Rocksolid Light

Welcome to Rocksolid Light

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

Shannon's Observation: Nothing is so frustrating as a bad situation that is beginning to improve.


aus+uk / uk.transport.london / Re: routemasters are back in London

SubjectAuthor
* routemasters are back in LondonTitus_Atomicus@somewhere.in.the.world
+* Re: routemasters are back in LondonRecliner
|`* Re: routemasters are back in LondonTitus_Atomicus@somewhere.in.the.world
| `* Re: routemasters are back in LondonRecliner
|  +* Re: routemasters are back in LondonKen
|  |+- Re: routemasters are back in LondonGraeme Wall
|  |`* Re: routemasters are back in LondonRecliner
|  | `* Re: routemasters are back in LondonKen
|  |  +* Re: routemasters are back in LondonMuttley
|  |  |+* Re: routemasters are back in LondonRecliner
|  |  ||`* Re: routemasters are back in LondonMuttley
|  |  || `- Re: routemasters are back in LondonJulian Macassey
|  |  |+* Re: routemasters are back in LondonBlueshirt
|  |  ||+- Re: routemasters are back in LondonMuttley
|  |  ||`- Re: routemasters are back in LondonGraeme Wall
|  |  |`* Re: routemasters are back in LondonKen
|  |  | +* Re: routemasters are back in LondonMuttley
|  |  | |`* Re: routemasters are back in LondonKen
|  |  | | `- Re: routemasters are back in LondonMuttley
|  |  | `* Re: routemasters are back in LondonGraeme Wall
|  |  |  +* Re: routemasters are back in LondonMuttley
|  |  |  |`- Re: routemasters are back in LondonGraeme Wall
|  |  |  `* Re: routemasters are back in LondonMarland
|  |  |   `* Re: routemasters are back in LondonGraeme Wall
|  |  |    `- Re: routemasters are back in LondonMarland
|  |  `- Re: routemasters are back in LondonRecliner
|  `* Re: routemasters are back in LondonTitus_Atomicus@somewhere.in.the.world
|   +* Re: routemasters are back in LondonRecliner
|   |+* Re: routemasters are back in LondonGraeme Wall
|   ||`* Re: routemasters are back in LondonRecliner
|   || +* Re: routemasters are back in LondonTheo
|   || |`* Re: routemasters are back in LondonRecliner
|   || | `* Re: routemasters are back in LondonTheo
|   || |  `* Re: routemasters are back in LondonGraeme Wall
|   || |   +- Re: routemasters are back in LondonTheo
|   || |   +* Re: routemasters are back in LondonMuttley
|   || |   |+- Re: routemasters are back in LondonMuttley
|   || |   |`* Re: routemasters are back in LondonGraeme Wall
|   || |   | `* Re: routemasters are back in LondonMuttley
|   || |   |  `* Re: routemasters are back in LondonMarland
|   || |   |   `* Re: routemasters are back in LondonMuttley
|   || |   |    +- Re: routemasters are back in LondonMarland
|   || |   |    `- Re: routemasters are back in LondonGraeme Wall
|   || |   `- Re: routemasters are back in LondonRecliner
|   || `- Re: routemasters are back in LondonMarland
|   |+* Re: routemasters are back in LondonTitus_Atomicus@somewhere.in.the.world
|   ||`* Re: routemasters are back in LondonRecliner
|   || `* Re: routemasters are back in LondonTitus_Atomicus@somewhere.in.the.world
|   ||  +- Re: routemasters are back in LondonRoland Perry
|   ||  `- Re: routemasters are back in LondonMarland
|   |`- Re: routemasters are back in LondonBlueshirt
|   `- Re: routemasters are back in LondonBlueshirt
`- Re: routemasters are back in LondonTitus_Atomicus@somewhere.in.the.world

Pages:123
Re: routemasters are back in London

<zfkKN.231063$ds1.154092@fx14.ams1>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=5934&group=uk.transport.london#5934

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.transport.london
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!193.141.40.65.MISMATCH!npeer.as286.net!npeer-ng0.as286.net!peer03.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!fx14.ams1.POSTED!not-for-mail
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPad)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:O309nFECNS/s0WOhB/SdHgufosY=
Newsgroups: uk.transport.london
Subject: Re: routemasters are back in London
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: recliner.usenet@gmail.com (Recliner)
References: <uskqpf$5ju$1$Atomicus@news.chmurka.net>
<DhmHN.197890$ds1.108704@fx14.ams1>
<uskt88$813$1$Atomicus@news.chmurka.net>
<tv2uuil228sc3kf0n5nn6isgf0gcl2la05@4ax.com>
<ut7509$36i$1$Atomicus@news.chmurka.net>
<A6GJN.350870$7uxe.255765@fx09.ams1>
<ut7elc$3m3fv$1@dont-email.me>
<BIIJN.131239$t3Rc.85361@fx06.ams1>
<0rF*NlIFz@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>
<x29KN.255886$hq1.29943@fx13.ams1>
<1rF*UNLFz@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>
<utbpim$p607$1@dont-email.me>
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <zfkKN.231063$ds1.154092@fx14.ams1>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 17:50:23 GMT
X-Received-Bytes: 2955
 by: Recliner - Tue, 19 Mar 2024 17:50 UTC

Graeme Wall <rail@greywall.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> On 19/03/2024 10:23, Theo wrote:
>> Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I wonder how long it'll be before Boris buses appear on the used market.
>>>> The early ones are now 12 years old - not sure what the service life of a
>>>> regular London bus is, but they must be getting towards that.
>>>>
>>>> The original Routemasters lasted a long time because they were endlessly
>>>> refurbished, but that doesn't happen today. Given the many problems
>>>> they have, I'd expect operators would much rather replace them with new
>>>> electric buses - especially the Euro 5 examples.
>>>
>>> There's only one operator: TfL. It owns the whole fleet, as the leasing
>>> companies wouldn't fund a bus with so little re-sale potential.
>>
>> TfL don't operate them, they're leased out to contract bus operators
>> (Go-ahead, RATP, etc*) aren't they? I wonder at what point they refuse to
>> tender if TfL insist on using the New Routemaster?
>>
>> * I haven't surveyed exactly which operators use them at present
>>
>>>> Maybe at some point TfL will cut their losses?
>>>
>>> I suspect TfL will be keen to investigate converting them to battery
>>> operation.
>>
>> Conversions have worked so well on the railways...
>
> They are hybrid buses so already have most of the kit necessary for full
> electric operation. Remove the diesel engine and fit a bigger battery.
>
> Remove the rear staircase and doors and replace with extra seating and
> you might have a serviceable vehicle.

That makes the conversion much more expensive, so it might be getting
perilously close to the cost of an all-new, more efficient vehicle with a
much longer life.

Re: routemasters are back in London

<l5u5koF5qgqU1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=5937&group=uk.transport.london#5937

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.transport.london
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: gemehabal@btinternet.co.uk (Marland)
Newsgroups: uk.transport.london
Subject: Re: routemasters are back in London
Date: 19 Mar 2024 18:59:36 GMT
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <l5u5koF5qgqU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <uskqpf$5ju$1$Atomicus@news.chmurka.net>
<DhmHN.197890$ds1.108704@fx14.ams1>
<uskt88$813$1$Atomicus@news.chmurka.net>
<tv2uuil228sc3kf0n5nn6isgf0gcl2la05@4ax.com>
<ut7509$36i$1$Atomicus@news.chmurka.net>
<A6GJN.350870$7uxe.255765@fx09.ams1>
<ut7elc$3m3fv$1@dont-email.me>
<BIIJN.131239$t3Rc.85361@fx06.ams1>
<0rF*NlIFz@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>
<x29KN.255886$hq1.29943@fx13.ams1>
<1rF*UNLFz@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>
<utbpim$p607$1@dont-email.me>
<utc8rh$smb2$1@dont-email.me>
<utc9i4$sq85$2@dont-email.me>
<utc9oi$ssch$1@dont-email.me>
<l5trdtF49b7U1@mid.individual.net>
<utcdtt$ts7s$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net nXW7KS4UDb2YJG1WlI0z5w7kREdZAPXcxKTUzuCfwuDT1fFHyt
Cancel-Lock: sha1:auAEN6ZNRV6KOM6dx7OglaAXRlc= sha1:3FKRGomBPPNFI4e8BFfXB1M6f58= sha256:rxOGXCxmyw/phXK87JW8FaiEzOSwekf/CRZAerWOv8Q=
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPad)
 by: Marland - Tue, 19 Mar 2024 18:59 UTC

<Muttley@dastardlyhq.com> wrote:
> On 19 Mar 2024 16:05:17 GMT
> Marland <gemehabal@btinternet.co.uk> wrote:
>> <Muttley@dastardlyhq.com> wrote:
>>> Yes, I forgot about it. Though the rear exit is what differentiates it from
>>> other buses and is its only advantage. Take that away and its an overpriced
>>> badly ventilated nothing special bus.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Take some of the roof off , install a coffee counter in the rear platform
>> space and use them as tour buses.
>
> I imagine the tour bus companies run on fairly thin margins. The last thing
> they'll probably want is some overcomplicated unreliable hybrid bus that needs
> specialist maintenance.
>
>

Perhaps I should have thought Party Bus, make it a cocktail bar at the back
and charge accordingly.

GH

Re: routemasters are back in London

<ute6ja$1ctrj$2@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=5944&group=uk.transport.london#5944

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.transport.london
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: rail@greywall.demon.co.uk (Graeme Wall)
Newsgroups: uk.transport.london
Subject: Re: routemasters are back in London
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 08:26:18 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <ute6ja$1ctrj$2@dont-email.me>
References: <uskqpf$5ju$1$Atomicus@news.chmurka.net>
<DhmHN.197890$ds1.108704@fx14.ams1> <uskt88$813$1$Atomicus@news.chmurka.net>
<tv2uuil228sc3kf0n5nn6isgf0gcl2la05@4ax.com>
<ut7509$36i$1$Atomicus@news.chmurka.net> <A6GJN.350870$7uxe.255765@fx09.ams1>
<ut7elc$3m3fv$1@dont-email.me> <BIIJN.131239$t3Rc.85361@fx06.ams1>
<0rF*NlIFz@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk> <x29KN.255886$hq1.29943@fx13.ams1>
<1rF*UNLFz@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk> <utbpim$p607$1@dont-email.me>
<utc8rh$smb2$1@dont-email.me> <utc9i4$sq85$2@dont-email.me>
<utc9oi$ssch$1@dont-email.me> <l5trdtF49b7U1@mid.individual.net>
<utcdtt$ts7s$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 08:26:18 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6db827fffe720e5b2060fd9ecf703856";
logging-data="1472371"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/i+kv5sFSngu8z+M5+Z0VqE9D1V2DAHgg="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:T6tMOmegEgrewvVY8CgIaC7KQg0=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <utcdtt$ts7s$1@dont-email.me>
 by: Graeme Wall - Wed, 20 Mar 2024 08:26 UTC

On 19/03/2024 16:19, Muttley@dastardlyhq.com wrote:
> On 19 Mar 2024 16:05:17 GMT
> Marland <gemehabal@btinternet.co.uk> wrote:
>> <Muttley@dastardlyhq.com> wrote:
>>> Yes, I forgot about it. Though the rear exit is what differentiates it from
>>> other buses and is its only advantage. Take that away and its an overpriced
>>> badly ventilated nothing special bus.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Take some of the roof off , install a coffee counter in the rear platform
>> space and use them as tour buses.
>
> I imagine the tour bus companies run on fairly thin margins. The last thing
> they'll probably want is some overcomplicated unreliable hybrid bus that needs
> specialist maintenance.
>

Which is why a lot went for Routemasters, solid, reliable and uncomplicated.

--
Graeme Wall
This account not read.

Pages:123
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor