Rocksolid Light - uk.telecom.mobile - Re: Pixel 4a (5G) vs Pixel 5

Re: Pixel 4a (5G) vs Pixel 5

<e8dab024-5a71-42c6-9ce6-688e4cfd85f0n@googlegroups.com>

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=4720&group=uk.telecom.mobile#4720

copy link Newsgroups: uk.telecom.mobile

X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5acd:0:b0:3f5:e8f:47b2 with SMTP id d13-20020ac85acd000000b003f50e8f47b2mr4917673qtd.11.1684314452022;
Wed, 17 May 2023 02:07:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:12cf:b0:6ab:a9f:218 with SMTP id
a15-20020a05683012cf00b006ab0a9f0218mr6347694otq.0.1684314451754; Wed, 17 May
2023 02:07:31 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: uk.telecom.mobile
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 02:07:31 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <ct0c6gdvsnl2jnsngecge8srfu35igci2l@4ax.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.131.79.184; posting-account=G_qByQgAAABH7uU6wg7XlEhlQQv2HaY5
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.131.79.184
References: <ct0c6gdvsnl2jnsngecge8srfu35igci2l@4ax.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <e8dab024-5a71-42c6-9ce6-688e4cfd85f0n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Pixel 4a (5G) vs Pixel 5
From: vvvvvvvvvvvvvva@outlook.com (V)
Injection-Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 09:07:32 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 2102

by: V - Wed, 17 May 2023 09:07 UTC

Look out this:

groups.google.com/g/airplane/c/6youQ9mdRk8/m/FI7hNeZCBwAJ

This is new age chat platform developed by me..........

On Thursday, April 1, 2021 at 7:45:58 PM UTC+2, Scott wrote:
> Moving on from the stolen phone thread, I liked my Pixel so much that
> I want to replace it. I definitely want 5G capability for
> future-proofing.
>
> The 4a and 5 look very similar - same chip. As far as I can see, the
> 5 is IPX8 water resistant, has no headphone socket and is capable of
> wireless charging. The 4a does not claim water resistance but has a
> standard headphone socket and no wireless charging.
>
> My thoughts are (1) is IPX8 necessary or will any phone cope with a
> little bit of rain if you are sensible; and (2) is wireless charging
> slower that the USB-C fast charge?
>
> Any comments on whether it is worth paying extra for the Pixel 5? Am
> I missing anything?

Confession is good for the soul, but bad for the career.

aus+uk / uk.telecom.mobile / Re: Pixel 4a (5G) vs Pixel 5

Subject	Author
Pixel 4a (5G) vs Pixel 5	V