dolf wrote:
> 19 APRIL 2023
>
> MATTERS RELEVANT TO IBAC CASE-2022XXXX AS COMPLAINT LODGED 17 JULY 2002
> BEING ITEM: 27. IS THERE ANYTHING FURTHER YOU WANT TO TELL US ABOUT YOUR
> PERSONAL SITUATION RELEVANT TO THIS COMPLAINT?
>
> 1)    It ought then to be substantive cause to bring CRIMINAL CHARGES
> against legal counsel PETER RIDDELL for PERJURY and perverting the
> COURSE OF JUSTICE by a deliberate misrepresentation of two telephone
> calls made to them in a matter of self representation before a BLIND
> judicatory. That my conduct in matters of this complaint was mindful
> that PRESERVATION of any probity related to such action against the
> INSURER was a primary concern.
>
> YOUTUBE: "MUSE - RESISTANCE"
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPE9uSFFxrI>
>
> I HAVE NOT LABOURED FOR 25 YEARS JUST SO SOMEONE CAN STEAL MY LIFE
> OPPORTUNITY which is enumerated within our 17 APRIL 2023 submission to
> IBAC in conveying the use of MATRIX PROTOTYPES #SIX (#123 / #369) as
> TWEEDLEDUM[B] and #ONE (#99 / #297) TWEEDLEDEE[D] as an established fact
> in then providing an "ILLEGALITY DEFENCE" against an INSURER's
> IMPROPRIETY by deploying a term dichotomy such as “TOTAL AND PERMANENT
> DISABILITY” as involving destabilising the AUTONOMY of a person and
> overriding such integrity as a SOVEREIGN principle
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/IBAC%20Notes%2020230417.pdf>
>
> 2)    The concept of a #232 - HIJACKING SCHEMA perpetuated as a
> "gennaion pseudos" (ie. honourable or noble lie) against the SOVEREIGN /
> AUTONOMY dynamic were considerations also raised (ie. the IDENTICAL
> MATRICES were provided) within our submissions of 17 TO 20 JULY 2018 as
> made to the FINANCIAL SERVICES ROYAL COMMISSION:
>
> "In practical functional terms of #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL (ie.
> PROTOTYPE #NINE WITHIN BOTH 9x9 MATRICES) applicable to the INSURANCE /
> FINANCIAL SERVICES INDUSTRY that if the perennial [philosophical] use of
> the binomial THEORY OF NUMBER METHODOLOGY {ARCH KAI TELOS OIDA: #1 + #2
> + #3 + #4 = #10}  has an inherent deficiency TWEEDLEDUM[B] AND
> TWEEDLEDEE[D] and an introduction of a further dichotomy such as “TOTAL
> AND PERMANENT DISABILITY” as a disparity between SALARY CONTINUANCE
> INSURANCE POLICY and that of SUPERANNUATION portfolios it is as #1 + #2
> + #3 + #4 = #10 capable of destabilising the AUTONOMY of a person and
> overriding such integrity as a SOVEREIGN principle.
>
> Furthermore in relation to a disproportionate or non existent insurance
> benefit being applied to the chronic psychiatric condition known as PTSD
> - POST TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER in the circumstance where effective
> GOVERNANCE is a product of SAPIENT reality and our proposition to extend
> definition of a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF
> HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS
> THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY.
>
> That the Insurance Industry’s failure to appropriately manage and in
> circumstance of a lack of provision as appropriate medical intervention
> to the precursor medical condition: “HYPER-AROUSAL OF THE CENTRAL
> NERVOUS SYSTEM AND STRESS OF THE STARTLE REFLEX” is then (ie. I can
> articulate time after all and I have an experience of a bomb blast on 27
> March 1986) causal for the exasperation of the medical condition in[to]
> a chronic state."
>
> 3)    To that end, we have provided a psychiatrist who specialises in
> METAPHOR THERAPY and a cognitive scientist (Monash University) our
> informal research case study on the use of a four line lyric as then a
> NEURAL LINGUISTIC SPACIAL OVERLAY and META DESCRIPTORS (#317, #205,
> #144, #383) for an event intervention against MURDOCH press over US
> PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN'S IRELAND visit to thwart seditious contemporaneous
> local actions by IRISH REPUBLICANISM
>
> 4)    From correspondence with FRANCESCO DE FERRARI the AMP CHIEF
> EXECUTIVE OFFICER dated 29 JUNE 2020 (who as an ITALIAN took no action
> because of an intention to sell those products and services), it was
> stated that my last conversation with a "DESIGNATED LEGAL PRACTICE"
> failed on the basis that such "ILLEGALITY DEFENCE" (as we then termed it
> to be) being entirely defined by the ROYAL COMMISSION as obtained from
> MEDIA REPORTS OF 27 APRIL 2018 conveying ROWENA ORR AS QUEEN'S COUNSEL
> ASSISTING THE ROYAL COMMISSION INTO FINANCIAL SERVICES ADVISING CRIMINAL
> PROSECUTION OUGHT TO BE BROUGHT AGAINST AMP FOLLOWING EVIDENCE OF
> 'UNCONSCIONABLE' MISCONDUCT WHICH WAS DESCRIBED AS 'UNLAWFUL AND
> ETHICALLY AND MORALLY WRONG'.
>
> WE USED THIS EXACTING EXAMPLE IN OUR SUBMISSION TO THE FINANCIAL
> SERVICES ROYAL COMMISSION: By suggesting the imperative of #432 -
> DISHEARTENING was an impost purposed {TORAH #FIVE: #114 / #342; #SIX:
> #123 / #369 v’s HETEROS #SIX: #114 / #342 by #FIVE: #111 / #333; #ONE:
> #99 / #297 impetus} upon the Dutch troops and the United Nations
> authority itself does not in any manner diminish the suffering of the
> people but diminishes the culpability of the Dutch entirely since they
> themselves were the targets and the #419 - SLAUGHTER the means.
>
> Being habitual and recalcitrant misconduct of the insurer which now
> grants me an opportunity to seek a redress for alleged perjury by LEGAL
> COUNSEL MR. PETER RIDDELL which was undertaken on behalf of AXA GLOBAL
> (AUSTRALIA) GROUP INSURANCE arising from his 4 December 2001 mischievous
> letter made to the VICTORIAN CIVIL & ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL (VCAT) as
> the knowingly false misrepresentation of 2 telephone calls made by me on
> 30 November, 2001 in being a courtesy to that LEGAL COUNSEL for the
> INSURER.
>
> ----------
>
> TO: AMP CLAIMS ASSESSORS
>
> FURTHER TO CORRESPONDENCE SENT @ 1438 HOURS ON 15 AUGUST 2017 / 1334
> HOURS ON 16 AUGUST 2017 / 0911 HOURS ON 22 AUGUST / MULTIPLE OF 31
> AUGUST 2017 ARE THESE ADDITIONAL DIARY NOTES WITH RESPECTS TO MY CLAIM
> NO: M1001872 FOR PLAN NO: 00004,283:
>
> Given this clear evidence to the contrary of Mr Peter Riddell’s
> submission made to the VCAT Extra-ordinary hearing of 7 December, 2001
> in the mischievous and wrongful misrepresentation of my two telephone
> calls as the basis of a false report to police and perjured evidence.
> The following is a transcript (which may contain transcription and
> conceptual errors due to reduced audibility) dated 11 February 2004
> obtained from tapes provided by the Victoria Civil & Administrative
> Tribunal (anti-discrimination list) as proceedings of 0936 hours 7
> December 2001 before Deputy President Ms. Cate McKenzie presiding over
> A500 of 2000 in matter of Australian Casualty & Life (AXA Global Group
> Insurance) and Mark Capecchi. The proceedings were conducted by
> telephone hook-up.
>
> THE D.PRESIDENT: Telephone?
>
> Thank you. Mr Riddell, you are appearing by
>
> MR RIDDELL: Yes, madam, I appear by way of telephone. I also have
> Shannon Lindner with me who is a solicitor in the actual legal group.
>
> THE D.PRESIDENT: Very well now, this directions hearing has been called
> on as a result of a letter which has been sent by the respondents to the
> Tribunal. The best way I can summarise, in effect, what that letter
> raised were concerns about certain conduct of Mr Boek which, as I
> understand it, has been the subject of a report to police. The reason
> why the Tribunal deals with these matters initially at least, unless
> there is some exceptional circumstance that would warrant otherwise by
> bringing on a directions hearing, is so that the Tribunal can, if
> necessary, receive evidence of what the relevant matter is and then
> determine how best to deal with it.
>
> In this case, and in fact every case where a directions hearing is held,
> if there is a request made by a party to appear by telephone the
> Tribunal is very happy to accommodate that request and that is in fact
> what has happened today. Now, I might get you, Mr Riddell, to explain
> what aspects of Mr Boek's conduct have concerned the respondents and, of
> course, I will give you a chance to reply, Mr Boek, after Mr Riddell has
> finished. Very well, Mr Riddell.
>
> MR RIDDELL: Thank you, madam. On 30 November in the morning I received a
> telephone call from Mr Boek, a threatening telephone call, advising that
> he had left a number of messages for me. I then accessed those messages
> on my voice mail and was quite threatened by the content of those
> messages and I had grave concerns for my safety and the safety of my
> family. I, that morning, contacted the Victoria Police and reported the
> matter and they viewed the matter most seriously. They suggested that I
> not present myself in the presence of Mr Boek, which is why I am
> presenting myself by way of telephone today.
>
> THE D.PRESIDENT: Yes, and as I say, there is no difficulty about that. Yes?
>
> MR RIDDELL: Two messages. I have forwarded to the Tribunal a transcript
> of those
>
> THE D.PRESIDENT: Have you a recording of them?
>
> MR RIDDELL: I do and I would like to play that for the Tribunal.
>
> THE D.PRESIDENT: Certainly. May I just, before you do, get my associate
> to take an affirmation from you because given the seriousness of the
> matter it ought to be on evidence.
>
> MR PETER ANTHONY RIDDELL, affirmed [9.36am]
>
> THE D.PRESIDENT: Recording. Thank you. Now, if you would play the tape
>
> MR RIDDELL: If it is not clear please let me know and I will adjust the
> volume.
>
> THE D.PRESIDENT: Certainly.
>
> TELEPHONE MESSAGE ONE: "Mr Riddell, this is Dolf Boek [calling]. I'm
> just wondering whether you['ve been self congratulatory about my
> previous submissions to the court and have failed to recognise their
> transcendent logic built on time]. They are religious model that
> co-ordinates or synchronises over 6000 years to the 9 September of this
> year. That means [when this year expires,] my court case will be a
> matter of an accusation of fascism against yourself at the company from
> which I will not cease until I have your #419 - SOUL.
>
> You may return this message if you like, [number omitted]. You have
> until the end of this year and then I would never again turn my hand
> against the action that I am going to take. Meaning? I will conclude
> when one of us going to the #390 - GRAVE."
>
> TELEPHONE MESSAGE TWO: "Mr Riddell, Dolf Boek. You do realise that if
> you are not prepared to come clean with your justifications of your past
> treatment of me that as of the new year we will not be having another
> contract because I will not be co-operating with you further and we will
> are more likely to go to court at some stage. At some stage you are
> going to have to recognise the fact that you are a blasphemer. Your
> religious context has no continuing validity and since I am able to
> rationally prove that with a mathematical model..... you are going to
> understand how forceful and hard metaphysics is."
>
> MR RIDDELL: That concludes the two voice mail messages.
>
> ...
>
> MR RIDDELL: - - - submission that Mr Boek has conducted himself in such
> a way that he shows he has no intention of according to the rules of the
> court. He has indicated quite clearly that his court case will now be a
> matter of fascism against myself and AXA and in those circumstances a
> false claim is frivolous and vexatious and should be struck out forthwith.
>
> THE D.PRESIDENT: Boek. Mr Boek? Very well, all right. Now, I will hear
> from Mr
>
> MR BOEK: Yes, ma'am, I have - you would have noticed that there were no
> actual words of threat. They were words that were based on fact in that
> particular phone call. Here I have a particular mathematical model which
> is mentioned in that particular phone call. It is based upon a work by
> Johann Kepler, a German astronomer born in 1571 to 1630. He came up with
> three rules of which I have come up with a fourth [associated to the
> ephemeral and mundane as a transcendent fecundite connection to the
> Vernal and the Autumn Equinox in the 6th year of the 22nd Course of
> Gamul: 7 x 24 x 13 x 49 = 6J or 294 x 364 days or 365.2423 x 293 years -
> Vernal Equinox Wednesday 20 March 1996 / 21 March].
>
> His three rules in terms of astronomical cycles were: (1) that the
> planet... And then I will get to my bit of relevance to the 6000 years.
>
> THE D.PRESIDENT: Yes, yes, yes.
>
> MR BOEK: (1) That the planets move in elliptical orbits around the sun
> which is situated at one of the focus of the ellipses; (2) that the
> radius vectors joining each planet to the sun describes equal areas in
> equal times; (3) that the ratio of the square of the planet's year to
> the cube of the planet's mean distance from the sun is the same for each
> planet.
>
> Now, what I am suggesting is that the 6000 year cycle fits a
> mathematical model on logic and reason called Telos equals Arch plus
> C-squared:
>
> Telos [122J3W1D] = Arch [3W1D] + c² [9(9²+1)/2]
>
> That has been my particular field of study as my retirement activity. A
> religious pursuit which is, how can I say, an area of contemplative
> life. The best model that can currently be exhibited with regards to
> this particular thesis is nothing more than Harry Potter and the
> Philosopher Stone. I raise that as a particular point because the poetry
> that is used in...
>
> 
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/EarthSeasons.png>
>
> 
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/fascist.gif>
>
> There are several legal issues involved with respects to [the] Saint
> Andrews Cause Célèbre participated in by the representatives of the
> Returned Service League as Public Authority and the nature of its
> association to a FOREIGN POWER as a group named KNIGHTS TEMPLARS
> INTERNATIONAL which formed within 2015 and comprises various: RELIGIONS
> / STATES / MILITARY / ORGANISATIONS / INSTITUTIONS as unconscionable
> attempts made by them to impose a substituted ethic @5 against the
> INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTUS whether by NEGLECT or forced WILL
> upon our War Dead and to usurp @1 the Sovereignty embodied within the
> Governor General as ANTHROPIC COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE.
> 
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/Templar%20Saint%20Andrews.JPG>
>
> 
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/Knights%20Mantra.jpg>
>
> [IMAGES: THE KNIGHTS TEMPLAR INTERNATIONAL AS SAINT ANDREWS CAUSE
> CÉLÈBRE HAS A SUBSTITUTED ETHOS AS MANTRA: "FOR THOSE BRAVE WHO GAVE
> THEIR LIVES SO WE COULD LIVE OURS"]
>
> MR RIDDELL: Madam, could I object?
>
> ...
>
> MR RIDDELL: I am not sure that the intention is entirely relevant. It is
> the manner in which I reasonably interpreted those phone messages. There
> is a transcript before the court. I was threatened. Mr Boek, by his
> conduct today and in the past, on any objective view appears to be
> unstable. I think it is inappropriate that this matter be continued.
>
> Peter Riddell on January 2013 published this perspective:
>
> TITLE: "The Illegality Defence: Has your insured been misbehaving?"
>
> Insurers and superannuation fund trustees assessing life and disability
> claims may have cause to consider an insured's unlawful conduct and
> whether grounds arise to decline a claim on the basis of the illegality
> defence. There are a number of aspects to the illegality defence. This
> paper reviews the impact of public policy on claims for indemnity
> arising out of unlawful conduct on the part of insureds.
>
> WHO DOES THIS IMPACT?
> Insurers and superannuation fund trustees assessing disability insurance
> claims.
>
> WHAT ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN?
> Unlawful conduct by an insured may allow an insurer to deny liability
> for an insurance claim on the grounds that it would be against public
> policy to allow an insured to receive a benefit under the policy.
>
> As the application of public policy often involves making difficult
> value judgments, each case will depend upon its own particular
> circumstances. As such, you may first wish to seek advice as to what
> action to take having regard to the facts of your particular claim.
>
> ILLEGALITY AND PUBLIC POLICY
> It is well established that a claim that arises out of a loss caused
> directly in the commission of a felony or similarly serious criminal
> offence by an insured can be denied on the ground that to pay the claim
> would be contrary to public policy.  This is based on the principle that
> no person should benefit from their crime or wrongdoing ("the public
> policy principle").
>
> ------------
>
> 17 APRIL 2023
>
> COUNCIL NOTE: I would suggest that the only means remaining for
> WELLINGTON SHIRE COUNCIL to mitigate vicarious liability associated to
> any intended LEGAL ACTION is to remove the CHERISHED / BLESSED MOTHER
> WITH NAKED CHILD STATUE before KING CHARLES III coronation on 6 MAY 2023.
>
> 1)    The accompanying document deals with the issue on an #373 common
> element between a DEATH THREAT [#205, #237 - USE OF FORCE, #315, #321
> #333, #342, #373 ***] OF BUTCHERED #419 - SLAUGHTERED MEAT PLACED WITHIN
> MY MAILBOX ON 15 NOVEMBER 2017 as being evidence of an unaccountable and
> obmutescence as #373 - HATRED perpetuated by localised and
> unconstitutional IRISH REPUBLICANISM / RETURNED SERVICES LEAGUE (RSL)
> protagonists of seditious action pursuant to 26 MARCH 2017 attendance at
> MICHAEL JOHN GILMARTIN'S STAR HOTEL for a fillet minion lunch
> accompanying a moderate (ie. TOSS A BUMPER OR TWO DOWN OUR THROAT)
> consumption of alcohol, in making a reasonable objection to a ruckus
> disruption of a requested quiet amenity, then resulting within an
> unlawful year long liquor ban upon the entirely fabricated and
> uncorroborated pretext that I threatened to kill a patron as a person
> then entirely unknown to either the hotel or myself:
>
> - NOVICHOK poisoning event [#291 / #342 / #373 *LUOSHU*] on 4 MARCH 2018
> - GOOD FRIDAY AGREEMENT [#298 / #373 ***] on 10 APRIL 1998
> - REICH CONCORDAT [#291 / #373 ***] on 20 JULY 1933
>
> 2)    An identified catalyst for action is related to the term GALLIPOLI
> which is the Italian form of the Greek name Καλλίπολις (Kallipolis),
> meaning 'beautiful city' and thusly has an unavoidable correspondence to
> FASCISM and ROME's FOUNDATION STONES @1 - #99 / #297, @5 - #111 / #333.
>
> This philosophical term Kallipolis actually applies to the utopian
> ATLANTIS as city-state ruled by philosopher-kings as theorised by Plato
> in the Republic where the ideal city (kallipolis) had a charter myth,
> the MYTH OF THE METALS, a gennaion pseudos (Rep. III.414b) which is not
> best rendered as 'Noble Lie' but as the metaphorical or mythical
> statement of a truth which the general populace can understand and be
> persuaded to accept only in some such form.
>
> 3)    TIM ROWE (MASTER OF CEREMONIES AT SAINT PATRICK'S DAY CHERISHED /
> BLESSED MOTHER WITH NAKED CHILD STATUE UNVEILING) ON 22 MAY 2018:
> "RESPONSE - BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION AS PERSECUTION (paraphrased):
>
> #232 - *FOREVER* *YOUNG* *WAR* *GRAVES* #298 - *ENCLOSURE* *POEM*
> #232 - UNLAWFUL WELLINGTON LIQUOR ACCORD BAN EVENT OF 26 MARCH 2017
> #232 - PLAQUE PLACEMENT ON 8 JUNE 2017
>
> AS THE PROBABLE WORLD WAR ONE 2018 CENTENNIAL HIJACK SCHEMA as [#6, #2,
> #8, #6, #200, #10] / [#2, #8, #6, #200, #10, #6] = bâchûwr (H970):
> {UMBRA: #216 % #41 = #11} 1) youth, *YOUNG* *MAN*;
>
> Council acknowledges receipt [ECM 2332240 / Our reference TR:SM] of the
> letter and advise that no further action will be taken at this point in
> time."
>
> 4)    The diary note for the STAR HOTEL event dated 26 MARCH 2017
> appears to conform with a dialectic obtained from a MATRIX PROTOTYPE
> #SIX (ie. having a #123 = #17, #41, #65 correspondence to the DOMINION
> matrix which is associated with the LUOSHU square as then its reference
> object with an implicit #38 logical fallacy) element #232 - UNLAWFUL
> LIQUOR BAN EVENT 26 MARCH 2017 (gâzar (H1504): *TO* *DECREE*,
> *EXCLUDED*, *CUT* *OFF* / rîyb (H7379): *DISPUTE*, *CONTROVERSY*, *CASE*
> *AT* *LAW*) = [#66, #42, #18, #65, #41]
>
> 
> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/Papal%20War%20Commemorations%20Intellectual%20Property%20Theft%201.png>
>
>
> A further patterning attribute was associated to 30 MAY 2017 (#308):
> DATE OF UNLAWFUL LIQUOR BAN NOTICE AS MISREPRESENTATION OF AN INCIDENTAL
> STAR HOTEL EVENT [#358 / #291] OF 26 MARCH 2017 AND THAT WAS RECEIVED
> UPON 5 JUNE 2017 IN TRANSITING DURING PENTECOST SUNDAY.
>
> 5)    Whereas the stone pedestal with a FOREVER YOUNG POEM situated
> adjacent to a LONE PINE tree associated with GALLIPOLI on the external
> boundary to the SALE WAR GRAVES cemetery appears to deploy a dialectic
> obtained from a MATRIX PROTOTYPE #ONE (ie. having a structural
> correspondence to GERMAN fascism and immaterially to the VATICAN CITY
> STATE) element #232 - FOREVER YOUNG (bâchûwr (H970): *YOUTH*, *YOUNG*
> *MAN* / zâkar (H2142): *RECALL*, *REMEMBER*) POEM (SACRED GROVE EXTERNAL
> TO SALE WAR CEMETERY #298 - ENCLOSURE) [#1, #9, #17, #25, #33, #41, #49,
> #57]
>
> 
> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/Papal%20War%20Commemorations%20Intellectual%20Property%20Theft%202.png>
>
>
> 6)    This common and besieging element #38 / #232 - 8 JUNE 2017 as
> CARDINAL GEORGE PELL's birthday is similarly occurs on the occasion of a
> #449 - METAL PLAQUE INSTALLATION at the #449 - CHERISHED / BLESSED
> MOTHER WITH NAKED CHILD STATUE (ie. unveiled on #449 - SAINT PATRICK'S
> DAY 17 MARCH 2017) which appears to be a transit event (BOER WAR
> MEMORIAL --> ECCLESIASTICAL CALENDAR CONFORMITY) related an improper
> POPPY wreath observed at the BOER WAR MEMORIAL on 10 JUNE 2017.
>
> 
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/OATH%2020170608%201510%20-%202.jpg>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/BOER%2020170610%201154%20-%205.jpg>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/BOER%2020170610%201153%20-%204.jpg>
>
> 7)    The earlier event date of 10 JUNE 2015 as #38 - FULLNESS (SHENG)
> corresponds to RUSSIAN PRESIDENT VLADIMIR PUTIN's second meeting with
> POPE FRANCIS AT THE VATICAN as STATE VISIT concerns on whether there
> were DISCLOSURES MADE TO PUTIN ABOUT SUCH FAITHFUL SOLDIERS OF THE
> CATHOLIC CHURCH AS ECCLESIASTICAL ACTION on 11 APRIL 2015 (#308) as
> DECLARATION OF PAPAL BULL MISERICORDIAE VULTUS (ANNOUNCED: #449 / #503 -
> 13 MARCH 2015.
>
> 8)    Thus our document has some considerations on concerns by the
> RUSSIANs (REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM IDEA @328) HAVING A VALID CONCERN (ie.
> the #33 - PHONEMES induces a pathological characteristic within the
> TABLE TALK which includes JEWS, CHRISTIANS and COMMUNISTS in the same
> class as exclusion group) ABOUT NAZI IDENTITY (ie. "rewrite history and
> glorify fascists" [Wikileaks document ID: 08MOSCOW2656_a, dated 1
> FEBRUARY 2008]) which is BELLIGERENTLY an unresolved question of 90
> years duration and could subject NATO to reparations within the
> UKRAINIAN proxy war.
>
> FOR SCENARIO EXPANSION SEE: "MANAGING MAGGOTY FLY STRIKE WITH STRATEGIC
> CHEMICAL APPLICATION "
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Maggoty%20Fly%20Strike.pdf>
>
and then

In article <w96dnZ9Cx6Xez935nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@giganews.com>, pursent100
@gmail.com says...
>
> dolf wrote:
> > 19 APRIL 2023
> >
> > MATTERS RELEVANT TO IBAC CASE-2022XXXX AS COMPLAINT LODGED 17 JULY 2002
> > BEING ITEM: 27. IS THERE ANYTHING FURTHER YOU WANT TO TELL US ABOUT YOUR
> > PERSONAL SITUATION RELEVANT TO THIS COMPLAINT?
> >
> > 1)    It ought then to be substantive cause to bring CRIMINAL CHARGES
> > against legal counsel PETER RIDDELL for PERJURY and perverting the
> > COURSE OF JUSTICE by a deliberate misrepresentation of two telephone
> > calls made to them in a matter of self representation before a BLIND
> > judicatory. That my conduct in matters of this complaint was mindful
> > that PRESERVATION of any probity related to such action against the
> > INSURER was a primary concern.
> >
> > YOUTUBE: "MUSE - RESISTANCE"
> >
> > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPE9uSFFxrI>
> >
> > I HAVE NOT LABOURED FOR 25 YEARS JUST SO SOMEONE CAN STEAL MY LIFE
> > OPPORTUNITY which is enumerated within our 17 APRIL 2023 submission to
> > IBAC in conveying the use of MATRIX PROTOTYPES #SIX (#123 / #369) as
> > TWEEDLEDUM[B] and #ONE (#99 / #297) TWEEDLEDEE[D] as an established fact
> > in then providing an "ILLEGALITY DEFENCE" against an INSURER's
> > IMPROPRIETY by deploying a term dichotomy such as ?TOTAL AND PERMANENT
> > DISABILITY? as involving destabilising the AUTONOMY of a person and
> > overriding such integrity as a SOVEREIGN principle
> >
> > <http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/IBAC%20Notes%2020230417.pdf>
> >
> > 2)    The concept of a #232 - HIJACKING SCHEMA perpetuated as a
> > "gennaion pseudos" (ie. honourable or noble lie) against the SOVEREIGN /
> > AUTONOMY dynamic were considerations also raised (ie. the IDENTICAL
> > MATRICES were provided) within our submissions of 17 TO 20 JULY 2018 as
> > made to the FINANCIAL SERVICES ROYAL COMMISSION:
> >
> > "In practical functional terms of #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL (ie.
> > PROTOTYPE #NINE WITHIN BOTH 9x9 MATRICES) applicable to the INSURANCE /
> > FINANCIAL SERVICES INDUSTRY that if the perennial [philosophical] use of
> > the binomial THEORY OF NUMBER METHODOLOGY {ARCH KAI TELOS OIDA: #1 + #2
> > + #3 + #4 = #10}  has an inherent deficiency TWEEDLEDUM[B] AND
> > TWEEDLEDEE[D] and an introduction of a further dichotomy such as ?TOTAL
> > AND PERMANENT DISABILITY? as a disparity between SALARY CONTINUANCE
> > INSURANCE POLICY and that of SUPERANNUATION portfolios it is as #1 + #2
> > + #3 + #4 = #10 capable of destabilising the AUTONOMY of a person and
> > overriding such integrity as a SOVEREIGN principle.
> >
> > Furthermore in relation to a disproportionate or non existent insurance
> > benefit being applied to the chronic psychiatric condition known as PTSD
> > - POST TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER in the circumstance where effective
> > GOVERNANCE is a product of SAPIENT reality and our proposition to extend
> > definition of a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF
> > HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS
> > THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY.
> >
> > That the Insurance Industry?s failure to appropriately manage and in
> > circumstance of a lack of provision as appropriate medical intervention
> > to the precursor medical condition: ?HYPER-AROUSAL OF THE CENTRAL
> > NERVOUS SYSTEM AND STRESS OF THE STARTLE REFLEX? is then (ie. I can
> > articulate time after all and I have an experience of a bomb blast on 27
> > March 1986) causal for the exasperation of the medical condition in[to]
> > a chronic state."
> >
> > 3)    To that end, we have provided a psychiatrist who specialises in
> > METAPHOR THERAPY and a cognitive scientist (Monash University) our
> > informal research case study on the use of a four line lyric as then a
> > NEURAL LINGUISTIC SPACIAL OVERLAY and META DESCRIPTORS (#317, #205,
> > #144, #383) for an event intervention against MURDOCH press over US
> > PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN'S IRELAND visit to thwart seditious contemporaneous
> > local actions by IRISH REPUBLICANISM
> >
> > 4)    From correspondence with FRANCESCO DE FERRARI the AMP CHIEF
> > EXECUTIVE OFFICER dated 29 JUNE 2020 (who as an ITALIAN took no action
> > because of an intention to sell those products and services), it was
> > stated that my last conversation with a "DESIGNATED LEGAL PRACTICE"
> > failed on the basis that such "ILLEGALITY DEFENCE" (as we then termed it
> > to be) being entirely defined by the ROYAL COMMISSION as obtained from
> > MEDIA REPORTS OF 27 APRIL 2018 conveying ROWENA ORR AS QUEEN'S COUNSEL
> > ASSISTING THE ROYAL COMMISSION INTO FINANCIAL SERVICES ADVISING CRIMINAL
> > PROSECUTION OUGHT TO BE BROUGHT AGAINST AMP FOLLOWING EVIDENCE OF
> > 'UNCONSCIONABLE' MISCONDUCT WHICH WAS DESCRIBED AS 'UNLAWFUL AND
> > ETHICALLY AND MORALLY WRONG'.
> >
> > WE USED THIS EXACTING EXAMPLE IN OUR SUBMISSION TO THE FINANCIAL
> > SERVICES ROYAL COMMISSION: By suggesting the imperative of #432 -
> > DISHEARTENING was an impost purposed {TORAH #FIVE: #114 / #342; #SIX:
> > #123 / #369 v?s HETEROS #SIX: #114 / #342 by #FIVE: #111 / #333; #ONE:
> > #99 / #297 impetus} upon the Dutch troops and the United Nations
> > authority itself does not in any manner diminish the suffering of the
> > people but diminishes the culpability of the Dutch entirely since they
> > themselves were the targets and the #419 - SLAUGHTER the means.
> >
> > Being habitual and recalcitrant misconduct of the insurer which now
> > grants me an opportunity to seek a redress for alleged perjury by LEGAL
> > COUNSEL MR. PETER RIDDELL which was undertaken on behalf of AXA GLOBAL
> > (AUSTRALIA) GROUP INSURANCE arising from his 4 December 2001 mischievous
> > letter made to the VICTORIAN CIVIL & ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL (VCAT) as
> > the knowingly false misrepresentation of 2 telephone calls made by me on
> > 30 November, 2001 in being a courtesy to that LEGAL COUNSEL for the
> > INSURER.
> >
> > ----------
> >
> > TO: AMP CLAIMS ASSESSORS
> >
> > FURTHER TO CORRESPONDENCE SENT @ 1438 HOURS ON 15 AUGUST 2017 / 1334
> > HOURS ON 16 AUGUST 2017 / 0911 HOURS ON 22 AUGUST / MULTIPLE OF 31
> > AUGUST 2017 ARE THESE ADDITIONAL DIARY NOTES WITH RESPECTS TO MY CLAIM
> > NO: M1001872 FOR PLAN NO: 00004,283:
> >
> > Given this clear evidence to the contrary of Mr Peter Riddell?s
> > submission made to the VCAT Extra-ordinary hearing of 7 December, 2001
> > in the mischievous and wrongful misrepresentation of my two telephone
> > calls as the basis of a false report to police and perjured evidence.
> > The following is a transcript (which may contain transcription and
> > conceptual errors due to reduced audibility) dated 11 February 2004
> > obtained from tapes provided by the Victoria Civil & Administrative
> > Tribunal (anti-discrimination list) as proceedings of 0936 hours 7
> > December 2001 before Deputy President Ms. Cate McKenzie presiding over
> > A500 of 2000 in matter of Australian Casualty & Life (AXA Global Group
> > Insurance) and Mark Capecchi. The proceedings were conducted by
> > telephone hook-up.
> >
> > THE D.PRESIDENT: Telephone?
> >
> > Thank you. Mr Riddell, you are appearing by
> >
> > MR RIDDELL: Yes, madam, I appear by way of telephone. I also have
> > Shannon Lindner with me who is a solicitor in the actual legal group.
> >
> > THE D.PRESIDENT: Very well now, this directions hearing has been called
> > on as a result of a letter which has been sent by the respondents to the
> > Tribunal. The best way I can summarise, in effect, what that letter
> > raised were concerns about certain conduct of Mr Boek which, as I
> > understand it, has been the subject of a report to police. The reason
> > why the Tribunal deals with these matters initially at least, unless
> > there is some exceptional circumstance that would warrant otherwise by
> > bringing on a directions hearing, is so that the Tribunal can, if
> > necessary, receive evidence of what the relevant matter is and then
> > determine how best to deal with it.
> >
> > In this case, and in fact every case where a directions hearing is held,
> > if there is a request made by a party to appear by telephone the
> > Tribunal is very happy to accommodate that request and that is in fact
> > what has happened today. Now, I might get you, Mr Riddell, to explain
> > what aspects of Mr Boek's conduct have concerned the respondents and, of
> > course, I will give you a chance to reply, Mr Boek, after Mr Riddell has
> > finished. Very well, Mr Riddell.
> >
> > MR RIDDELL: Thank you, madam. On 30 November in the morning I received a
> > telephone call from Mr Boek, a threatening telephone call, advising that
> > he had left a number of messages for me. I then accessed those messages
> > on my voice mail and was quite threatened by the content of those
> > messages and I had grave concerns for my safety and the safety of my
> > family. I, that morning, contacted the Victoria Police and reported the
> > matter and they viewed the matter most seriously. They suggested that I
> > not present myself in the presence of Mr Boek, which is why I am
> > presenting myself by way of telephone today.
> >
> > THE D.PRESIDENT: Yes, and as I say, there is no difficulty about that. Yes?
> >
> > MR RIDDELL: Two messages. I have forwarded to the Tribunal a transcript
> > of those
> >
> > THE D.PRESIDENT: Have you a recording of them?
> >
> > MR RIDDELL: I do and I would like to play that for the Tribunal.
> >
> > THE D.PRESIDENT: Certainly. May I just, before you do, get my associate
> > to take an affirmation from you because given the seriousness of the
> > matter it ought to be on evidence.
> >
> > MR PETER ANTHONY RIDDELL, affirmed [9.36am]
> >
> > THE D.PRESIDENT: Recording. Thank you. Now, if you would play the tape
> >
> > MR RIDDELL: If it is not clear please let me know and I will adjust the
> > volume.
> >
> > THE D.PRESIDENT: Certainly.
> >
> > TELEPHONE MESSAGE ONE: "Mr Riddell, this is Dolf Boek [calling]. I'm
> > just wondering whether you['ve been self congratulatory about my
> > previous submissions to the court and have failed to recognise their
> > transcendent logic built on time]. They are religious model that
> > co-ordinates or synchronises over 6000 years to the 9 September of this
> > year. That means [when this year expires,] my court case will be a
> > matter of an accusation of fascism against yourself at the company from
> > which I will not cease until I have your #419 - SOUL.
> >
> > You may return this message if you like, [number omitted]. You have
> > until the end of this year and then I would never again turn my hand
> > against the action that I am going to take. Meaning? I will conclude
> > when one of us going to the #390 - GRAVE."

Skeeter <nomail@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> In article <w96dnZ9Cx6Xez935nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@giganews.com>, pursent100
> @gmail.com says...
>>
>> dolf wrote:
>>> 19 APRIL 2023
>>>
>>> MATTERS RELEVANT TO IBAC CASE-2022XXXX AS COMPLAINT LODGED 17 JULY 2002
>>> BEING ITEM: 27. IS THERE ANYTHING FURTHER YOU WANT TO TELL US ABOUT YOUR
>>> PERSONAL SITUATION RELEVANT TO THIS COMPLAINT?
>>>
>>> 1)    It ought then to be substantive cause to bring CRIMINAL CHARGES
>>> against legal counsel PETER RIDDELL for PERJURY and perverting the
>>> COURSE OF JUSTICE by a deliberate misrepresentation of two telephone
>>> calls made to them in a matter of self representation before a BLIND
>>> judicatory. That my conduct in matters of this complaint was mindful
>>> that PRESERVATION of any probity related to such action against the
>>> INSURER was a primary concern.
>>>
>>> YOUTUBE: "MUSE - RESISTANCE"
>>>
>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPE9uSFFxrI>
>>>
>>> I HAVE NOT LABOURED FOR 25 YEARS JUST SO SOMEONE CAN STEAL MY LIFE
>>> OPPORTUNITY which is enumerated within our 17 APRIL 2023 submission to
>>> IBAC in conveying the use of MATRIX PROTOTYPES #SIX (#123 / #369) as
>>> TWEEDLEDUM[B] and #ONE (#99 / #297) TWEEDLEDEE[D] as an established fact
>>> in then providing an "ILLEGALITY DEFENCE" against an INSURER's
>>> IMPROPRIETY by deploying a term dichotomy such as ?TOTAL AND PERMANENT
>>> DISABILITY? as involving destabilising the AUTONOMY of a person and
>>> overriding such integrity as a SOVEREIGN principle
>>>
>>> <http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/IBAC%20Notes%2020230417.pdf>
>>>
>>> 2)    The concept of a #232 - HIJACKING SCHEMA perpetuated as a
>>> "gennaion pseudos" (ie. honourable or noble lie) against the SOVEREIGN /
>>> AUTONOMY dynamic were considerations also raised (ie. the IDENTICAL
>>> MATRICES were provided) within our submissions of 17 TO 20 JULY 2018 as
>>> made to the FINANCIAL SERVICES ROYAL COMMISSION:
>>>
>>> "In practical functional terms of #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL (ie.
>>> PROTOTYPE #NINE WITHIN BOTH 9x9 MATRICES) applicable to the INSURANCE /
>>> FINANCIAL SERVICES INDUSTRY that if the perennial [philosophical] use of
>>> the binomial THEORY OF NUMBER METHODOLOGY {ARCH KAI TELOS OIDA: #1 + #2
>>> + #3 + #4 = #10}  has an inherent deficiency TWEEDLEDUM[B] AND
>>> TWEEDLEDEE[D] and an introduction of a further dichotomy such as ?TOTAL
>>> AND PERMANENT DISABILITY? as a disparity between SALARY CONTINUANCE
>>> INSURANCE POLICY and that of SUPERANNUATION portfolios it is as #1 + #2
>>> + #3 + #4 = #10 capable of destabilising the AUTONOMY of a person and
>>> overriding such integrity as a SOVEREIGN principle.
>>>
>>> Furthermore in relation to a disproportionate or non existent insurance
>>> benefit being applied to the chronic psychiatric condition known as PTSD
>>> - POST TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER in the circumstance where effective
>>> GOVERNANCE is a product of SAPIENT reality and our proposition to extend
>>> definition of a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF
>>> HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS
>>> THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY.
>>>
>>> That the Insurance Industry?s failure to appropriately manage and in
>>> circumstance of a lack of provision as appropriate medical intervention
>>> to the precursor medical condition: ?HYPER-AROUSAL OF THE CENTRAL
>>> NERVOUS SYSTEM AND STRESS OF THE STARTLE REFLEX? is then (ie. I can
>>> articulate time after all and I have an experience of a bomb blast on 27
>>> March 1986) causal for the exasperation of the medical condition in[to]
>>> a chronic state."
>>>
>>> 3)    To that end, we have provided a psychiatrist who specialises in
>>> METAPHOR THERAPY and a cognitive scientist (Monash University) our
>>> informal research case study on the use of a four line lyric as then a
>>> NEURAL LINGUISTIC SPACIAL OVERLAY and META DESCRIPTORS (#317, #205,
>>> #144, #383) for an event intervention against MURDOCH press over US
>>> PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN'S IRELAND visit to thwart seditious contemporaneous
>>> local actions by IRISH REPUBLICANISM
>>>
>>> 4)    From correspondence with FRANCESCO DE FERRARI the AMP CHIEF
>>> EXECUTIVE OFFICER dated 29 JUNE 2020 (who as an ITALIAN took no action
>>> because of an intention to sell those products and services), it was
>>> stated that my last conversation with a "DESIGNATED LEGAL PRACTICE"
>>> failed on the basis that such "ILLEGALITY DEFENCE" (as we then termed it
>>> to be) being entirely defined by the ROYAL COMMISSION as obtained from
>>> MEDIA REPORTS OF 27 APRIL 2018 conveying ROWENA ORR AS QUEEN'S COUNSEL
>>> ASSISTING THE ROYAL COMMISSION INTO FINANCIAL SERVICES ADVISING CRIMINAL
>>> PROSECUTION OUGHT TO BE BROUGHT AGAINST AMP FOLLOWING EVIDENCE OF
>>> 'UNCONSCIONABLE' MISCONDUCT WHICH WAS DESCRIBED AS 'UNLAWFUL AND
>>> ETHICALLY AND MORALLY WRONG'.
>>>
>>> WE USED THIS EXACTING EXAMPLE IN OUR SUBMISSION TO THE FINANCIAL
>>> SERVICES ROYAL COMMISSION: By suggesting the imperative of #432 -
>>> DISHEARTENING was an impost purposed {TORAH #FIVE: #114 / #342; #SIX:
>>> #123 / #369 v?s HETEROS #SIX: #114 / #342 by #FIVE: #111 / #333; #ONE:
>>> #99 / #297 impetus} upon the Dutch troops and the United Nations
>>> authority itself does not in any manner diminish the suffering of the
>>> people but diminishes the culpability of the Dutch entirely since they
>>> themselves were the targets and the #419 - SLAUGHTER the means.
>>>
>>> Being habitual and recalcitrant misconduct of the insurer which now
>>> grants me an opportunity to seek a redress for alleged perjury by LEGAL
>>> COUNSEL MR. PETER RIDDELL which was undertaken on behalf of AXA GLOBAL
>>> (AUSTRALIA) GROUP INSURANCE arising from his 4 December 2001 mischievous
>>> letter made to the VICTORIAN CIVIL & ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL (VCAT) as
>>> the knowingly false misrepresentation of 2 telephone calls made by me on
>>> 30 November, 2001 in being a courtesy to that LEGAL COUNSEL for the
>>> INSURER.
>>>
>>> ----------
>>>
>>> TO: AMP CLAIMS ASSESSORS
>>>
>>> FURTHER TO CORRESPONDENCE SENT @ 1438 HOURS ON 15 AUGUST 2017 / 1334
>>> HOURS ON 16 AUGUST 2017 / 0911 HOURS ON 22 AUGUST / MULTIPLE OF 31
>>> AUGUST 2017 ARE THESE ADDITIONAL DIARY NOTES WITH RESPECTS TO MY CLAIM
>>> NO: M1001872 FOR PLAN NO: 00004,283:
>>>
>>> Given this clear evidence to the contrary of Mr Peter Riddell?s
>>> submission made to the VCAT Extra-ordinary hearing of 7 December, 2001
>>> in the mischievous and wrongful misrepresentation of my two telephone
>>> calls as the basis of a false report to police and perjured evidence.
>>> The following is a transcript (which may contain transcription and
>>> conceptual errors due to reduced audibility) dated 11 February 2004
>>> obtained from tapes provided by the Victoria Civil & Administrative
>>> Tribunal (anti-discrimination list) as proceedings of 0936 hours 7
>>> December 2001 before Deputy President Ms. Cate McKenzie presiding over
>>> A500 of 2000 in matter of Australian Casualty & Life (AXA Global Group
>>> Insurance) and Mark Capecchi. The proceedings were conducted by
>>> telephone hook-up.
>>>
>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Telephone?
>>>
>>> Thank you. Mr Riddell, you are appearing by
>>>
>>> MR RIDDELL: Yes, madam, I appear by way of telephone. I also have
>>> Shannon Lindner with me who is a solicitor in the actual legal group.
>>>
>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Very well now, this directions hearing has been called
>>> on as a result of a letter which has been sent by the respondents to the
>>> Tribunal. The best way I can summarise, in effect, what that letter
>>> raised were concerns about certain conduct of Mr Boek which, as I
>>> understand it, has been the subject of a report to police. The reason
>>> why the Tribunal deals with these matters initially at least, unless
>>> there is some exceptional circumstance that would warrant otherwise by
>>> bringing on a directions hearing, is so that the Tribunal can, if
>>> necessary, receive evidence of what the relevant matter is and then
>>> determine how best to deal with it.
>>>
>>> In this case, and in fact every case where a directions hearing is held,
>>> if there is a request made by a party to appear by telephone the
>>> Tribunal is very happy to accommodate that request and that is in fact
>>> what has happened today. Now, I might get you, Mr Riddell, to explain
>>> what aspects of Mr Boek's conduct have concerned the respondents and, of
>>> course, I will give you a chance to reply, Mr Boek, after Mr Riddell has
>>> finished. Very well, Mr Riddell.
>>>
>>> MR RIDDELL: Thank you, madam. On 30 November in the morning I received a
>>> telephone call from Mr Boek, a threatening telephone call, advising that
>>> he had left a number of messages for me. I then accessed those messages
>>> on my voice mail and was quite threatened by the content of those
>>> messages and I had grave concerns for my safety and the safety of my
>>> family. I, that morning, contacted the Victoria Police and reported the
>>> matter and they viewed the matter most seriously. They suggested that I
>>> not present myself in the presence of Mr Boek, which is why I am
>>> presenting myself by way of telephone today.
>>>
>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Yes, and as I say, there is no difficulty about that. Yes?
>>>
>>> MR RIDDELL: Two messages. I have forwarded to the Tribunal a transcript
>>> of those
>>>
>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Have you a recording of them?
>>>
>>> MR RIDDELL: I do and I would like to play that for the Tribunal.
>>>
>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Certainly. May I just, before you do, get my associate
>>> to take an affirmation from you because given the seriousness of the
>>> matter it ought to be on evidence.
>>>
>>> MR PETER ANTHONY RIDDELL, affirmed [9.36am]
>>>
>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Recording. Thank you. Now, if you would play the tape
>>>
>>> MR RIDDELL: If it is not clear please let me know and I will adjust the
>>> volume.
>>>
>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Certainly.
>>>
>>> TELEPHONE MESSAGE ONE: "Mr Riddell, this is Dolf Boek [calling]. I'm
>>> just wondering whether you['ve been self congratulatory about my
>>> previous submissions to the court and have failed to recognise their
>>> transcendent logic built on time]. They are religious model that
>>> co-ordinates or synchronises over 6000 years to the 9 September of this
>>> year. That means [when this year expires,] my court case will be a
>>> matter of an accusation of fascism against yourself at the company from
>>> which I will not cease until I have your #419 - SOUL.
>>>
>>> You may return this message if you like, [number omitted]. You have
>>> until the end of this year and then I would never again turn my hand
>>> against the action that I am going to take. Meaning? I will conclude
>>> when one of us going to the #390 - GRAVE."
>
> is this anything
>

19 APRIL 2023

MATTERS RELEVANT TO IBAC CASE-2022XXXX AS COMPLAINT LODGED 17 JULY 2002
BEING ITEM: 27. IS THERE ANYTHING FURTHER YOU WANT TO TELL US ABOUT YOUR
PERSONAL SITUATION RELEVANT TO THIS COMPLAINT?

1) It ought then to be substantive cause to bring CRIMINAL CHARGES
against legal counsel PETER RIDDELL for PERJURY and perverting the
COURSE OF JUSTICE by a deliberate misrepresentation of two telephone
calls made to them in a matter of self representation before a BLIND
judicatory. That my conduct in matters of this complaint was mindful
that PRESERVATION of any probity related to such action against the
INSURER was a primary concern.

YOUTUBE: "MUSE - RESISTANCE"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPE9uSFFxrI>

I HAVE NOT LABOURED FOR 25 YEARS JUST SO SOMEONE CAN STEAL MY LIFE
OPPORTUNITY which is enumerated within our 17 APRIL 2023 submission to
IBAC in conveying the use of MATRIX PROTOTYPES #SIX (#123 / #369) as
TWEEDLEDUM[B] and #ONE (#99 / #297) TWEEDLEDEE[D] as an established fact
in then providing an "ILLEGALITY DEFENCE" against an INSURER's
IMPROPRIETY by deploying a term dichotomy such as “TOTAL AND PERMANENT
DISABILITY” as involving destabilising the AUTONOMY of a person and
overriding such integrity as a SOVEREIGN principle

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/IBAC%20Notes%2020230417.pdf>

2) The concept of a #232 - HIJACKING SCHEMA perpetuated as a "gennaion
pseudos" (ie. honourable or noble lie) against the SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY
dynamic were considerations also raised (ie. the IDENTICAL MATRICES were
provided) within our submissions of 17 TO 20 JULY 2018 as made to the
FINANCIAL SERVICES ROYAL COMMISSION:

"In practical functional terms of #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL (ie.
PROTOTYPE #NINE WITHIN BOTH 9x9 MATRICES) applicable to the INSURANCE /
FINANCIAL SERVICES INDUSTRY that if the perennial [philosophical] use of
the binomial THEORY OF NUMBER METHODOLOGY {ARCH KAI TELOS OIDA: #1 + #2
+ #3 + #4 = #10} has an inherent deficiency TWEEDLEDUM[B] AND
TWEEDLEDEE[D] and an introduction of a further dichotomy such as “TOTAL
AND PERMANENT DISABILITY” as a disparity between SALARY CONTINUANCE
INSURANCE POLICY and that of SUPERANNUATION portfolios it is as #1 + #2
+ #3 + #4 = #10 capable of destabilising the AUTONOMY of a person and
overriding such integrity as a SOVEREIGN principle.

Furthermore in relation to a disproportionate or non existent insurance
benefit being applied to the chronic psychiatric condition known as PTSD
- POST TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER in the circumstance where effective
GOVERNANCE is a product of SAPIENT reality and our proposition to extend
definition of a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF
HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS
THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY.

That the Insurance Industry’s failure to appropriately manage and in
circumstance of a lack of provision as appropriate medical intervention
to the precursor medical condition: “HYPER-AROUSAL OF THE CENTRAL
NERVOUS SYSTEM AND STRESS OF THE STARTLE REFLEX” is then (ie. I can
articulate time after all and I have an experience of a bomb blast on 27
March 1986) causal for the exasperation of the medical condition in[to]
a chronic state."

3) To that end, we have provided a psychiatrist who specialises in
METAPHOR THERAPY and a cognitive scientist (Monash University) our
informal research case study on the use of a four line lyric as then a
NEURAL LINGUISTIC SPACIAL OVERLAY and META DESCRIPTORS (#317, #205,
#144, #383) for an event intervention against MURDOCH press over US
PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN'S IRELAND visit to thwart seditious contemporaneous
local actions by IRISH REPUBLICANISM

4) From correspondence with FRANCESCO DE FERRARI the AMP CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER dated 29 JUNE 2020 (who as an ITALIAN took no action because of
an intention to sell those products and services), it was stated that my
last conversation with a "DESIGNATED LEGAL PRACTICE" failed on the basis
that such "ILLEGALITY DEFENCE" (as we then termed it to be) being
entirely defined by the ROYAL COMMISSION as obtained from MEDIA REPORTS
OF 27 APRIL 2018 conveying ROWENA ORR AS QUEEN'S COUNSEL ASSISTING THE
ROYAL COMMISSION INTO FINANCIAL SERVICES ADVISING CRIMINAL PROSECUTION
OUGHT TO BE BROUGHT AGAINST AMP FOLLOWING EVIDENCE OF 'UNCONSCIONABLE'
MISCONDUCT WHICH WAS DESCRIBED AS 'UNLAWFUL AND ETHICALLY AND MORALLY
WRONG'.

WE USED THIS EXACTING EXAMPLE IN OUR SUBMISSION TO THE FINANCIAL
SERVICES ROYAL COMMISSION: By suggesting the imperative of #432 -
DISHEARTENING was an impost purposed {TORAH #FIVE: #114 / #342; #SIX:
#123 / #369 v’s HETEROS #SIX: #114 / #342 by #FIVE: #111 / #333; #ONE:
#99 / #297 impetus} upon the Dutch troops and the United Nations
authority itself does not in any manner diminish the suffering of the
people but diminishes the culpability of the Dutch entirely since they
themselves were the targets and the #419 - SLAUGHTER the means.

Being habitual and recalcitrant misconduct of the insurer which now
grants me an opportunity to seek a redress for alleged perjury by LEGAL
COUNSEL MR. PETER RIDDELL which was undertaken on behalf of AXA GLOBAL
(AUSTRALIA) GROUP INSURANCE arising from his 4 December 2001 mischievous
letter made to the VICTORIAN CIVIL & ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL (VCAT) as
the knowingly false misrepresentation of 2 telephone calls made by me on
30 November, 2001 in being a courtesy to that LEGAL COUNSEL for the INSURER.

----------

TO: AMP CLAIMS ASSESSORS

FURTHER TO CORRESPONDENCE SENT @ 1438 HOURS ON 15 AUGUST 2017 / 1334
HOURS ON 16 AUGUST 2017 / 0911 HOURS ON 22 AUGUST / MULTIPLE OF 31
AUGUST 2017 ARE THESE ADDITIONAL DIARY NOTES WITH RESPECTS TO MY CLAIM
NO: M1001872 FOR PLAN NO: 00004,283:

Given this clear evidence to the contrary of Mr Peter Riddell’s
submission made to the VCAT Extra-ordinary hearing of 7 December, 2001
in the mischievous and wrongful misrepresentation of my two telephone
calls as the basis of a false report to police and perjured evidence.
The following is a transcript (which may contain transcription and
conceptual errors due to reduced audibility) dated 11 February 2004
obtained from tapes provided by the Victoria Civil & Administrative
Tribunal (anti-discrimination list) as proceedings of 0936 hours 7
December 2001 before Deputy President Ms. Cate McKenzie presiding over
A500 of 2000 in matter of Australian Casualty & Life (AXA Global Group
Insurance) and Mark Capecchi. The proceedings were conducted by
telephone hook-up.

THE D.PRESIDENT: Telephone?

Thank you. Mr Riddell, you are appearing by

MR RIDDELL: Yes, madam, I appear by way of telephone. I also have
Shannon Lindner with me who is a solicitor in the actual legal group.

THE D.PRESIDENT: Very well now, this directions hearing has been called
on as a result of a letter which has been sent by the respondents to the
Tribunal. The best way I can summarise, in effect, what that letter
raised were concerns about certain conduct of Mr Boek which, as I
understand it, has been the subject of a report to police. The reason
why the Tribunal deals with these matters initially at least, unless
there is some exceptional circumstance that would warrant otherwise by
bringing on a directions hearing, is so that the Tribunal can, if
necessary, receive evidence of what the relevant matter is and then
determine how best to deal with it.

In this case, and in fact every case where a directions hearing is held,
if there is a request made by a party to appear by telephone the
Tribunal is very happy to accommodate that request and that is in fact
what has happened today. Now, I might get you, Mr Riddell, to explain
what aspects of Mr Boek's conduct have concerned the respondents and, of
course, I will give you a chance to reply, Mr Boek, after Mr Riddell has
finished. Very well, Mr Riddell.

MR RIDDELL: Thank you, madam. On 30 November in the morning I received a
telephone call from Mr Boek, a threatening telephone call, advising that
he had left a number of messages for me. I then accessed those messages
on my voice mail and was quite threatened by the content of those
messages and I had grave concerns for my safety and the safety of my
family. I, that morning, contacted the Victoria Police and reported the
matter and they viewed the matter most seriously. They suggested that I
not present myself in the presence of Mr Boek, which is why I am
presenting myself by way of telephone today.

THE D.PRESIDENT: Yes, and as I say, there is no difficulty about that. Yes?

MR RIDDELL: Two messages. I have forwarded to the Tribunal a transcript
of those

THE D.PRESIDENT: Have you a recording of them?

MR RIDDELL: I do and I would like to play that for the Tribunal.

THE D.PRESIDENT: Certainly. May I just, before you do, get my associate
to take an affirmation from you because given the seriousness of the
matter it ought to be on evidence.

MR PETER ANTHONY RIDDELL, affirmed [9.36am]

THE D.PRESIDENT: Recording. Thank you. Now, if you would play the tape

MR RIDDELL: If it is not clear please let me know and I will adjust the
volume.