<Muttley@dastardlyhq.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Jan 2024 23:16:25 -0000 (UTC)
> Sam Wilson <ukr@dummy.wislons.fastmail.co.uk> wrote:
>> <Muttley@dastardlyhq.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2 Jan 2024 16:33:17 -0000 (UTC)
>>> Sam Wilson <ukr@dummy.wislons.fastmail.co.uk> wrote:
>>>> Marland <gemehabal@btinternet.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>> Have never really found “Motor” to be widely used. It seems to be the
>>>
>>> Can't you people use UTF8? What the hell is that line noise?
>>
>> That’s Marland’s text you’re quoting, not mine, and it looks perfectly
>> normal here.
>
> Well god knows what encoding it is , I just get gibberish. The header states
> utf8 but none of my utf8 enabled apps can decode it.
>
>

FWIW I use News Tap as my reader, used to use a paid for version of Agent
but that resides on an almost dead laptop. so for the time being News Tap
it is. In fact as the residual drops of usenet
disappear down a virtual plughole I don’t think I will be changing it.
Never realised it causes problems to some and haven’t a clue about
changing how it works.

Has some quirks I don’t like such as hiding a read post the moment you
leave the thread which can make a topic hard to follow, work is around was
to save a dummy reply but I have a title search brings the thread out
from where it is hiding.

GH

Marland <gemehabal@btinternet.co.uk> wrote:
> <Muttley@dastardlyhq.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, 2 Jan 2024 23:16:25 -0000 (UTC)
>> Sam Wilson <ukr@dummy.wislons.fastmail.co.uk> wrote:
>>> <Muttley@dastardlyhq.com> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 2 Jan 2024 16:33:17 -0000 (UTC)
>>>> Sam Wilson <ukr@dummy.wislons.fastmail.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>> Marland <gemehabal@btinternet.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>> Have never really found “Motor” to be widely used. It seems to be the
>>>>
>>>> Can't you people use UTF8? What the hell is that line noise?
>>>
>>> That’s Marland’s text you’re quoting, not mine, and it looks perfectly
>>> normal here.
>>
>> Well god knows what encoding it is , I just get gibberish. The header states
>> utf8 but none of my utf8 enabled apps can decode it.
>>
>>
>
> FWIW I use News Tap as my reader, used to use a paid for version of Agent
> but that resides on an almost dead laptop. so for the time being News Tap
> it is. In fact as the residual drops of usenet
> disappear down a virtual plughole I don’t think I will be changing it.
> Never realised it causes problems to some and haven’t a clue about
> changing how it works.
>
> Has some quirks I don’t like such as hiding a read post the moment you
> leave the thread which can make a topic hard to follow,

That's a user preference. You can change it show all posts, whether read or
unread. That's how I have it.

> work is around was
> to save a dummy reply but I have a title search brings the thread out
> from where it is hiding.

No need for the workaround.

Charles Ellson <charlesellson@btinternet.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 23:22:45 GMT, Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Sam Wilson <ukr@dummy.wislons.fastmail.co.uk> wrote:
>>> <Muttley@dastardlyhq.com> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 2 Jan 2024 16:33:17 -0000 (UTC)
>>>> Sam Wilson <ukr@dummy.wislons.fastmail.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>> Marland <gemehabal@btinternet.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>> Have never really found “Motor” to be widely used. It seems to be the
>>>>
>>>> Can't you people use UTF8? What the hell is that line noise?
>>>
>>> That’s Marland’s text you’re quoting, not mine, and it looks perfectly
>>> normal here.
>>
>> Yes, and here.
>>
> Not here with Forte Agent.

Interesting - in this message the quotes around Motor and the apostrophes
in my text are displayed as little boxes and in this reply they’ve been
removed from the quoted text altogether. The apostrophe in Muttley’s
question, presumably an ASCII single quote, is preserved.

Sam

--
The entity formerly known as Sam.Wilson@ed.ac.uk
Spit the dummy to reply

On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 08:52:28 -0000 (UTC), Muttley@dastardlyhq.com
wrote:

>On Wed, 03 Jan 2024 03:02:32 +0000
>Charles Ellson <charlesellson@btinternet.com> wrote:
>>On Wed, 03 Jan 2024 03:01:11 +0000, Charles Ellson
>><charlesellson@btinternet.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 03 Jan 2024 02:51:01 +0000, Charles Ellson
>>><charlesellson@btinternet.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 23:22:45 GMT, Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Sam Wilson <ukr@dummy.wislons.fastmail.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>> <Muttley@dastardlyhq.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, 2 Jan 2024 16:33:17 -0000 (UTC)
>>>>>>> Sam Wilson <ukr@dummy.wislons.fastmail.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Marland <gemehabal@btinternet.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Have never really found ?otor? to be widely used. It seems to be the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can't you people use UTF8? What the hell is that line noise?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That? Marland? text you?e quoting, not mine, and it looks perfectly
>>>>>> normal here.
>>>>>
>>>>>Yes, and here.
>>>>>
>>>>Not here with Forte Agent.
>>>>
>>>But I see I have Unicode UTF-8 available so I will try that.
>>>
>>Now getting quote marks instead of Klingon.
>
>That rather begs the question of whats wrong with plain ascii quotes, ie ""
>
Yes, looking more closely the quote marks around "motor" are the
directional version which are not ASCII 34. Unicode rather than UTF-8?

Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:
> Marland <gemehabal@btinternet.co.uk> wrote:
>> <Muttley@dastardlyhq.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2 Jan 2024 23:16:25 -0000 (UTC)
>>> Sam Wilson <ukr@dummy.wislons.fastmail.co.uk> wrote:
>>>> <Muttley@dastardlyhq.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 2 Jan 2024 16:33:17 -0000 (UTC)
>>>>> Sam Wilson <ukr@dummy.wislons.fastmail.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>> Marland <gemehabal@btinternet.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>> Have never really found “Motor” to be widely used. It seems to be the
>>>>>
>>>>> Can't you people use UTF8? What the hell is that line noise?
>>>>
>>>> That’s Marland’s text you’re quoting, not mine, and it looks perfectly
>>>> normal here.
>>>
>>> Well god knows what encoding it is , I just get gibberish. The header states
>>> utf8 but none of my utf8 enabled apps can decode it.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> FWIW I use News Tap as my reader, used to use a paid for version of Agent
>> but that resides on an almost dead laptop. so for the time being News Tap
>> it is. In fact as the residual drops of usenet
>> disappear down a virtual plughole I don’t think I will be changing it.
>> Never realised it causes problems to some and haven’t a clue about
>> changing how it works.
>>
>> Has some quirks I don’t like such as hiding a read post the moment you
>> leave the thread which can make a topic hard to follow,
>
> That's a user preference. You can change it show all posts, whether read or
> unread. That's how I have it.
>
>> work is around was
>> to save a dummy reply but I have a title search brings the thread out
>> from where it is hiding.
>
> No need for the workaround.
>
>

Now found the setting that I must have inadvertently changed sometime,
wasn’t where I expected it to be.

GH

In message <%8XkN.33590$Xs07.448@fx06.ams1>, at 16:50:03 on Tue, 2 Jan
2024, Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> remarked:

>>>> PS Then I reflect on the strange olde Brit expression of a *motor* to
>>>> describe the whole moving vehicle which to me would be an
>>>> auto/automobile or car. (And I think we'd be beyond the horseless
>>>> carriage stage [oops] by then).
>>>
>>> Have never really found "Motor" to be widely used. It seems to be
>>> the preserve of that London dialect that isn’t genuine Cockney but
>>> has grown with the City . As such you often here it used by often
>>> slightly dodgy types in B movies or TV series such as the Sweeney.

I never cease to be astonished by the way people mis-classify cockney
slang. Which is always the "other" word, and not the pair of words.

So "give me a butchers", is 'a look' rhyming with 'butchers hook'.
Or "do you like my new whistle" - suit, rhyming with 'whistle and flute'

>>> I suppose the showing of those overseas may give the impression its
>>> use is more common than it really is, pimply youths may use it for
>>> it while while turning their reliable but boring 1st car into an
>>> unreliable noisy junk heap by sticking bits on and cutting other
>>> parts off so people "Look at my Mota" but most grow out of it.
>>
>> It seemed to be common in my grandfather’s generation - born near the end
>> of the C19.
>
>Yes, I think that was typical pre-War usage. And don't forget
>
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Motor

I posted somewhere recently I had to get "a new set of wheels", by which
I meant the whole car, not just circular things with tyres on.
--
Roland Perry

Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
> In message <%8XkN.33590$Xs07.448@fx06.ams1>, at 16:50:03 on Tue, 2 Jan
> 2024, Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> remarked:
>
>>>>> PS Then I reflect on the strange olde Brit expression of a *motor* to
>>>>> describe the whole moving vehicle which to me would be an
>>>>> auto/automobile or car. (And I think we'd be beyond the horseless
>>>>> carriage stage [oops] by then).
>>>>
>>>> Have never really found "Motor" to be widely used. It seems to be
>>>> the preserve of that London dialect that isn’t genuine Cockney but
>>>> has grown with the City . As such you often here it used by often
>>>> slightly dodgy types in B movies or TV series such as the Sweeney.
>
> I never cease to be astonished by the way people mis-classify cockney
> slang. Which is always the "other" word, and not the pair of words.
>
> So "give me a butchers", is 'a look' rhyming with 'butchers hook'.
> Or "do you like my new whistle" - suit, rhyming with 'whistle and flute'
>
>>>> I suppose the showing of those overseas may give the impression its
>>>> use is more common than it really is, pimply youths may use it for
>>>> it while while turning their reliable but boring 1st car into an
>>>> unreliable noisy junk heap by sticking bits on and cutting other
>>>> parts off so people "Look at my Mota" but most grow out of it.
>>>
>>> It seemed to be common in my grandfather’s generation - born near the end
>>> of the C19.
>>
>> Yes, I think that was typical pre-War usage. And don't forget
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Motor
>
> I posted somewhere recently I had to get "a new set of wheels", by which
> I meant the whole car, not just circular things with tyres on.

Mmmmm, metonymy. Miss Groby would have loved it.

<https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1942/03/21/here-lies-miss-groby>

Sam

--
The entity formerly known as Sam.Wilson@ed.ac.uk
Spit the dummy to reply

In message <unbrv8$li1d$1@dont-email.me>, at 15:35:04 on Sat, 6 Jan
2024, Sam Wilson <ukr@dummy.wislons.fastmail.co.uk> remarked:
>Roland Perry <roland@perry.uk> wrote:
>> In message <%8XkN.33590$Xs07.448@fx06.ams1>, at 16:50:03 on Tue, 2 Jan
>> 2024, Recliner <recliner.usenet@gmail.com> remarked:
>>
>>>>>> PS Then I reflect on the strange olde Brit expression of a *motor* to
>>>>>> describe the whole moving vehicle which to me would be an
>>>>>> auto/automobile or car. (And I think we'd be beyond the horseless
>>>>>> carriage stage [oops] by then).
>>>>>
>>>>> Have never really found "Motor" to be widely used. It seems to be
>>>>> the preserve of that London dialect that isn’t genuine Cockney but
>>>>> has grown with the City . As such you often here it used by often
>>>>> slightly dodgy types in B movies or TV series such as the Sweeney.
>>
>> I never cease to be astonished by the way people mis-classify cockney
>> slang. Which is always the "other" word, and not the pair of words.
>>
>> So "give me a butchers", is 'a look' rhyming with 'butchers hook'.
>> Or "do you like my new whistle" - suit, rhyming with 'whistle and flute'
>>
>>>>> I suppose the showing of those overseas may give the impression its
>>>>> use is more common than it really is, pimply youths may use it for
>>>>> it while while turning their reliable but boring 1st car into an
>>>>> unreliable noisy junk heap by sticking bits on and cutting other
>>>>> parts off so people "Look at my Mota" but most grow out of it.
>>>>
>>>> It seemed to be common in my grandfather’s generation - born near the end
>>>> of the C19.
>>>
>>> Yes, I think that was typical pre-War usage. And don't forget
>>>
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Motor
>>
>> I posted somewhere recently I had to get "a new set of wheels", by which
>> I meant the whole car, not just circular things with tyres on.
>
>Mmmmm, metonymy. Miss Groby would have loved it.
>
><https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1942/03/21/here-lies-miss-groby>

It's no longer politically correct, but once upon a time the initials
"BMW" were said to stand for "Black Man's Wheels".

https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&f=23&t=981733&i=20
--
Roland Perry