Rocksolid Light

Welcome to Rocksolid Light

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

All new: Parts not interchangeable with previous model.


aus+uk / uk.d-i-y / Re: Brexit dividend: Civil service has ballooned by 100, 000 since Brexit!

Re: Brexit dividend: Civil service has ballooned by 100, 000 since Brexit!

<aeb650b8bcd54bc8aa8bad1da5a9cfdd@dizum.com>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=127377&group=uk.d-i-y#127377

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
From: nobody@dizum.com (Nomen Nescio)
Subject: Re: Brexit dividend: Civil service has ballooned by 100,
000 since Brexit!
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <aeb650b8bcd54bc8aa8bad1da5a9cfdd@dizum.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 15:27:33 +0100 (CET)
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!news2.arglkargh.de!alphared!sewer!news.dizum.net!not-for-mail
Organization: dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider
X-Abuse: abuse@dizum.com
Injection-Info: sewer.dizum.com - 2001::1/128
 by: Nomen Nescio - Thu, 21 Mar 2024 14:27 UTC

On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 12:40:31 +0000, Ottavio Caruso <ottavio2006-usenet2012@yahoo.com> wrote:

>Am 21/03/2024 um 10:58 schrieb Joe:
>> On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:36:16 +0000
>> Ottavio Caruso <ottavio2006-usenet2012@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Am 20/03/2024 um 20:54 schrieb Rod Speed:
>>>> We are no victims. Even you lot migrated here in droves, for a
>>>> reason,
>>>
>>> And the reason was not to escape HM Prisons.
>>>
>>>> bludger
>>>
>>> What you lack in educated speech, you make up with prison slang.
>>>
>>> Congratulations, you are a true Australian!
>>>
>>
>> Had you realised that a few years ago, an Australian made an English
>> translation of the Divine Comedy?
>>
>
>Not a true Australian, then. True Australians couldn't tell Christian
>Europeans from the "religion of peace" ones.
>
>But, what do I hear you say, neither gammons do! Bingo!

Auschwitz: Myth and facts
By Mark Weber

Nearly everyone has heard of Auschwitz, the German wartime
concentration camp where many prisoners -- most of them Jewish --
were reportedly exterminated, especially in gas chambers. Auschwitz
is widely regarded as the most terrible Nazi extermination center.
The camp's horrific reputation cannot, however, be reconciled with
the facts.

Scholars challenge Holocaust story

Astonishing as it may seem, more and more historians and engineers
have been challenging the widely accepted Auschwitz story.
These "revisionist" scholars do not dispute the fact that large
numbers of Jews were deported to the camp, or that many died there,
particularly of typhus and other diseases. But the compelling
evidence they present shows that Auschwitz was not an extermination
center and that the story of mass killings in "gas chambers" is a
myth.

The Auschwitz camps

The Auschwitz camp complex was set up in 1940 in what is now south-
central Poland. Large numbers of Jews were deported there between
1942 and mid-1944.

The main camp was known as Auschwitz I. Birkenau, or Auschwitz II,
was supposedly the main extermination center, and Monowitz, or
Auschwitz III, was a large industrial center where gasoline was
produced from coal. In addition there were dozens of smaller
satellite camps devoted to the war economy.

Four million victims?

At the postwar Nuremberg Tribunal, the Allies charged that the
Germans exterminated four million people at Auschwitz. This figure,
which was invented by the Soviets, was uncritically accepted for
many years. It often appeared in major American newspapers and
magazines, for example. (note 1)

Today no reputable historian, not even those who generally accept
the extermination story, believes this figure. Israeli Holocaust
historian Yehuda Bauer said in 1989 that it is time to finally
acknowledge the familiar four million figure is a deliberate myth.
In July 1990 the Auschwitz State Museum in Poland, along with
Israel's Yad Vashem Holocaust Center, suddenly announced that
altogether perhaps one million people (both Jews and non-Jews) died
there. Neither institution would say how many of these people were
killed, nor were any estimates given of the numbers of those
supposedly gassed. (note 2) One prominent Holocaust historian,
Gerald Reitlinger, has estimated that perhaps 700,000 or so Jews
perished at Auschwitz. More recently, Holocaust historian Jean-
Claude Pressac has estimated that about 800,000 persons -- of whom
630,000 were Jewish -- perished at Auschwitz. While even such lower
figures are incorrect, they show how the Auschwitz story has changed
drastically over the years. (note 3)

Bizarre tales
At one time it was seriously claimed that Jews were systematically
electrocuted at Auschwitz. American newspapers, citing a Soviet
eyewitness report from liberated Auschwitz, told readers in February
1945 that the methodical Germans had killed Jews there using
an "electric conveyor belt on which hundreds of persons could be
electrocuted simultaneously [and] then moved on into furnaces. They
were burned almost instantly, producing fertilizer for nearby
cabbage fields." (note 4)

And at the Nuremberg Tribunal, chief U.S. prosecutor Robert Jackson
charged that the Germans used a "newly invented" device to
instantaneously "vaporize" 20,000 Jews near Auschwitz "in such a way
that there was no trace left of them." (note 5) No reputable
historian now accepts either of these fanciful tales.

The Höss 'confession'
A key Holocaust document is the "confession" of former Auschwitz
commandant Rudolf Höss of April 5, 1946, which was submitted by the
U.S. prosecution at the main Nuremberg trial. (note 6)

Although it is still widely cited as solid proof for the Auschwitz
extermination story, it is actually a false statement that was
obtained by torture.

Many years after the war, British military intelligence sergeant
Bernard Clarke described how he and five other British soldiers
tortured the former commandant to obtain his "confession." Höss
himself privately explained his ordeal in these words: "Certainly, I
signed a statement that I killed two and half million Jews. I could
just as well have said that it was five million Jews. There are
certain methods by which any confession can be obtained, whether it
is true or not." (note 7)

Even historians who generally accept the Holocaust extermination
story now acknowledge that many of the specific statements made in
the Höss "affidavit" are simply not true. For one thing, no serious
scholar now claims that anything like two and a half or three
million people perished in Auschwitz.

The Höss "affidavit" further alleges that Jews were already being
exterminated by gas in the summer of 1941 at three other camps:
Belzec, Treblinka and Wolzek. The "Wolzek" camp mentioned by Höss is
a total invention. No such camp existed, and the name is no longer
mentioned in Holocaust literature. Moreover, the story these days by
those who believe in the Holocaust legend is that gassings of Jews
did not begin at Auschwitz, Treblinka, or Belzec until sometime in
1942.

No documentary evidence

Many thousands of secret German documents dealing with Auschwitz
were confiscated after the war by the Allies. Not a single one
refers to a policy or program of extermination. In fact, the
extermination story cannot be reconciled with the documentary
evidence.

Many Jewish inmates unable to work

For example, it is often claimed that all Jews at Auschwitz who were
unable to work were immediately killed. Jews who were too old,
young, sick, or weak were supposedly gassed on arrival, and only
those who could be worked to death were temporarily kept alive.

But the evidence shows that, in fact, a very high percentage of the
Jewish inmates were not able to work, and were nevertheless not
killed. For example, an internal German telex message dated Sept. 4,
1943, from the chief of the Labor Allocation department of the SS
Economic and Administrative Main Office (WVHA), reported that of
25,000 Jewish inmates in Auschwitz, only 3,581 were able to work,
and that all of the remaining Jewish inmates -- some 21,500, or
about 86 percent -- were unable to work. (note 8)

This is also confirmed in a secret report dated April 5, 1944,
on "security measures in Auschwitz" by Oswald Pohl, head of the SS
concentration camp system, to SS chief Heinrich Himmler. Pohl
reported that there was a total of 67,000 inmates in the entire
Auschwitz camp complex, of whom 18,000 were hospitalized or
disabled. In the Auschwitz II camp (Birkenau), supposedly the main
extermination center, there were 36,000 inmates, mostly female, of
whom "approximately 15,000 are unable to work." (note 9)

These two documents simply cannot be reconciled with the Auschwitz
extermination story.

The evidence shows that Auschwitz-Birkenau was established primarily
as a camp for Jews who were not able to work, including the sick and
elderly, as well as for those who were temporarily awaiting
assignment to other camps. That's the considered view of Dr. Arthur
Butz of Northwestern University, who also says that this was the
reason for the unusually high death rate there. (note 10)

Princeton University history professor Arno Mayer, who is Jewish,
acknowledges in a recent book about the "final solution" that more
Jews perished at Auschwitz as a result of typhus and other "natural"
causes than were executed. (note 11)

Anne Frank

Perhaps the best known Auschwitz inmate was Anne Frank, who is known
around the world for her famous diary. But few people know that
thousands of Jews, including Anne and her father, Otto
Frank, "survived" Auschwitz.

The 15-year-old girl and her father were deported from the
Netherlands to Auschwitz in September 1944. Several weeks later, in
the face of the advancing Soviet army, Anne was evacuated along with
many other Jews to the Bergen-Belsen camp, where she died of typhus
in March 1945.

Her father came down with typhus in Auschwitz and was sent to the
camp hospital to recover. He was one of thousands of sick and feeble
Jews who were left behind when the Germans abandoned the camp in
January 1945, shortly before it was overrun by the Soviets. He died
in Switzerland in 1980.

If the German policy had been to kill Anne Frank and her father,
they would not have survived Auschwitz. Their fate, tragic though it
was, cannot be reconciled with the extermination story.

Allied propaganda

The Auschwitz gassing story is based in large part on the hearsay
statements of former Jewish inmates who did not personally see any
evidence of extermination. Their beliefs are understandable, because
rumors about gassings at Auschwitz were widespread.

Allied planes dropped large numbers of leaflets, written in Polish
and German, on Auschwitz and the surrounding areas which claimed
that people were being gassed in the camp. The Auschwitz gassing
story, which was an important part of the Allied wartime propaganda
effort, was also broadcast to Europe by Allied radio stations. (note
12)

Survivor testimony

Former inmates have confirmed that they saw no evidence of
extermination at Auschwitz.

An Austrian woman, Maria Vanherwaarden, testified about her camp
experiences in a Toronto District Court in March 1988. She was
interned in Auschwitz-Birkenau in 1942 for having sexual relations
with a Polish forced laborer. On the train trip to the camp, a Gypsy
woman told her and the others that they would all be gassed at
Auschwitz.

Upon arrival, Maria and the other women were ordered to undress and
go into a large concrete room without windows to take a shower. The
terrified women were sure that they were about to die. But then,
instead of gas, water came out of the shower heads.

Auschwitz was no vacation center, Maria confirmed. She witnessed the
death of many fellow inmates by disease, particularly typhus, and
quite a few committed suicide. But she saw no evidence at all of
mass killings, gassings, or of any extermination program. (note 13)

A Jewish woman named Marika Frank arrived at Auschwitz-Birkenau from
Hungary in July 1944, when 25,000 Jews were supposedly gassed and
cremated daily. She likewise testified after the war that she heard
and saw nothing of "gas chambers" during the time she was interned
there. She heard the gassing stories only later. (note 14)

Inmates released

Auschwitz internees who had served their sentences were released and
returned to their home countries. If Auschwitz had actually been a
top secret extermination center, the Germans would certainly not
have released inmates who "knew" what was happening in the camp.
(note 15)

Himmler orders death rate reduced

In response to the deaths of many inmates due to disease, especially
typhus, the German authorities responsible for the camps ordered
firm counter-measures.

The head of the SS camp administration office sent a directive dated
Dec. 28, 1942, to Auschwitz and the other concentration camps. It
sharply criticized the high death rate of inmates due to disease,
and ordered that "camp physicians must use all means at their
disposal to significantly reduce the death rate in the various
camps." Furthermore, it ordered:

The camp doctors must supervise more often than in the past the
nutrition of the prisoners and, in cooperation with the
administration, submit improvement recommendations to the camp
commandants ... The camp doctors are to see to it that the working
conditions at the various labor places are improved as much as
possible.

Finally, the directive stressed that "the Reichsfhrer SS [Heinrich
Himmler] has ordered that the death rate absolutely must be
reduced." (note 16)

German camp regulations

Official German camp regulations make clear that Auschwitz was not
an extermination center. They ordered: (note 17)

New arrivals in the camp are to be given a thorough medical
examination, and if there is any doubt [about their health], they
must be sent to quarantine for observation.

Prisoners who report sick must be examined that same day by the camp
physician. If necessary, the physician must transfer the prisoners
to a hospital for professional treatment.

The camp physician must regularly inspect the kitchen regarding the
preparation of the food and the quality of the food supply. Any
deficiencies that may arise must be reported to the camp commandant.

Special care should be given in the treatment of accidents, in order
not to impair the full productivity of the prisoners.

Prisoners who are to be released or transfered must first be brought
before the camp physician for medical examination.

Telltale aerial photos

Detailed aerial reconnaissance photographs taken of Auschwitz-
Birkenau on several random days in 1944 (during the height of the
alleged extermination period there) were made public by the CIA in
1979. These photos show no trace of piles of corpses, smoking
crematory chimneys or masses of Jews awaiting death, things that
have been repeatedly alleged, and all of which would have been
clearly visible if Auschwitz had been the extermination center it is
said to have been. (note 18)

Absurd cremation claims

Cremation specialists have confirmed that thousands of corpses could
not possibly have been cremated every day throughout the spring and
summer of 1944 at Auschwitz, as commonly alleged.

For example, Mr. Ivan Lagace, manager of a large crematory in
Calgary, Canada, testified in court in April 1988 that the Auschwitz
cremation story is technically impossible. The allegation that
10,000 or even 20,000 corpses were burned every day at Auschwitz in
the summer of 1944 in crematories and open pits is
simply "preposterous" and "beyond the realm of reality," he declared
under oath. (note 19)

Gassing expert refutes extermination story

America's leading gas chamber expert, Boston engineer Fred A.
Leuchter, carefully examined the supposed "gas chambers" in Poland
and concluded that the Auschwitz gassing story is absurd and
technically impossible.

Leuchter is the foremost specialist on the design and installation
of gas chambers used in the United States to execute convicted
criminals. For example, he designed a gas chamber facility for the
Missouri state penitentiary.

In February 1988 he carried out a detailed onsite examination of
the "gas chambers" at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek in Poland,
which are either still standing or only partially in ruins. In sworn
testimony to a Toronto court and in a technical report, Leuchter
described every aspect of his investigation.

He concluded by emphatically declaring that the alleged gassing
facilities could not possibly have been used to kill people. Among
other things, he pointed out that the so-called "gas chambers" were
not properly sealed or vented to kill human beings without also
killing German camp personnel. (note 20)

Dr. William B. Lindsey, a research chemist employed for 33 years by
the Dupont Corporation, likewise testified in a 1985 court case that
the Auschwitz gassing story is technically impossible. Based on a
careful on-site examination of the "gas chambers" at Auschwitz,
Birkenau and Majdanek, and on his years of experience, he
declared: "I have come to the conclusion that no one was willfully
or purposefully killed with Zyklon B [hydrocyanic acid gas] in this
manner. I consider it absolutely impossible." (note 21)

Notes

Nuremberg document 008-USSR. IMT blue series, Vol. 39, pp. 241,
261.; NC and A red series, vol. 1, p. 35.; C.L.
Sulzberger, "Oswiecim Killings Placed at 4,000,000," New York Times,
May 8, 1945, and, New York Times, Jan. 31, 1986, p. A4.
Y. Bauer, "Fighting the Distortions," Jerusalem Post (Israel), Sept.
22, 1989; "Auschwitz Deaths Reduced to a Million," Daily Telegraph
(London), July 17, 1990; "Poland Reduces Auschwitz Death Toll
Estimate to 1 Million," The Washington Times, July 17, 1990.
G. Reitlinger, The Final Solution (1971); J.-C. Pressac, Le
Crématoires d'Auschwitz: La Machinerie du meurtre de mass (Paris:
CNRS, 1993). On Pressac's estimates, see: L'Express (France), Sept.
30, 1993, p. 33.
Washington (DC) Daily News, Feb. 2, 1945, pp. 2, 35. (United Press
dispatch from Moscow).
IMT blue series, Vol. 16, p. 529-530. (June 21, 1946).
Nuremberg document 3868-PS (USA-819). IMT blue series, Vol. 33, pp.
275-279.
Rupert Butler, Legions of Death (England: 1983), pp. 235; R.
Faurisson, The Journal of Historical Review, Winter 1986-87, pp. 389-
403.
Archives of the Jewish Historical Institute of Warsaw, German
document No. 128, in: H. Eschwege, ed., Kennzeichen J (East Berlin:
1966), p. 264.
Nuremberg document NO-021. NMT green series, Vol. 5. pp. 384-385.
Arthur Butz, The Hoax of the Twentieth Century (Costa Mesa, Calif.),
p. 124.
Arno Mayer, Why Did the Heavens Not Darken?: The 'Final Solution' in
History (Pantheon, 1989), p. 365.
Nuremberg document NI-11696. NMT green series, Vol. 8, p. 606.
Testimony in Toronto District Court, March 28, 1988. Toronto Star,
March 29, 1988, p. A2.
Sylvia Rothchild, ed., Voices from the Holocaust (New York: 1981),
pp. 188-191.
Walter Laqueur, The Terrible Secret (Boston: 1981), p. 169.
Nuremberg document PS-2171, Annex 2. NC&A red series, Vol. 4, pp.
833-834.
"Rules and Regulations for the Concentration Camps." Anthology,
Inhuman Medicine, Vol. 1, Part 1 (Warsaw: International Auschwitz
Committee, 1970), pp. 149-151.; S. Paskuly, ed., Death Dealer: the
Memoirs of the SS Kommandant at Auschwitz (Buffalo: 1992), pp. 216-
217.
Dino A. Brugioni and Robert C. Poirier, The Holocaust Revisited
(Washington, DC: Central Intelligence Agency, 1979).
Canadian Jewish News (Toronto), April 14, 1988, p. 6.
The Leuchter Report: An Engineering Report on the Alleged Execution
Gas Chambers at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek (Toronto: 1988).
Available for $17.00, postpaid, from the IHR.
The Globe and Mail (Toronto), Feb. 12, 1985, p. M3
Summary

The Auschwitz extermination story originated as wartime propaganda.
Now, more than 40 years after the end of the Second World War, it is
time to take another, more objective look at this highly polemicized
chapter of history. The Auschwitz legend is the core of the
Holocaust story. If hundreds of thousands of Jews were not
systematically killed there, as alleged, one of the great myths of
our time collapses.

Artificially maintaining the hatreds and passions of the past
prevents genuine reconciliation and lasting peace. Revisionism
promotes historical awareness and international understanding. That
is why the work of the Institute for Historical Review is so
important and deserves your support.

SubjectRepliesAuthor
o Re: Brexit dividend: Civil service has ballooned by 100, 000 since Brexit!

By: Nomen Nescio on Thu, 21 Mar 2024

0Nomen Nescio
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor