The name for Em and Ed's venture. It's a good subject for discussion, as
it _is_ important.

(I'm rather pleased that - if I've understood correctly - Emma seems to
intend to take exactly the same courses as Ed, and be a full hands-on
person, regardless of gender.)

I think it's best they avoid anything with Grundy in it.

variations on Em and Ed are _probably_ not a good idea if they have big
ambitions (and it's good to have those) - Em'n'Ed, Em & Ed, emaned,
etc., all do sound like a two-person operation (I know it is, but!).
Might be good if they were doing home cooking or something. With the
possible exception of "E & E".

Something with Ambridge maybe? I rather like ATS - Ambridge Tree
Services - though they might get some trouble if they tried that! But
other variations ... Ambridge Forestry? Though that could be
misunderstood as involving planting.

I always now think anything George suggests has an ulterior motive, but
his "Ultimate ..." isn't bad, except: it's a long way from the beginning
of the alphabet, so won't appear early in any alphabetical listing, but
isn't near enough the end to appear at the end.

Anyway, I thought it would be a good subject for UMRA. (And on-topic for
once!)
--
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

"Victory does not bring with it a sense of triumph - rather the dull numbness
of relief..." - Cecil Beaton quoted by Anthony Horowitz, RT 2015/1/3-9

On Sun, 14 Apr 2024 01:23:22 +0100, "J. P. Gilliver"
<G6JPG@255soft.uk> wrote:

>The name for Em and Ed's venture. It's a good subject for discussion, as
>it _is_ important.
>
>(I'm rather pleased that - if I've understood correctly - Emma seems to
>intend to take exactly the same courses as Ed, and be a full hands-on
>person, regardless of gender.)
>
>I think it's best they avoid anything with Grundy in it.
>
>variations on Em and Ed are _probably_ not a good idea if they have big
>ambitions (and it's good to have those) - Em'n'Ed, Em & Ed, emaned,
>etc., all do sound like a two-person operation (I know it is, but!).
>Might be good if they were doing home cooking or something. With the
>possible exception of "E & E".
>
>Something with Ambridge maybe? I rather like ATS - Ambridge Tree
>Services - though they might get some trouble if they tried that! But
>other variations ... Ambridge Forestry? Though that could be
>misunderstood as involving planting.
>
>I always now think anything George suggests has an ulterior motive, but
>his "Ultimate ..." isn't bad, except: it's a long way from the beginning
>of the alphabet, so won't appear early in any alphabetical listing, but
>isn't near enough the end to appear at the end.
>
>Anyway, I thought it would be a good subject for UMRA. (And on-topic for
>once!)

Grunwald?
Mr. Tree?
Hackett & Burn?

N.

In message <04vn1j15b4ep7oeh7ico5rvgkekfmf1ca1@4ax.com> at Sun, 14 Apr
2024 17:01:19, Nick Odell <nickodell49@yahoo.ca> writes
>On Sun, 14 Apr 2024 01:23:22 +0100, "J. P. Gilliver"
><G6JPG@255soft.uk> wrote:
>
>>The name for Em and Ed's venture. It's a good subject for discussion, as
>>it _is_ important.
[]
>>possible exception of "E & E".
[]
>Grunwald?
>Mr. Tree?
>Hackett & Burn?
>
>N.

I rather like Grunwald!

Makes me think something involving Ent might be good. But probably not,
as the reference is probably too obscure! Still, "Ambridge Ent-erprises"
might be nice ...
--
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

The bottleneck is always at the top of the bottle. - Attributed to Peter
Drucker (re management), by @Eric_Partaker 2023-7-14

J. P. Gilliver <G6JPG@255soft.uk> wrote:
> In message <04vn1j15b4ep7oeh7ico5rvgkekfmf1ca1@4ax.com> at Sun, 14 Apr
> 2024 17:01:19, Nick Odell <nickodell49@yahoo.ca> writes
>> On Sun, 14 Apr 2024 01:23:22 +0100, "J. P. Gilliver"
>> <G6JPG@255soft.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> The name for Em and Ed's venture. It's a good subject for discussion, as
>>> it _is_ important.
> []
>>> possible exception of "E & E".
> []
>> Grunwald?
>> Mr. Tree?
>> Hackett & Burn?
>>
>> N.
>
> I rather like Grunwald!
>
> Makes me think something involving Ent might be good. But probably not,
> as the reference is probably too obscure! Still, "Ambridge Ent-erprises"
> might be nice ...

Ents’ Enterprises. ?

--
Toodle Pip, Mike McMillan

In message <uvimc8$5ua5$1@dont-email.me> at Mon, 15 Apr 2024 07:52:40,
Mike McMillan <toodle.pip1@virginmedia.com> writes
>J. P. Gilliver <G6JPG@255soft.uk> wrote:
[]
>> Makes me think something involving Ent might be good. But probably not,
>> as the reference is probably too obscure! Still, "Ambridge Ent-erprises"
>> might be nice ...
>
>Ents’ Enterprises. ?
>
Ambridge Ents?
--
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

Write a question, using "why".

Why?

On 15/04/2024 11:32, J. P. Gilliver wrote:
> In message <uvimc8$5ua5$1@dont-email.me> at Mon, 15 Apr 2024 07:52:40,
> Mike McMillan <toodle.pip1@virginmedia.com> writes
>> J. P. Gilliver <G6JPG@255soft.uk> wrote:
> []
>>> Makes me think something involving Ent might be good. But probably not,
>>> as the reference is probably too obscure! Still, "Ambridge Ent-erprises"
>>> might be nice ...
>>
>> Ents’ Enterprises. ?
>>
> Ambridge Ents?

The ArBorSet (capitalisation important)

john