Rocksolid Light

Welcome to Rocksolid Light

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

At many levels, Perl is a "diagonal" language. -- Larry Wall in <199709021854.LAA12794@wall.org>

aus+uk / uk.telecom.mobile / Re: Very asymmetric 5G

SubjectAuthor
* Very asymmetric 5GRupert Moss-Eccardt
`* Very asymmetric 5Gnotya...@gmail.com
 +- Very asymmetric 5GV
 +- Very asymmetric 5GAndy Burns
 `* Very asymmetric 5GRupert Moss-Eccardt
  +- Very asymmetric 5GRupert Moss-Eccardt
  `* Very asymmetric 5Gnotya...@gmail.com
   `* Very asymmetric 5GRupert Moss-Eccardt
    `* Very asymmetric 5GDavid Higton
     `* Very asymmetric 5GChris
      `- Very asymmetric 5GTweed

1
Re: Very asymmetric 5G

<74cce7a25a.DaveMeUK@BeagleBoard-xM>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=4648&group=uk.telecom.mobile#4648

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.telecom.mobile
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: dave@davehigton.me.uk (David Higton)
Newsgroups: uk.telecom.mobile
Subject: Re: Very asymmetric 5G
Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 14:46:07 +0100
Organization: Home
Lines: 36
Message-ID: <74cce7a25a.DaveMeUK@BeagleBoard-xM>
References: <kbs4ccF4cfhU1@mid.individual.net> <5e5be5bb-2673-433b-af93-146acd297027n@googlegroups.com> <kbv4rpFiqicU1@mid.individual.net>
<9bf18092-d8fd-4696-9b4a-d8b0445f8660n@googlegroups.com> <kc3qb5Fa7iuU1@mid.individual.net>
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a7f7b9b6ee52377a773d79edaab56138";
logging-data="1182671"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/Vt+BNzQZ50iNw1y4WRc5cDZdNTDoSPGM="
User-Agent: Messenger-Pro/8.03 (MsgServe/8.01) (RISC-OS/5.29) NewsHound/v1.54
Cancel-Lock: sha1:qDjcXY7kZRj4YJnk/YPJkv2qnHg=
 by: David Higton - Thu, 11 May 2023 13:46 UTC

In message <kc3qb5Fa7iuU1@mid.individual.net>
Rupert Moss-Eccardt <nin@moss-eccardt.com> wrote:

> On 9 May 2023 09:44, "notya...@gmail.com" wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 9 May 2023 at 15:50:39 UTC+1, Rupert Moss-Eccardt wrote:
> > > On 8 May 2023 12:04, "notya...@gmail.com" wrote:
> > > > On Monday, 8 May 2023 at 12:24:58 UTC+1, Rupert Moss-Eccardt wrote:
> > > > > I was in "town" today so got 5G. Oh, I though, I wonder how quick
> > > > > it is. 100Mb/s down, 0.18Mb/s up
> > > > >
> > > > > So what would cause such disparity? Is there something wrong?
> > > >
> > > > Measure again.
> > > >
> > > > When I tested in March in Manchester, I got 227Mbps down and 96Mbps
> > > > up.
> >
> > That was with an S23 Ultra.
> >
>
> Hence my question - is there something wrong locally for me?

How long have you tested it for, how many times, and on how many different
web sites?

I've used 5G in both Stockport and Manchester, and it's been rather odd
that the speed is either blindingly fast or snail's pace - fortunately
more often the former than the latter. No numeric measurements in my
case, just informal observations of web accesses.

Even for a speed test, you're going through a chain of network segments,
any of which can be overloaded or faulty. If you get consistently poor
performance over a period (long enough not to be just due to temporary
overload), it's time to complain.

David

Re: Very asymmetric 5G

<u3itrt$14an0$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=4649&group=uk.telecom.mobile#4649

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.telecom.mobile
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: ithinkiam@gmail.com (Chris)
Newsgroups: uk.telecom.mobile
Subject: Re: Very asymmetric 5G
Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 14:25:01 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <u3itrt$14an0$1@dont-email.me>
References: <9bf18092-d8fd-4696-9b4a-d8b0445f8660n@googlegroups.com>
<kc3qb5Fa7iuU1@mid.individual.net>
<74cce7a25a.DaveMeUK@BeagleBoard-xM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 14:25:01 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f30b6cfeecf034f985d4bcf03fc4ecb1";
logging-data="1190624"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18TTpXgnh6byMNSJCuIA+ZvsvkHRLCu8Dk="
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:XJSP5kUrqembp92c+FciOqi/yzE=
sha1:bgLZG6pv+Y2CpGh4JcSG3pOxMnw=
 by: Chris - Thu, 11 May 2023 14:25 UTC

David Higton <dave@davehigton.me.uk> wrote:
> In message <kc3qb5Fa7iuU1@mid.individual.net>
> Rupert Moss-Eccardt <nin@moss-eccardt.com> wrote:
>
>> On 9 May 2023 09:44, "notya...@gmail.com" wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, 9 May 2023 at 15:50:39 UTC+1, Rupert Moss-Eccardt wrote:
>>>> On 8 May 2023 12:04, "notya...@gmail.com" wrote:
>>>>> On Monday, 8 May 2023 at 12:24:58 UTC+1, Rupert Moss-Eccardt wrote:
>>>>>> I was in "town" today so got 5G. Oh, I though, I wonder how quick
>>>>>> it is. 100Mb/s down, 0.18Mb/s up
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So what would cause such disparity? Is there something wrong?
>>>>>
>>>>> Measure again.
>>>>>
>>>>> When I tested in March in Manchester, I got 227Mbps down and 96Mbps
>>>>> up.
>>>
>>> That was with an S23 Ultra.
>>>
>>
>> Hence my question - is there something wrong locally for me?
>
> How long have you tested it for, how many times, and on how many different
> web sites?

Exactly. I got similar behaviour to OP but during the test the phone
changed from 5G to 4G. I was on the train...

> I've used 5G in both Stockport and Manchester, and it's been rather odd
> that the speed is either blindingly fast or snail's pace - fortunately
> more often the former than the latter. No numeric measurements in my
> case, just informal observations of web accesses.

5G is patchy around here so am not seeing much benefit from it.

Re: Very asymmetric 5G

<u3j4j1$1544b$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=4650&group=uk.telecom.mobile#4650

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.telecom.mobile
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: usenet.tweed@gmail.com (Tweed)
Newsgroups: uk.telecom.mobile
Subject: Re: Very asymmetric 5G
Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 16:19:45 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 46
Message-ID: <u3j4j1$1544b$1@dont-email.me>
References: <9bf18092-d8fd-4696-9b4a-d8b0445f8660n@googlegroups.com>
<kc3qb5Fa7iuU1@mid.individual.net>
<74cce7a25a.DaveMeUK@BeagleBoard-xM>
<u3itrt$14an0$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 16:19:45 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2cfae4538526921aee0ff5d9b08f04d1";
logging-data="1216651"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19hHJSPTkRlNaLEFv8jw4Ab"
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPad)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:cw5EKvt0gqKUdl9EnWoc7BD7p+U=
sha1:/CyMs5pDvhFgYGLKO+Syb4Z8bqI=
 by: Tweed - Thu, 11 May 2023 16:19 UTC

Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
> David Higton <dave@davehigton.me.uk> wrote:
>> In message <kc3qb5Fa7iuU1@mid.individual.net>
>> Rupert Moss-Eccardt <nin@moss-eccardt.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 9 May 2023 09:44, "notya...@gmail.com" wrote:
>>>> On Tuesday, 9 May 2023 at 15:50:39 UTC+1, Rupert Moss-Eccardt wrote:
>>>>> On 8 May 2023 12:04, "notya...@gmail.com" wrote:
>>>>>> On Monday, 8 May 2023 at 12:24:58 UTC+1, Rupert Moss-Eccardt wrote:
>>>>>>> I was in "town" today so got 5G. Oh, I though, I wonder how quick
>>>>>>> it is. 100Mb/s down, 0.18Mb/s up
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So what would cause such disparity? Is there something wrong?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Measure again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When I tested in March in Manchester, I got 227Mbps down and 96Mbps
>>>>>> up.
>>>>
>>>> That was with an S23 Ultra.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hence my question - is there something wrong locally for me?
>>
>> How long have you tested it for, how many times, and on how many different
>> web sites?
>
> Exactly. I got similar behaviour to OP but during the test the phone
> changed from 5G to 4G. I was on the train...
>
>> I've used 5G in both Stockport and Manchester, and it's been rather odd
>> that the speed is either blindingly fast or snail's pace - fortunately
>> more often the former than the latter. No numeric measurements in my
>> case, just informal observations of web accesses.
>
> 5G is patchy around here so am not seeing much benefit from it.
>
>
>
This may be a blind alley of partially understood facts, but I remember
reading somewhere that some handsets fall back from 5G to 4G to save power.
The 5G chipset is power hungry, at least in current incarnations. If the
phone thinks it doesn’t need the speed it can fall back. Obviously for a
speed test you would think it does need the speed, but the phone might be
making a false decision during the upload part of the test.

Re: Very asymmetric 5G

<a5aeecf5-a688-44a0-8248-0ac2ca10c2e5n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=4662&group=uk.telecom.mobile#4662

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.telecom.mobile
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:4694:b0:759:2e3d:914b with SMTP id bq20-20020a05620a469400b007592e3d914bmr624831qkb.9.1683955051806;
Fri, 12 May 2023 22:17:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:7ec5:b0:192:8947:8ac with SMTP id
wz5-20020a0568707ec500b00192894708acmr7110717oab.1.1683955051549; Fri, 12 May
2023 22:17:31 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.snarked.org!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: uk.telecom.mobile
Date: Fri, 12 May 2023 22:17:31 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5e5be5bb-2673-433b-af93-146acd297027n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.131.78.239; posting-account=JYCD-AoAAABJjYHTEug7bzEvKBag4Jpy
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.131.78.239
References: <kbs4ccF4cfhU1@mid.individual.net> <5e5be5bb-2673-433b-af93-146acd297027n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <a5aeecf5-a688-44a0-8248-0ac2ca10c2e5n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Very asymmetric 5G
From: vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvva@hotmail.com (V)
Injection-Date: Sat, 13 May 2023 05:17:31 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Lines: 15
 by: V - Sat, 13 May 2023 05:17 UTC

⠀⠀ ⠀⠀¯\_(ツ)_/¯⠀ ⠀⠀⠀

anglezzzzzzzzzzz.000webhostapp.com
kohtumispaik3.66ghz.com/a.php
anglezzzzzzz.likesyou.org
↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑
LOOK out THERE, boys AND girls...............

On Monday, May 8, 2023 at 9:04:16 PM UTC+2, notya...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, 8 May 2023 at 12:24:58 UTC+1, Rupert Moss-Eccardt wrote:
> > I was in "town" today so got 5G. Oh, I though, I wonder how quick it is.
> > 100Mb/s down, 0.18Mb/s up
> >
> > So what would cause such disparity? Is there something wrong?
> Measure again.
>
> When I tested in March in Manchester, I got 227Mbps down and 96Mbps up.
>
> Could be your phone, could be overenthusiastic uplink attenuation by the base station.

Very asymmetric 5G

<kbs4ccF4cfhU1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=5284&group=uk.telecom.mobile#5284

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.telecom.mobile
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.szaf.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: nin@moss-eccardt.com (Rupert Moss-Eccardt)
Newsgroups: uk.telecom.mobile
Subject: Very asymmetric 5G
Date: Mon, 08 May 2023 12:22:51 +0100
Lines: 4
Message-ID: <kbs4ccF4cfhU1@mid.individual.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit
X-Trace: individual.net y16ceg3PT5PuXL0rqnvoCgUWTDl6LfkgwEpIG6Ayc+KXq1n2gG
Cancel-Lock: sha1:rMJ2GYhAgCF1DerCg+W1Kiq91Co=
User-Agent: NewsgroupsRT/17
 by: Rupert Moss-Eccardt - Mon, 8 May 2023 11:22 UTC

I was in "town" today so got 5G. Oh, I though, I wonder how quick it is.
100Mb/s down, 0.18Mb/s up

So what would cause such disparity? Is there something wrong?

Re: Very asymmetric 5G

<5e5be5bb-2673-433b-af93-146acd297027n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=5285&group=uk.telecom.mobile#5285

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.telecom.mobile
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:1707:b0:74f:baef:6c4a with SMTP id az7-20020a05620a170700b0074fbaef6c4amr3736690qkb.6.1683572655618;
Mon, 08 May 2023 12:04:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:14c9:b0:6ab:a25:4e5f with SMTP id
t9-20020a05683014c900b006ab0a254e5fmr48327otq.4.1683572655299; Mon, 08 May
2023 12:04:15 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!1.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!border-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: uk.telecom.mobile
Date: Mon, 8 May 2023 12:04:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <kbs4ccF4cfhU1@mid.individual.net>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2a00:23c7:ef16:7b01:98a0:7c08:ff5f:5686;
posting-account=4hkfSwkAAADcv-_hpUK54e62WKY0FdSL
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2a00:23c7:ef16:7b01:98a0:7c08:ff5f:5686
References: <kbs4ccF4cfhU1@mid.individual.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <5e5be5bb-2673-433b-af93-146acd297027n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Very asymmetric 5G
From: notyalckram@gmail.com (notya...@gmail.com)
Injection-Date: Mon, 08 May 2023 19:04:15 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 10
 by: notya...@gmail.com - Mon, 8 May 2023 19:04 UTC

On Monday, 8 May 2023 at 12:24:58 UTC+1, Rupert Moss-Eccardt wrote:
> I was in "town" today so got 5G. Oh, I though, I wonder how quick it is.
> 100Mb/s down, 0.18Mb/s up
>
> So what would cause such disparity? Is there something wrong?

Measure again.

When I tested in March in Manchester, I got 227Mbps down and 96Mbps up.

Could be your phone, could be overenthusiastic uplink attenuation by the base station.

Re: Very asymmetric 5G

<kbt1n2F8ttpU1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=5286&group=uk.telecom.mobile#5286

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.telecom.mobile
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!lilly.ping.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: usenet@andyburns.uk (Andy Burns)
Newsgroups: uk.telecom.mobile
Subject: Re: Very asymmetric 5G
Date: Mon, 8 May 2023 20:43:29 +0100
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <kbt1n2F8ttpU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <kbs4ccF4cfhU1@mid.individual.net>
<5e5be5bb-2673-433b-af93-146acd297027n@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net EtdeKh4ApYlUbiZOp4l7swxcv6AqdHmanqV0sInDiqOqaESfQS
Cancel-Lock: sha1:jcyNeTL3mnXj2stwfg0gkXnJ9cM=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/102.10.1
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <5e5be5bb-2673-433b-af93-146acd297027n@googlegroups.com>
 by: Andy Burns - Mon, 8 May 2023 19:43 UTC

notya...@gmail.com wrote:

> On Monday, 8 May 2023 at 12:24:58 UTC+1, Rupert Moss-Eccardt wrote:
>
>> I was in "town" today so got 5G. Oh, I though, I wonder how quick it is.
>> 100Mb/s down, 0.18Mb/s up
>>
>> So what would cause such disparity? Is there something wrong?
>
> Measure again.
>
> When I tested in March in Manchester, I got 227Mbps down and 96Mbps up.

I've had the same

345 Mbs down / 38.7 Mbps up (derby)

and the reverse

129 Mbps down / 304 Mbps up (leicester)

both of which were quite consistently repeated at the respective locations

Re: Very asymmetric 5G

<kbv4rpFiqicU1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=5288&group=uk.telecom.mobile#5288

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.telecom.mobile
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: nin@moss-eccardt.com (Rupert Moss-Eccardt)
Newsgroups: uk.telecom.mobile
Subject: Re: Very asymmetric 5G
Date: Tue, 09 May 2023 15:49:28 +0100
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <kbv4rpFiqicU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <kbs4ccF4cfhU1@mid.individual.net> <5e5be5bb-2673-433b-af93-146acd297027n@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit
X-Trace: individual.net oMOq3VvchtLdVqbCUt/l6AL233yvSEEWlTbCZHKmqovKMBpHN7
Cancel-Lock: sha1:U56/PIWm7oUVLGcZj4zxBVfs0+w=
User-Agent: NewsgroupsRT/17
In-Reply-To: <5e5be5bb-2673-433b-af93-146acd297027n@googlegroups.com>
 by: Rupert Moss-Eccardt - Tue, 9 May 2023 14:49 UTC

On 8 May 2023 12:04, "notya...@gmail.com" wrote:
> On Monday, 8 May 2023 at 12:24:58 UTC+1, Rupert Moss-Eccardt wrote:
>> I was in "town" today so got 5G. Oh, I though, I wonder how quick it is.
>> 100Mb/s down, 0.18Mb/s up
>>
>> So what would cause such disparity? Is there something wrong?
>
> Measure again.
>
> When I tested in March in Manchester, I got 227Mbps down and 96Mbps up.
>
> Could be your phone, could be overenthusiastic uplink attenuation by the base station.

This was with a Nokia X20, a colleague with a Samsung A23 of some sort
got the same result.

Re: Very asymmetric 5G

<kbv4t5Fiqr3U1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=5289&group=uk.telecom.mobile#5289

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.telecom.mobile
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: nin@moss-eccardt.com (Rupert Moss-Eccardt)
Newsgroups: uk.telecom.mobile
Subject: Re: Very asymmetric 5G
Date: Tue, 09 May 2023 15:50:13 +0100
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <kbv4t5Fiqr3U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <kbs4ccF4cfhU1@mid.individual.net> <5e5be5bb-2673-433b-af93-146acd297027n@googlegroups.com> <kbv4rpFiqicU1@mid.individual.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit
X-Trace: individual.net ZgsJQ4WOecN+7x0Qw6C5KQSdiXOVIe3vsymrVgHF1GKWDcmC8G
Cancel-Lock: sha1:5RV5WC13xk9ytQAh1jdCt/j0dpM=
User-Agent: NewsgroupsRT/17
In-Reply-To: <kbv4rpFiqicU1@mid.individual.net>
 by: Rupert Moss-Eccardt - Tue, 9 May 2023 14:50 UTC

On 9 May 2023 15:49, Rupert Moss-Eccardt wrote:
> On 8 May 2023 12:04, "notya...@gmail.com" wrote:
>> On Monday, 8 May 2023 at 12:24:58 UTC+1, Rupert Moss-Eccardt wrote:
>>> I was in "town" today so got 5G. Oh, I though, I wonder how quick it is.
>>> 100Mb/s down, 0.18Mb/s up
>>>
>>> So what would cause such disparity? Is there something wrong?
>>
>> Measure again.
>>
>> When I tested in March in Manchester, I got 227Mbps down and 96Mbps up.
>>
>> Could be your phone, could be overenthusiastic uplink attenuation by the base station.
>
> This was with a Nokia X20, a colleague with a Samsung A23 of some sort
> got the same result.
>

Oops! S23

Re: Very asymmetric 5G

<9bf18092-d8fd-4696-9b4a-d8b0445f8660n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=5290&group=uk.telecom.mobile#5290

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.telecom.mobile
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5c88:0:b0:3f3:89cf:7f5f with SMTP id r8-20020ac85c88000000b003f389cf7f5fmr4158570qta.13.1683650663921;
Tue, 09 May 2023 09:44:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:aca:b905:0:b0:394:25bb:bb41 with SMTP id
j5-20020acab905000000b0039425bbbb41mr129361oif.1.1683650663456; Tue, 09 May
2023 09:44:23 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: uk.telecom.mobile
Date: Tue, 9 May 2023 09:44:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <kbv4rpFiqicU1@mid.individual.net>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2a00:23c7:ef16:7b01:c52c:f810:41e2:23ee;
posting-account=4hkfSwkAAADcv-_hpUK54e62WKY0FdSL
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2a00:23c7:ef16:7b01:c52c:f810:41e2:23ee
References: <kbs4ccF4cfhU1@mid.individual.net> <5e5be5bb-2673-433b-af93-146acd297027n@googlegroups.com>
<kbv4rpFiqicU1@mid.individual.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <9bf18092-d8fd-4696-9b4a-d8b0445f8660n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Very asymmetric 5G
From: notyalckram@gmail.com (notya...@gmail.com)
Injection-Date: Tue, 09 May 2023 16:44:23 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 2036
 by: notya...@gmail.com - Tue, 9 May 2023 16:44 UTC

On Tuesday, 9 May 2023 at 15:50:39 UTC+1, Rupert Moss-Eccardt wrote:
> On 8 May 2023 12:04, "notya...@gmail.com" wrote:
> > On Monday, 8 May 2023 at 12:24:58 UTC+1, Rupert Moss-Eccardt wrote:
> >> I was in "town" today so got 5G. Oh, I though, I wonder how quick it is.
> >> 100Mb/s down, 0.18Mb/s up
> >>
> >> So what would cause such disparity? Is there something wrong?
> >
> > Measure again.
> >
> > When I tested in March in Manchester, I got 227Mbps down and 96Mbps up.

That was with an S23 Ultra.

> >
> > Could be your phone, could be overenthusiastic uplink attenuation by the base station.
> This was with a Nokia X20, a colleague with a Samsung A23 of some sort
> got the same result.

Re: Very asymmetric 5G

<kc3qb5Fa7iuU1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=5292&group=uk.telecom.mobile#5292

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.telecom.mobile
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: nin@moss-eccardt.com (Rupert Moss-Eccardt)
Newsgroups: uk.telecom.mobile
Subject: Re: Very asymmetric 5G
Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 10:20:36 +0100
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <kc3qb5Fa7iuU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <kbs4ccF4cfhU1@mid.individual.net> <5e5be5bb-2673-433b-af93-146acd297027n@googlegroups.com>
<kbv4rpFiqicU1@mid.individual.net> <9bf18092-d8fd-4696-9b4a-d8b0445f8660n@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit
X-Trace: individual.net d1yAg3oDo/6jRSi0RLpSzA3JxG6OcoNm+YVrtY93HopGLFrW1A
Cancel-Lock: sha1:cabeQX1B6/8Gie39wNMj6pBpB4k=
User-Agent: NewsgroupsRT/17
In-Reply-To: <9bf18092-d8fd-4696-9b4a-d8b0445f8660n@googlegroups.com>
 by: Rupert Moss-Eccardt - Thu, 11 May 2023 09:20 UTC

On 9 May 2023 09:44, "notya...@gmail.com" wrote:
> On Tuesday, 9 May 2023 at 15:50:39 UTC+1, Rupert Moss-Eccardt wrote:
>> On 8 May 2023 12:04, "notya...@gmail.com" wrote:
>> > On Monday, 8 May 2023 at 12:24:58 UTC+1, Rupert Moss-Eccardt wrote:
>> >> I was in "town" today so got 5G. Oh, I though, I wonder how quick it is.
>> >> 100Mb/s down, 0.18Mb/s up
>> >>
>> >> So what would cause such disparity? Is there something wrong?
>> >
>> > Measure again.
>> >
>> > When I tested in March in Manchester, I got 227Mbps down and 96Mbps up.
>
> That was with an S23 Ultra.
>

Hence my question - is there something wrong locally for me?

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor