https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FyISof8X0Acklxg?format=jpg&name=small

swldx...@gmail.com <swldxer1958@gmail.com> wrote:
> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FyISof8X0Acklxg?format=jpg&name=small

You conveniently forgot to include the 1.5m safety zone for the cyclists.

--
Spike

On Thursday, June 8, 2023 at 10:09:25 PM UTC+1, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FyISof8X0Acklxg?format=jpg&name=small

Highway Code revised: Cyclists given priority in new rules as drivers ordered to keep 1.5-metres distance when overtaking

Cars must leave at least 1.5 metres room when passing bicycles - while revised guidance also says "it can be safer" for cyclists to ride two abreast.

Spike <Aero.Spike@mail.invalid> wrote:
> swldx...@gmail.com <swldxer1958@gmail.com> wrote:
>> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FyISof8X0Acklxg?format=jpg&name=small
>
> You conveniently forgot to include the 1.5m safety zone for the cyclists.

A cyclist falsely claimed that “[The Highway Code] is silent on group
riding protocol”

Rule 66: Be considerate of the needs of other road users when riding in
groups. You can ride two abreast and it can be safer to do so, particularly
in larger groups or when accompanying children or less experienced riders.
Be aware of drivers behind you, and allow them to overtake (e.g. by moving
into single file or stopping) when you feel it is safe to let them do so.

HTH

Interesting that untrained, untested, and unlicensed cyclists are allowed
to make judgements as to when it is safe to let drivers overtake.

--
Spike

On Thursday, June 8, 2023 at 10:09:25 PM UTC+1, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FyISof8X0Acklxg?format=jpg&name=small

Under revised guidance cyclists will be given priority, and a hierarchy of road users will be introduced.

https://www.admiral.com/magazine/news/highway-code-revised-for-all-road-users

swldx...@gmail.com <swldxer1958@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thursday, June 8, 2023 at 10:09:25 PM UTC+1, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
>> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FyISof8X0Acklxg?format=jpg&name=small
>
> Under revised guidance cyclists will be given priority, and a hierarchy
> of road users will be introduced.
>
> https://www.admiral.com/magazine/news/highway-code-revised-for-all-road-users
>

Yet the pedestrian, on a pavement, placed in fear of her life by a cyclist
who should not have been there, was jailed when the cyclist lost control of
her bike causing her own death.

Simply put, the hierarchy places those road users who are most at risk in the event of a collision at the top of a ‘scale’ or hierarchy. Pedestrians are at the top, because their lack of protection makes them extremely vulnerable in an incident. Next, we have cyclists, horse riders and motorcyclists. Below that we have car and van drivers, and at that leaves us with bus and lorry drivers at the bottom.

So far, so good. But there’s one more bit to understand – the lower you are in the hierarchy, the more harm you and your vehicle can cause. This means you have to be particularly careful around more vulnerable road users. At this point, you might think: ‘Surely motorists are already more mindful of pedestrians, cyclists, and other vulnerable road users, right?’

Well, of course, many people are mindful – just as many people drive sensibly and safely. But like all these things, there’s always room to improve. The new rules (also known as “H rules”) are designed to remind everyone who uses our roads how important it is to take responsibility for their own safety as well as the safety of others. In short, if we’re all looking after each other (and ourselves), then our roads should become safer places.
Where can I find the new rules?

Good question! You’ll be pleased to learn that you don’t have to look very far for them – they’re all at the front of the latest Highway Code.

swldx...@gmail.com <swldxer1958@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thursday, June 8, 2023 at 10:09:25 PM UTC+1, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
>> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FyISof8X0Acklxg?format=jpg&name=small

> Under revised guidance cyclists will be given priority, and a hierarchy
> of road users will be introduced.

> https://www.admiral.com/magazine/news/highway-code-revised-for-all-road-users

When is this to be brought in, then?

🙄

--
Spike

Hierarchy of road users – undoubtedly the biggest change to the Highway Code is the new hierarchy of road users. The idea is that those who are deemed most vulnerable, or at risk, on the roads are placed at the very top of the hierarchy. The government deems pedestrians, cyclists, horse riders and motorcyclists as the most likely to be injured from an accident, and so this is the order of the hierarchy. It means that those in cars, vans and other vehicles now have a ‘greater responsibility’ to protect these vulnerable people when on the road.

Giving way and crossing the road – the updated Highway Code clarifies a number of points on giving way and crossing the road. Firstly, it states that when people are crossing the road, or waiting to cross at a junction, traffic should give way. If people have already begun crossing, and traffic is looking to turn into the road, the pedestrian always has the priority. And finally, all road users must give way to people on zebra and parallel crossings.

Cyclists’ position on the road – more guidance has been offered in regards to how cyclists should position themselves when on the road. When cycling alone, they’re advised to position themselves in the centre of the road when it’s quiet, in slow-moving traffic, at junctions or on narrow roads. When cycling in a group, they’re advised to ride two abreast as it’s safer to do so.

On Saturday, 10 June 2023 at 21:00:37 UTC+1, Brian wrote:
> swldx...@gmail.com <swldx...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thursday, June 8, 2023 at 10:09:25 PM UTC+1, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FyISof8X0Acklxg?format=jpg&name=small
> >
> > Under revised guidance cyclists will be given priority, and a hierarchy
> > of road users will be introduced.
> >
> > https://www.admiral.com/magazine/news/highway-code-revised-for-all-road-users
> >
> Yet the pedestrian, on a pavement, placed in fear of her life by a cyclist
> who should not have been there, was jailed when the cyclist lost control of
> her bike causing her own death.

According to Spike pedestrians are untrained, untaxed and unlicensed.

A cyclist falsely claimed that “[The Highway Code] is silent on group
riding protocol”

Rule 66: Be considerate of the needs of other road users when riding in
groups. You can ride two abreast and it can be safer to do so, particularly
in larger groups or when accompanying children or less experienced riders.
Be aware of drivers behind you, and allow them to overtake (e.g. by moving
into single file or stopping) when you feel it is safe to let them do so.

“….or stopping…” Some hopes!!!

swldx...@gmail.com <swldxer1958@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hierarchy of road users – undoubtedly the biggest change to the
> Highway Code is the new hierarchy of road users. The idea is that those
> who are deemed most vulnerable, or at risk, on the roads are placed at
> the very top of the hierarchy. The government deems pedestrians,
> cyclists, horse riders and motorcyclists as the most likely to be injured
> from an accident, and so this is the order of the hierarchy. It means
> that those in cars, vans and other vehicles now have a ‘greater
> responsibility’ to protect these vulnerable people when on the road.
>
> Giving way and crossing the road – the updated Highway Code clarifies
> a number of points on giving way and crossing the road. Firstly, it
> states that when people are crossing the road, or waiting to cross at a
> junction, traffic should give way. If people have already begun crossing,
> and traffic is looking to turn into the road, the pedestrian always has
> the priority. And finally, all road users must give way to people on
> zebra and parallel crossings.
>
> Cyclists’ position on the road – more guidance has been offered in
> regards to how cyclists should position themselves when on the road. When
> cycling alone, they’re advised to position themselves in the centre of
> the road when it’s quiet, in slow-moving traffic, at junctions or on
> narrow roads. When cycling in a group, they’re advised to ride two
> abreast as it’s safer to do so.
>

--
Spike

On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 8:03:43 AM UTC+1, Mike Collins wrote:

> According to Spike pedestrians are untrained, untaxed and unlicensed.

Spike who? The one in my killfile with the "Nugent" entity?

On Sunday, 11 June 2023 at 10:36:03 UTC+1, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 8:03:43 AM UTC+1, Mike Collins wrote:
>
> > According to Spike pedestrians are untrained, untaxed and unlicensed.
> Spike who? The one in my killfile with the "Nugent" entity?

They are the same 'person'. ECT is not an exact science.

On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 4:29:27 PM UTC+1, Mike Collins wrote:
> On Sunday, 11 June 2023 at 10:36:03 UTC+1, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 8:03:43 AM UTC+1, Mike Collins wrote:
> >
> > > According to Spike pedestrians are untrained, untaxed and unlicensed.
> > Spike who? The one in my killfile with the "Nugent" entity?
> They are the same 'person'. ECT is not an exact science.

They'll never beat "Judith's" 250 sockpuppets.

Mike Collins <cmike8828@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, 11 June 2023 at 10:36:03 UTC+1, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 8:03:43 AM UTC+1, Mike Collins wrote:
>>
>>> According to Spike pedestrians are untrained, untaxed and unlicensed.
>> Spike who? The one in my killfile with the "Nugent" entity?
>
> They are the same 'person'. ECT is not an exact science.

Neither is the fabulous ‘Google groups kill file’.

--
Spike

On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 4:41:20 PM UTC+1, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 4:29:27 PM UTC+1, Mike Collins wrote:
> > On Sunday, 11 June 2023 at 10:36:03 UTC+1, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 8:03:43 AM UTC+1, Mike Collins wrote:
> > >
> > > > According to Spike pedestrians are untrained, untaxed and unlicensed.
> > > Spike who? The one in my killfile with the "Nugent" entity?
> > They are the same 'person'. ECT is not an exact science.
> They'll never beat "Judith's" 250 sockpuppets.

Marie
Judith <judit...@live.co.uk> (1946 posts 18/06/08 - 17/02/09)
keith.hill <m...@privacy.net> (23 posts 07/07/08 - 09/07/08)
freddy <m...@privacy.net> (3 posts 09/07/08 - 17/01/09)
sandra.york <m...@privacy.net> (2 posts 09/07/08)
will smith <m...@privacy.net> (8 posts 09/07/08 - 10/07/08)
barker <m...@privacy.net> (6 posts 10/07/08 - 13/08/08)
judithsmith <judit...@invalidlive.co.uk> (1 post 18/07/08)
cager <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 21/07/08)
steve.trent <m...@privacy.net> (6 posts 21/07/08 - 22/07/08)
billy <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 21/07/08)
Martin Danndy <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 23/07/08)
Mark White <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 23/07/08)
judith <m...@privacy.net> (2 posts 24/07/08 - 23/12/08)
billy <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 25/07/08)
smithy <m...@privacy.net> (2 posts 25/07/08)
Richard Jones <m...@privacy.net> (2 posts 31/07/08 - 01/08/08)
walter.smith <m...@privacy.net> (4 posts 02/08/08 - 13/09/08)
Jugger <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 02/08/08)
robert <m...@privacy.net> (5 posts 02/08/08 - 31/07/11)
Mark <m...@privacy.net> (3 posts 03/08/08 - 07/06/10)
DaveSmith <m...@privacy.net> (4 posts 04/08/08 - 05/08/08)
Vic <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 06/08/08)
HarryHill <m...@privacy.net> (9 posts 06/08/08 - 24/08/08)
minter <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 07/08/08)
dolly <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 11/08/08)
miller <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 15/08/08)
Andy Pike <m...@privacy.net> (2 posts 16/08/08 - 18/08/08)
Richard Hyndes <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 17/08/08)
craven <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 21/08/08)
Ginger <m...@privacy.net> (2 posts 23/08/08 - 29/01/09)
wanker lee <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 30/08/08)
rover <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 01/09/08)
andy smith <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 13/09/08)
I've told you - I am NOT Phil Lee <m...@privacy.net> (5 posts 13/09/08 -
02/10/08)
John Gates <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 02/10/08)
Andy.Nunn <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 02/10/08)
Guy - don't feed the trolls <m...@privacy.net> (2 posts 02/10/08)
Guy - you are still feeding them <m...@privacy.invalid.net> (2 posts
02/10/08)
judithsmith <judit...@live.invalid.co.uk> (1 post 05/10/08)
colinlunn <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 12/10/08)
henry root <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 12/10/08)
margaretsmith <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 13/10/08)
Harry Roberts <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 19/10/08)
Richard <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 22/10/08)
Hills <m...@privacy.net> (6 posts 23/10/08 - 02/11/08)
udith <judit...@live.co.uk> (1 post 25/10/08)
Barry Turner <m...@privacy.net> (3 posts 22/11/08 - 26/11/08)
Viv Green <m...@privacy.net> (4 posts 28/11/08 - 29/11/08)
judith smith <judit...@live.co.uk> (1989 posts 29/11/08 - 14/01/10)
j smith <judit...@removethislive.co.uk> (1 post 06/12/08)
Uncle Ben <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 08/12/08)
jsmith <judit...@deadorlive.co.uk> (1 post 08/12/08)
Trevor Frogg <m...@privacy.net> (7 posts 10/12/08)
Richard Clarke <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 11/12/08)
Steve Gable <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 15/12/08)
jsmith <m...@privacy.net> (4 posts 17/12/08 - 26/01/09)
js <m...@privacy.net> (34 posts 17/12/08 - 23/12/08)
js1 <m...@privacy.net> (3 posts 18/12/08 - 19/12/08)
js2 <m...@privacy.net> (3 posts 18/12/08 - 22/12/08)
js3 <m...@privacy.net> (2 posts 18/12/08 - 19/12/08)
js4 <m...@privacy.net> (2 posts 18/12/08)
Judith <m...@privacy.net> (4 posts 19/12/08 - 20/12/08)
jas <m...@privacy.net> (5 posts 19/12/08 - 20/12/08)
Judith <m...@privacy.net> (3 posts 19/12/08)
jks <m...@privacy.net> (5 posts 19/12/08 - 25/12/08)
J_Smith <m...@privacy.net> (2 posts 19/12/08 - 20/12/08)
J_Smith <m...@privacy.net> (2 posts 19/12/08)
JSmith. <m...@privacy.net> (2 posts 19/12/08)
Judith.Smith <m...@privacy.net> (3 posts 19/12/08 - 25/12/08)
Jud.Smith <m...@privacy.net> (3 posts 19/12/08 - 22/12/08)
jsmith <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 19/12/08)
Round Robin <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 20/12/08)
j <jsm...@privacy.net> (2 posts 20/12/08 - 22/12/08)
not Guy <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 20/12/08)
Jolly polly <knee...@aton.con> (92 posts 22/12/08 - 23/11/11)
js <m...@pprivacy.net> (1 post 23/12/08)
jas <jas...@privacy.net> (4 posts 23/12/08)
judith_and_taylor <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 23/12/08)
jsmith_taylor <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 23/12/08)
taylorandsmith <m...@privacy.net> (2 posts 23/12/08)
smithandtaylor <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 23/12/08)
polly <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 24/12/08)
judithsmithneetaylor <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 24/12/08)
Smithandtaylor@privacy Net <smithan...@privacy.net> (2 posts
24/12/08 - 26/12/08)
Taylorandsmith@privacy Net <taylora...@privacy.net> (3 posts
24/12/08)
Taylor Smith Me@privacy Net <taylor...@privacy.net> (1 post
24/12/08)
Jsmithtaylor@privacy Net <jsmith...@privacy.net> (1 post 24/12/08)
Taylosrandsmith@privacy Net <taylosr...@privacy.net> (1 post
26/12/08)
Jusithtaylor@privacy Net <jusith...@privacy.net> (1 post 26/12/08)
Taylorsmith@privacy Net <taylo...@privacy.net> (1 post 26/12/08)
Judithtaylorsmith@privacy Net <judithta...@privacy.net> (140
posts 26/12/08 - 12/02/09)
Jolly Polly <knee...@aton.com> (144 posts 27/12/08 - 25/04/10)
Judithtaylorsmith@hotmailinvalid Com
<judithta...@hotmailinvalid.com> (1 post 30/12/08)
derbydale <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 04/01/09)
vinny <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 05/01/09)
doggy <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 08/01/09)
Judithtaylorsmith1@privacy Net <judithtay...@privacy.net> (4
posts 12/01/09 - 25/01/09)
Judithtaylorsmith3@privacy Net <judithtay...@privacy.net> (4
posts 14/01/09 - 30/01/09)
Judith Taylorsmith@privacy Net <judith.t...@privacy.net> (1
post 15/01/09)
roven <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 17/01/09)
Judithtaylorsmith@privacy Nets <judithta...@privacy.nets> (1
post 18/01/09)
ziggy <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 18/01/09)
Judithtaylorsmithe@privacy Net <judithtay...@privacy.net> (1
post 24/01/09)
Judithtaylorsmith5@privacy Net <judithtay...@privacy.net> (1
post 24/01/09)
Judithtaylorsmith9@privacy Net <judithtay...@privacy.net> (3
posts 24/01/09 - 08/02/09)
Judithtaylorsmith7@privacy Net <judithtay...@privacy.net> (1
post 24/01/09)
Judithtaylorsmith4@privacy Net <judithtay...@privacy.net> (1
post 25/01/09)
Judithtaylorsmith0@privacy Net <judithtay...@privacy.net> (1
post 25/01/09)
Judith&taylorsmith@privacy Net <judith&ta...@privacy.net> (1
post 28/01/09)
aston <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 29/01/09)
andy.moon <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 30/01/09)
stratford <m...@privacy.net> (2 posts 30/01/09 - 31/01/09)
mr jones <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 31/01/09)
rufus <m...@privacy.net> (9 posts 31/01/09 - 01/02/09)
mr softy <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 31/01/09)
Judithtaylorsmitha@privacy Net <judithtay...@privacy.net> (1
post 01/02/09)
colinhill <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 01/02/09)
flipper <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 01/02/09)
banker <m...@privacy.net> (2 posts 02/02/09)
relevant <m...@privacy.net> (7 posts 03/02/09)
handy <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 03/02/09)
raven <m...@privacy.net> (3 posts 03/02/09)
bike99 <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 03/02/09)
dingo <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 03/02/09)
roundabout <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 03/02/09)
Jdithtaylorsmith@privacy Net <jdithtay...@privacy.net> (1 post
04/02/09)
mrssmithslittlegirl <m...@privacy.net> (2 posts 06/02/09 - 08/02/09)
Judith's best friend <jbestf...@privacy.net> (9 posts 08/02/09 -
12/02/09)
Bob Jones <robert...@invalidlive.co.uk> (1 post 09/02/09)
radical <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 09/02/09)
js the truth will out <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 09/02/09)
james lowe <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 09/02/09)
ruffles <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 09/02/09)
Ian.Smith's.a.liar <m...@privacy.net> (2 posts 12/02/09)
IanSmithsaliar <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 12/02/09)
not.ian.smith <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 12/02/09)
Judithsmith@live Co Uk <judit...@live.co.uk> (1 post 12/02/09)
Jenny Hill <jen...@invalidlive.co.uk> (1 post 15/02/09)
Judith <judithsmith@live Co Uk>-- <judith <judit...@live.co.uk>-->
(1 post 16/02/09)
Bob <robert...@live.co.uk> (3 posts 18/02/09)
andywright <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 24/02/09)
judith's auto response <notj...@live.co.uk> (9 posts 06/03/09 -
08/03/09)
Julian <m...@privacy.net> (5 posts 08/03/09 - 08/05/09)
Clarification@live Co Uk <clarif...@live.co.uk> (6 posts 09/04/09
- 18/04/09)
Judith Mary Smith <judith...@live.co.uk> (1 post 21/05/09)
Judith M Smith <judith...@live.co.uk> (1817 posts 21/05/09 -
14/12/09)
Judith M Smith <judith...@live.co.uk> (2 posts 22/05/09)
Lou Knee <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 25/05/09)
Lou Knee <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 25/05/09)
jms <moderat...@live.co.uk> (1023 posts 26/05/09 - 10/12/09)
Pip Ryder <pipr...@gmail.com> (65 posts 06/07/09 - 05/08/09)
Trevor <trevorhar...@hotmail.com> (9 posts 08/10/09 - 31/10/10)
Farmer Giles <gilez...@live.co.uk> (1 post 28/10/09)
Sarah <m...@privacy.net> (2 posts 23/11/09 - 24/11/09)
Frank Miller <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 24/11/09)
Bollen <m...@privacy.net> (4 posts 05/01/10)
JMS <jmsmi...@live.co.uk> (2199 posts 14/01/10 - 13/01/11)
Rob <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 27/03/10)
Ruper Bear's Brother <m...@privacy.net> (3 posts 22/05/10)
David Green <david...@live.co.uk.invalid> (1 post 12/07/10)
random access <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 19/10/10)
Mr Protester <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 30/10/10)
Judith <jmsmi...@hotmail.co.uk> (3320 posts 16/01/11 - 22/11/11)
Yorky <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 17/01/11)
Micky Frost <micky...@live.co.uk> (2 posts 03/04/11)
Simon_mason@rocketmail Com <simon...@rocketmail.com> (1 post
31/05/11)
Greentable <m...@privacy.net> (7 posts 25/07/11 - 30/07/11)
Marie <m...@privacy.net> (10 posts 25/07/11 - 19/09/11)
Trevor <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 01/08/11)
The Cycle Stat <m...@privacy.net> (2 posts 04/08/11)
39 <m...@privacy.net> (2 posts 05/08/11)
39 <m...@privacy.ne> (1 post 05/08/11)
Tony Grant <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 06/08/11)
Tony Grant (partner of Judith Smith) <m...@privacy.net> (1 post
07/08/11)
Tramp <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 10/08/11)
grimbo <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 13/08/11)
Walter <m...@privacy.net> (3 posts 14/08/11 - 04/09/11)
dreadlock <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 15/08/11)
Correction <m...@privacy.net> (7 posts 15/08/11 - 06/09/11)
Mr Moonlight <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 21/08/11)
query <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 22/08/11)
Graham Jones <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 22/08/11)
SMJ Reversal <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 25/08/11)
The Mason Monitor <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 28/08/11)
Tigger <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 29/08/11)
MM <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 29/08/11)
newcomer <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 29/08/11)
Janet <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 29/08/11)
Mr MM <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 30/08/11)
andre <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 30/08/11)
He is quite daft <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 30/08/11)
GV <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 30/08/11)
Maria <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 30/08/11)
BP Watch <m...@privacy.net> (2 posts 31/08/11)
Mr Counter <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 01/09/11)
Raymond Tring <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 03/09/11)
Jill <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 03/09/11)
Lichen <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 03/09/11)
maureen <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 05/09/11)
Griff <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 05/09/11)
Gill <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 05/09/11)
Raymond <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 05/09/11)
shandy <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 21/09/11)
Statto (JMS) <m...@privacy.net> (7 posts 30/09/11 - 01/11/11)
Mr Woo <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 05/10/11)
graham <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 08/10/11)
clarification <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 11/10/11)
OhSoSimpleSimon <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 21/10/11)
Statto <m...@privacy.net> (6 posts 22/10/11 - 23/10/11)
Guy Chapman <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 23/10/11)
Huge Magnet <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 28/10/11)
Pam <m...@privacy.net> (1 post 02/11/11)

On 08/06/2023 10:27 pm, Spike wrote:
> swldx...@gmail.com <swldxer1958@gmail.com> wrote:
>> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FyISof8X0Acklxg?format=jpg&name=small
>
> You conveniently forgot to include the 1.5m safety zone for the cyclists...

....each.

Oddly, they (chav-cyclists) *never* allow that 1.5m "safety" zone when
passing vehicles when stopped at traffic lights, etc.

On 10/06/2023 09:03 pm, Simon Mason wrote:

> Simply put, the hierarchy places those road users who are most at risk in the event of a collision at the top of a ‘scale’ or hierarchy. Pedestrians are at the top, because their lack of protection makes them extremely vulnerable in an incident witha chav-cyclist on a footway. Next, we have chav-cyclists, horse riders and motorcyclists. Below that we have car and van drivers, and at that leaves us with bus and lorry drivers at the bottom.
>
> So far, so good. But there’s one more bit to understand – the lower you are in the hierarchy, the more harm you and your vehicle can cause. This means you have to be particularly careful around more vulnerable road users. At this point, you might think: ‘Surely motorists are already more mindful of pedestrians, chav-cyclists, and other vulnerable road users, right?’
>
> Well, of course, many people are mindful – just as many people drive sensibly and safely. But like all these things, there’s always room to improve. The new rules (also known as “H rules”) are designed to remind everyone who uses our roads how important it is to take responsibility for their own safety as well as the safety of others. In short, if we’re all looking after each other (and ourselves), then our roads should become safer places.
> Where can I find the new rules?
>
> Good question! You’ll be pleased to learn that you don’t have to look very far for them – they’re all at the front of the latest Highway Code.
>

Hypocrites united in action.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FyXAORjWwAIShUL?format=jpg&name=900x900

A cyclist falsely claimed that “[The Highway Code] is silent on group
riding protocol”

Rule 66: Be considerate of the needs of other road users when riding in
groups. You can ride two abreast and it can be safer to do so, particularly
in larger groups or when accompanying children or less experienced riders.
Be aware of drivers behind you, and allow them to overtake (e.g. by moving
into single file or stopping) when you feel it is safe to let them do so.

“….or stopping…” Some hopes!!!

--
Spike

Hypocrites united in action.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FyXAORjWwAIShUL?format=jpg&name=900x900

On 11/06/2023 10:36 am, swldx...@gmail.com wrote:

> On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 8:03:43 AM UTC+1, Mike Collins wrote:
>
>> According to Spike pedestrians are untrained, untaxed and unlicensed.
>
> Spike who? The one in my killfile with the "Nugent" entity?

The ones whose posts you keep answering repeatedly, you mean?

:-)

On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 8:03:43 AM UTC+1, Mike Collins wrote:

> According to Spike pedestrians are untrained, untaxed and unlicensed.

Sounds like a pound shop Mr Arsehole.