19 APRIL 2023

MATTERS RELEVANT TO IBAC CASE-2022XXXX AS COMPLAINT LODGED 17 JULY 2002
BEING ITEM: 27. IS THERE ANYTHING FURTHER YOU WANT TO TELL US ABOUT YOUR
PERSONAL SITUATION RELEVANT TO THIS COMPLAINT?

1) It ought then to be substantive cause to bring CRIMINAL CHARGES
against legal counsel PETER RIDDELL for PERJURY and perverting the
COURSE OF JUSTICE by a deliberate misrepresentation of two telephone
calls made to them in a matter of self representation before a BLIND
judicatory. That my conduct in matters of this complaint was mindful
that PRESERVATION of any probity related to such action against the
INSURER was a primary concern.

YOUTUBE: "MUSE - RESISTANCE"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPE9uSFFxrI>

I HAVE NOT LABOURED FOR 25 YEARS JUST SO SOMEONE CAN STEAL MY LIFE
OPPORTUNITY which is enumerated within our 17 APRIL 2023 submission to
IBAC in conveying the use of MATRIX PROTOTYPES #SIX (#123 / #369) as
TWEEDLEDUM[B] and #ONE (#99 / #297) TWEEDLEDEE[D] as an established fact
in then providing an "ILLEGALITY DEFENCE" against an INSURER's
IMPROPRIETY by deploying a term dichotomy such as “TOTAL AND PERMANENT
DISABILITY” as involving destabilising the AUTONOMY of a person and
overriding such integrity as a SOVEREIGN principle

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/IBAC%20Notes%2020230417.pdf>

2) The concept of a #232 - HIJACKING SCHEMA perpetuated as a "gennaion
pseudos" (ie. honourable or noble lie) against the SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY
dynamic were considerations also raised (ie. the IDENTICAL MATRICES were
provided) within our submissions of 17 TO 20 JULY 2018 as made to the
FINANCIAL SERVICES ROYAL COMMISSION:

"In practical functional terms of #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL (ie.
PROTOTYPE #NINE WITHIN BOTH 9x9 MATRICES) applicable to the INSURANCE /
FINANCIAL SERVICES INDUSTRY that if the perennial [philosophical] use of
the binomial THEORY OF NUMBER METHODOLOGY {ARCH KAI TELOS OIDA: #1 + #2
+ #3 + #4 = #10} has an inherent deficiency TWEEDLEDUM[B] AND
TWEEDLEDEE[D] and an introduction of a further dichotomy such as “TOTAL
AND PERMANENT DISABILITY” as a disparity between SALARY CONTINUANCE
INSURANCE POLICY and that of SUPERANNUATION portfolios it is as #1 + #2
+ #3 + #4 = #10 capable of destabilising the AUTONOMY of a person and
overriding such integrity as a SOVEREIGN principle.

Furthermore in relation to a disproportionate or non existent insurance
benefit being applied to the chronic psychiatric condition known as PTSD
- POST TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER in the circumstance where effective
GOVERNANCE is a product of SAPIENT reality and our proposition to extend
definition of a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF
HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS
THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY.

That the Insurance Industry’s failure to appropriately manage and in
circumstance of a lack of provision as appropriate medical intervention
to the precursor medical condition: “HYPER-AROUSAL OF THE CENTRAL
NERVOUS SYSTEM AND STRESS OF THE STARTLE REFLEX” is then (ie. I can
articulate time after all and I have an experience of a bomb blast on 27
March 1986) causal for the exasperation of the medical condition in[to]
a chronic state."

3) To that end, we have provided a psychiatrist who specialises in
METAPHOR THERAPY and a cognitive scientist (Monash University) our
informal research case study on the use of a four line lyric as then a
NEURAL LINGUISTIC SPACIAL OVERLAY and META DESCRIPTORS (#317, #205,
#144, #383) for an event intervention against MURDOCH press over US
PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN'S IRELAND visit to thwart seditious contemporaneous
local actions by IRISH REPUBLICANISM

4) From correspondence with the AMP CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER dated 29
JUNE 2020 (who as an ITALIAN took no action because of an intention to
sell those products and services), it was stated that my last
conversation with a "DESIGNATED LEGAL PRACTICE" failed on the basis that
such "ILLEGALITY DEFENCE" (as we then termed it to be) being entirely
defined by the ROYAL COMMISSION as obtained from MEDIA REPORTS OF 27
APRIL 2018 conveying ROWENA ORR AS QUEEN'S COUNSEL ASSISTING THE ROYAL
COMMISSION INTO FINANCIAL SERVICES ADVISING CRIMINAL PROSECUTION OUGHT
TO BE BROUGHT AGAINST AMP FOLLOWING EVIDENCE OF 'UNCONSCIONABLE'
MISCONDUCT WHICH WAS DESCRIBED AS 'UNLAWFUL AND ETHICALLY AND MORALLY
WRONG'.

WE USED THIS EXACTING EXAMPLE IN OUR SUBMISSION TO THE FINANCIAL
SERVICES ROYAL COMMISSION: By suggesting the imperative of #432 -
DISHEARTENING was an impost purposed {TORAH #FIVE: #114 / #342; #SIX:
#123 / #369 v’s HETEROS #SIX: #114 / #342 by #FIVE: #111 / #333; #ONE:
#99 / #297 impetus} upon the Dutch troops and the United Nations
authority itself does not in any manner diminish the suffering of the
people but diminishes the culpability of the Dutch entirely since they
themselves were the targets and the #419 - SLAUGHTER the means.

Being habitual and recalcitrant misconduct of the insurer which now
grants me an opportunity to seek a redress for alleged perjury by LEGAL
COUNSEL MR. PETER RIDDELL which was undertaken on behalf of AXA GLOBAL
(AUSTRALIA) GROUP INSURANCE arising from his 4 December 2001 mischievous
letter made to the VICTORIAN CIVIL & ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL (VCAT) as
the knowingly false misrepresentation of 2 telephone calls made by me on
30 November, 2001 in being a courtesy to that LEGAL COUNSEL for the INSURER.

----------

TO: AMP CLAIMS ASSESSORS

FURTHER TO CORRESPONDENCE SENT @ 1438 HOURS ON 15 AUGUST 2017 / 1334
HOURS ON 16 AUGUST 2017 / 0911 HOURS ON 22 AUGUST / MULTIPLE OF 31
AUGUST 2017 ARE THESE ADDITIONAL DIARY NOTES WITH RESPECTS TO MY CLAIM
NO: M1001872 FOR PLAN NO: 00004,283:

Given this clear evidence to the contrary of Mr Peter Riddell’s
submission made to the VCAT Extra-ordinary hearing of 7 December, 2001
in the mischievous and wrongful misrepresentation of my two telephone
calls as the basis of a false report to police and perjured evidence.
The following is a transcript (which may contain transcription and
conceptual errors due to reduced audibility) dated 11 February 2004
obtained from tapes provided by the Victoria Civil & Administrative
Tribunal (anti-discrimination list) as proceedings of 0936 hours 7
December 2001 before Deputy President Ms. Cate McKenzie presiding over
A500 of 2000 in matter of Australian Casualty & Life (AXA Global Group
Insurance) and Mark Capecchi. The proceedings were conducted by
telephone hook-up.

THE D.PRESIDENT: Telephone?

Thank you. Mr Riddell, you are appearing by

MR RIDDELL: Yes, madam, I appear by way of telephone. I also have
Shannon Lindner with me who is a solicitor in the actual legal group.

THE D.PRESIDENT: Very well now, this directions hearing has been called
on as a result of a letter which has been sent by the respondents to the
Tribunal. The best way I can summarise, in effect, what that letter
raised were concerns about certain conduct of Mr Boek which, as I
understand it, has been the subject of a report to police. The reason
why the Tribunal deals with these matters initially at least, unless
there is some exceptional circumstance that would warrant otherwise by
bringing on a directions hearing, is so that the Tribunal can, if
necessary, receive evidence of what the relevant matter is and then
determine how best to deal with it.

In this case, and in fact every case where a directions hearing is held,
if there is a request made by a party to appear by telephone the
Tribunal is very happy to accommodate that request and that is in fact
what has happened today. Now, I might get you, Mr Riddell, to explain
what aspects of Mr Boek's conduct have concerned the respondents and, of
course, I will give you a chance to reply, Mr Boek, after Mr Riddell has
finished. Very well, Mr Riddell.

MR RIDDELL: Thank you, madam. On 30 November in the morning I received a
telephone call from Mr Boek, a threatening telephone call, advising that
he had left a number of messages for me. I then accessed those messages
on my voice mail and was quite threatened by the content of those
messages and I had grave concerns for my safety and the safety of my
family. I, that morning, contacted the Victoria Police and reported the
matter and they viewed the matter most seriously. They suggested that I
not present myself in the presence of Mr Boek, which is why I am
presenting myself by way of telephone today.

THE D.PRESIDENT: Yes, and as I say, there is no difficulty about that. Yes?

MR RIDDELL: Two messages. I have forwarded to the Tribunal a transcript
of those

THE D.PRESIDENT: Have you a recording of them?

MR RIDDELL: I do and I would like to play that for the Tribunal.

THE D.PRESIDENT: Certainly. May I just, before you do, get my associate
to take an affirmation from you because given the seriousness of the
matter it ought to be on evidence.

MR PETER ANTHONY RIDDELL, affirmed [9.36am]

THE D.PRESIDENT: Recording. Thank you. Now, if you would play the tape

MR RIDDELL: If it is not clear please let me know and I will adjust the
volume.