The latest version of Outlook shows each email address separately
instead of presenting all the emails in a single inbox. Looking at
Google, this seems to be an issue without a solution. However, what
about creating a rule - Always move messages to a.b@c.d to Inbox?
Is there a simpler or better way?

Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
> The latest version of Outlook shows each email address separately
> instead of presenting all the emails in a single inbox. Looking at
> Google, this seems to be an issue without a solution. However, what
> about creating a rule - Always move messages to a.b@c.d to Inbox?
> Is there a simpler or better way?
>

Do you mean a lack of a unified in box, ie you have more than one email
account and want them all to end up in one place? As far as I know Outlook
for Windows has never had this feature, whereas Outlook for Mac has.

One way round it is to use eMclient, the free version supports two
accounts.

In article <u45mrd$b54m$1@dont-email.me>,
Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:
> Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
> > The latest version of Outlook shows each email address separately
> > instead of presenting all the emails in a single inbox. Looking at
> > Google, this seems to be an issue without a solution. However, what
> > about creating a rule - Always move messages to a.b@c.d to Inbox?
> > Is there a simpler or better way?
> >

> Do you mean a lack of a unified in box, ie you have more than one email
> account and want them all to end up in one place? As far as I know Outlook
> for Windows has never had this feature, whereas Outlook for Mac has.

> One way round it is to use eMclient, the free version supports two
> accounts.

I use Thunderbird - I have 6 email accounts received on it. They are all
separate, but I can move mails between them.

--
from KT24 in Surrey, England - sent from my RISC OS 4té
"I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

On Thu, 18 May 2023 17:21:49 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
<usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

>Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
>> The latest version of Outlook shows each email address separately
>> instead of presenting all the emails in a single inbox. Looking at
>> Google, this seems to be an issue without a solution. However, what
>> about creating a rule - Always move messages to a.b@c.d to Inbox?
>> Is there a simpler or better way?
>>
>Do you mean a lack of a unified in box, ie you have more than one email
>account and want them all to end up in one place? As far as I know Outlook
>for Windows has never had this feature, whereas Outlook for Mac has.

I do mean that. My previous Outlook did this. I know there are lots
of complaints about it. Is there anything wrong with my approach
(which so far seems to be working)?
>
>One way round it is to use eMclient, the free version supports two
>accounts.

I have five to deal with.

Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
> The latest version of Outlook shows each email address separately
> instead of presenting all the emails in a single inbox. Looking at
> Google, this seems to be an issue without a solution. However, what
> about creating a rule - Always move messages to a.b@c.d to Inbox?
> Is there a simpler or better way?

Yes, don't use Outlook! :-)

--
Chris Green
·

In article <5aa699eb56charles@candehope.me.uk>, charles
<charles@candehope.me.uk> wrote:

> I use Thunderbird - I have 6 email accounts received on it. They are
> all separate, but I can move mails between them.

I use !Pluto. :-)

Given that your sig says you use a RO 4te I wonder why you don't.

Jim

--
Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me.
Electronics https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scots_Guide/intro/electron.htm
biog http://jcgl.orpheusweb.co.uk/history/ups_and_downs.html
Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html

In article <5aa6f3e57fnoise@audiomisc.co.uk>,
Jim Lesurf <noise@audiomisc.co.uk> wrote:
> In article <5aa699eb56charles@candehope.me.uk>, charles
> <charles@candehope.me.uk> wrote:

> > I use Thunderbird - I have 6 email accounts received on it. They are
> > all separate, but I can move mails between them.

> I use !Pluto. :-)

> Given that your sig says you use a RO 4te I wonder why you don't.

> Jim

Simple. This comes from a RISC OS Machine and uses Pluto. Thunderbird is on
a Windows machine which is better for accessing items that I am sent by
others. RISC OS is getting better now that Iris has arrived.

--
from KT24 in Surrey, England - sent from my RISC OS 4té
"I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

In article <5aa6f73354charles@candehope.me.uk>, charles
<charles@candehope.me.uk> wrote:

> Simple. This comes from a RISC OS Machine and uses Pluto. Thunderbird is
> on a Windows machine which is better for accessing items that I am sent
> by others. RISC OS is getting better now that Iris has arrived.

!Iris is quite good. Although I tend to like !NetSurf as it can dodge some
of the stuff in web code, etc. e.g. being able to use a WebForum without
the ads, etc, being imposed on me. :-)

Jim

--
Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me.
Electronics https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scots_Guide/intro/electron.htm
biog http://jcgl.orpheusweb.co.uk/history/ups_and_downs.html
Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html

One of the reasons I like Outlook Express was being able to have
identities. IE I could in effect just get email from one address at a time.
This gives me time management, so as long as senders use the right one, I
can deal with personal email on one identity, and talking newspaper on
another and charity info on another, and as I need to actually take an
action to download the email account concerned I do not engage with what I
consider work, when I'm in relaxation mode. And no, I do not use social
media at all, unless I need to have a moan about the actions of a company
on Twitter due to them never responding to emails.
Brian

--

--:
This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
The Sofa of Brian Gaff...
briang1@blueyonder.co.uk
Blind user, so no pictures please
Note this Signature is meaningless.!
"Tweed" <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:u45mrd$b54m$1@dont-email.me...
> Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
>> The latest version of Outlook shows each email address separately
>> instead of presenting all the emails in a single inbox. Looking at
>> Google, this seems to be an issue without a solution. However, what
>> about creating a rule - Always move messages to a.b@c.d to Inbox?
>> Is there a simpler or better way?
>>
>
> Do you mean a lack of a unified in box, ie you have more than one email
> account and want them all to end up in one place? As far as I know Outlook
> for Windows has never had this feature, whereas Outlook for Mac has.
>
> One way round it is to use eMclient, the free version supports two
> accounts.
>