This was Tweeted earlier

French media regulator CSA has ordered France-based satellite operator
Eutelsat to stop carrying Hamas's TV channel Al-Aqsa. Al-Aqsa's channel
on Eutelsat is now simply displaying a QR code directing viewers to a
live stream on Telegram.

Does seem rather silly then. What exactly is the channel. I particularly
laugh at the antics of the adult channels on freeview, which now seem
present some choices on screen that are not read out by mosttvs but
apparently direct you to a streaming set of channels. So where is the audio
porn then. cheesy grin.
Brian

--

--:
This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
The Sofa of Brian Gaff...
briang1@blueyonder.co.uk
Blind user, so no pictures please
Note this Signature is meaningless.!
"JMB99" <mb@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:ugj227$1b1qf$1@dont-email.me...
> This was Tweeted earlier
>
>
> French media regulator CSA has ordered France-based satellite operator
> Eutelsat to stop carrying Hamas's TV channel Al-Aqsa. Al-Aqsa's channel on
> Eutelsat is now simply displaying a QR code directing viewers to a live
> stream on Telegram.

On 16/10/2023 14:26, Brian Gaff wrote:
> What exactly is the channel.

Judging by the name - the group that "invaded" part of Israel

--
mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk

On 16/10/2023 at 15:31, alan_m wrote:
> On 16/10/2023 14:26, Brian Gaff wrote:
>> What exactly is the channel.
>
> Judging by the name - the group that "invaded" part of Israel
>

"invaded". Only a pretend, with no damage done?

--
Wilf

On 16/10/2023 15:43, Wilf wrote:
> On 16/10/2023 at 15:31, alan_m wrote:
>> On 16/10/2023 14:26, Brian Gaff wrote:
>>> What exactly is the channel.
>>
>> Judging by the name - the group that "invaded" part of Israel
>>
>
> "invaded".   Only a pretend, with no damage done?

Didn't the Israelis "invade" Palestine a while ago?

--
Max Demian

On 16/10/2023 17:10, Max Demian wrote:
> Didn't the Israelis "invade" Palestine a while ago?

Much more complicated than that.

Max Demian wrote:

> On 16/10/2023 15:43, Wilf wrote:
> > On 16/10/2023 at 15:31, alan_m wrote:
> > > On 16/10/2023 14:26, Brian Gaff wrote:
> > > > What exactly is the channel.
> > >
> > > Judging by the name - the group that "invaded" part of Israel
> >
> > "invaded".   Only a pretend, with no damage done?
>
> Didn't the Israelis "invade" Palestine a while ago?

Depends on how far you want to go back...

Surely, the saudis could make the Palestinians a large island to use instead
of where they are now, but unfortunately, it does not help with the
Jerusalem issue, where both religions think they have sole rights there.
Brian

--

--:
This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
The Sofa of Brian Gaff...
briang1@blueyonder.co.uk
Blind user, so no pictures please
Note this Signature is meaningless.!
"Blueshirt" <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote in message
news:xn0o86xz9t7axlv001@reader.xsnews.nl...
> Max Demian wrote:
>
>> On 16/10/2023 15:43, Wilf wrote:
>> > On 16/10/2023 at 15:31, alan_m wrote:
>> > > On 16/10/2023 14:26, Brian Gaff wrote:
>> > > > What exactly is the channel.
>> > >
>> > > Judging by the name - the group that "invaded" part of Israel
>> >
>> > "invaded". Only a pretend, with no damage done?
>>
>> Didn't the Israelis "invade" Palestine a while ago?
>
> Depends on how far you want to go back...

Brian Gaff wrote:

> Surely, the Saudis could make the Palestinians a large island to use
> instead of where they are now,

That wouldn't be 'Palestine' though would it? It'd just be another bit of
sand in the middle east.

On 17/10/2023 in message <xn0o87d0ltrrsgv000@reader.xsnews.nl> Blueshirt
wrote:

>Brian Gaff wrote:
>
>>Surely, the Saudis could make the Palestinians a large island to use
>>instead of where they are now,
>
>That wouldn't be 'Palestine' though would it? It'd just be another bit of
>sand in the middle east.

Better make the Israelis a home in America, they are the ones illegally
occupying Palestine.

--
Jeff Gaines Dorset UK
640k ought to be enough for anyone.
(Bill Gates, 1981)

On 17/10/2023 22:35, Jeff Gaines wrote:
> Better make the Israelis a home in America, they are the ones illegally
> occupying Palestine.

You mean North American illegally occupied by the USAians?

The Israelis have been in Israel much longer than the USAians have been
occupying North America (or the Palestinians in Palestine), even if you
ignore all the Biblical claims.

On 17/10/2023 22:35, Jeff Gaines wrote:
> Better make the Israelis a home in America, they are the ones illegally
> occupying Palestine.

Surprise, surprise, the HAMAS TV service has reopened from Qatar
continuing to pump out false stories.

On 17/10/2023 at 23:50, JMB99 wrote:
> On 17/10/2023 22:35, Jeff Gaines wrote:
>> Better make the Israelis a home in America, they are the ones illegally
>> occupying Palestine.
>
>
> Surprise, surprise, the HAMAS TV service has reopened from Qatar
> continuing to pump out false stories.
>
>

Ah yes, Qatar, where the Hamas leadership lives in luxury.

--
Wilf

On 17/10/2023 in message <ugn31j$37foj$1@dont-email.me> JMB99 wrote:

>On 17/10/2023 22:35, Jeff Gaines wrote:
>>Better make the Israelis a home in America, they are the ones illegally
>>occupying Palestine.
>
>
>
>You mean North American illegally occupied by the USAians?
>
>The Israelis have been in Israel much longer than the USAians have been
>occupying North America (or the Palestinians in Palestine), even if you
>ignore all the Biblical claims.

This might help you:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-54116567

--
Jeff Gaines Dorset UK
The true meaning of life is to plant trees under whose shade you do not
expect to sit.

Jeff Gaines wrote:

> On 17/10/2023 in message <ugn31j$37foj$1@dont-email.me> JMB99 wrote:
>
> > On 17/10/2023 22:35, Jeff Gaines wrote:
> > > Better make the Israelis a home in America, they are the ones
> > > illegally occupying Palestine.
> > You mean North American illegally occupied by the USAians?
> >
> > The Israelis have been in Israel much longer than the USAians have
> > been occupying North America (or the Palestinians in Palestine), even
> > if you ignore all the Biblical claims.
>
> This might help you:
>
> https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-54116567

Nah, not really. That's only modern history. Try Googleing the 'Kingdom
of Israel' or the 'Twelve Tribes of Israel'. Hebrew speaking "Yahweh"
worshipping people were living in that area of the "middle-east" since
before the time of Jesus... well, if you believe that the various
scriptures that are part of the Holy books are based on some historical
fact and not just made-up works of fantasy.

Either way, Hamas TV is still the organ of a terrorist organisation based
in Gaza sacrificing it's people in a pointless war - that it can never
win - whilst it's leaders live in comfort in other parts of the
middle-east away from all the death and destruction.

On 18/10/2023 in message <xn0o88dfquo1459002@reader.xsnews.nl> Blueshirt
wrote:

>Either way, Hamas TV is still the organ of a terrorist organisation based
>in Gaza sacrificing it's people in a pointless war - that it can never
>win - whilst it's leaders live in comfort in other parts of the
>middle-east away from all the death and destruction.

It's not Hamas that should "win", it's a terrorist organisation. The
Palestinians need to be given their land back and Israel need to withdraw
to its 1947 borders - which still gives it half of Palestine.

--
Jeff Gaines Dorset UK
Are you confused about gender?
Try milking a bull, you'll learn real quick.

Jeff Gaines wrote:

> On 18/10/2023 in message <xn0o88dfquo1459002@reader.xsnews.nl>
> Blueshirt wrote:
>
> > Either way, Hamas TV is still the organ of a terrorist organisation
> > based in Gaza sacrificing it's people in a pointless war - that it
> > can never win - whilst it's leaders live in comfort in other parts of
> > the middle-east away from all the death and destruction.
>
> It's not Hamas that should "win", it's a terrorist organisation. The
> Palestinians need to be given their land back and Israel need to
> withdraw to its 1947 borders - which still gives it half of Palestine.

Clearly peace lays in the two sides living alongside each other probably
in two different states... but it's a lot easier to type that on a
keyboard than it is to make it happen!

It was the Arab countries that rejected the UN's 1947 border plans! It
was also the surrounding Arab nations that started a war with Israel at
it's inception when the British left!

On 18/10/2023 in message <xn0o88gtjusn18i000@reader.xsnews.nl> Blueshirt
wrote:

>>>Either way, Hamas TV is still the organ of a terrorist organisation
>>>based in Gaza sacrificing it's people in a pointless war - that it
>>>can never win - whilst it's leaders live in comfort in other parts of
>>>the middle-east away from all the death and destruction.
>>
>>It's not Hamas that should "win", it's a terrorist organisation. The
>>Palestinians need to be given their land back and Israel need to
>>withdraw to its 1947 borders - which still gives it half of Palestine.
>
>Clearly peace lays in the two sides living alongside each other probably
>in two different states... but it's a lot easier to type that on a
>keyboard than it is to make it happen!
>
>It was the Arab countries that rejected the UN's 1947 border plans! It
>was also the surrounding Arab nations that started a war with Israel at
>it's inception when the British left!

I expect they were a bit cheesed off at Israel stealing Palestine?

--
Jeff Gaines Dorset UK
Have you ever noticed that all the instruments searching for intelligent
life are pointing away from Earth?

Jeff Gaines wrote:

> On 18/10/2023 in message <xn0o88gtjusn18i000@reader.xsnews.nl>
> Blueshirt wrote:
>
> > > > Either way, Hamas TV is still the organ of a terrorist
> > > > organisation based in Gaza sacrificing it's people in a pointless
> > > > war - that it can never win - whilst it's leaders live in comfort
> > > > in other parts of the middle-east away from all the death and
> > > > destruction.
> > >
> > > It's not Hamas that should "win", it's a terrorist organisation. The
> > > Palestinians need to be given their land back and Israel need to
> > > withdraw to its 1947 borders - which still gives it half of
> > > Palestine.
> >
> > Clearly peace lays in the two sides living alongside each other
> > probably in two different states... but it's a lot easier to type
> > that on a keyboard than it is to make it happen!
> >
> > It was the Arab countries that rejected the UN's 1947 border plans! It
> > was also the surrounding Arab nations that started a war with Israel
> > at it's inception when the British left!
>
> I expect they were a bit cheesed off at Israel stealing Palestine?

Make your mind up, either the Palestinian Jews were entitled to their
half of Palestine - when the British left - or they stole it all. I don't
know if the 1947 borders drawn up by the UN were fair or not, but it gave
both peoples land to live in. Which seems like a good start. If the Arab
nations choose to go to war rather than accept the UN border plans, or
even negotiate different ones, then they can't really complain when they
get their arses kicked over and over again. (1949, 1967, 1973 etc...)

If you poke a bear, you shouldn't be surprised if you get bitten. But of
course, Hamas are not one bit surprised at the result of their recent
provocation of Israel. They got exactly the results they wanted... death
and destruction of innocent people whilst the Hamas leadership watch the
events unfolding in Gaza on Al-Aqsa TV from the comfort of their homes in
Qatar and Turkey.

On 18/10/2023 in message <xn0o88k7hux42t7000@reader.xsnews.nl> Blueshirt
wrote:

>>>It was the Arab countries that rejected the UN's 1947 border plans! It
>>>was also the surrounding Arab nations that started a war with Israel
>>>at it's inception when the British left!
>>
>>I expect they were a bit cheesed off at Israel stealing Palestine?
>
>Make your mind up, either the Palestinian Jews were entitled to their
>half of Palestine - when the British left - or they stole it all. I don't
>know if the 1947 borders drawn up by the UN were fair or not, but it gave
>both peoples land to live in. Which seems like a good start. If the Arab
>nations choose to go to war rather than accept the UN border plans, or
>even negotiate different ones, then they can't really complain when they
>get their arses kicked over and over again. (1949, 1967, 1973 etc...)

You seem to expect the Palestinians to accept that half their country was
stolen?

--
Jeff Gaines Dorset UK
There are 3 types of people in this world. Those who can count, and those
who can't.

Jeff Gaines wrote:

> On 18/10/2023 in message <xn0o88k7hux42t7000@reader.xsnews.nl>
> Blueshirt wrote:
>
> > > > It was the Arab countries that rejected the UN's 1947 border
> > > > plans! It was also the surrounding Arab nations that started a
> > > > war with Israel at it's inception when the British left!
> > >
> > > I expect they were a bit cheesed off at Israel stealing Palestine?
> >
> > Make your mind up, either the Palestinian Jews were entitled to their
> > half of Palestine - when the British left - or they stole it all. I
> > don't know if the 1947 borders drawn up by the UN were fair or not,
> > but it gave both peoples land to live in. Which seems like a good
> > start. If the Arab nations choose to go to war rather than accept the
> > UN border plans, or even negotiate different ones, then they can't
> > really complain when they get their arses kicked over and over again.
> > (1949, 1967, 1973 etc...)
>
> You seem to expect the Palestinians to accept that half their country
> was stolen?

It wasn't stolen... as has been pointed out to you Jewish people have
inhabited that area of 'Palestine' since before Biblical times. (Jesus
was born not far from Jerusalem and he was Jewish ... allegedly.) The
Palestinian Jews were entitled to a home and that is what the British
mandate promised. It was the Arabs that refused to accept that, they
wanted it all.

https://www.lotuseaters.com/where-is-palestine-13-02-23

Your trendy sound bite of the Palestinian Arabs having their land
"stolen" is way more complex than that. Which is why there is no easy
solution. If one simple sentence could sort it all out then the problem
of Palestine would have been solved long before now.

Current events mean it's not going to be sorted out any time soon either!

In article <xn0o88q2yv56kbo001@reader.xsnews.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> Jeff Gaines wrote:

> > On 18/10/2023 in message <xn0o88k7hux42t7000@reader.xsnews.nl>
> > Blueshirt wrote:
> >
> > > > > It was the Arab countries that rejected the UN's 1947 border
> > > > > plans! It was also the surrounding Arab nations that started a
> > > > > war with Israel at it's inception when the British left!
> > > >
> > > > I expect they were a bit cheesed off at Israel stealing Palestine?
> > >
> > > Make your mind up, either the Palestinian Jews were entitled to their
> > > half of Palestine - when the British left - or they stole it all. I
> > > don't know if the 1947 borders drawn up by the UN were fair or not,
> > > but it gave both peoples land to live in. Which seems like a good
> > > start. If the Arab nations choose to go to war rather than accept the
> > > UN border plans, or even negotiate different ones, then they can't
> > > really complain when they get their arses kicked over and over again.
> > > (1949, 1967, 1973 etc...)
> >
> > You seem to expect the Palestinians to accept that half their country
> > was stolen?

> It wasn't stolen... as has been pointed out to you Jewish people have
> inhabited that area of 'Palestine' since before Biblical times. (Jesus
> was born not far from Jerusalem and he was Jewish ... allegedly.) The
> Palestinian Jews were entitled to a home and that is what the British
> mandate promised. It was the Arabs that refused to accept that, they
> wanted it all.

> https://www.lotuseaters.com/where-is-palestine-13-02-23

> Your trendy sound bite of the Palestinian Arabs having their land
> "stolen" is way more complex than that. Which is why there is no easy
> solution. If one simple sentence could sort it all out then the problem
> of Palestine would have been solved long before now.

> Current events mean it's not going to be sorted out any time soon either!

and it was all part of the Ottoman Empire since the early part of the16th
Century.

--
from KT24 in Surrey, England - sent from my RISC OS 4té²
"I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

On 18/10/2023 in message <xn0o88q2yv56kbo001@reader.xsnews.nl> Blueshirt
wrote:

>It wasn't stolen... as has been pointed out to you Jewish people have
>inhabited that area of 'Palestine' since before Biblical times.

What's the relevance? Palestine existed, Israel didn't.

--
Jeff Gaines Dorset UK
How does a gender neutral bog differ from a unisex bog ?
It has a non-binary number on the door.

In article <xn0o88rt1c4lbaw00j@news.individual.net>,
Jeff Gaines <jgnewsid@outlook.com> wrote:
> On 18/10/2023 in message <xn0o88q2yv56kbo001@reader.xsnews.nl> Blueshirt
> wrote:

> >It wasn't stolen... as has been pointed out to you Jewish people have
> >inhabited that area of 'Palestine' since before Biblical times.

> What's the relevance? Palestine existed, Israel didn't.

it only existed as a British area of protection after WW1. 25 years.

--
from KT24 in Surrey, England - sent from my RISC OS 4té²
"I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

On 18/10/2023 in message <5af570fb73charles@candehope.me.uk> charles wrote:

>In article <xn0o88rt1c4lbaw00j@news.individual.net>,
> Jeff Gaines <jgnewsid@outlook.com> wrote:
>>On 18/10/2023 in message <xn0o88q2yv56kbo001@reader.xsnews.nl> Blueshirt
>>wrote:
>
>>>It wasn't stolen... as has been pointed out to you Jewish people have
>>>inhabited that area of 'Palestine' since before Biblical times.
>
>>What's the relevance? Palestine existed, Israel didn't.
>
>it only existed as a British area of protection after WW1. 25 years.

That's right, Palestine existed, Israel didn't.

--
Jeff Gaines Dorset UK
If it's not broken, mess around with it until it is