“Can’t wait for speed limits at the next F1 race in Vegas”: Cyclists and
motorists baffled by new “April Fools” 20mph time trial rules

THU, FEB 08, 2024 10:47

So, it appears that yesterday’s story on Cycling Time Trials’ reaction to
the increasingly widespread implementation of 20mph speed limits in
built-up areas – which includes forcing participants to slow to the
required 20mph during those particular sections – has elicited quite the
reaction online.

For those who missed it – CTT, the governing body for that classically
British, self-loathing discipline of racing your bike solo against nothing
but a clock, this week issued new guidance advising those taking part in
its time trials to adhere to new 20mph speed limits, and any other rule of
the road, following the default implementation of these reduced zones in
Wales, as well as other parts of England, last year.

CTT’s guidance also stipulated that any course with a lengthy 20mph section
should not be used if a viable alternative is available, due to concerns
over safety for participants and other road users, along with the risk of
causing “public outrage” which, CTT says, could put the future of time
trialling in Britain in jeopardy.

And how did the internet react to this new safety-oriented, anti-“public
outrage” measure? By checking the calendar, apparently.

This is either a joke, or the world really has gone mad. Next, rugby
players must wear bubble wrap onesies,” said Joe.

“This rubbish is contagious! Time to come to our senses!!” exclaimed Paul,
representing the rather odd, sparsely populated central part of the Venn
diagram of cyclists and those opposed to reduced speed limits.

“Emailed dropped into my inbox last night. I found the position hilarious.
Granted it makes sense but just don’t run TTs on 20mph roads and all good,”
said an amused cycling lawyer Rory McCarron.

“Why? There is no speed limit for bicycles on Britain's roads,” Adabadang
wrote on Twitter, summing up the general attitude of the non-TTing cyclist.

Pointing out the difficulty of enforcing these measures, Shit Cycling Shots
wrote: “Marshalls with speed guns in every village? Good luck enforcing
this one!”

Others noted the irony of forcing cyclists, during a race, to adhere to a
speed limit apparently, ahem, often ignored by other road users.

“Maybe the weekend before the event they should do a speed check on cars in
any 20 limit they pass through. Max speed for riders is the highest
recorded by a car,” said Stuart.

“Tell drivers to stick to it then you have a deal,” agreed Sebastian, with
Dan describing the measure as “kowtowing to the anti-cycling mob”.

“Can’t wait for speed limits at the next F1 race in Vegas,” wrote the
Entitled Cyclist, while Eamonn said: “Schrodinger’s Cyclist. Going too fast
while simultaneously going too slow and delaying the all-important
drivers.”

On the more extreme end of the reaction spectrum, one Facebook user, Shaun,
however, reckons time trialling shouldn’t even take place on a road, never
mind a 20mph section.

“If you want to TT, get a road closure or do it on a track. Sport shouldn't
take place on the public highway. I'm a cyclist by the way,” says ‘cyclist’
Shaun.

Some, meanwhile, used the guidance to pitch their own, groundbreaking
vision for the future of time trialling in the UK.

“They should do the whole route on 20mph roads and disqualify anyone who is
even a tiny bit over 20mph average,” said cat-owning cyclist Travis (and
Sigrid, I suppose), while Phil described the new world of time trialling as
an “acceleration test”.

“Or a time trial in the truest sense of the term. Getting from A to B as
close to an allotted time as possible,” said Farrell.

Now, that is a time trial I could get behind…

[This article, and other ‘news’, at the link below]

<https://road.cc/content/news/cycling-live-blog-8-february-2024-306641#live-blog-item-54767>

--
Spike