On 1/25/2024 11:01 AM, scooter lied:
>
>
> "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:RIxsN.255942$Wp_8.254134@fx17.iad...
>> On 1/25/2024 8:04 AM, scooter lied:
>>>
>>>
>>> "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:deesN.68809$GX69.6523@fx46.iad...
>>>> On 1/24/2024 9:05 AM, Scout wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:NO9sN.53944$5Hnd.41843@fx03.iad...
>>>>>> On 1/24/2024 6:02 AM, scooter lied:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:1lVrN.44870$Iswd.42596@fx05.iad...
>>>>>>>> On 1/23/2024 10:17 AM, scooter lied:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:mfSrN.44077$SyNd.36362@fx33.iad...
>>>>>>>>>> On 1/23/2024 5:32 AM, scooter lied:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>> news:A4CrN.221414$Ama9.217629@fx12.iad...
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/22/2024 12:56 PM, scooter lied:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:uom2qa$phl5$4@dont-email.me...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:MPG.401833245c7274ae990efc@usnews.blocknews.net:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <20240121.230256.2824f4d1@erienetworks.net>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> remailer@domain.invalid says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <uoh0rd$3oq4f$10@dont-email.me>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I'm the queer who follows Trump's dog to pick up turds > when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shits.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If there were, the Justice Department would already have brought
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> charges against him.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You know insurrection is a crime, right?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So is rape and yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just to recap, under Section 2383 of the federal criminal code, a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> person is guilty of a felony, punishable by up to ten years�
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> imprisonment, if he
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And why do we need a refresher on this? Because the Department of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Justice has been investigating Donald Trump and the January 6,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2021,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Capitol riot for nearly three years, yet no insurrection charges
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have ever been brought against Trump ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nationalreview.com/2023/09/there-is-no-insurrection-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> case-against-trump/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ===============
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why Jan. 6 insurrections sent a letter to the Folger Shakespeare
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Library
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Which of these have been convicted of insurrection?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Not necessary to judge that the event *was* an insurrection,
>>>>>>>>>>>> scooter. It was.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You say it's not necessary to judge
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I say, correctly, that it is not necessary to charge and convict
>>>>>>>>>> anyone for the statutory crime of insurrection in order to judge that
>>>>>>>>>> the *event* was an insurrection.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No, that's merely an opinion
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No, scooter, it's a statement of fact.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Claiming your assertions are factual
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I didn't,
>>>>>
>>>>> Rudy admits
>>>>
>>>> No, scooter. Once again, scooter, *whenever* you say that your Usenet
>>>> opponent — your better in every dimension — "admits" something, you're
>>>> lying. Your Usenet opponent — your better — has never "admitted" what you
>>>> claim he has. You're always lying when you use that construction, scooter.
>>>
>>> Then why did you admit it?
>>
>> Why do you lie and say someone has "admitted" something that he hasn't, scooter?
>> *Every* time you say your opponent — your better in every dimension — "admits"
>> something, you're lying. Why do you keep telling that same lie, scooter?
>
> Only you can answer why

No, you're the one lying, scooter, and you're the one who needs to explain why
you do it.

To reiterate, whenever you say "Rudy admits...", you're lying. I have never
"admitted" what you lie and claim I admit.

"Rudy admits..." is one of your scooterisms that prove your shitty thinking.

In article <SHQsN.385962$83n7.234407@fx18.iad>, banmilk@hotmail.com
says...
>
> On 1/25/2024 11:01 AM, scooter lied:
> >
> >
> > "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:RIxsN.255942$Wp_8.254134@fx17.iad...
> >> On 1/25/2024 8:04 AM, scooter lied:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >>> news:deesN.68809$GX69.6523@fx46.iad...
> >>>> On 1/24/2024 9:05 AM, Scout wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >>>>> news:NO9sN.53944$5Hnd.41843@fx03.iad...
> >>>>>> On 1/24/2024 6:02 AM, scooter lied:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >>>>>>> news:1lVrN.44870$Iswd.42596@fx05.iad...
> >>>>>>>> On 1/23/2024 10:17 AM, scooter lied:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >>>>>>>>> news:mfSrN.44077$SyNd.36362@fx33.iad...
> >>>>>>>>>> On 1/23/2024 5:32 AM, scooter lied:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> "Wilson Woods" <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >>>>>>>>>>> news:A4CrN.221414$Ama9.217629@fx12.iad...
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/22/2024 12:56 PM, scooter lied:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:uom2qa$phl5$4@dont-email.me...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Skeeter <Skeeterweed@proton.me> wrote in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:MPG.401833245c7274ae990efc@usnews.blocknews.net:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <20240121.230256.2824f4d1@erienetworks.net>,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> remailer@domain.invalid says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <uoh0rd$3oq4f$10@dont-email.me>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I'm the queer who follows Trump's dog to pick up turds > when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shits.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If there were, the Justice Department would already have brought
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> charges against him.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You know insurrection is a crime, right?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So is rape and yet.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just to recap, under Section 2383 of the federal criminal code, a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> person is guilty of a felony, punishable by up to ten yearsâ??
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> imprisonment, if he
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And why do we need a refresher on this? Because the Department of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Justice has been investigating Donald Trump and the January 6,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2021,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Capitol riot for nearly three years, yet no insurrection charges
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have ever been brought against Trump ...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.nationalreview.com/2023/09/there-is-no-insurrection-
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> case-against-trump/
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ===============
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why Jan. 6 insurrections sent a letter to the Folger Shakespeare
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Library
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Which of these have been convicted of insurrection?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Not necessary to judge that the event *was* an insurrection,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> scooter. It was.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> You say it's not necessary to judge
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I say, correctly, that it is not necessary to charge and convict
> >>>>>>>>>> anyone for the statutory crime of insurrection in order to judge that
> >>>>>>>>>> the *event* was an insurrection.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> No, that's merely an opinion
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> No, scooter, it's a statement of fact.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Claiming your assertions are factual
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I didn't,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Rudy admits
> >>>>
> >>>> No, scooter. Once again, scooter, *whenever* you say that your Usenet
> >>>> opponent ? your better in every dimension ? "admits" something, you're
> >>>> lying. Your Usenet opponent ? your better ? has never "admitted" what you
> >>>> claim he has. You're always lying when you use that construction, scooter.
> >>>
> >>> Then why did you admit it?
> >>
> >> Why do you lie and say someone has "admitted" something that he hasn't, scooter?
> >> *Every* time you say your opponent ? your better in every dimension ? "admits"
> >> something, you're lying. Why do you keep telling that same lie, scooter?
> >
> > Only you can answer why
>
> No, you're the one lying, scooter, and you're the one who needs to explain why
> you do it.
>
> To reiterate, whenever you say "Rudy admits...", you're lying. I have never
> "admitted" what you lie and claim I admit.
>
> "Rudy admits..." is one of your scooterisms that prove your shitty thinking.

Why do you ignore me when I ask about how you say I "admitted" to
spending time in jail. You said I "admitted" I was a child molester like
you say in your stupid opening. Yet you can't show us where I
"admitted" anything. Why do you call out people for the same shit you
do? You're a fake.