'I didn't pull the trigger. I would never point a gun at someone and
pull the trigger on them, never,' he said in December 2021.

Got news - He did both.
Like any left wingnut, he lies through his teeth as a matter of course -
Nor can they accept any personal responsibility for their actions that,
more often than not, hurt others..

Even the swamp mired FBI said so - All we need is a judge/DA who is not
a wingnut and follows the law for a conviction.

```````````````

Alec Baldwin could still be CHARGED in Rust shooting after damming
forensic report says the trigger had to be pulled 'sufficiently' in
order to fire

Baldwin, 65, has repeatedly claimed he did not pull the trigger on
the gun that shot a bullet into Halyna Hutchins, killing her
A new firearms report claims the gun's trigger was pulled
In April, charges against Baldwin were dismissed, but could still
be filed pending the investigation into the gun

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12411545/Alec-Baldwin-CHARGED-Rust-shooting-damming-forensic-report-says-trigger-pulled-sufficiently-order-fire.html

`````````````````````````
--
Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for
light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter.

On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 00:25:45 -0400
JeSSe <zo@so.org> wrote:

> Alec Baldwin could still be CHARGED in Rust shooting after damming
> forensic report says the trigger had to be pulled 'sufficiently' in
> order to fire

And so we go round in circles again with so-called experts claiming Baldwin must have pulled the trigger and being proven wrong. Which is why charges against Baldwin were dropped.

And, whether he did or didn't, it has no bearing at all on the charges laid against Gutierrez-Reed for putting a live round in the gun she was responsible for loading.

It's just the anti-Baldwin, anti-left, propagandists trying to have a second bite of the cherry, trying to blame Baldwin for the criminal failings of others.