Slight breeze, no rain, no thunder; all a bit of a damp squib, despite it
being sexed up on TV weather forecasts for the last few days.

--
Spike

On Wednesday, 27 September 2023 at 13:27:16 UTC+1, Spike wrote:
> Slight breeze, no rain, no thunder; all a bit of a damp squib, despite it
> being sexed up on TV weather forecasts for the last few days.
>
Where are you located?

Freddie <niall@hosiene.co.uk> wrote:
> On Wednesday, 27 September 2023 at 13:27:16 UTC+1, Spike wrote:
>> Slight breeze, no rain, no thunder; all a bit of a damp squib, despite it
>> being sexed up on TV weather forecasts for the last few days.

> Where are you located?

In the storm-lashed SW…

--
Spike

On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 2:08:38 PM UTC+1, Spike wrote:
> Freddie <ni...@hosiene.co.uk> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 27 September 2023 at 13:27:16 UTC+1, Spike wrote:
> >> Slight breeze, no rain, no thunder; all a bit of a damp squib, despite it
> >> being sexed up on TV weather forecasts for the last few days.
>
> > Where are you located?
> In the storm-lashed SW…
>
> --
> Spike

Bwhahahahahaha! Storm Agnes not happening because spikey, right on the edge of the wind warning, is only getting exactly what was forecast for him in his own back yard. 😂😂😂😂😂

Oh this just gets better. These deniers just crack you up! 😂😂😂😂😂

Paul from Llanmaes <pauljgarvey03@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 2:08:38 PM UTC+1, Spike wrote:
>> Freddie <ni...@hosiene.co.uk> wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, 27 September 2023 at 13:27:16 UTC+1, Spike wrote:
>>>> Slight breeze, no rain, no thunder; all a bit of a damp squib, despite it
>>>> being sexed up on TV weather forecasts for the last few days.
>>
>>> Where are you located?
>> In the storm-lashed SW…
>>
>> --
>> Spike
>
> Bwhahahahahaha! Storm Agnes not happening because spikey, right on the
> edge of the wind warning, is only getting exactly what was forecast for
> him in his own back yard. 😂😂😂😂😂
>
> Oh this just gets better. These deniers just crack you up! 😂😂😂😂😂

Anyone with knowledge would put the situation down to the impossibility of
modelling a chaotic process.

That didn’t stop them sexing-up Agnes early on…

--
Spike

On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 7:02:31 PM UTC+1, Spike wrote:
> Paul from Llanmaes <pauljg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 2:08:38 PM UTC+1, Spike wrote:
> >> Freddie <ni...@hosiene.co.uk> wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, 27 September 2023 at 13:27:16 UTC+1, Spike wrote:
> >>>> Slight breeze, no rain, no thunder; all a bit of a damp squib, despite it
> >>>> being sexed up on TV weather forecasts for the last few days.
> >>
> >>> Where are you located?
> >> In the storm-lashed SW…
> >>
> >> --
> >> Spike
> >
> > Bwhahahahahaha! Storm Agnes not happening because spikey, right on the
> > edge of the wind warning, is only getting exactly what was forecast for
> > him in his own back yard. 😂😂😂😂😂
> >
> > Oh this just gets better. These deniers just crack you up! 😂😂😂😂😂
> Anyone with knowledge would put the situation down to the impossibility of
> modelling a chaotic process.
>
> That didn’t stop them sexing-up Agnes early on…
>
> --
> Spike

Oh marvellous. Your ignorance is amazing. The Irish weather service named this storm and got its power and problems pretty spot on, despite the fact that spikey has discovered a new stupid angle, that anything in meteorology, or climatology is impossible (it's not, within parameters and probabilities) because Lorentz postalated (correctly, he was an actual scientist) that the atmosphere is a chaotic system and thus subject to the Lorentz attractor and the butterfly effect. 😂😂😂😂😂

That is truly priceless. Just how stupid can this denier get? It'll be underwater volcanoes explaining GW next. You watch. 😂😂😂😂😂

On Thu, 28 Sep 2023 02:00:48 -0700 (PDT)
Paul from Llanmaes <pauljgarvey03@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 7:02:31 PM UTC+1, Spike wrote:
> > Paul from Llanmaes <pauljg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 2:08:38 PM UTC+1, Spike
> > > wrote:
> > >> Freddie <ni...@hosiene.co.uk> wrote:
> > >>> On Wednesday, 27 September 2023 at 13:27:16 UTC+1, Spike
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>> Slight breeze, no rain, no thunder; all a bit of a damp squib,
> > >>>> despite it being sexed up on TV weather forecasts for the last
> > >>>> few days.
> > >>
> > >>> Where are you located?
> > >> In the storm-lashed SW…
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Spike
> > >
> > > Bwhahahahahaha! Storm Agnes not happening because spikey, right
> > > on the edge of the wind warning, is only getting exactly what was
> > > forecast for him in his own back yard. 😂😂😂😂😂
> > >
> > > Oh this just gets better. These deniers just crack you up!
> > > 😂😂😂😂😂
> > Anyone with knowledge would put the situation down to the
> > impossibility of modelling a chaotic process.
> >
> > That didn’t stop them sexing-up Agnes early on…
> >
> > --
> > Spike
>
> Oh marvellous. Your ignorance is amazing. The Irish weather service
> named this storm and got its power and problems pretty spot on,
> despite the fact that spikey has discovered a new stupid angle, that
> anything in meteorology, or climatology is impossible (it's not,
> within parameters and probabilities) because Lorentz postalated
> (correctly, he was an actual scientist) that the atmosphere is a
> chaotic system and thus subject to the Lorentz attractor and the
> butterfly effect. 😂😂😂😂😂
>
> That is truly priceless. Just how stupid can this denier get? It'll
> be underwater volcanoes explaining GW next. You watch. 😂😂😂😂😂

Any idea what became of Weatherlawyer? He had some, umm, interesting
thoughts.

On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 10:38:06 AM UTC+1, Bernie wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Sep 2023 02:00:48 -0700 (PDT)
> Paul from Llanmaes <pauljg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 7:02:31 PM UTC+1, Spike wrote:
> > > Paul from Llanmaes <pauljg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 2:08:38 PM UTC+1, Spike
> > > > wrote:
> > > >> Freddie <ni...@hosiene.co.uk> wrote:
> > > >>> On Wednesday, 27 September 2023 at 13:27:16 UTC+1, Spike
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>>> Slight breeze, no rain, no thunder; all a bit of a damp squib,
> > > >>>> despite it being sexed up on TV weather forecasts for the last
> > > >>>> few days.
> > > >>
> > > >>> Where are you located?
> > > >> In the storm-lashed SW…
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> Spike
> > > >
> > > > Bwhahahahahaha! Storm Agnes not happening because spikey, right
> > > > on the edge of the wind warning, is only getting exactly what was
> > > > forecast for him in his own back yard. 😂😂😂😂😂
> > > >
> > > > Oh this just gets better. These deniers just crack you up!
> > > > 😂😂😂😂😂
> > > Anyone with knowledge would put the situation down to the
> > > impossibility of modelling a chaotic process.
> > >
> > > That didn’t stop them sexing-up Agnes early on…
> > >
> > > --
> > > Spike
> >
> > Oh marvellous. Your ignorance is amazing. The Irish weather service
> > named this storm and got its power and problems pretty spot on,
> > despite the fact that spikey has discovered a new stupid angle, that
> > anything in meteorology, or climatology is impossible (it's not,
> > within parameters and probabilities) because Lorentz postalated
> > (correctly, he was an actual scientist) that the atmosphere is a
> > chaotic system and thus subject to the Lorentz attractor and the
> > butterfly effect. 😂😂😂😂😂
> >
> > That is truly priceless. Just how stupid can this denier get? It'll
> > be underwater volcanoes explaining GW next. You watch. 😂😂😂😂😂
> Any idea what became of Weatherlawyer? He had some, umm, interesting
> thoughts.

He was saying he wasn't well when he last posted. I hope he is OK.

Paul from Llanmaes <pauljgarvey03@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 7:02:31 PM UTC+1, Spike wrote:
>> Paul from Llanmaes <pauljg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 2:08:38 PM UTC+1, Spike wrote:
>>>> Freddie <ni...@hosiene.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>> On Wednesday, 27 September 2023 at 13:27:16 UTC+1, Spike wrote:
>>>>>> Slight breeze, no rain, no thunder; all a bit of a damp squib, despite it
>>>>>> being sexed up on TV weather forecasts for the last few days.
>>>>
>>>>> Where are you located?
>>>> In the storm-lashed SW…
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Spike
>>>
>>> Bwhahahahahaha! Storm Agnes not happening because spikey, right on the
>>> edge of the wind warning, is only getting exactly what was forecast for
>>> him in his own back yard. 😂😂😂😂😂
>>>
>>> Oh this just gets better. These deniers just crack you up! 😂😂😂😂😂
>> Anyone with knowledge would put the situation down to the impossibility of
>> modelling a chaotic process.
>>
>> That didn’t stop them sexing-up Agnes early on…
>>
>> --
>> Spike
>
> Oh marvellous. Your ignorance is amazing. The Irish weather service named
> this storm and got its power and problems pretty spot on

You’re drifting off again.

It was the *BBC* that was sexing-up Agnes.

Hint: I don’t receive Irish TV…

despite the fact that spikey has discovered a new stupid angle, that
anything in meteorology, or climatology is impossible (it's not, within
parameters and probabilities) because Lorentz postalated (correctly, he was
an actual scientist) that the atmosphere is a chaotic system and thus
subject to the Lorentz attractor and the butterfly effect. 😂😂😂😂😂

So you’re saying that if you put bounds on a chaotic system such that it
isn’t chaotic any more, you can model it.

Sheesh…

I don’t see a Nobel coming your way any time soon.

> That is truly priceless. Just how stupid can this denier get? It'll be
> underwater volcanoes explaining GW next. You watch. 😂😂😂😂😂

I could be as stupid as you, if I worked very hard at it.

--
Spike

On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 11:39:10 AM UTC+1, Spike wrote:
> Paul from Llanmaes <pauljg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 7:02:31 PM UTC+1, Spike wrote:
> >> Paul from Llanmaes <pauljg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 2:08:38 PM UTC+1, Spike wrote:
> >>>> Freddie <ni...@hosiene.co.uk> wrote:
> >>>>> On Wednesday, 27 September 2023 at 13:27:16 UTC+1, Spike wrote:
> >>>>>> Slight breeze, no rain, no thunder; all a bit of a damp squib, despite it
> >>>>>> being sexed up on TV weather forecasts for the last few days.
> >>>>
> >>>>> Where are you located?
> >>>> In the storm-lashed SW…
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Spike
> >>>
> >>> Bwhahahahahaha! Storm Agnes not happening because spikey, right on the
> >>> edge of the wind warning, is only getting exactly what was forecast for
> >>> him in his own back yard. 😂😂😂😂😂
> >>>
> >>> Oh this just gets better. These deniers just crack you up! 😂😂😂😂😂
> >> Anyone with knowledge would put the situation down to the impossibility of
> >> modelling a chaotic process.
> >>
> >> That didn’t stop them sexing-up Agnes early on…
> >>
> >> --
> >> Spike
> >
> > Oh marvellous. Your ignorance is amazing. The Irish weather service named
> > this storm and got its power and problems pretty spot on
> You’re drifting off again.
>
> It was the *BBC* that was sexing-up Agnes.
>
> Hint: I don’t receive Irish TV…
> despite the fact that spikey has discovered a new stupid angle, that
> anything in meteorology, or climatology is impossible (it's not, within
> parameters and probabilities) because Lorentz postalated (correctly, he was
> an actual scientist) that the atmosphere is a chaotic system and thus
> subject to the Lorentz attractor and the butterfly effect. 😂😂😂😂😂
> So you’re saying that if you put bounds on a chaotic system such that it
> isn’t chaotic any more, you can model it.
>
> Sheesh…
>
> I don’t see a Nobel coming your way any time soon.
> > That is truly priceless. Just how stupid can this denier get? It'll be
> > underwater volcanoes explaining GW next. You watch. 😂😂😂😂😂
> I could be as stupid as you, if I worked very hard at it.
>
>
> --
> Spike

A denier falls into the TV trap yet again. Go on, quote the Daily Express as your weather expert next. 😂😂😂😂😂

On Fri, 29 Sep 2023 12:13:58 -0700 (PDT)
Paul from Llanmaes <pauljgarvey03@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 10:38:06 AM UTC+1, Bernie wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Sep 2023 02:00:48 -0700 (PDT)
> > Paul from Llanmaes <pauljg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 7:02:31 PM UTC+1, Spike
> > > wrote:
> > > > Paul from Llanmaes <pauljg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 2:08:38 PM UTC+1, Spike
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >> Freddie <ni...@hosiene.co.uk> wrote:
> > > > >>> On Wednesday, 27 September 2023 at 13:27:16 UTC+1, Spike
> > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > >>>> Slight breeze, no rain, no thunder; all a bit of a damp
> > > > >>>> squib, despite it being sexed up on TV weather forecasts
> > > > >>>> for the last few days.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> Where are you located?
> > > > >> In the storm-lashed SW…
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> Spike
> > > > >
> > > > > Bwhahahahahaha! Storm Agnes not happening because spikey,
> > > > > right on the edge of the wind warning, is only getting
> > > > > exactly what was forecast for him in his own back yard.
> > > > > 😂😂😂😂😂
> > > > >
> > > > > Oh this just gets better. These deniers just crack you up!
> > > > > 😂😂😂😂😂
> > > > Anyone with knowledge would put the situation down to the
> > > > impossibility of modelling a chaotic process.
> > > >
> > > > That didn’t stop them sexing-up Agnes early on…
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Spike
> > >
> > > Oh marvellous. Your ignorance is amazing. The Irish weather
> > > service named this storm and got its power and problems pretty
> > > spot on, despite the fact that spikey has discovered a new stupid
> > > angle, that anything in meteorology, or climatology is impossible
> > > (it's not, within parameters and probabilities) because Lorentz
> > > postalated (correctly, he was an actual scientist) that the
> > > atmosphere is a chaotic system and thus subject to the Lorentz
> > > attractor and the butterfly effect. 😂😂😂😂😂
> > >
> > > That is truly priceless. Just how stupid can this denier get?
> > > It'll be underwater volcanoes explaining GW next. You watch.
> > > 😂😂😂😂😂
> > Any idea what became of Weatherlawyer? He had some, umm,
> > interesting thoughts.
>
> He was saying he wasn't well when he last posted. I hope he is OK.

Oh, I didn't know he was ill. He came to mind recently because of the
spate of earthquakes that we seem to be having. Like you say, I hope
he's OK.

On Sunday, October 1, 2023 at 8:39:51 PM UTC+1, Bernie wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Sep 2023 12:13:58 -0700 (PDT)
> Paul from Llanmaes <pauljg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 10:38:06 AM UTC+1, Bernie wrote:
> > > On Thu, 28 Sep 2023 02:00:48 -0700 (PDT)
> > > Paul from Llanmaes <pauljg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 7:02:31 PM UTC+1, Spike
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > Paul from Llanmaes <pauljg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 2:08:38 PM UTC+1, Spike
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >> Freddie <ni...@hosiene.co.uk> wrote:
> > > > > >>> On Wednesday, 27 September 2023 at 13:27:16 UTC+1, Spike
> > > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>> Slight breeze, no rain, no thunder; all a bit of a damp
> > > > > >>>> squib, despite it being sexed up on TV weather forecasts
> > > > > >>>> for the last few days.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> Where are you located?
> > > > > >> In the storm-lashed SW…
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> --
> > > > > >> Spike
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Bwhahahahahaha! Storm Agnes not happening because spikey,
> > > > > > right on the edge of the wind warning, is only getting
> > > > > > exactly what was forecast for him in his own back yard.
> > > > > > 😂😂😂😂😂
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Oh this just gets better. These deniers just crack you up!
> > > > > > 😂😂😂😂😂
> > > > > Anyone with knowledge would put the situation down to the
> > > > > impossibility of modelling a chaotic process.
> > > > >
> > > > > That didn’t stop them sexing-up Agnes early on…
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Spike
> > > >
> > > > Oh marvellous. Your ignorance is amazing. The Irish weather
> > > > service named this storm and got its power and problems pretty
> > > > spot on, despite the fact that spikey has discovered a new stupid
> > > > angle, that anything in meteorology, or climatology is impossible
> > > > (it's not, within parameters and probabilities) because Lorentz
> > > > postalated (correctly, he was an actual scientist) that the
> > > > atmosphere is a chaotic system and thus subject to the Lorentz
> > > > attractor and the butterfly effect. 😂😂😂😂😂
> > > >
> > > > That is truly priceless. Just how stupid can this denier get?
> > > > It'll be underwater volcanoes explaining GW next. You watch.
> > > > 😂😂😂😂😂
> > > Any idea what became of Weatherlawyer? He had some, umm,
> > > interesting thoughts.
> >
> > He was saying he wasn't well when he last posted. I hope he is OK.
> Oh, I didn't know he was ill. He came to mind recently because of the
> spate of earthquakes that we seem to be having. Like you say, I hope
> he's OK.
What doesn't kill makes strong in a manner of speaking.

Thank you both. I see Paul is still up to his old tricks. I wonder why you keep him going, or is it that you need feedback.?
IIRC I managed quite well despite only getting negative feed back from this shill for the elites. Recall that posts from Gab all point to the faults of the globalists pushing an agenda that completely lacks any scientific integrity.
For example nothing on here from him relates to the topic.
Nothing on here from him points to any proof of anything whatever.

I was going to ask for a translation of:
> > > > > > Bwhahahahahaha! Storm Agnes not happening because spikey,
> > > > > > right on the edge of the wind warning, is only getting
> > > > > > exactly what was forecast for him in his own back yard.
> > > > > > 😂😂😂😂😂
But then I read his well wishes

I have a list of caccine injuries form my teens for which I am grateful that I am still alive had I not been so lackadaisical I might well have Died Suddenly: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Gab+Died+Suddenly&t=vivaldi&iar=videos&iax=videos&ia=videos

The upshot is that from tinnitus to kidney failure all my injuries help me understand the beauty of creation on the masterpiece of Jehovah God's gift to Man. Consider:
> > > > that anything in meteorology, or climatology is impossible
> > > > (it's not, within parameters and probabilities) because Lorentz
> > > > postalated (correctly, he was an actual scientist) that the
> > > > atmosphere is a chaotic system and thus subject to the Lorentz
> > > > attractor and the butterfly effect.
> > > >
> > > > That is truly priceless. Just how stupid can this denier get?
> > > > It'll be underwater volcanoes explaining GW next. You watch.
> > > >
> > > Any idea what became of Weatherlawyer? He had some, umm,
> > > interesting thoughts.
Boy I have I got news for you if you are interested.

The North Atlantic is ideal for studying the effects of the weather within the parameters defined by Lorentz, bear in mind that his butterfly effect is just the result of fractals defining spaghetti charts.
Most of which, even for canada, with its communist government, still gives pretty good forecasts for over two weeks on its NAEFS.

You can, for instance differentiate earthquakes from volcanic eruption with them. Perhaps not easily from this recent spate of quakes:
https://www.fourmilab.ch/cgi-bin/Solar?di=83F3B3E9BB22AA2753B1653C669C8078BD93FAC5D5BFC42FC252C9AA957C7B780320290235535E58A0EE3EDDFFDDE9F15A14FFD23F7117879C9DB661274DF824951FA4A81303D332F927B9 then being due to alignments with the sun. Not that the sun is critical though as the centre of the n-body problem, it is the most important.
All planets are in free fall, thus bear the same input factor as each other.. Their impact is on the centre of mass, tearing off regions of atmosphere thus causing Torque. I can leave you to discuss the rest.

What I am pointing out is that as the spirit sorted out the chaos, Jehovah decided what to do with it. If you decide to look into the works of the creator, you would best approach him with respect if you want answers. I can tell you stuff but unless god calls you you won't have the spirit of understanding. Thus you will be wasting your time.
I have asked him to bless you all even that idiot shill.
But now I need to go to bed.
Bye.

> H-1023 Noon 17 October over British Isles equates to an Indonesian volcano I forget the name. I am 74 this month, it is expected. It will come to in time, I am sure.
Sinabung (Sumatra, Indonesia)

A lot depends on the development of high pressure, I am still not familiar with such behaviour so much to do so little time to do it.
I suppose I could ask my father to send more harvesters or maybe wait for stones to cry out?

On Saturday, October 14, 2023 at 10:28:59 PM UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote:
> > H-1023 Noon 17 October over British Isles equates to an Indonesian volcano I forget the name. I am 74 this month, it is expected. It will come to in time, I am sure.
> Sinabung (Sumatra, Indonesia)
>
> A lot depends on the development of high pressure, I am still not familiar with such behaviour so much to do so little time to do it.
> I suppose I could ask my father to send more harvesters or maybe wait for stones to cry out?

Be careful whom to whom you wish well. They might appear.

Glad you are OK. Your ideas are as ridiculous as ever.

On Saturday, October 14, 2023 at 7:10:24 PM UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote:

> Here is one for Paul:

I don't wish you well, on the contrary Jesus said to wipe their shit off my feet when dealing with people like you but you're the only person that is a useful idiot that I can help the others to escape destruction through, if that is possible. I happen to know exactly why you behave like you work for demons. You are full of spite and even now, still can't get over it.
Nothing to do with me, I got over liberals a long time ago.

Whether they can help it or not there are a lot of honest liberals that can come to light, in whatever way they need to. Once there, the spirit can operate on them as God pleases. I doubt you will change much Paul. You are a bitterly sad bastard and there is nothing anyone on here can do for you, I suspect they have done trying since Will left. Kudos to him.

Popocatépetl (Central Mexico): Explosive activity continues. Volcanic Ash Advisory Center (VAAC) Washington warned about a volcanic ash plume that rose up to estimated 19000 ft (5800 m) altitude or flight level 190 .
The full report is as follows: FQT EM to 19000 ft (5800 m)

Nevado del Ruiz 22000 ft (Colombia): Explosive activity continues. Volcanic Ash Advisory Center (VAAC) Washington warned about a volcanic ash plume that rose up to estimated 22000 ft (6700 m) altitude or flight level 220 .
The full report is as follows: NEW VAM EMS to 22000 ft (6700 m)

19000 ft is not uncommon for that mountain, 22000 ft is a bad day for blebs in British people and you can check out this is so with dialysis wards all over the country. Just search for: Nevado del Ruiz. These appear on the South West of the chart once they leave America.
Europe and Africa on the South East if there is no interference from Highs. This stuff will help Meteorologists one day, likely not in my life but soon. The global model first but imagine what it could do for NAEFS charts.

Spike. I have not followed this or any other group for some time and don't know who you are, I remember some of the old stalwarts from the old brigade.. Can I ask you to accept that I do know what I am talking about?
Imagine that the cyclones appearing on the North Atlantic courtesy of the Met Office are extract of South and Central America, for the most part. The Russian stuff appears as cyclones along with Aleut eruptions. Likely not Japan though. Perhaps maybe?

The water comes from Underground seas that are also rich in petroleum https://ia802200.us.archive.org/17/items/the-deep-hot-biosphere-thomas-gold/The%20Deep%20Hot%20Biosphere%20-%20Thomas%20Gold.pdf
Pacific eruptions tend to show up as anticyclonic. Study it please. Indonesian stuff is always anticyclonic, Semeru is represented by an High over Greenland. The presence of Anticyclones has the ability to force cyclones onto a different track. Once you make the connection for yourself/selves that is, you will no longer see them differently, you are as it were, now in the light.
The time-frames fit. Make the connection before the idiot beats you to it.
No offence paul you stupid bastard. The communists are tfel they are dead useful.