Rocksolid Light

Welcome to Rocksolid Light

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

People humiliating a salami!


aus+uk / uk.d-i-y / Re: is Creosote banned?

SubjectAuthor
* Re: is Creosote banned?Mattc
+* Re: is Creosote banned?John Rumm
|`* Re: is Creosote banned?Davey
| `- Re: is Creosote banned?John Rumm
`- Re: is Creosote banned?wasbit

1
Re: is Creosote banned?

<17bad098e48d5a7c$1973$3078224$4606d853@news.newsgroupdirect.com>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=126611&group=uk.d-i-y#126611

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
From: 94005d6dc10b7d2429a4f4db7553e4c6@example.com (Mattc)
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Subject: Re: is Creosote banned?
X-Poster: Hermes 2.0
References: <1ipop.50946$7u3.7341@newsfe04.ams2> <int83k$95q$1@news.datemas.de> <56a5676e-8a41-4872-b980-b66aceeb3bd6@z31g2000vbs.googlegroups.com> <inumvt$jl1$1@news.datemas.de> <GOSdncJztfl3fD_QnZ2dnUVZ7sSdnZ2d@bt.com>
In-Reply-To: <GOSdncJztfl3fD_QnZ2dnUVZ7sSdnZ2d@bt.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: 9ecd27dc80909b5f9e5db70f1b6f7036;a56082b044a50ad8ee5a9fd2ce24e174
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Lines: 7
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsgroupdirect.com!not-for-mail
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2024 14:32:43 +0000
Nntp-Posting-Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2024 14:32:43 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 1143
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsgroupdirect.com
Organization: NewsgroupDirect
Message-Id: <17bad098e48d5a7c$1973$3078224$4606d853@news.newsgroupdirect.com>
 by: Mattc - Fri, 8 Mar 2024 14:32 UTC

I'm a pole tester and can categorically say no we don't. Perhaps they used to in the old days, but we don't now and haven't done for at least 5 years.

Oldest pole I've tested and passed was from 1897. The alternative to creosote that was used in the early 2000s doesn't last anywhere near as long.

--
For full context, visit https://www.homeownershub.com/uk-diy/is-creosote-banned-699640-.htm

Re: is Creosote banned?

<usiql2$2ikc3$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=126675&group=uk.d-i-y#126675

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: see.my.signature@nowhere.null (John Rumm)
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Subject: Re: is Creosote banned?
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2024 23:16:49 +0000
Organization: Internode Ltd
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <usiql2$2ikc3$1@dont-email.me>
References: <1ipop.50946$7u3.7341@newsfe04.ams2>
<int83k$95q$1@news.datemas.de>
<56a5676e-8a41-4872-b980-b66aceeb3bd6@z31g2000vbs.googlegroups.com>
<inumvt$jl1$1@news.datemas.de> <GOSdncJztfl3fD_QnZ2dnUVZ7sSdnZ2d@bt.com>
<17bad098e48d5a7c$1973$3078224$4606d853@news.newsgroupdirect.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2024 23:16:50 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d0c33589c567633304516f560daf242d";
logging-data="2707843"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18x/MYIhj2sqWOxXJchQPylUvZWZLlgCgY="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:SyN9d95SzGC+n+7UJPcTnUZtZC4=
In-Reply-To: <17bad098e48d5a7c$1973$3078224$4606d853@news.newsgroupdirect.com>
Content-Language: en-GB
 by: John Rumm - Sat, 9 Mar 2024 23:16 UTC

On 08/03/2024 14:32, Mattc wrote:

> I'm a pole tester and can categorically say no we don't.

You don't what?

> Perhaps they
> used to in the old days, but we don't now and haven't done for at least
> 5 years.

That's nice, what are you talking about?

> Oldest pole I've tested and passed was from 1897. The alternative to
> creosote that was used in the early 2000s doesn't last anywhere near as
> long.

Let me guess another response to a decade+ old thread where a good
number of the original posted are no longer with us?

https://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php/Hoh

--
Cheers,

John.

/=================================================================\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk |
\=================================================================/

Re: is Creosote banned?

<usiva0$2jh3o$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=126676&group=uk.d-i-y#126676

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: davey@example.invalid (Davey)
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Subject: Re: is Creosote banned?
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 00:36:15 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <usiva0$2jh3o$1@dont-email.me>
References: <1ipop.50946$7u3.7341@newsfe04.ams2>
<int83k$95q$1@news.datemas.de>
<56a5676e-8a41-4872-b980-b66aceeb3bd6@z31g2000vbs.googlegroups.com>
<inumvt$jl1$1@news.datemas.de>
<GOSdncJztfl3fD_QnZ2dnUVZ7sSdnZ2d@bt.com>
<17bad098e48d5a7c$1973$3078224$4606d853@news.newsgroupdirect.com>
<usiql2$2ikc3$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 00:36:16 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5df1764d76ae2ccf6423437a9f919f8f";
logging-data="2737272"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+BWTX74PdlusKKvU7A7jx8"
Cancel-Lock: sha1:VpMmvx+0aKZpvd2KSde5j2TWkDI=
X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.16.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
 by: Davey - Sun, 10 Mar 2024 00:36 UTC

On Sat, 9 Mar 2024 23:16:49 +0000
John Rumm <see.my.signature@nowhere.null> wrote:

> On 08/03/2024 14:32, Mattc wrote:
>
> > I'm a pole tester and can categorically say no we don't.
>
> You don't what?
>
> > Perhaps they
> > used to in the old days, but we don't now and haven't done for at
> > least 5 years.
>
> That's nice, what are you talking about?
>
> > Oldest pole I've tested and passed was from 1897. The alternative
> > to creosote that was used in the early 2000s doesn't last anywhere
> > near as long.
>
> Let me guess another response to a decade+ old thread where a good
> number of the original posted are no longer with us?
>
> https://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php/Hoh
>

Yep, 12 years ago. Roll on the end of Google Groups linking to Usenet.

--
Davey.

Re: is Creosote banned?

<usjvso$2t8v2$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=126680&group=uk.d-i-y#126680

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: wasbit@nowhere.com (wasbit)
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Subject: Re: is Creosote banned?
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 09:52:25 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <usjvso$2t8v2$1@dont-email.me>
References: <1ipop.50946$7u3.7341@newsfe04.ams2>
<int83k$95q$1@news.datemas.de>
<56a5676e-8a41-4872-b980-b66aceeb3bd6@z31g2000vbs.googlegroups.com>
<inumvt$jl1$1@news.datemas.de> <GOSdncJztfl3fD_QnZ2dnUVZ7sSdnZ2d@bt.com>
<17bad098e48d5a7c$1973$3078224$4606d853@news.newsgroupdirect.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 09:52:24 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2c19f370c94059c680359c5bdabb8a01";
logging-data="3056610"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18iam25ViOHxrKKNX9drc4D"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; Win64; x64; rv:5.0) Aura/20220608
Interlink/52.9.8194
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Eu5iLk4KBdXCy3GfJbPSBrVMQV8=
In-Reply-To: <17bad098e48d5a7c$1973$3078224$4606d853@news.newsgroupdirect.com>
Content-Language: en-US
 by: wasbit - Sun, 10 Mar 2024 09:52 UTC

On 08/03/2024 14:32, Mattc wrote:
> I'm a pole tester and can categorically say no we don't. Perhaps they
> used to in the old days, but we don't now and haven't done for at least
> 5 years.
>
> Oldest pole I've tested and passed was from 1897. The alternative to
> creosote that was used in the early 2000s doesn't last anywhere near as
> long.
>

Reply to an ancient thread.

"In July 2003, it became an offence for the general public to purchase
and apply Coal Tar Creosote.

However, the product is still available for sale to trades-people.

This means the traditional user such as the agricultural community,
builders, etc. are still able to purchase Coal Tar Creosote, providing
they do not resell to the general householder."

- https://www.creosotesales.co.uk/about/

--
Regards
wasbit

Re: is Creosote banned?

<usktof$33kpf$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=126708&group=uk.d-i-y#126708

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: see.my.signature@nowhere.null (John Rumm)
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Subject: Re: is Creosote banned?
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 18:22:06 +0000
Organization: Internode Ltd
Lines: 41
Message-ID: <usktof$33kpf$1@dont-email.me>
References: <1ipop.50946$7u3.7341@newsfe04.ams2>
<int83k$95q$1@news.datemas.de>
<56a5676e-8a41-4872-b980-b66aceeb3bd6@z31g2000vbs.googlegroups.com>
<inumvt$jl1$1@news.datemas.de> <GOSdncJztfl3fD_QnZ2dnUVZ7sSdnZ2d@bt.com>
<17bad098e48d5a7c$1973$3078224$4606d853@news.newsgroupdirect.com>
<usiql2$2ikc3$1@dont-email.me> <usiva0$2jh3o$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 18:22:07 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d0c33589c567633304516f560daf242d";
logging-data="3265327"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/zSQlceygtRLntNiFbnPcev8nENp3Iz4k="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:IhGPOAfgasHdp36tJu/M6GxCC+w=
In-Reply-To: <usiva0$2jh3o$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-GB
 by: John Rumm - Sun, 10 Mar 2024 18:22 UTC

On 10/03/2024 00:36, Davey wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Mar 2024 23:16:49 +0000
> John Rumm <see.my.signature@nowhere.null> wrote:
>
>> On 08/03/2024 14:32, Mattc wrote:
>>
>>> I'm a pole tester and can categorically say no we don't.
>>
>> You don't what?
>>
>>> Perhaps they
>>> used to in the old days, but we don't now and haven't done for at
>>> least 5 years.
>>
>> That's nice, what are you talking about?
>>
>>> Oldest pole I've tested and passed was from 1897. The alternative
>>> to creosote that was used in the early 2000s doesn't last anywhere
>>> near as long.
>>
>> Let me guess another response to a decade+ old thread where a good
>> number of the original posted are no longer with us?
>>
>> https://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php/Hoh
>>
>
> Yep, 12 years ago. Roll on the end of Google Groups linking to Usenet.

Won't help with the hoh posters - they don't use google

--
Cheers,

John.

/=================================================================\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk |
\=================================================================/

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor