 1979 this would make it impossible to have
50 years of archives.

1979 began with two people figuring out how to exchange messages and
files between computers would mean the archives from then would be very
small and boring.

The asswipe is full of shit but that is common knowledge anyway.

--
Facisim: The first step is to fascinate fools and muzzle the intelligent

Bertrand Russell

Idlehands wrote on 22/4/24 10:50 pm:
> On 2024-04-22 5:29 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 21/4/24 10:42 pm:
>
> <CHOP>
>
>>> Care to look up the followups?
>>
>> No, thanks, but YOU, asswipe, supposedly have 50 years of UseNet
>> archives on YOUR server, asswipe, so why don't YOU, asswipe, look up
>> the followups, asswipe??
>
> Since Usenet was invented in 1979 this would make it impossible to have
> 50 years of archives.

Didn't UseNet develop out of (What was it called) DARPANet or some such
..... a Military network the had spread to some University-type
Institutions??

> 1979 began with two people figuring out how to exchange messages and
> files between computers would mean the archives from then would be very
> small and boring.
>
> The asswipe is full of shit but that is common knowledge anyway.

It certainly is common knowledge!!
--
Daniel

In article <v05hmn$u1uv$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>The Doctor wrote on 21/4/24 10:42 pm:
>> In article <v030gn$a0n5$1@dont-email.me>,
>> Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>> I wonder how many signed??
>>>
>>> 18/06/1991 18:32:49 UTC
>>>
>>> WHEREAS the BBC serial Doctor Who is considered a popular British
>>> institution, WHEREAS this hiatus is getting unnecessarily drawn-out and
>>> WHEREAS the fans of Doctor Who , im the majority, want to see the
>>> return of Sylvester McCoy and Sophie Aldred
>>> We the fans of Doctor Who request the BBC to
>>> 1) request the return of Sylvester McCoy for 130 episodes
>>> 2) Request an immediate decision on the show's producer
>>> 3) requset that the original contracts signed by Sylester McCoy and
>>> Sophie Aldred be honoured
>>>
>>> Name Address Signature
>>>
>>> ______________________________________________________________________
>>>
>>> ______________________________________________________________________
>>>
>>> ______________________________________________________________________
>>>
>>> ______________________________________________________________________
>>>
>>> ______________________________________________________________________
>>>
>>> Dave Yadallee y***....@e****.********.**b.ca
>>> Edmonton Remote Systems: Serving Northern Alberta since 1982
>>>
>>> "im the majority"?? "requset"?? "Sylester"??Even back then, our
>>> correspondent couldn't get his Spell Checker functioning correctly!!
>>
>> Care to look up the followups?
>
>No, thanks, but YOU, a%e, supposedly have 50 years of UseNet
>archives on YOUR server, a%e, so why don't YOU, a%e, look up the
>followups, a%e??

It is all there for you red-beard.

>--
>Daniel

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <v05r8c$106hc$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>Idlehands wrote on 22/4/24 10:50 pm:
>> On 2024-04-22 5:29 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
>>> The Doctor wrote on 21/4/24 10:42 pm:
>>
>> <CHOP>
>>
>>>> Care to look up the followups?
>>>
>>> No, thanks, but YOU, a%e, supposedly have 50 years of UseNet
>>> archives on YOUR server, a%e, so why don't YOU, a%e, look up
>>> the followups, a%e??
>>
>> Since Usenet was invented in 1979 this would make it impossible to have
>> 50 years of archives.
>
>Didn't UseNet develop out of (What was it called) DARPANet or some such
>.... a Military network the had spread to some University-type
>Institutions??
>
>> 1979 began with two people figuring out how to exchange messages and
>> files between computers would mean the archives from then would be very
>> small and boring.
>>
>> The a%e is full of s* but that is common knowledge anyway.
>
>It certainly is common knowledge!!

And if you set your expire file to 50 years ...

>--
>Daniel

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

On 2024-04-22 8:12 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
> Idlehands wrote on 22/4/24 10:50 pm:
>> On 2024-04-22 5:29 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
>>> The Doctor wrote on 21/4/24 10:42 pm:
>>
>> <CHOP>
>>
>>>> Care to look up the followups?
>>>
>>> No, thanks, but YOU, asswipe, supposedly have 50 years of UseNet
>>> archives on YOUR server, asswipe, so why don't YOU, asswipe, look up
>>> the followups, asswipe??
>>
>> Since Usenet was invented in 1979 this would make it impossible to
>> have 50 years of archives.
>
> Didn't UseNet develop out of (What was it called) DARPANet or some such
> .... a Military network the had spread to some University-type
> Institutions??
>
>> 1979 began with two people figuring out how to exchange messages and
>> files between computers would mean the archives from then would be
>> very small and boring.
>>
>> The asswipe is full of shit but that is common knowledge anyway.
>
> It certainly is common knowledge!!

Usenet was conceived in 1979 and publicly established in 1980, at the
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and Duke University,[8][2]
over a decade before the World Wide Web went online (and thus before the
general public received access to the Internet), making it one of the
oldest computer network communications systems still in widespread use.

It was originally built on the "poor man's ARPANET", employing UUCP as
its transport protocol to offer mail and file transfers, as well as
announcements through the newly developed news software such as A News.
The name "Usenet" emphasizes its creators' hope that the USENIX
organization would take an active role in its operation.[9]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet

--
Facisim: The first step is to fascinate fools and muzzle the intelligent

Bertrand Russell