Rocksolid Light

Welcome to Rocksolid Light

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

All the world's a stage and most of us are desperately unrehearsed. -- Sean O'Casey


aus+uk / uk.d-i-y / Panama Canal

SubjectAuthor
* Panama CanalJeff Gaines
+* Re: Panama CanalRod Speed
|`- Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!Peeler
+* Re: Panama CanalAlan Lee
|`- Re: Panama CanalJohn Rumm
+* Re: Panama Canalcharles
|+* Re: Panama CanalClive Arthur
||`- Re: Panama CanalThe Natural Philosopher
|+- Re: Panama CanalSam Plusnet
|`* Re: Panama CanalFredxx
| `* Re: Panama CanalRod Speed
|  +- Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!Peeler
|  `* Re: Panama CanalFredxx
|   +* Re: Panama Canalalan_m
|   |+* Re: Panama CanalFredxx
|   ||`* Re: Panama CanalTim Lamb
|   || `* Re: Panama CanalFredxx
|   ||  `* Re: Panama CanalRod Speed
|   ||   +* Re: Panama CanalFredxx
|   ||   |`* Re: Panama CanalRod Speed
|   ||   | `* Re: Panama CanalFredxx
|   ||   |  `* Re: Panama CanalRod Speed
|   ||   |   +* Re: Panama Canalalan_m
|   ||   |   |+* Re: Panama CanalRod Speed
|   ||   |   ||`* Re: Panama CanalRod Speed
|   ||   |   || `- Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!Peeler
|   ||   |   |`- Re: Panama CanalAnthonyL
|   ||   |   `- Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!Peeler
|   ||   `- Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!Peeler
|   |`* Re: Panama CanalJeff Gaines
|   | +- Re: Panama CanalFredxx
|   | `* Re: Panama CanalAndrew
|   |  +- Re: Panama CanalChris Hogg
|   |  `- Re: Panama Canalalan_m
|   `* Re: Panama CanalRod Speed
|    `- Re: UNBELIEVABLE: It's 03:59 am in Australia and the Senile Ozzietard is out of Peeler
+* Re: Panama Canalalan_m
|`- Re: Panama Canalalan_m
+* Re: Panama CanalTim Streater
|`* Re: Panama CanalChris Hogg
| +* Re: Panama CanalTim Streater
| |+* Re: Panama CanalSteveW
| ||`- Re: Panama CanalTim Streater
| |`- Re: Panama CanalChris Hogg
| `* Re: Panama CanalReentrant
|  +* Re: Panama CanalThe Natural Philosopher
|  |`- Re: Panama CanalTim Streater
|  `- Re: Panama Canalme9
+* Re: Panama CanalAndy Burns
|`* Re: Panama Canalalan_m
| `- Re: Panama CanalFredxx
+- Re: Panama CanalJeff Gaines
+- Re: Panama CanalJNugent
`* Re: Panama CanalMax Demian
 `* Re: Panama CanalAndrew
  `- Re: Panama CanalMax Demian

Pages:123
Panama Canal

<xn0oizwssbbrgfy024@news.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=126321&group=uk.d-i-y#126321

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: jgnewsid@outlook.com (Jeff Gaines)
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Subject: Panama Canal
Date: 6 Mar 2024 08:22:28 GMT
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <xn0oizwssbbrgfy024@news.individual.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net n6jywehU3/ojW1uXc94L5gF/gWmaWQBYOFVlySlj8HXWr0wkjU
Cancel-Lock: sha1:5Tqvss49x9wtqZT8Rwjov1gCIHQ= sha256:QgsLiM3iZCPh0gKwvhIZHK1dIJgQNi+g2Yy8l1egvMI=
User-Agent: XanaNews/1.21-f3fb89f (x86; Portable ISpell)
X-Face: `{n`"d>nF^Uwzc:,L`j<I0Z`+o3aIFomb({]W!ey_aouI;EhEg9Q~,73RF,@{]-!$,A,z>,x
X-Ref: news.individual.net ~XNS:0000585A
 by: Jeff Gaines - Wed, 6 Mar 2024 08:22 UTC

I'm sure people in here will know.

There is an issue with the Panama Canal because of lack of water.

On the Thames (slightly different scale) the water come in at the "high"
end and is let out through a series of locks to the tidal Thames.

Why can't the Panama Canal work on that basis?

--
Jeff Gaines Dorset UK
Those are my principles – and if you don’t like them, well, I have others.
(Groucho Marx)

Re: Panama Canal

<op.2j7d0wx8byq249@pvr2.lan>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=126322&group=uk.d-i-y#126322

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com (Rod Speed)
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Subject: Re: Panama Canal
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2024 19:32:46 +1100
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <op.2j7d0wx8byq249@pvr2.lan>
References: <xn0oizwssbbrgfy024@news.individual.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net rMgbioN3ChnoAGySTdnmhQSY4WGpxJ9yhwj1X8LxNBLfNDTRI=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:tg/8aK/66MqlPXhKVSeSI9UINJI= sha256:mprC3G+lMFxKzmaqdMHQof2GUIjNRU6H0hQeEscrBoY=
User-Agent: Opera Mail/1.0 (Win32)
 by: Rod Speed - Wed, 6 Mar 2024 08:32 UTC

Jeff Gaines <jgnewsid@outlook.com> wrote

> I'm sure people in here will know.

Yep

> There is an issue with the Panama Canal because of lack of water.

Yep

> On the Thames (slightly different scale) the water come in at the "high"
> end and is let out through a series of locks to the tidal Thames.

Yep

> Why can't the Panama Canal work on that basis?

It does. The problem is the lack of water at the
high end and the much higher volume of water
involved to the much higher volume of massive
ships moving thru the canal.

Re: Panama Canal

<us99u4$9nic$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=126323&group=uk.d-i-y#126323

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: alan@darkroom.plus.com (Alan Lee)
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Subject: Re: Panama Canal
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 08:36:20 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <us99u4$9nic$1@dont-email.me>
References: <xn0oizwssbbrgfy024@news.individual.net>
Reply-To: alan@darkroom.+.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 08:36:20 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="be7b075c6a50c60911badbec5634396b";
logging-data="319052"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+/2T3j1O74u04MI1XNz2Ji"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:5Fnn7Rnxk2gHlmL8d2HOj2FpKz4=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <xn0oizwssbbrgfy024@news.individual.net>
 by: Alan Lee - Wed, 6 Mar 2024 08:36 UTC

On 06/03/2024 08:22, Jeff Gaines wrote:
>
> I'm sure people in here will know.
>
> There is an issue with the Panama Canal because of lack of water.
>
> On the Thames (slightly different scale) the water come in at the "high"
> end and is let out through a series of locks to the tidal Thames.
>
> Why can't the Panama Canal work on that basis?

Because the high point of the Panama is in the middle.
Even the Thames has trouble with low water in dry periods. Midlands
canals with their up and down profile regularly have limits of use in
dry periods, they work on the same principle as the Panama, a large
lake/store of water at the summit. In Victorian times, the water at the
bottom would be pumped back to the store at the top, but that doesnt
happen now.

Re: Panama Canal

<5b3d4e8a9fcharles@candehope.me.uk>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=126329&group=uk.d-i-y#126329

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
X-Ufhash: t01C8cBlhOepHeUt8CKP4HYD4HimCnvTdZUXO55fTitiwmmk1WGIGx5XozEal442I%2B81%2FXsG%2FSGslqUVXJOdj0Vz7oqM7o0yTAxqnfZFOp1ySBkZ7wAjdhEax0eRnwP1DdA3u5izzxyO29wGByyXWz22MRGEZzxntyqvLHYloh2CjfQiE52aos75USsJMslkpenDzdf%2BBQEjlEc0s2KU%2FMNkqMo%3D
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: Panama Canal
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
User-Agent: Pluto/3.20 (RISC OS/5.29) NewsHound/v1.52-32
From: charles@candehope.me.uk (charles)
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 24 09:30:02 UTC
Message-Id: <5b3d4e8a9fcharles@candehope.me.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed.abavia.com!abe005.abavia.com!abe001.abavia.com!feeder3.usenet.farm!feeder4.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!news.usenet.farm
Organization: Usenet.Farm
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
References: <xn0oizwssbbrgfy024@news.individual.net>
 by: charles - Wed, 6 Mar 2024 09:30 UTC

In article <xn0oizwssbbrgfy024@news.individual.net>,
Jeff Gaines <jgnewsid@outlook.com> wrote:

> I'm sure people in here will know.

> There is an issue with the Panama Canal because of lack of water.

> On the Thames (slightly different scale) the water come in at the "high"
> end and is let out through a series of locks to the tidal Thames.

> Why can't the Panama Canal work on that basis?

Bigger ships using bigger locks and using a larger amount of water.

--
from KT24 in Surrey, England - sent from my RISC OS 4té²
"I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!

<4oXFN.516828$7sbb.385175@fx16.iad>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=126334&group=uk.d-i-y#126334

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx16.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: trolltrap@valid.invalid (Peeler)
Subject: Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: A Void
References: <xn0oizwssbbrgfy024@news.individual.net> <op.2j7d0wx8byq249@pvr2.lan>
X-Newsreader: Pan/0.141
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <4oXFN.516828$7sbb.385175@fx16.iad>
X-Complaints-To: https://www.astraweb.com/aup
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2024 10:16:32 UTC
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 11:16:29 +0100
X-Received-Bytes: 951
 by: Peeler - Wed, 6 Mar 2024 10:16 UTC

On Wed, 06 Mar 2024 19:32:46 +1100, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

<FLUSH the abnormal trolling senile cretin's latest trollshit unread>

--
Xeno to senile Rodent:
"You're a sad old man Rod, truly sad."
MID: <id04c3F50peU1@mid.individual.net>

Re: Panama Canal

<l4qvr8Fog5sU2@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=126337&group=uk.d-i-y#126337

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: junk@admac.myzen.co.uk (alan_m)
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Subject: Re: Panama Canal
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 10:46:00 +0000
Organization: At Home
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <l4qvr8Fog5sU2@mid.individual.net>
References: <xn0oizwssbbrgfy024@news.individual.net>
Reply-To: news@admac.myzen.co.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net zU66vSo/WtwHs44vPhBRzQnZnTu8inY7UlTAdJ+SX2wbeN5NjZ
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZyY3sRdy8oUF84W0btvGQT4JToI= sha256:UwT48XDsm4qWVWzA/0v0wUtL0pi3lFx8enWeTcp2ZX4=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <xn0oizwssbbrgfy024@news.individual.net>
 by: alan_m - Wed, 6 Mar 2024 10:46 UTC

On 06/03/2024 08:22, Jeff Gaines wrote:
>
> I'm sure people in here will know.
>
> There is an issue with the Panama Canal because of lack of water.
>
> On the Thames (slightly different scale) the water come in at the "high"
> end and is let out through a series of locks to the tidal Thames.
>
> Why can't the Panama Canal work on that basis?
>

The Panama canal is higher in the middle, and much very higher than high
tide at the oceans at either end.

--
mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk

Re: Panama Canal

<l4r115FondkU1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=126340&group=uk.d-i-y#126340

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: junk@admac.myzen.co.uk (alan_m)
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Subject: Re: Panama Canal
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 11:06:13 +0000
Organization: At Home
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <l4r115FondkU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <xn0oizwssbbrgfy024@news.individual.net>
<l4qvr8Fog5sU2@mid.individual.net>
Reply-To: news@admac.myzen.co.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net 87zbiX0Tf46ESR5ZGSj4xwpYVWgutgfY2S6yzSDWB5S8NUPTKA
Cancel-Lock: sha1:IQaGzBp5NvBXlKHn+4ywz3UIvRk= sha256:5g1oA4qhbyK24AzaMFlGn0in0FXMW9gcXzkZc9pWb+Y=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <l4qvr8Fog5sU2@mid.individual.net>
 by: alan_m - Wed, 6 Mar 2024 11:06 UTC

On 06/03/2024 10:46, alan_m wrote:
> On 06/03/2024 08:22, Jeff Gaines wrote:
>>
>> I'm sure people in here will know.
>>
>> There is an issue with the Panama Canal because of lack of water.
>>
>> On the Thames (slightly different scale) the water come in at the
>> "high" end and is let out through a series of locks to the tidal Thames.
>>
>> Why can't the Panama Canal work on that basis?
>>
>
> The Panama canal is higher in the middle, and much very higher than high
> tide at the oceans at either end.
>

https://149909199.v2.pressablecdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Panama-Canal-Locks-Animation.gif

--
mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk

Re: Panama Canal

<l4r2hrFovb5U1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=126342&group=uk.d-i-y#126342

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: tim@streater.me.uk (Tim Streater)
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Subject: Re: Panama Canal
Date: 6 Mar 2024 11:32:11 GMT
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <l4r2hrFovb5U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <xn0oizwssbbrgfy024@news.individual.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=fixed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net yksd3DI4Y0Hfdh/xjL7tKgUUUbhXC6QcIDVNrVVgiKaRfnvjkn
Cancel-Lock: sha1:liCjx4/hnOiPUg9+iYoXxoLUDlY= sha256:BVGudKgONaRrhJsyA+4rjIIjLXI09IWVTf/BpKinolY=
X-Face: "M;\x&0=#cxDW4-*uL~{5d@+P7KmbB:]::l[1_h]^tu#H9yQ#.X4kSbDi;atp9otO=_G|Z2 t<Cay~&S1ru:A{I$SdbF$KS43iuPUwIh,8X"%3L;9=T~]BLW=IKvZ|/}D@Rml{4D#!Uc)|mu`34(e~ x[(n[\3.'{ChZ!"cF'!%M)iM0u~wQ"%,JC}JOhtI;:<EF5?fcf<^2T,{u.&U|?`X%B_eD##Y=ZdC2< Mq_b}MHzYQg8x-N,4)~`n*K*k?No"WVa3]]dntN(76o.nd1`;l}[-O<wJB{MQNv=H^6M`>CL2oMg$~ oW5:YPiBg[-rf40JdIu#K4A+M2gSW<LK5!!SEt:%K0z&:[N:7
User-Agent: Usenapp for MacOS
X-Usenapp: v1.27.2/l - Full License
 by: Tim Streater - Wed, 6 Mar 2024 11:32 UTC

On 6 Mar 2024 at 08:22:28 GMT, ""Jeff Gaines"" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> wrote:

>
> I'm sure people in here will know.
>
> There is an issue with the Panama Canal because of lack of water.
>
> On the Thames (slightly different scale) the water come in at the "high"
> end and is let out through a series of locks to the tidal Thames.
>
> Why can't the Panama Canal work on that basis?

Where is the high end of the Panama Canal?

--
"The EU Customs Union is a racket that defends producers in rich countries against producers in poor countries."

Jacob Rees-Mogg MP

Re: Panama Canal

<l4r33oFobc4U2@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=126344&group=uk.d-i-y#126344

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: usenet@andyburns.uk (Andy Burns)
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Subject: Re: Panama Canal
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 11:41:44 +0000
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <l4r33oFobc4U2@mid.individual.net>
References: <xn0oizwssbbrgfy024@news.individual.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net h6X7jtBrJaWkSPxL9J3auwGqP6hh37zR9telqFqlSDIJ6FECxo
Cancel-Lock: sha1:OoH1d30o7pB9f5ff+5al2k5gSdM= sha256:SrqG0CTo6xgov0VH/vQt1YKvDzbzo9rCqgebT0UjLX0=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <xn0oizwssbbrgfy024@news.individual.net>
 by: Andy Burns - Wed, 6 Mar 2024 11:41 UTC

Jeff Gaines wrote:

> There is an issue with the Panama Canal because of lack of water.

About a decade ago they deepened and widened the canal, so it takes more
water to operate the locks.

The most recent El Nino has been longer and stronger than usual bringing
a drought.

Re: Panama Canal

<hcmgui55ufoppuvf92qjhgkis8gmcklh6t@4ax.com>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=126348&group=uk.d-i-y#126348

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: me@privacy.net (Chris Hogg)
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Subject: Re: Panama Canal
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2024 11:58:51 +0000
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <hcmgui55ufoppuvf92qjhgkis8gmcklh6t@4ax.com>
References: <xn0oizwssbbrgfy024@news.individual.net> <l4r2hrFovb5U1@mid.individual.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net N4pkXV3SwvFKjzRicKRdYgHZYBrlp7rWakPlnq7kEfuDXsymar
Cancel-Lock: sha1:JKyLGGNS7V+OC3drk1VUsjaY0i8= sha256:WjdtGt4bOzSgsE4v47gSKv1jXsm1nXdRZRsc5n398gg=
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
X-No-Archive: yes
 by: Chris Hogg - Wed, 6 Mar 2024 11:58 UTC

On 6 Mar 2024 11:32:11 GMT, Tim Streater <tim@streater.me.uk> wrote:

>On 6 Mar 2024 at 08:22:28 GMT, ""Jeff Gaines"" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm sure people in here will know.
>>
>> There is an issue with the Panama Canal because of lack of water.
>>
>> On the Thames (slightly different scale) the water come in at the "high"
>> end and is let out through a series of locks to the tidal Thames.
>>
>> Why can't the Panama Canal work on that basis?
>
>Where is the high end of the Panama Canal?

Sea level on the Pacific side is higher than on the Atlantic side by a
whole 8 inches! Loads of other info on wiki:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panama_Canal

--
Chris

Re: Panama Canal

<us9mr7$dnvt$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=126350&group=uk.d-i-y#126350

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!news.hispagatos.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: clive@nowaytoday.co.uk (Clive Arthur)
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Subject: Re: Panama Canal
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 12:16:39 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <us9mr7$dnvt$1@dont-email.me>
References: <xn0oizwssbbrgfy024@news.individual.net>
<5b3d4e8a9fcharles@candehope.me.uk>
Reply-To: clive@nowaytoday.co.uk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 12:16:39 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="cf3ceb548fee46e21fe0317fd56b1401";
logging-data="450557"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+ADkFzLYGQUXw5FsxUK37TUmYUEzB5YvY="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Zhp/xW0TGA+lER2NJJ3E8pvRT4c=
In-Reply-To: <5b3d4e8a9fcharles@candehope.me.uk>
Content-Language: en-GB
 by: Clive Arthur - Wed, 6 Mar 2024 12:16 UTC

On 06/03/2024 09:30, charles wrote:
> In article <xn0oizwssbbrgfy024@news.individual.net>,
> Jeff Gaines <jgnewsid@outlook.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm sure people in here will know.
>
>> There is an issue with the Panama Canal because of lack of water.
>
>> On the Thames (slightly different scale) the water come in at the "high"
>> end and is let out through a series of locks to the tidal Thames.
>
>> Why can't the Panama Canal work on that basis?
>
> Bigger ships using bigger locks and using a larger amount of water.
>

Make them take their own water. Problem solved.

--
Cheers
Clive

Re: Panama Canal

<us9n8s$dqrv$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=126351&group=uk.d-i-y#126351

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: tnp@invalid.invalid (The Natural Philosopher)
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Subject: Re: Panama Canal
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 12:23:56 +0000
Organization: A little, after lunch
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <us9n8s$dqrv$1@dont-email.me>
References: <xn0oizwssbbrgfy024@news.individual.net>
<5b3d4e8a9fcharles@candehope.me.uk> <us9mr7$dnvt$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 12:23:56 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="57aabcf026c9e11c297d73147dd301ce";
logging-data="453503"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX182yxNfQgavdMNV1gJ+hvbNbchARD5QnWQ="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Q/yp6DmbaK1hfiyOQwqMRIhvsL0=
In-Reply-To: <us9mr7$dnvt$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-GB
 by: The Natural Philosop - Wed, 6 Mar 2024 12:23 UTC

On 06/03/2024 12:16, Clive Arthur wrote:
> On 06/03/2024 09:30, charles wrote:
>> In article <xn0oizwssbbrgfy024@news.individual.net>,
>>     Jeff Gaines <jgnewsid@outlook.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm sure people in here will know.
>>
>>> There is an issue with the Panama Canal because of lack of water.
>>
>>> On the Thames (slightly different scale) the water come in at the "high"
>>> end and is let out through a series of locks to the tidal Thames.
>>
>>> Why can't the Panama Canal work on that basis?
>>
>> Bigger ships using bigger locks and using a larger amount of water.
>>
>
> Make them take their own water.  Problem solved.
>
I'm fairly sure the laws of physics will have something to say about that...

--
WOKE is an acronym... Without Originality, Knowledge or Education.

Re: Panama Canal

<l4r5uvFpf8mU2@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=126353&group=uk.d-i-y#126353

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: tim@streater.me.uk (Tim Streater)
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Subject: Re: Panama Canal
Date: 6 Mar 2024 12:30:23 GMT
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <l4r5uvFpf8mU2@mid.individual.net>
References: <xn0oizwssbbrgfy024@news.individual.net> <l4r2hrFovb5U1@mid.individual.net> <hcmgui55ufoppuvf92qjhgkis8gmcklh6t@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=fixed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net 1sehPcLrVmtIwDMq/unvWwS11eLGbSveEIoKQYMZrlc3c6Xk1u
Cancel-Lock: sha1:RfpOYdTcgFXnzn9BCJ62ReHF4eQ= sha256:o4xP/p91Vq7uqk1u8Mr4FxuIIKGsEugFjSvuk/irCfw=
X-Face: "M;\x&0=#cxDW4-*uL~{5d@+P7KmbB:]::l[1_h]^tu#H9yQ#.X4kSbDi;atp9otO=_G|Z2 t<Cay~&S1ru:A{I$SdbF$KS43iuPUwIh,8X"%3L;9=T~]BLW=IKvZ|/}D@Rml{4D#!Uc)|mu`34(e~ x[(n[\3.'{ChZ!"cF'!%M)iM0u~wQ"%,JC}JOhtI;:<EF5?fcf<^2T,{u.&U|?`X%B_eD##Y=ZdC2< Mq_b}MHzYQg8x-N,4)~`n*K*k?No"WVa3]]dntN(76o.nd1`;l}[-O<wJB{MQNv=H^6M`>CL2oMg$~ oW5:YPiBg[-rf40JdIu#K4A+M2gSW<LK5!!SEt:%K0z&:[N:7
User-Agent: Usenapp for MacOS
X-Usenapp: v1.27.2/l - Full License
 by: Tim Streater - Wed, 6 Mar 2024 12:30 UTC

On 6 Mar 2024 at 11:58:51 GMT, "Chris Hogg" <me@privacy.net> wrote:

> On 6 Mar 2024 11:32:11 GMT, Tim Streater <tim@streater.me.uk> wrote:
>
>> On 6 Mar 2024 at 08:22:28 GMT, ""Jeff Gaines"" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I'm sure people in here will know.
>>>
>>> There is an issue with the Panama Canal because of lack of water.
>>>
>>> On the Thames (slightly different scale) the water come in at the "high"
>>> end and is let out through a series of locks to the tidal Thames.
>>>
>>> Why can't the Panama Canal work on that basis?
>>
>> Where is the high end of the Panama Canal?
>
> Sea level on the Pacific side is higher than on the Atlantic side by a
> whole 8 inches! Loads of other info on wiki:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panama_Canal

That wasn't what I was asking.

--
"Please stop telling us what you feel. Please stop telling us what your intuition is. Your intuitive feelings are of no interest whatsoever, and nor are mine. I don't give a bugger what you feel, or what I feel. I want to know what the evidence shows." -- Richard Dawkins

Re: Panama Canal

<us9ogj$e2jg$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=126355&group=uk.d-i-y#126355

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: steve@walker-family.me.uk (SteveW)
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Subject: Re: Panama Canal
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 12:45:07 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <us9ogj$e2jg$1@dont-email.me>
References: <xn0oizwssbbrgfy024@news.individual.net>
<l4r2hrFovb5U1@mid.individual.net>
<hcmgui55ufoppuvf92qjhgkis8gmcklh6t@4ax.com>
<l4r5uvFpf8mU2@mid.individual.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 12:45:07 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="eefff612de8ffe3eefc712d602b2ec29";
logging-data="461424"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+6oDQikoLl7avMFtykdegLeOBdQ3Q1oEA="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:8wmYbMcfprbrleBwdMTXqhHAZpY=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <l4r5uvFpf8mU2@mid.individual.net>
 by: SteveW - Wed, 6 Mar 2024 12:45 UTC

On 06/03/2024 12:30, Tim Streater wrote:
> On 6 Mar 2024 at 11:58:51 GMT, "Chris Hogg" <me@privacy.net> wrote:
>
>> On 6 Mar 2024 11:32:11 GMT, Tim Streater <tim@streater.me.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> On 6 Mar 2024 at 08:22:28 GMT, ""Jeff Gaines"" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm sure people in here will know.
>>>>
>>>> There is an issue with the Panama Canal because of lack of water.
>>>>
>>>> On the Thames (slightly different scale) the water come in at the "high"
>>>> end and is let out through a series of locks to the tidal Thames.
>>>>
>>>> Why can't the Panama Canal work on that basis?
>>>
>>> Where is the high end of the Panama Canal?
>>
>> Sea level on the Pacific side is higher than on the Atlantic side by a
>> whole 8 inches! Loads of other info on wiki:
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panama_Canal
>
> That wasn't what I was asking.

Both ends are low, it is the middle that is high and fed from a lake.

Re: Panama Canal

<xn0oj0461blpgrz026@news.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=126357&group=uk.d-i-y#126357

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: jgnewsid@outlook.com (Jeff Gaines)
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Subject: Re: Panama Canal
Date: 6 Mar 2024 13:00:52 GMT
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <xn0oj0461blpgrz026@news.individual.net>
References: <xn0oizwssbbrgfy024@news.individual.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net e8N0Qrlfj4oJ3vsmGYVhXQz5Qjc72ZQnnIqw/AmJD/IN0hvQSl
Cancel-Lock: sha1:XZc27qvdrVka2HbFkLFyfXYjRbI= sha256:gIvBw2A98B4Q7VRkZB8JPbDoJfbDSmUZ6CW6X7RgM+M=
User-Agent: XanaNews/1.21-f3fb89f (x86; Portable ISpell)
X-Face: `{n`"d>nF^Uwzc:,L`j<I0Z`+o3aIFomb({]W!ey_aouI;EhEg9Q~,73RF,@{]-!$,A,z>,x
X-Ref: news.individual.net ~XNS:0000585C
 by: Jeff Gaines - Wed, 6 Mar 2024 13:00 UTC

On 06/03/2024 in message <xn0oizwssbbrgfy024@news.individual.net> Jeff
Gaines wrote:

>
>I'm sure people in here will know.
>
>There is an issue with the Panama Canal because of lack of water.
>
>On the Thames (slightly different scale) the water come in at the "high"
>end and is let out through a series of locks to the tidal Thames.
>
>Why can't the Panama Canal work on that basis?

Many thank for all the replies :-)

I didn't realise the high spot was in the middle that explains it!

I like the animation of how locks work, first graphical program I wrote on
my BBC micro was to explain that to my daughter.

--
Jeff Gaines Dorset UK
George Washington was a British subject until well after his 40th birthday.
(Margaret Thatcher, speech at the White House 17 December 1979)

Re: Panama Canal

<l4r8ooFpr34U1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=126359&group=uk.d-i-y#126359

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: junk@admac.myzen.co.uk (alan_m)
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Subject: Re: Panama Canal
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 13:18:16 +0000
Organization: At Home
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <l4r8ooFpr34U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <xn0oizwssbbrgfy024@news.individual.net>
<l4r33oFobc4U2@mid.individual.net>
Reply-To: news@admac.myzen.co.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net v8bHH5nEEpl3Z/bVvRtiTAoKjvzsjlWvlPiey7M4DzyzLrnWoV
Cancel-Lock: sha1:FrnUhhUNX6ZJc7grORm5KK959fc= sha256:G8meaZCEXYTLMUIt6bEI85dI40FrI6AEdrJW+UVeG/w=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <l4r33oFobc4U2@mid.individual.net>
 by: alan_m - Wed, 6 Mar 2024 13:18 UTC

On 06/03/2024 11:41, Andy Burns wrote:
> Jeff Gaines wrote:
>
>> There is an issue with the Panama Canal because of lack of water.
>
> About a decade ago they deepened and widened the canal, so it takes more
> water to operate the locks.
>
> The most recent El Nino has been longer and stronger than usual bringing
> a drought.

Didn't they also construct more (pumped) side ponds?

--
mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk

Re: Panama Canal

<l4rcb9FqbufU1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=126368&group=uk.d-i-y#126368

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!news.samoylyk.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: jnugent97@mail.com (JNugent)
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Subject: Re: Panama Canal
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 14:19:21 +0000
Organization: Home User
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <l4rcb9FqbufU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <xn0oizwssbbrgfy024@news.individual.net>
Reply-To: jnugent@mail.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net +xIVcrIpgTTdIu8gmJuPvQQtBc0JWyMqb5dePA46/hxszMW9oV
Cancel-Lock: sha1:c1Zf9lgCJ8AB6px5YOw8LLEo4FY= sha256:Zx+9Uccsl58XXjEWyftH4mUeRn/R7PlL/rDNRIv9nls=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/60.6.1
In-Reply-To: <xn0oizwssbbrgfy024@news.individual.net>
Content-Language: en-GB
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 240305-4, 3/5/2024), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
 by: JNugent - Wed, 6 Mar 2024 14:19 UTC

On 06/03/2024 08:22 am, Jeff Gaines wrote:
>
> I'm sure people in here will know.
>
> There is an issue with the Panama Canal because of lack of water.
>
> On the Thames (slightly different scale) the water come in at the "high"
> end and is let out through a series of locks to the tidal Thames.
>
> Why can't the Panama Canal work on that basis?

It does.

Re: Panama Canal

<db4huih4r3psibrlniqipcoiggeippe9i4@4ax.com>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=126377&group=uk.d-i-y#126377

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: me@privacy.net (Chris Hogg)
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Subject: Re: Panama Canal
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2024 15:54:47 +0000
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <db4huih4r3psibrlniqipcoiggeippe9i4@4ax.com>
References: <xn0oizwssbbrgfy024@news.individual.net> <l4r2hrFovb5U1@mid.individual.net> <hcmgui55ufoppuvf92qjhgkis8gmcklh6t@4ax.com> <l4r5uvFpf8mU2@mid.individual.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net lTjGBhGB4JTkyVNjY6wxQAH+Xxodt/m4V4SYEBnX+hts5mssGW
Cancel-Lock: sha1:4R/KVLW86b/StvqTOnB4bIKzJRk= sha256:kGSXGLES3N6QoL88ehBGVEHvMt7gqRuNhDNv3YvD7y8=
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
X-No-Archive: yes
 by: Chris Hogg - Wed, 6 Mar 2024 15:54 UTC

On 6 Mar 2024 12:30:23 GMT, Tim Streater <tim@streater.me.uk> wrote:

>On 6 Mar 2024 at 11:58:51 GMT, "Chris Hogg" <me@privacy.net> wrote:
>
>> On 6 Mar 2024 11:32:11 GMT, Tim Streater <tim@streater.me.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> On 6 Mar 2024 at 08:22:28 GMT, ""Jeff Gaines"" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm sure people in here will know.
>>>>
>>>> There is an issue with the Panama Canal because of lack of water.
>>>>
>>>> On the Thames (slightly different scale) the water come in at the "high"
>>>> end and is let out through a series of locks to the tidal Thames.
>>>>
>>>> Why can't the Panama Canal work on that basis?
>>>
>>> Where is the high end of the Panama Canal?
>>
>> Sea level on the Pacific side is higher than on the Atlantic side by a
>> whole 8 inches! Loads of other info on wiki:
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panama_Canal
>
>That wasn't what I was asking.

It is what you asked, (the clue is 'end') but apparently not what you
meant to ask :-)

--
Chris

Re: Panama Canal

<l4riltFramlU1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=126379&group=uk.d-i-y#126379

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: tim@streater.me.uk (Tim Streater)
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Subject: Re: Panama Canal
Date: 6 Mar 2024 16:07:25 GMT
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <l4riltFramlU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <xn0oizwssbbrgfy024@news.individual.net> <l4r2hrFovb5U1@mid.individual.net> <hcmgui55ufoppuvf92qjhgkis8gmcklh6t@4ax.com> <l4r5uvFpf8mU2@mid.individual.net> <us9ogj$e2jg$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=fixed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net aCSQsWY3wf/yRfAzhoZHMQOIkW9IuJ2CxvSQuoyANcvAs1Hw+7
Cancel-Lock: sha1:DdI4FfG1kqdlD3fcEwf0omW2Ips= sha256:ZigUDwaNE2WpOCRlmbgnJ8NpAhXr3aWU2vr5pjJzBzM=
X-Face: "M;\x&0=#cxDW4-*uL~{5d@+P7KmbB:]::l[1_h]^tu#H9yQ#.X4kSbDi;atp9otO=_G|Z2 t<Cay~&S1ru:A{I$SdbF$KS43iuPUwIh,8X"%3L;9=T~]BLW=IKvZ|/}D@Rml{4D#!Uc)|mu`34(e~ x[(n[\3.'{ChZ!"cF'!%M)iM0u~wQ"%,JC}JOhtI;:<EF5?fcf<^2T,{u.&U|?`X%B_eD##Y=ZdC2< Mq_b}MHzYQg8x-N,4)~`n*K*k?No"WVa3]]dntN(76o.nd1`;l}[-O<wJB{MQNv=H^6M`>CL2oMg$~ oW5:YPiBg[-rf40JdIu#K4A+M2gSW<LK5!!SEt:%K0z&:[N:7
User-Agent: Usenapp for MacOS
X-Usenapp: v1.27.2/l - Full License
 by: Tim Streater - Wed, 6 Mar 2024 16:07 UTC

On 6 Mar 2024 at 12:45:07 GMT, "SteveW" <steve@walker-family.me.uk> wrote:

> On 06/03/2024 12:30, Tim Streater wrote:
>> On 6 Mar 2024 at 11:58:51 GMT, "Chris Hogg" <me@privacy.net> wrote:
>>
>>> On 6 Mar 2024 11:32:11 GMT, Tim Streater <tim@streater.me.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 6 Mar 2024 at 08:22:28 GMT, ""Jeff Gaines"" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> There is an issue with the Panama Canal because of lack of water.
>>>>>
>>>>> On the Thames (slightly different scale) the water come in at the "high"
>>>>> end and is let out through a series of locks to the tidal Thames.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why can't the Panama Canal work on that basis?
>>>>
>>>> Where is the high end of the Panama Canal?
>>>
>>> Sea level on the Pacific side is higher than on the Atlantic side by a
>>> whole 8 inches! Loads of other info on wiki:
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panama_Canal
>>
>> That wasn't what I was asking.
>
> Both ends are low, it is the middle that is high and fed from a lake.

Yes I know (and knew). I was asking Jeff where he thought the high end was. In
fact, the lake isn't just tapped for water to run the canal. It splits the
canal into two sections and you have a 20 mile section of the lake to cross,
in the middle. So the Panama canal is like 2 x River Thames back-to-back, and
the lake provides water for both sections. So the canal and the Thames operate
the same way; the issue is a shortage of rainfall in the area.

--
Tim

Re: Panama Canal

<usactl$i9t2$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=126399&group=uk.d-i-y#126399

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: see.my.signature@nowhere.null (John Rumm)
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Subject: Re: Panama Canal
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 18:33:24 +0000
Organization: Internode Ltd
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <usactl$i9t2$1@dont-email.me>
References: <xn0oizwssbbrgfy024@news.individual.net>
<us99u4$9nic$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 18:33:25 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="37dbdcb550b028aa8d3519bd14a6c2e1";
logging-data="599970"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX193z+XVxV9qpaewf0XouyqDK02L/ELevbE="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:xS8OerSzDsJsoAlE1MwYU5AOVk8=
In-Reply-To: <us99u4$9nic$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-GB
 by: John Rumm - Wed, 6 Mar 2024 18:33 UTC

On 06/03/2024 08:36, Alan Lee wrote:
> On 06/03/2024 08:22, Jeff Gaines wrote:
>>
>> I'm sure people in here will know.
>>
>> There is an issue with the Panama Canal because of lack of water.
>>
>> On the Thames (slightly different scale) the water come in at the
>> "high" end and is let out through a series of locks to the tidal Thames.
>>
>> Why can't the Panama Canal work on that basis?
>
> Because the high point of the Panama is in the middle.
> Even the Thames has trouble with low water in dry periods. Midlands
> canals with their up and down profile regularly have limits of use in
> dry periods, they work on the same principle as the Panama, a large
> lake/store of water at the summit. In Victorian times, the water at the
> bottom would be pumped back to the store at the top, but that doesnt
> happen now.

With the "new" supermax locks, they do pump between locks so as to reuse
some of the water. The can't do that on the older ones though.

--
Cheers,

John.

/=================================================================\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk |
\=================================================================/

Re: Panama Canal

<Sl3GN.52737$bIG8.48418@fx04.ams1>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=126407&group=uk.d-i-y#126407

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!peer01.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!fx04.ams1.POSTED!not-for-mail
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Panama Canal
Content-Language: en-GB
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
References: <xn0oizwssbbrgfy024@news.individual.net>
<5b3d4e8a9fcharles@candehope.me.uk>
From: not@home.com (Sam Plusnet)
In-Reply-To: <5b3d4e8a9fcharles@candehope.me.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <Sl3GN.52737$bIG8.48418@fx04.ams1>
X-Complaints-To: abuse(at)newshosting.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2024 19:20:18 UTC
Organization: Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 19:20:17 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 1382
 by: Sam Plusnet - Wed, 6 Mar 2024 19:20 UTC

On 06-Mar-24 9:30, charles wrote:
> In article <xn0oizwssbbrgfy024@news.individual.net>,
> Jeff Gaines <jgnewsid@outlook.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm sure people in here will know.
>
>> There is an issue with the Panama Canal because of lack of water.
>
>> On the Thames (slightly different scale) the water come in at the "high"
>> end and is let out through a series of locks to the tidal Thames.
>
>> Why can't the Panama Canal work on that basis?
>
> Bigger ships using bigger locks and using a larger amount of water.
>
And so ad infinitum?

--
Sam Plusnet

Re: Panama Canal

<usatph$lp6i$3@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=126432&group=uk.d-i-y#126432

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: fredxx@spam.invalid (Fredxx)
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Subject: Re: Panama Canal
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 23:21:21 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <usatph$lp6i$3@dont-email.me>
References: <xn0oizwssbbrgfy024@news.individual.net>
<5b3d4e8a9fcharles@candehope.me.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 23:21:21 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d7f6790545c1215dbc84260434e3cb8a";
logging-data="713938"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+VujH0i32nO7xGO+d/u/W7"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:HgcS7xFcmaWNVBMeRnjXCY0s4aI=
In-Reply-To: <5b3d4e8a9fcharles@candehope.me.uk>
Content-Language: en-GB
 by: Fredxx - Wed, 6 Mar 2024 23:21 UTC

On 06/03/2024 09:30, charles wrote:
> In article <xn0oizwssbbrgfy024@news.individual.net>,
> Jeff Gaines <jgnewsid@outlook.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm sure people in here will know.
>
>> There is an issue with the Panama Canal because of lack of water.
>
>> On the Thames (slightly different scale) the water come in at the "high"
>> end and is let out through a series of locks to the tidal Thames.
>
>> Why can't the Panama Canal work on that basis?
>
> Bigger ships using bigger locks and using a larger amount of water.

And a small sip in a big lock uses the same amount of water as a big ship.

Re: Panama Canal

<op.2j8l3agqbyq249@pvr2.lan>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=126444&group=uk.d-i-y#126444

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com (Rod Speed)
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Subject: Re: Panama Canal
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2024 11:24:36 +1100
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <op.2j8l3agqbyq249@pvr2.lan>
References: <xn0oizwssbbrgfy024@news.individual.net>
<5b3d4e8a9fcharles@candehope.me.uk> <usatph$lp6i$3@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net 648wJziXSHxTZTszD2IZ1wqTrGWy8tcuXXuDhyldwggVug/g4=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:O7oQDZJjW2FpM6jJDpSBJDYFwRM= sha256:IdbqW/vFXjuLQXmjzxKkXyAwoBT3fuiDl0HGhX6YW7U=
User-Agent: Opera Mail/1.0 (Win32)
 by: Rod Speed - Thu, 7 Mar 2024 00:24 UTC

On Thu, 07 Mar 2024 10:21:21 +1100, Fredxx <fredxx@spam.invalid> wrote:

> On 06/03/2024 09:30, charles wrote:
>> In article <xn0oizwssbbrgfy024@news.individual.net>,
>> Jeff Gaines <jgnewsid@outlook.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm sure people in here will know.
>>
>>> There is an issue with the Panama Canal because of lack of water.
>>
>>> On the Thames (slightly different scale) the water come in at the
>>> "high"
>>> end and is let out through a series of locks to the tidal Thames.
>>
>>> Why can't the Panama Canal work on that basis?
>> Bigger ships using bigger locks and using a larger amount of water.
>
> And a small sip in a big lock uses the same amount of water as a big
> ship.

Nope, the small ship displaces less water and a lock
that can take a big ship needs much more water to fill it.

Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!

<rHfGN.44508$zF_1.12614@fx18.iad>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=126461&group=uk.d-i-y#126461

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!npeer.as286.net!npeer-ng0.as286.net!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx18.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: trolltrap@valid.invalid (Peeler)
Subject: Re: Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: A Void
References: <xn0oizwssbbrgfy024@news.individual.net> <5b3d4e8a9fcharles@candehope.me.uk> <usatph$lp6i$3@dont-email.me> <op.2j8l3agqbyq249@pvr2.lan>
X-Newsreader: Pan/0.141
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <rHfGN.44508$zF_1.12614@fx18.iad>
X-Complaints-To: https://www.astraweb.com/aup
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2024 09:22:31 UTC
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 10:22:27 +0100
X-Received-Bytes: 1170
 by: Peeler - Thu, 7 Mar 2024 09:22 UTC

On Thu, 07 Mar 2024 11:24:36 +1100, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

<FLUSH the abnormal trolling senile cretin's latest trollshit unread>

--
Pomegranate Bastard addressing the trolling senile cretin from Oz:
"I repeat, you are a complete and utter imbecile."
MID: <mpelth1engag7090piqvqp85pco7nphoal@4ax.com>

Re: Panama Canal

<fymdnfe6ELLEO3T4nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=126483&group=uk.d-i-y#126483

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!69.80.99.26.MISMATCH!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.brightview.co.uk!news.brightview.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2024 11:34:49 +0000
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 11:34:40 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Panama Canal
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
References: <xn0oizwssbbrgfy024@news.individual.net> <l4r2hrFovb5U1@mid.individual.net> <hcmgui55ufoppuvf92qjhgkis8gmcklh6t@4ax.com>
Content-Language: en-GB
From: reentrant@invalid.org.uk (Reentrant)
In-Reply-To: <hcmgui55ufoppuvf92qjhgkis8gmcklh6t@4ax.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <fymdnfe6ELLEO3T4nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
Lines: 27
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-2pJscuNlu5OF4rGpjAjetabOnIU/xLiB6IbV16HlzF8DNRRLeVDimPbNDQCXqNL63FoRYORISraoXuo!4rds+K0qR8mL4bPFqv/BLJukzZ/eJrKLzVw7B+ZdYz6U4OboOTAMhpxYz0bAmFBhm1uBQMtw1+ti!zT6GhOgeJF8L98XHjR2UEAC7uK8=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
 by: Reentrant - Thu, 7 Mar 2024 11:34 UTC

On 06/03/2024 11:58, Chris Hogg wrote:
> On 6 Mar 2024 11:32:11 GMT, Tim Streater <tim@streater.me.uk> wrote:
>
>> On 6 Mar 2024 at 08:22:28 GMT, ""Jeff Gaines"" <jgnewsid@outlook.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I'm sure people in here will know.
>>>
>>> There is an issue with the Panama Canal because of lack of water.
>>>
>>> On the Thames (slightly different scale) the water come in at the "high"
>>> end and is let out through a series of locks to the tidal Thames.
>>>
>>> Why can't the Panama Canal work on that basis?
>>
>> Where is the high end of the Panama Canal?
>
> Sea level on the Pacific side is higher than on the Atlantic side by a
> whole 8 inches! Loads of other info on wiki:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panama_Canal
>

Another counter-intuitive fact - the western-most end of the canal meets
the Caribbean, and the eastern-most end meets the Pacific.
--
Reentrant

Pages:123
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor