1960s?
1970s?
1980s?
1990s?
2000s?
2010s?
2020s?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

The idiot inquired:

> 1960s?
> 1970s?
> 1980s?
> 1990s?
> 2000s?
> 2010s?
> 2020s?

All of the above!

--
solar penguin

In article <uuu357$2pcag$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>The idiot inquired:
>
>> 1960s?
>> 1970s?
>> 1980s?
>> 1990s?
>> 2000s?
>> 2010s?
>> 2020s?
>
>All of the above!
>

Get ready for other to pick your feathers!

>--
>solar penguin

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

On 4/7/2024 5:08 AM, The Doctor wrote:
> 1960s?
> 1970s?
> 1980s?
> 1990s?
> 2000s?
> 2010s?
> 2020s?

I literally have open right now a Doctor Who Wikipedia page that breaks
down the seasons. LOL Since I already have the episode list open,
let's take a look...

Tom Baker was the Doctor in the 70s, so "State of Decay" coming out in
1980 notwithstanding, the 70s.

However since obviously you didn't really mean to put Classic Who up
against New Who, for the reboot the best decade would be the 2000s.
That would give us Rose and David Tennant and all the awesome goodness
that came in between.

In article <uuuecg$2rr50$1@dont-email.me>,
Arthur Lipscomb <arthur@alum.calberkeley.org> wrote:
>On 4/7/2024 5:08 AM, The Doctor wrote:
>> 1960s?
>> 1970s?
>> 1980s?
>> 1990s?
>> 2000s?
>> 2010s?
>> 2020s?
>
>
>I literally have open right now a Doctor Who Wikipedia page that breaks
>down the seasons. LOL Since I already have the episode list open,
>let's take a look...
>
>Tom Baker was the Doctor in the 70s, so "State of Decay" coming out in
>1980 notwithstanding, the 70s.
>
>However since obviously you didn't really mean to put Classic Who up
>against New Who, for the reboot the best decade would be the 2000s.
>That would give us Rose and David Tennant and all the awesome goodness
>that came in between.

So for you 1970s, early 1980s and 2000s!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

On 07/04/2024 13:08, The Doctor wrote:
> 1960s?
> 1970s?

1970s

We has both Jon Pertwee and Tom Baker, and none of that woke crap that
brought the series to its end in 2017.

> 1980s?
> 1990s?
> 2000s?
> 2010s?
> 2020s?

--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." -William Shatner

In article <uuv13u$30dm2$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>On 07/04/2024 13:08, The Doctor wrote:
>> 1960s?
>> 1970s?
>
>1970s
>
>We has both Jon Pertwee and Tom Baker, and none of that woke crap that
>brought the series to its end in 2017.
>
>> 1980s?
>> 1990s?
>> 2000s?
>> 2010s?
>> 2020s?
>

So far mostly the 1970s

>--
>The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
>
>"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
>stands for." -William Shatner
>

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

On 4/7/2024 5:08 AM, The Doctor wrote:
> 1960s?
> 1970s?
> 1980s?
> 1990s?
> 2000s?
> 2010s?
> 2020s?

The only Doctor Who in the 1990s was the awful Americanised movie with
Paul McGann in 1996.

The original show ended in 1989 and the resurrected show started in 2005.

In article <uuu2cr$1qhp$1@gallifrey.nk.ca>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:

>1970s?
>1980s?

I'm not sure which one, but leaning towards the 1980's.

--
Let's go Brandon!

In article <uuv74g$31q8c$1@dont-email.me>,
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
>On 4/7/2024 5:08 AM, The Doctor wrote:
>> 1960s?
>> 1970s?
>> 1980s?
>> 1990s?
>> 2000s?
>> 2010s?
>> 2020s?
>
>The only Doctor Who in the 1990s was the awful Americanised movie with
>Paul McGann in 1996.
>
>The original show ended in 1989 and the resurrected show started in 2005.
>

I did like the McCoy/McGann movie myself.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <Ubu357$2pcag$1@dont-email.me>,
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>In article <uuu2cr$1qhp$1@gallifrey.nk.ca>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>
>>1970s?
>>1980s?
>
>I'm not sure which one, but leaning towards the 1980's.
>

The JN-T years.

>--
>Let's go Brandon!
>

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

On 4/7/2024 8:56 PM, The Doctor wrote:
> In article <uuv74g$31q8c$1@dont-email.me>,
> Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
>> On 4/7/2024 5:08 AM, The Doctor wrote:
>>> 1960s?
>>> 1970s?
>>> 1980s?
>>> 1990s?
>>> 2000s?
>>> 2010s?
>>> 2020s?
>>
>> The only Doctor Who in the 1990s was the awful Americanised movie with
>> Paul McGann in 1996.
>>
>> The original show ended in 1989 and the resurrected show started in 2005.
>>
>
> I did like the McCoy/McGann movie myself.

+1

In article <uv2742$3rf1o$1@dont-email.me>,
Arthur Lipscomb <arthur@alum.calberkeley.org> wrote:
>On 4/7/2024 8:56 PM, The Doctor wrote:
>> In article <uuv74g$31q8c$1@dont-email.me>,
>> Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
>>> On 4/7/2024 5:08 AM, The Doctor wrote:
>>>> 1960s?
>>>> 1970s?
>>>> 1980s?
>>>> 1990s?
>>>> 2000s?
>>>> 2010s?
>>>> 2020s?
>>>
>>> The only Doctor Who in the 1990s was the awful Americanised movie with
>>> Paul McGann in 1996.
>>>
>>> The original show ended in 1989 and the resurrected show started in 2005.
>>>
>>
>> I did like the McCoy/McGann movie myself.
>
>+1

+2
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In message <uv2742$3rf1o$1@dont-email.me>, Arthur Lipscomb
<arthur@alum.calberkeley.org> writes
>On 4/7/2024 8:56 PM, The Doctor wrote:
>> In article <uuv74g$31q8c$1@dont-email.me>,
>> Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
>>> On 4/7/2024 5:08 AM, The Doctor wrote:
>>>> 1960s?
>>>> 1970s?
>>>> 1980s?
>>>> 1990s?
>>>> 2000s?
>>>> 2010s?
>>>> 2020s?
>>>
>>> The only Doctor Who in the 1990s was the awful Americanised movie with
>>> Paul McGann in 1996.
>>>
>>> The original show ended in 1989 and the resurrected show started in 2005.
>>>
>> I did like the McCoy/McGann movie myself.
>
>+1

I didn't like it myself. The worst thing was possibly its take on the
Master, who I have always felt should be outwardly charming rather than
hideous.
--
John Hall
"Acting is merely the art of keeping a large group of people
from coughing."
Sir Ralph Richardson (1902-83)

In article <R4B$5nDNzQFmFwrQ@jhall_nospamxx.co.uk>,
John Hall <john@jhall.co.uk> wrote:
>In message <uv2742$3rf1o$1@dont-email.me>, Arthur Lipscomb
><arthur@alum.calberkeley.org> writes
>>On 4/7/2024 8:56 PM, The Doctor wrote:
>>> In article <uuv74g$31q8c$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
>>>> On 4/7/2024 5:08 AM, The Doctor wrote:
>>>>> 1960s?
>>>>> 1970s?
>>>>> 1980s?
>>>>> 1990s?
>>>>> 2000s?
>>>>> 2010s?
>>>>> 2020s?
>>>>
>>>> The only Doctor Who in the 1990s was the awful Americanised movie with
>>>> Paul McGann in 1996.
>>>>
>>>> The original show ended in 1989 and the resurrected show started in 2005.
>>>>
>>> I did like the McCoy/McGann movie myself.
>>
>>+1
>
>I didn't like it myself. The worst thing was possibly its take on the
>Master, who I have always felt should be outwardly charming rather than
>hideous.

What about the Daleks exterminating the MAster?

>--
>John Hall
> "Acting is merely the art of keeping a large group of people
> from coughing."
> Sir Ralph Richardson (1902-83)

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

On 4/9/2024 7:28 AM, The Doctor wrote:
> In article <R4B$5nDNzQFmFwrQ@jhall_nospamxx.co.uk>,
> John Hall <john@jhall.co.uk> wrote:
>> In message <uv2742$3rf1o$1@dont-email.me>, Arthur Lipscomb
>> <arthur@alum.calberkeley.org> writes
>>> On 4/7/2024 8:56 PM, The Doctor wrote:
>>>> In article <uuv74g$31q8c$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>> Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 4/7/2024 5:08 AM, The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>> 1960s?
>>>>>> 1970s?
>>>>>> 1980s?
>>>>>> 1990s?
>>>>>> 2000s?
>>>>>> 2010s?
>>>>>> 2020s?
>>>>>
>>>>> The only Doctor Who in the 1990s was the awful Americanised movie with
>>>>> Paul McGann in 1996.
>>>>>
>>>>> The original show ended in 1989 and the resurrected show started in 2005.
>>>>>
>>>> I did like the McCoy/McGann movie myself.
>>>
>>> +1
>>
>> I didn't like it myself. The worst thing was possibly its take on the
>> Master, who I have always felt should be outwardly charming rather than
>> hideous.
>
> What about the Daleks exterminating the MAster?
>
>> --
>

I have to admit, the Daleks would never put someone on trial. They
exterminate first and ask questions later! But it would have been a
*little* more believable if the Master convinced the Daleks to let him
git rid of the Doctor for them and it was all part of a joint plan. A
throw away line could have fixed that plot hole. Perhaps that was the
plan all along but the scene was cut for time.

In article <uv58i7$p3a5$3@dont-email.me>,
Arthur Lipscomb <arthur@alum.calberkeley.org> wrote:
>On 4/9/2024 7:28 AM, The Doctor wrote:
>> In article <R4B$5nDNzQFmFwrQ@jhall_nospamxx.co.uk>,
>> John Hall <john@jhall.co.uk> wrote:
>>> In message <uv2742$3rf1o$1@dont-email.me>, Arthur Lipscomb
>>> <arthur@alum.calberkeley.org> writes
>>>> On 4/7/2024 8:56 PM, The Doctor wrote:
>>>>> In article <uuv74g$31q8c$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 4/7/2024 5:08 AM, The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>>> 1960s?
>>>>>>> 1970s?
>>>>>>> 1980s?
>>>>>>> 1990s?
>>>>>>> 2000s?
>>>>>>> 2010s?
>>>>>>> 2020s?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The only Doctor Who in the 1990s was the awful Americanised movie with
>>>>>> Paul McGann in 1996.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The original show ended in 1989 and the resurrected show started in 2005.
>>>>>>
>>>>> I did like the McCoy/McGann movie myself.
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>
>>> I didn't like it myself. The worst thing was possibly its take on the
>>> Master, who I have always felt should be outwardly charming rather than
>>> hideous.
>>
>> What about the Daleks exterminating the MAster?
>>
>>> --
>>
>
>I have to admit, the Daleks would never put someone on trial. They
>exterminate first and ask questions later! But it would have been a
>*little* more believable if the Master convinced the Daleks to let him
>git rid of the Doctor for them and it was all part of a joint plan. A
>throw away line could have fixed that plot hole. Perhaps that was the
>plan all along but the scene was cut for time.

Exactly! A trial for the Master by the Daleks?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <uuvpup$lgg$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>> doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:

>>>1970s?
>>>1980s?
>>
>>I'm not sure which one, but leaning towards the 1980's.
>
>The JN-T years.

I had Tom Baker and Peter Davidson in mind when I chose.

--
Let's go Brandon!

In article <uv67tu$10nsn$1@dont-email.me>,
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>In article <uuvpup$lgg$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>> doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>
>>>>1970s?
>>>>1980s?
>>>
>>>I'm not sure which one, but leaning towards the 1980's.
>>
>>The JN-T years.
>
>I had Tom Baker and Peter Davidson in mind when I chose.
>

Early 1980s then.

>--
>Let's go Brandon!
>
>

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In message <uv67tu$10nsn$1@dont-email.me>, Ubiquitous
<weberm@polaris.net> writes
>In article <uuvpup$lgg$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>> doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>
>>>>1970s?
>>>>1980s?
>>>
>>>I'm not sure which one, but leaning towards the 1980's.
>>
>>The JN-T years.
>
>I had Tom Baker and Peter Davidson in mind when I chose.
>

Wasn't Tom Baker the 1970s?
--
John Hall
"Acting is merely the art of keeping a large group of people
from coughing."
Sir Ralph Richardson (1902-83)

John Hall <john_nospam@jhall.co.uk> wrote:
> In message <uv67tu$10nsn$1@dont-email.me>, Ubiquitous
> <weberm@polaris.net> writes
>> In article <uuvpup$lgg$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>> doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>>
>>>>> 1970s?
>>>>> 1980s?
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure which one, but leaning towards the 1980's.
>>>
>>> The JN-T years.
>>
>> I had Tom Baker and Peter Davidson in mind when I chose.
>>
>
> Wasn't Tom Baker the 1970s?

1974-1981

--
The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

On 4/10/2024 12:56, John Hall wrote:
> In message <uv67tu$10nsn$1@dont-email.me>, Ubiquitous
> <weberm@polaris.net> writes
>> In article <uuvpup$lgg$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
>> wrote:
>>> Ubiquitous  <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>> doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>>
>>>>> 1970s?
>>>>> 1980s?
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure which one, but leaning towards the 1980's.
>>>
>>> The JN-T years.
>>
>> I had Tom Baker and Peter Davidson in mind when I chose.
>>
>
> Wasn't Tom Baker the 1970s?

For the most part, yes. But he was in the roll until 1981. JN-T's
first season was Tom Baker's last.

--

Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan

Hornplayer9599 wrote:

> On 4/10/2024 12:56, John Hall wrote:
>> In message <uv67tu$10nsn$1@dont-email.me>, Ubiquitous
>> <weberm@polaris.net> writes
>>> In article <uuvpup$lgg$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
>>> wrote:
>>>> Ubiquitous  <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>> doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> 1970s?
>>>>>> 1980s?
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not sure which one, but leaning towards the 1980's.
>>>>
>>>> The JN-T years.
>>>
>>> I had Tom Baker and Peter Davidson in mind when I chose.
>>>
>>
>> Wasn't Tom Baker the 1970s?

> For the most part, yes. But he was in the roll until 1981. JN-T's
> first season was Tom Baker's last.

For me 1970s also, although the opener of the current series with tennant
and tate was brilliant. JP was my favorite, TB 2nd; sometimes seemed to be
taking the piss. if they could redo the 1970s episodes with all
the modern SX and CGI, they would be fantastic. I thought Capaldi was also
very good, but the storylines wernt.

mike

In article <LWAt+0A$KtFmFwaD@jhall_nospamxx.co.uk>,
John Hall <john@jhall.co.uk> wrote:
>In message <uv67tu$10nsn$1@dont-email.me>, Ubiquitous
><weberm@polaris.net> writes
>>In article <uuvpup$lgg$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>> doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>>
>>>>>1970s?
>>>>>1980s?
>>>>
>>>>I'm not sure which one, but leaning towards the 1980's.
>>>
>>>The JN-T years.
>>
>>I had Tom Baker and Peter Davidson in mind when I chose.
>>
>
>Wasn't Tom Baker the 1970s?

1974 to 1981

>--
>John Hall
> "Acting is merely the art of keeping a large group of people
> from coughing."
> Sir Ralph Richardson (1902-83)

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <ec6f0e5d1becee8af9f4a45ee49a545d@www.novabbs.com>,
miked <dmike204@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>Hornplayer9599 wrote:
>
>> On 4/10/2024 12:56, John Hall wrote:
>>> In message <uv67tu$10nsn$1@dont-email.me>, Ubiquitous
>>> <weberm@polaris.net> writes
>>>> In article <uuvpup$lgg$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Ubiquitous  <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>>> doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>> 1970s?
>>>>>>> 1980s?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not sure which one, but leaning towards the 1980's.
>>>>>
>>>>> The JN-T years.
>>>>
>>>> I had Tom Baker and Peter Davidson in mind when I chose.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Wasn't Tom Baker the 1970s?
>
>> For the most part, yes. But he was in the roll until 1981. JN-T's
>> first season was Tom Baker's last.
>
>For me 1970s also, although the opener of the current series with tennant
>and tate was brilliant. JP was my favorite, TB 2nd; sometimes seemed to be
>taking the piss. if they could redo the 1970s episodes with all
>the modern SX and CGI, they would be fantastic. I thought Capaldi was also
>very good, but the storylines wernt.
>
>mike

Capaldi under Moffat ...
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown