Rocksolid Light

Welcome to Rocksolid Light

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

The meek will inherit the earth -- if that's OK with you.


aus+uk / uk.sport.cricket / Re: Remember the name - Tazeem Chaudry Ali

SubjectAuthor
* Remember the name - Tazeem Chaudry AliRichard Dixon
`* Re: Remember the name - Tazeem Chaudry AliRichard Dixon
 `* Re: Remember the name - Tazeem Chaudry AliMad Hamish
  `* Re: Remember the name - Tazeem Chaudry Alijack fredricks
   `* Re: Remember the name - Tazeem Chaudry AliMad Hamish
    `* Re: Remember the name - Tazeem Chaudry Alijack fredricks
     `* Re: Remember the name - Tazeem Chaudry Alijack fredricks
      `* Re: Remember the name - Tazeem Chaudry Alijack fredricks
       `* Re: Remember the name - Tazeem Chaudry AliMad Hamish
        `* Re: Remember the name - Tazeem Chaudry Alijack fredricks
         `* Re: Remember the name - Tazeem Chaudry AliMad Hamish
          +* Re: Remember the name - Tazeem Chaudry Alimax.it
          |+* Re: Remember the name - Tazeem Chaudry Alijack fredricks
          ||`* Re: Remember the name - Tazeem Chaudry Alimax.it
          || `* Re: Remember the name - Tazeem Chaudry Alijack fredricks
          ||  `* Re: Remember the name - Tazeem Chaudry Alimax.it
          ||   `- Re: Remember the name - Tazeem Chaudry Alijack fredricks
          |`* Re: Remember the name - Tazeem Chaudry AliDavid North
          | `* Re: Remember the name - Tazeem Chaudry Alijack fredricks
          |  `* Re: Remember the name - Tazeem Chaudry AliDavid North
          |   `* Re: Remember the name - Tazeem Chaudry Alijack fredricks
          |    `* Re: Remember the name - Tazeem Chaudry AliDavid North
          |     `- Re: Remember the name - Tazeem Chaudry Alijack fredricks
          `* Re: Remember the name - Tazeem Chaudry Alijack fredricks
           +* Re: Remember the name - Tazeem Chaudry AliMad Hamish
           |`- Re: Remember the name - Tazeem Chaudry Alijack fredricks
           `* Re: Remember the name - Tazeem Chaudry AliDavid North
            `- Re: Remember the name - Tazeem Chaudry Alijack fredricks

Pages:12
Re: Remember the name - Tazeem Chaudry Ali

<462fba05-192c-49d4-ac1a-691ad0546f61n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=29758&group=uk.sport.cricket#29758

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.sport.cricket
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1653:b0:42c:c3d:21bb with SMTP id y19-20020a05622a165300b0042c0c3d21bbmr247129qtj.5.1707133627624;
Mon, 05 Feb 2024 03:47:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6902:2208:b0:dc6:f877:ea7b with SMTP id
dm8-20020a056902220800b00dc6f877ea7bmr2094811ybb.9.1707133627416; Mon, 05 Feb
2024 03:47:07 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.network!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: uk.sport.cricket
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 03:47:07 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <l2bv9nFa0jiU1@mid.individual.net>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=59.101.188.101; posting-account=4Arn9AoAAABp1jqIZ1FDiINYowPTi37Z
NNTP-Posting-Host: 59.101.188.101
References: <ttssri50f111tj0pjof7kij119n84drmqr@4ax.com> <7176ef20-214c-4786-a19a-d67a5cc8de3bn@googlegroups.com>
<579urih8erntmlmkk5aj2e25dj26pki586@4ax.com> <fff763a4-c979-4d9a-829f-42965a366d22n@googlegroups.com>
<5b57ed45-8ad8-4af3-a700-0322f1d6acafn@googlegroups.com> <fe20eabe-c218-4d9b-b9f2-f53089292511n@googlegroups.com>
<eo1vrihcpqpk0loratnqcqm3jgbeiabe27@4ax.com> <b9dc81e4-d617-41fa-9569-0abb80aeda20n@googlegroups.com>
<7s6vrih6sis4cuap60anas1n8mssm6nlal@4ax.com> <vk8vri98192l4ek060q514a6k8pbilir9o@4ax.com>
<l2bru1F9m89U1@mid.individual.net> <414806d0-7839-4f25-a0dd-69703b7b8ff2n@googlegroups.com>
<l2bv9nFa0jiU1@mid.individual.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <462fba05-192c-49d4-ac1a-691ad0546f61n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Remember the name - Tazeem Chaudry Ali
From: jzfredricks@gmail.com (jack fredricks)
Injection-Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2024 11:47:07 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 2995
 by: jack fredricks - Mon, 5 Feb 2024 11:47 UTC

On Monday, February 5, 2024 at 9:32:11 PM UTC+10, David North wrote:
> On 05/02/2024 10:51, jack fredricks wrote:
> > On Monday, February 5, 2024 at 8:34:49 PM UTC+10, David North wrote:
> >> The fielder can say that, but the umpire is not obliged to take his word
> >> for it.
> >
> > Obliged? Sure. They're not obliged to do anything, and can make bad calls as much as they want.
> >
> > My example of a fielder saying "I didn't think the ball was dead" is just an example of actions that might make an umpire decide that ONE, and only one is needed, fielder thought the ball was still alive.
> Yes, _might_. That's a bit different from 'a fielder can say "I thought
> it wasn't dead" which means it isn't.'

Talking in "mights" is silly. The range of mights is very broad.
I say if an umpire gets an indication one player, in that kind of scenario, acts as if they think the ball is alive then an umpire SHOULD consider the ball to still be alive. (obviously excluding events that make the ball automatically dead eg a boundary).

I'm not disputing that an umpire can call the ball dead any time they want. They have that ultimate power.

Re: Remember the name - Tazeem Chaudry Ali

<l2cs33FerjjU1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=29766&group=uk.sport.cricket#29766

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.sport.cricket
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: nospam@lane-farm.fsnet.co.uk (David North)
Newsgroups: uk.sport.cricket
Subject: Re: Remember the name - Tazeem Chaudry Ali
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 19:43:30 +0000
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <l2cs33FerjjU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <ttssri50f111tj0pjof7kij119n84drmqr@4ax.com>
<7176ef20-214c-4786-a19a-d67a5cc8de3bn@googlegroups.com>
<579urih8erntmlmkk5aj2e25dj26pki586@4ax.com>
<fff763a4-c979-4d9a-829f-42965a366d22n@googlegroups.com>
<5b57ed45-8ad8-4af3-a700-0322f1d6acafn@googlegroups.com>
<fe20eabe-c218-4d9b-b9f2-f53089292511n@googlegroups.com>
<eo1vrihcpqpk0loratnqcqm3jgbeiabe27@4ax.com>
<b9dc81e4-d617-41fa-9569-0abb80aeda20n@googlegroups.com>
<7s6vrih6sis4cuap60anas1n8mssm6nlal@4ax.com>
<vk8vri98192l4ek060q514a6k8pbilir9o@4ax.com>
<l2bru1F9m89U1@mid.individual.net>
<414806d0-7839-4f25-a0dd-69703b7b8ff2n@googlegroups.com>
<l2bv9nFa0jiU1@mid.individual.net>
<462fba05-192c-49d4-ac1a-691ad0546f61n@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net cs1Kx4ZAU8k8WEktAmlmJQI3Nu6T5HtlaAmI1m0H/Dg/rtm9Ti
Cancel-Lock: sha1:l1ZK5/nK7gnP9IHL/j9gCqpG+74= sha256:ZYx/x7qu+CLNsQp+UyhrNsI71Hxne0aWW7W1LaZCxSY=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <462fba05-192c-49d4-ac1a-691ad0546f61n@googlegroups.com>
 by: David North - Mon, 5 Feb 2024 19:43 UTC

On 05/02/2024 11:47, jack fredricks wrote:
> On Monday, February 5, 2024 at 9:32:11 PM UTC+10, David North wrote:
>> On 05/02/2024 10:51, jack fredricks wrote:
>>> On Monday, February 5, 2024 at 8:34:49 PM UTC+10, David North wrote:
>>>> The fielder can say that, but the umpire is not obliged to take his word
>>>> for it.
>>>
>>> Obliged? Sure. They're not obliged to do anything, and can make bad calls as much as they want.
>>>
>>> My example of a fielder saying "I didn't think the ball was dead" is just an example of actions that might make an umpire decide that ONE, and only one is needed, fielder thought the ball was still alive.
>> Yes, _might_. That's a bit different from 'a fielder can say "I thought
>> it wasn't dead" which means it isn't.'
>
> Talking in "mights" is silly. The range of mights is very broad.
> I say if an umpire gets an indication one player, in that kind of scenario, acts as if they think the ball is alive then an umpire SHOULD consider the ball to still be alive. (obviously excluding events that make the ball automatically dead eg a boundary).
What if the player in question (and all of the others) was acting as if
they thought the ball was dead until something happened, such as the
batter picking up the ball, that meant that it was suddenly to their
advantage to act as if they thought it was in play?

In any case, would a fielder who genuinely thought the ball was still in
play be likely to say "I didn't think the ball was dead" before the
umpire had made a decision, rather than just appealing? ISTM that that
would be more characteristic of someone who was lying through their
teeth to try to con the umpire.

--
David North

Re: Remember the name - Tazeem Chaudry Ali

<1059a4bc-810c-4ab5-9eb0-312483f3ce94n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=29767&group=uk.sport.cricket#29767

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.sport.cricket
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5953:0:b0:42b:ee47:237e with SMTP id 19-20020ac85953000000b0042bee47237emr43256qtz.6.1707169513931;
Mon, 05 Feb 2024 13:45:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a81:4c02:0:b0:5ff:6ec3:b8da with SMTP id
z2-20020a814c02000000b005ff6ec3b8damr229283ywa.1.1707169513617; Mon, 05 Feb
2024 13:45:13 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: uk.sport.cricket
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 13:45:13 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <l2cs33FerjjU1@mid.individual.net>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=59.101.188.101; posting-account=4Arn9AoAAABp1jqIZ1FDiINYowPTi37Z
NNTP-Posting-Host: 59.101.188.101
References: <ttssri50f111tj0pjof7kij119n84drmqr@4ax.com> <7176ef20-214c-4786-a19a-d67a5cc8de3bn@googlegroups.com>
<579urih8erntmlmkk5aj2e25dj26pki586@4ax.com> <fff763a4-c979-4d9a-829f-42965a366d22n@googlegroups.com>
<5b57ed45-8ad8-4af3-a700-0322f1d6acafn@googlegroups.com> <fe20eabe-c218-4d9b-b9f2-f53089292511n@googlegroups.com>
<eo1vrihcpqpk0loratnqcqm3jgbeiabe27@4ax.com> <b9dc81e4-d617-41fa-9569-0abb80aeda20n@googlegroups.com>
<7s6vrih6sis4cuap60anas1n8mssm6nlal@4ax.com> <vk8vri98192l4ek060q514a6k8pbilir9o@4ax.com>
<l2bru1F9m89U1@mid.individual.net> <414806d0-7839-4f25-a0dd-69703b7b8ff2n@googlegroups.com>
<l2bv9nFa0jiU1@mid.individual.net> <462fba05-192c-49d4-ac1a-691ad0546f61n@googlegroups.com>
<l2cs33FerjjU1@mid.individual.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <1059a4bc-810c-4ab5-9eb0-312483f3ce94n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Remember the name - Tazeem Chaudry Ali
From: jzfredricks@gmail.com (jack fredricks)
Injection-Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2024 21:45:13 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 3300
 by: jack fredricks - Mon, 5 Feb 2024 21:45 UTC

On Tuesday, February 6, 2024 at 5:43:34 AM UTC+10, David North wrote:
> What if the player in question (and all of the others) was acting as if
> they thought the ball was dead until something happened, such as the
> batter picking up the ball, that meant that it was suddenly to their
> advantage to act as if they thought it was in play?

If the umpire decides that at a given point in time ALL fielders and both batsmen consider the ball dead, then the ball is dead.
A fielder can't then "resurrect" play by changing their mind.

> In any case, would a fielder who genuinely thought the ball was still in
> play be likely to say "I didn't think the ball was dead" before the
> umpire had made a decision, rather than just appealing? ISTM that that
> would be more characteristic of someone who was lying through their
> teeth to try to con the umpire.

You're focusing on the actual wording I used. Instead of those strange words, treat like another action to indicate the player thinks the ball is still live, eg a throw from the boundary in the Ian Bell run out.
But in this made up example that thrower in the *only* fielder who thought the ball was still live. The batsmen and other 10 fielders were walking off for lunch.
And, of course, the umpire hadn't called Over (or Lunch, in this case).
This action by the single player should/would keep the ball alive.

Pages:12
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor