Works both ways.
What the Bolsehviks fail to realize, or perhaps don't care, as they
operate in a land of smoke & mirrors by default, is that these numbers
argue against the latest Xiden panicked disaster scenario of Ukraine
falling and a NATO member being attacked next unless we immediately give
them $60 billion.

``````````

Putin has lost nearly 90 per cent of his pre-invasion army with
315,000 personnel either killed or injured since war began, according to
US intelligence

Report assessed that Moscow's losses have set back Russia's
military modernisation by 18 years, a source familiar with the
intelligence said

Putin has lost nearly 90 per cent of his pre-invasion army, with 315,000
personnel either killed or injured since war began, according to US
intelligence.

A declassified US intelligence report assessed that Moscow's losses in
personnel and armoured vehicles to Ukraine's military have set back
Russia's military modernisation by 18 years, a source familiar with the
intelligence said on Tuesday.

Russia has also lost almost two-thirds of its tank force, or 2,200 out
of its 3,500 pre-invasion stock, the congressional source said.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12860319/Putin-lost-nearly-90-cent-pre-invasion-army-315-000-personnel-killed-injured-war-began-according-intelligence.html
--
Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for
light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter.

On Wed, 13 Dec 2023 16:34:32 -0500
JeSSe <zo@so.org> wrote:

> Putin has lost nearly 90 per cent of his pre-invasion army with
> 315,000 personnel either killed or injured since war began, according
> to US intelligence

Yet, even with billions of dollars of western tax payer money and munitions gifted to Ukraine, Ukraine is no closer to wining this conflict.

If 90% of Russia's army is 315,000 men then Russia is waging her war with just 35,000 men.

That NATO, America, the UK, and of course Ukraine, cannot defeat an army of just 35,000 is shockingly telling.

But not really surprising given Loser Trump had to beg the Taliban, "third world savages armed only with sticks and stones", to accept America's surrender in Afghanistan.

I would love to hear US intelligence's explanation as to why NATO, America, the UK and Ukraine cannot collectively defeat an army of just 35,000. Are we simply unbelievably shit or are Russia's forces unimaginably better than ours ?

The Happy Hippy wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Dec 2023 16:34:32 -0500
> JeSSe <zo@so.org> wrote:
>
>> Putin has lost nearly 90 per cent of his pre-invasion army with
>> 315,000 personnel either killed or injured since war began, according
>> to US intelligence
>

>
> If 90% of Russia's army is 315,000 men then Russia is waging her war with just 35,000 men.
>
> That NATO, America, the UK, and of course Ukraine, cannot defeat an army of just 35,000 is shockingly telling.
>

>
> I would love to hear US intelligence's explanation as to why NATO, America, the UK and Ukraine cannot collectively defeat an army of just 35,000. Are we simply unbelievably shit or are Russia's forces unimaginably better than ours ?
>

You really are that dense, aren't you ?

From the little snippet YOU reposted:

> Putin has lost nearly 90 per cent of his pre-invasion army

Thats "pre-invasion army", as in, before the invasion.

Most of that has been obliterated, forcing Russia months ago into a
series of massive drafts and mobilizations to make up the shortfall.

It is embarrassing to have to explain this to an alleged grown man as if
you were a autistic child.

--
Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for
light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter.

On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 11:11:07 -0500
JeSSe <zo@so.org> wrote:

> The Happy Hippy wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Dec 2023 16:34:32 -0500
> > JeSSe <zo@so.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Putin has lost nearly 90 per cent of his pre-invasion army with
> >> 315,000 personnel either killed or injured since war began,
> >> according to US intelligence
> >
>
> >
> > If 90% of Russia's army is 315,000 men then Russia is waging her
> > war with just 35,000 men.
> >
> > That NATO, America, the UK, and of course Ukraine, cannot defeat an
> > army of just 35,000 is shockingly telling.
>
> >
> > I would love to hear US intelligence's explanation as to why NATO,
> > America, the UK and Ukraine cannot collectively defeat an army of
> > just 35,000. Are we simply unbelievably shit or are Russia's forces
> > unimaginably better than ours ?
>
> You really are that dense, aren't you ?
>
> From the little snippet YOU reposted:
>
> > Putin has lost nearly 90 per cent of his pre-invasion army
>
> Thats "pre-invasion army", as in, before the invasion.

I know you are retarded but that's exactly the point.

They have supposedly killed 315,000, yet are unable to defeat the 35,000 left.

Why is that ?

The Happy Hippy wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 11:11:07 -0500
> JeSSe <zo@so.org> wrote:
>
>> The Happy Hippy wrote:
>>> On Wed, 13 Dec 2023 16:34:32 -0500
>>> JeSSe <zo@so.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Putin has lost nearly 90 per cent of his pre-invasion army with
>>>> 315,000 personnel either killed or injured since war began,
>>>> according to US intelligence
>>>
>>
>>>
>>> If 90% of Russia's army is 315,000 men then Russia is waging her
>>> war with just 35,000 men.
>>>
>>> That NATO, America, the UK, and of course Ukraine, cannot defeat an
>>> army of just 35,000 is shockingly telling.
>>
>>>
>>> I would love to hear US intelligence's explanation as to why NATO,
>>> America, the UK and Ukraine cannot collectively defeat an army of
>>> just 35,000. Are we simply unbelievably shit or are Russia's forces
>>> unimaginably better than ours ?
>>
>> You really are that dense, aren't you ?
>>
>> From the little snippet YOU reposted:
>>
>>> Putin has lost nearly 90 per cent of his pre-invasion army
>>
>> Thats "pre-invasion army", as in, before the invasion.
>
> Yes I suck Putin cock as hard as hamas, got a problem with that ?

No, not really.

--
Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for
light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter.

On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 14:22:26 -0500
JeSSe <zo@so.org> wrote:

> Yes I suck Putin cock as hard as hamas, got a problem with that ?

Your words not mine.

And it's true, you really did used to suck Putin's dick, before Putin attacked Ukraine and you discovered Ukraine had real Nazis and swung from supporting Putin and his sissy Nazis to supporting Ukraine's real Nazis.

The Hamas Whore Hippy wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 14:22:26 -0500
> JeSSe <zo@so.org> wrote:
>
>> Yes I suck Putin cock as hard as hamas, got a problem with that ?
>
> My words, not yours

Yeah no shit, I already said I don't care - To each their own, I always
say !
Everyone can plainly see that you are a total putin/hamas whore, and
have been saying so for DECADES.
--
Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for
light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter.

On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 16:06:01 -0500
JeSSe <zo@so.org> wrote:

>> Yes I suck Putin cock as hard as hamas, got a problem with that ?
>>
>> My words, not yours
>
> Yeah no shit, I already said I don't care - To each their own, I
> always say !

Same here. You can suck whatever cock you want. You've sucked Putin's cock, "JOO BOY" Zelernsky's cock, so it's not surprising you now suck Israeli cock, complain about anti-Semitism and 'threats against Jews'.

Would I be right in guessing that when you meet up with the White Supremacist clan, your Aryan Brotherhood, you don't mention you are now a full paid-up "kike cocksucker" ?

The Happy Hippy wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 16:06:01 -0500
> JeSSe <zo@so.org> wrote:
>
>>> Yes I suck Putin cock as hard as hamas, got a problem with that ?
>>>
>>> My words, not yours
>>
>> Yeah no shit, I already said I don't care - To each their own, I
>> always say !
>
> suck cock sucked Putin's cock, cock, cock,
>
> cocksucker" ?
>

Switched from cunts to cocks, interesting dynamics here from a vulgar ,
confused [and CHILDLESS] nigger

--
Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for
light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter.