Message-ID:

If truth is beauty, how come no one has their hair done in the library? -- Lily Tomlin

Re: 1471

<06e5a840-725a-4b2b-9088-105ba0d19706@invalid.invalid>

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=127732&group=uk.d-i-y#127732

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: tnp@invalid.invalid (The Natural Philosopher)
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Subject: Re: 1471
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 16:56:49 +0000
Organization: A little, after lunch
Lines: 51
Message-ID: <06e5a840-725a-4b2b-9088-105ba0d19706@invalid.invalid>
References: <utk367$2v5q7$1@dont-email.me> <l65kelFa93fU1@mid.individual.net>
<utk7i6$303bj$5@dont-email.me> <l66be3FdlclU1@mid.individual.net>
<utl7sp$37sfj$1@dont-email.me> <utlv3r$3gev0$1@dont-email.me>
<utm6ud$3i30k$2@dont-email.me> <utn4q1$3p985$3@dont-email.me>
<utrill$113l9$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 17:56:50 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="81f8b70d9843cfe2836fddc8de21ad3c";
logging-data="1258978"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/rLwgjUGYEuV2YI9jqvaDNRv9hu/WL9p0="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:nSMdKoiLRMxybxPWYesLkR1xgng=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <utrill$113l9$2@dont-email.me>

by: The Natural Philosop - Mon, 25 Mar 2024 16:56 UTC

On 25/03/2024 10:12, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
> Am 23/03/2024 um 17:50 schrieb The Natural Philosopher:
>> On 23/03/2024 09:21, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
>>> Am 23/03/2024 um 07:07 schrieb The Natural Philosopher:
>>>> On 23/03/2024 00:31, Davey wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 21:27:31 +0000
>>>>> Roger Mills <mills37.fslife@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 22/03/2024 15:19, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>>>>>> On 22/03/2024 14:55, Andy Burns wrote:
>>>>>>>> The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>>>>>>>> tried to get the callers phone number but 1471 didn't work?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There have always been calls for which 1471 will say words to the
>>>>>>>> effect of
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "you were called today at $TIME,
>>>>>>>> but we do not have the caller's number to return the call"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I don't think a simple CLI withheld gives the same message.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The message I got was 'you have dialled a number that does not
>>>>>>> exist' ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well I've just rung 1471, and a female voice told me the time and
>>>>>> number of the most recent incoming call. Is your landline on an
>>>>>> Openreach line, or something different?
>>>>>
>>>>> But if, as seems likely, the OP'S presented number was spoofed, is
>>>>> that
>>>>> not the one that 1471 tried to call?
>>>>
>>>> Hmm. I wonder. Or did i misdial 1471
>>>>
>>>
>>> Advanced dementia and/or chronic alcoholism does this.
>>>
>> Well you would of course be the most experienced in that.
>>
>
> You bet! I am surrounded by demented gammons.
>
Classic projection from a man in denial
--
For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and
wrong.

H.L.Mencken

If truth is beauty, how come no one has their hair done in the library? -- Lily Tomlin

aus+uk / uk.d-i-y / Re: 1471