Rocksolid Light

Welcome to Rocksolid Light

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

Washington, D.C: Fifty square miles almost completely surrounded by reality.


aus+uk / uk.tech.digital-tv / Re: New TV aerial question

SubjectAuthor
* New TV aerial questionScott
+* Re: New TV aerial questionMark Carver
|+- Re: New TV aerial questionWoody
|+* Re: New TV aerial questionJeff Layman
||`* Re: New TV aerial questioncharles
|| +* Re: New TV aerial questionJeff Layman
|| |`* Re: New TV aerial questionScott
|| | +* Re: New TV aerial questionSH
|| | |+- Re: New TV aerial questionScott
|| | |`* Re: New TV aerial questionBrian Gregory
|| | | `- Re: New TV aerial questionMark Carver
|| | `- Re: New TV aerial questionJeff Layman
|| `* Re: New TV aerial questiontony sayer
||  +- Re: New TV aerial questionWoody
||  `* Re: New TV aerial questionScott
||   `* Re: New TV aerial questiontony sayer
||    `- Re: New TV aerial questionScott
|`* Re: New TV aerial questionScott
| `* Re: New TV aerial questionMark Carver
|  +* Re: New TV aerial questionWoody
|  |`* Re: New TV aerial questionalan_m
|  | `* Re: New TV aerial questionScott
|  |  +* Re: New TV aerial questionWoody
|  |  |+- Re: New TV aerial questionSH
|  |  |`- Re: New TV aerial questiontony sayer
|  |  `- Re: New TV aerial questioncharles
|  `- Re: New TV aerial questionAndy Burns
`* Re: New TV aerial questionScott
 +* Re: New TV aerial questionWoody
 |+- Re: New TV aerial questionTweed
 |`- Re: New TV aerial questionScott
 +- Re: New TV aerial questionScott
 `- Re: New TV aerial questionSH

Pages:12
Re: New TV aerial question

<egm30jletsoibuijc5rv3057rhc0scdusl@4ax.com>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=43220&group=uk.tech.digital-tv#43220

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.tech.digital-tv
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk (Scott)
Newsgroups: uk.tech.digital-tv
Subject: Re: New TV aerial question
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 20:11:27 +0000
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <egm30jletsoibuijc5rv3057rhc0scdusl@4ax.com>
References: <s57hviplmj22shl71il91aevhsj07g40vp@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net XIx8749l8CGGUNsuOLdslwJOktXoR15BUkpaW+mEIOROBWRlD6
Cancel-Lock: sha1:LsXqu0IpmBY6hVKIcw/FlQwFKFk= sha256:3rsExXgOdbqcjHBrfjbyDFV1YE3fphSMkUoUh8n3AbE=
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
 by: Scott - Mon, 25 Mar 2024 20:11 UTC

Any comment on this, found during research?

"XXX began installing aerials in 2006, and have continued ever since.
The firm maintains the company culture centered around the innovation
of digital technology. Primarily to give our clients the highest
digital service on the market.

"It should be noted, current aerials will be able to collect digital
TV to some extent. However, they were constructed for correspondent
signals. So there will be a difference in the quality of the picture.
Especially with ancient systems. Also, old aerials would have been
fitted to pick up limited variety of signals. Hence, they would be at
the local analogue receiver.

"Additionally, Analogue equipment corrupts over time. Yet is not
visible with the analogue signals. Because the image also worsens
gradually.

"However, with digital picture, it stays the same up until it achieves
a crucial juncture. Then the image suspends or disappears entirely. If
necessary, a new aerial system is constructed exclusively to enhance
digital communications.

"Furthermore, High gain aerials, of a big size, will enhance image
excellence. Even in areas of low reception. Therefore, preventing
digital disintegration. Therefore boosting the number of stations that
can be obtained."

Re: New TV aerial question

<utssmb$1besd$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=43221&group=uk.tech.digital-tv#43221

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.tech.digital-tv
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: harrogate3@ntlworld.com (Woody)
Newsgroups: uk.tech.digital-tv
Subject: Re: New TV aerial question
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 22:09:15 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <utssmb$1besd$1@dont-email.me>
References: <s57hviplmj22shl71il91aevhsj07g40vp@4ax.com>
<egm30jletsoibuijc5rv3057rhc0scdusl@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 23:09:15 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="95ecd2bfbb0c34e7f6d96c9400741ecd";
logging-data="1424269"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/H4nbT9hYyQzYBBa6/3HuPJu7tNm3OJjQ="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:iZRwylLfR2y2k5FGeGgegwcyNTA=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <egm30jletsoibuijc5rv3057rhc0scdusl@4ax.com>
 by: Woody - Mon, 25 Mar 2024 22:09 UTC

On Mon 25/03/2024 20:11, Scott wrote:
> Any comment on this, found during research?
>
> "XXX began installing aerials in 2006, and have continued ever since.
> The firm maintains the company culture centered around the innovation
> of digital technology. Primarily to give our clients the highest
> digital service on the market.
>
> "It should be noted, current aerials will be able to collect digital
> TV to some extent. However, they were constructed for correspondent
> signals. So there will be a difference in the quality of the picture.
> Especially with ancient systems. Also, old aerials would have been
> fitted to pick up limited variety of signals. Hence, they would be at
> the local analogue receiver.
>
> "Additionally, Analogue equipment corrupts over time. Yet is not
> visible with the analogue signals. Because the image also worsens
> gradually.
>
> "However, with digital picture, it stays the same up until it achieves
> a crucial juncture. Then the image suspends or disappears entirely. If
> necessary, a new aerial system is constructed exclusively to enhance
> digital communications.
>
> "Furthermore, High gain aerials, of a big size, will enhance image
> excellence. Even in areas of low reception. Therefore, preventing
> digital disintegration. Therefore boosting the number of stations that
> can be obtained."

The biggest load of blx I have ever read.

Where's Bill when you need hm.......

Re: New TV aerial question

<utts0o$1ls8b$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=43222&group=uk.tech.digital-tv#43222

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.tech.digital-tv
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: usenet.tweed@gmail.com (Tweed)
Newsgroups: uk.tech.digital-tv
Subject: Re: New TV aerial question
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 07:03:52 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <utts0o$1ls8b$1@dont-email.me>
References: <s57hviplmj22shl71il91aevhsj07g40vp@4ax.com>
<egm30jletsoibuijc5rv3057rhc0scdusl@4ax.com>
<utssmb$1besd$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 08:03:52 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a00dcfc4240408855b09213eb2f22d4a";
logging-data="1765643"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19dPkDBy1FptkbizHEOTXAd"
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPad)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:63qUwzleePBc1FmNp/Z4pIBFs7s=
sha1:Asiz3gae3Tw08TLAIB0kbYJM+xM=
 by: Tweed - Tue, 26 Mar 2024 07:03 UTC

Woody <harrogate3@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> On Mon 25/03/2024 20:11, Scott wrote:
>> Any comment on this, found during research?
>>
>> "XXX began installing aerials in 2006, and have continued ever since.
>> The firm maintains the company culture centered around the innovation
>> of digital technology. Primarily to give our clients the highest
>> digital service on the market.
>>
>> "It should be noted, current aerials will be able to collect digital
>> TV to some extent. However, they were constructed for correspondent
>> signals. So there will be a difference in the quality of the picture.
>> Especially with ancient systems. Also, old aerials would have been
>> fitted to pick up limited variety of signals. Hence, they would be at
>> the local analogue receiver.
>>
>> "Additionally, Analogue equipment corrupts over time. Yet is not
>> visible with the analogue signals. Because the image also worsens
>> gradually.
>>
>> "However, with digital picture, it stays the same up until it achieves
>> a crucial juncture. Then the image suspends or disappears entirely. If
>> necessary, a new aerial system is constructed exclusively to enhance
>> digital communications.
>>
>> "Furthermore, High gain aerials, of a big size, will enhance image
>> excellence. Even in areas of low reception. Therefore, preventing
>> digital disintegration. Therefore boosting the number of stations that
>> can be obtained."
>
> The biggest load of blx I have ever read.
>
> Where's Bill when you need hm.......
>
>

Looks like the output of ChatGPT after it’s been on a night on the town.

Re: New TV aerial question

<50550j5kjv9aah03fgqltk961aiik97ajo@4ax.com>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=43223&group=uk.tech.digital-tv#43223

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.tech.digital-tv
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk (Scott)
Newsgroups: uk.tech.digital-tv
Subject: Re: New TV aerial question
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 09:24:18 +0000
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <50550j5kjv9aah03fgqltk961aiik97ajo@4ax.com>
References: <s57hviplmj22shl71il91aevhsj07g40vp@4ax.com> <egm30jletsoibuijc5rv3057rhc0scdusl@4ax.com> <utssmb$1besd$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net vjFtynW2hiIiAO8JEsu7JQcizVye3BZ5AjxllWKh0O4Ur+h9qh
Cancel-Lock: sha1:l7a7Mb/T1XP5U81AFdzxWuBpP1M= sha256:d2p8cEHqu1c7wJ+G5L8R8sq4vVP5Lj8VvqaddZ1259c=
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
 by: Scott - Tue, 26 Mar 2024 09:24 UTC

On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 22:09:15 +0000, Woody <harrogate3@ntlworld.com>
wrote:

>On Mon 25/03/2024 20:11, Scott wrote:
>> Any comment on this, found during research?
>>
>> "XXX began installing aerials in 2006, and have continued ever since.
>> The firm maintains the company culture centered around the innovation
>> of digital technology. Primarily to give our clients the highest
>> digital service on the market.
>>
>> "It should be noted, current aerials will be able to collect digital
>> TV to some extent. However, they were constructed for correspondent
>> signals. So there will be a difference in the quality of the picture.
>> Especially with ancient systems. Also, old aerials would have been
>> fitted to pick up limited variety of signals. Hence, they would be at
>> the local analogue receiver.
>>
>> "Additionally, Analogue equipment corrupts over time. Yet is not
>> visible with the analogue signals. Because the image also worsens
>> gradually.
>>
>> "However, with digital picture, it stays the same up until it achieves
>> a crucial juncture. Then the image suspends or disappears entirely. If
>> necessary, a new aerial system is constructed exclusively to enhance
>> digital communications.
>>
>> "Furthermore, High gain aerials, of a big size, will enhance image
>> excellence. Even in areas of low reception. Therefore, preventing
>> digital disintegration. Therefore boosting the number of stations that
>> can be obtained."
>
>The biggest load of blx I have ever read.
>
>Where's Bill when you need hm.......

That's what I thought as I disqualified them from the tender list.

Re: New TV aerial question

<l6g8ioFtbaiU1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=43226&group=uk.tech.digital-tv#43226

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.tech.digital-tv
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: void-invalid-dead-dontuse@email.invalid (Brian Gregory)
Newsgroups: uk.tech.digital-tv
Subject: Re: New TV aerial question
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 15:40:08 +0000
Organization: https://www.Brian-Gregory.me.uk/
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <l6g8ioFtbaiU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <s57hviplmj22shl71il91aevhsj07g40vp@4ax.com>
<l5t1ngFcssU1@mid.individual.net> <utcsoh$111dq$1@dont-email.me>
<5b4440fc35charles@candehope.me.uk> <utd2ri$12iek$1@dont-email.me>
<gv3kvidgjr7unol80tdbcpjfcrp1hht6lh@4ax.com> <utd5ts$135uv$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net BOEcJ4gpkuQ56VHiL2UnrwbzhzecGt8+q12D3F0KMh1TIqfgXi
Cancel-Lock: sha1:kXbn1xDo4IfssiWM78hSjLMb+UI= sha256:Pgyynv+ozdvIYk2If7SPaPuALK1HiSMXAAHkUnxgsmk=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <utd5ts$135uv$1@dont-email.me>
 by: Brian Gregory - Tue, 26 Mar 2024 15:40 UTC

On 19/03/2024 23:08, SH wrote:
> Another is do do aaway with the BBC and ITV regions to permit national
> PSB channels so the PSB1, PSB2 and PSB3 become a SFN.

As I understand it SFNs don't work very well even with DVB-T2. The
symbol rate is still too high for the typical distances between our
transmitters.

--
Brian Gregory (in England).

Re: New TV aerial question

<l6gaf1Fqd3rU1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=43227&group=uk.tech.digital-tv#43227

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.tech.digital-tv
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: mark@invalid.com (Mark Carver)
Newsgroups: uk.tech.digital-tv
Subject: Re: New TV aerial question
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 16:12:15 +0000
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <l6gaf1Fqd3rU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <s57hviplmj22shl71il91aevhsj07g40vp@4ax.com>
<l5t1ngFcssU1@mid.individual.net> <utcsoh$111dq$1@dont-email.me>
<5b4440fc35charles@candehope.me.uk> <utd2ri$12iek$1@dont-email.me>
<gv3kvidgjr7unol80tdbcpjfcrp1hht6lh@4ax.com> <utd5ts$135uv$1@dont-email.me>
<l6g8ioFtbaiU1@mid.individual.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net p6lxCr04P/9IXxTKfiOXEQv4BltKc+uvzPKt5qnxc0YLvVAdw=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:fIa3up7oL7GXAzMxE6kEa2fO19g= sha256:nHUQ1ZmVcQqRbHLPBGRroXdhcec19be3huZcspFrxIs=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <l6g8ioFtbaiU1@mid.individual.net>
 by: Mark Carver - Tue, 26 Mar 2024 16:12 UTC

On 26/03/2024 15:40, Brian Gregory wrote:
> On 19/03/2024 23:08, SH wrote:
>> Another is do do aaway with the BBC and ITV regions to permit national
>> PSB channels so the PSB1, PSB2 and PSB3 become a SFN.
>
> As I understand it SFNs don't work very well even with DVB-T2. The
> symbol rate is still too high for the typical distances between our
> transmitters.
>
Indeed, keeping everything else equal, you have to reduce the payload,
to increase that geographical separation.

Re: New TV aerial question

<ncv50j942qhfr4c61ftn1kvkj76sjdfvau@4ax.com>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=43228&group=uk.tech.digital-tv#43228

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.tech.digital-tv
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk (Scott)
Newsgroups: uk.tech.digital-tv
Subject: Re: New TV aerial question
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 16:54:12 +0000
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <ncv50j942qhfr4c61ftn1kvkj76sjdfvau@4ax.com>
References: <s57hviplmj22shl71il91aevhsj07g40vp@4ax.com> <egm30jletsoibuijc5rv3057rhc0scdusl@4ax.com> <utuitb$1r9g8$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net 5B75b3MV2eOZTzWb5zFhHA4D2mYya0q+6IkP1haHPcvUs3I5AL
Cancel-Lock: sha1:765PTzdbeXPlJ/bzPQpUHE3sX/I= sha256:1hO7V+g7gB8xrShTp0Uc8apnz67PIuZ/dx79+diZEGU=
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
 by: Scott - Tue, 26 Mar 2024 16:54 UTC

On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 13:34:31 +0000 (GMT+00:00), "Graham. "
<graham-usenet@mail.com> wrote:

> Mike Harris Aerial & Satellite is a trading name of Aerial
> Services Scotland Ltd | Unit 1, 3 Bowerwalls Place, Barrhead, G78
> 1BF.
>
>Registered Company No: SC296435

I redacted this detail to protect the guilty :-)

Re: New TV aerial question

<utv27a$28rla$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=43229&group=uk.tech.digital-tv#43229

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.tech.digital-tv
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: i.love@spam.com (SH)
Newsgroups: uk.tech.digital-tv
Subject: Re: New TV aerial question
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 17:55:52 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <utv27a$28rla$1@dont-email.me>
References: <s57hviplmj22shl71il91aevhsj07g40vp@4ax.com>
<egm30jletsoibuijc5rv3057rhc0scdusl@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 17:55:54 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="fc2b336c2ecfecdf64b3d646a8f15a43";
logging-data="2387626"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19vzXC1Jeu4rxH8zja64YpFz8SyktRs/tM="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Qr92BR8ThVWAy7G5Ot0FvU8MdVk=
In-Reply-To: <egm30jletsoibuijc5rv3057rhc0scdusl@4ax.com>
Content-Language: en-GB
 by: SH - Tue, 26 Mar 2024 17:55 UTC

On 25/03/2024 20:11, Scott wrote:
> Any comment on this, found during research?
>
> "XXX began installing aerials in 2006, and have continued ever since.
> The firm maintains the company culture centered around the innovation
> of digital technology. Primarily to give our clients the highest
> digital service on the market.
>
> "It should be noted, current aerials will be able to collect digital
> TV to some extent. However, they were constructed for correspondent
> signals. So there will be a difference in the quality of the picture.
> Especially with ancient systems. Also, old aerials would have been
> fitted to pick up limited variety of signals. Hence, they would be at
> the local analogue receiver.
>
> "Additionally, Analogue equipment corrupts over time. Yet is not
> visible with the analogue signals. Because the image also worsens
> gradually.
>
> "However, with digital picture, it stays the same up until it achieves
> a crucial juncture. Then the image suspends or disappears entirely. If
> necessary, a new aerial system is constructed exclusively to enhance
> digital communications.
>
> "Furthermore, High gain aerials, of a big size, will enhance image
> excellence. Even in areas of low reception. Therefore, preventing
> digital disintegration. Therefore boosting the number of stations that
> can be obtained."

This is a ChatGPT response!

Pages:12
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor