On 2023-10-29 18:18, candycanearter07 wrote:
> On 10/29/23 20:00, Alan wrote:
>> On 2023-10-29 17:43, Wally J wrote:
>>> candycanearter07 <no@thanks.net> wrote
>>>
>>>>> ...getting back to the topic, have you seen that evidence you asked
>>>>> for?
>>>>
>>>> They might be asleep.
>>>
>>> Do you really think I offered to show the proof and then that I
>>> wouldn't?
>>> Only an iKook would do something that obviously stupid.
>>>
>>> It's bait.
>>> I was waiting for the iKooks to make fools out of themselves.
>>>
>>> Which is what they're doing by brazenly denying every truth about Apple.
>>>
>>> Just like I waited for Snit & Jolly Roger & Alan Baker to do it over
>>> here:
>>>   *It's a fact iOS devices can't even graph Wi-Fi signal strength
>>> over time*
>>>   <https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/PZuec56EWB0>
>>> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/PZuec56EWB0>
>>>
>>>       These Apple apologists _hate_ the truth about Apple products.
>>> They _hate_ what Apple is because Apple isn't what they _thought_ it
>>> was.
>>>       <https://youtu.be/7QaABa6DFIo> iKooks can't even see the fatal
>>> flaw
>>>
>>> In this case they _hate_ that the AppleID is required where if you don't
>>> log into the Apple mothership tracking servers, Apple disables the
>>> account!
>>>
>>> Which means you're logged into Apple mothership tracking servers
>>> every  day
>>> of your life - and - most Apple apps won't work without you logging in.
>>>
>>>   *That means there isn't any privacy ever possible on any Apple device*
>>
>> Weird that you talk about providing proof...
>>
>> ...but then don't provide any.
>
> Actually, I kind of agree. Not to be rude, but you didn't post the
> screenshots about the tracking servers. The wifi thing is extremely
> annoying (especially since they removed the hidden cellular info app)
> but can you post the stuff about the logging in?

Don't hold your breath.

:-)

On 2023-10-29, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
> On 2023-10-29 15:20, Wally J wrote:
>> Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
>>
>>>>>>> years-long troll. But then we all know this (except for the extremely
>>>>>>> gullible candy eater) because we've seen them before.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Candy eater?
>>>>>
>>>>> Whatever your name is.
>>>>
>>>> candycanearter07
>>>
>>> Whatever you say.
>>
>> Heh heh heh ... notice...
>
> ...that you've produced not a shred of the evidence you said you were
> going to provide?
>
> Yeah. I noticed.

We all have. Over, and over and over again.

--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR

On 2023-10-29, candycanearter07 <no@thanks.net> wrote:
> On 10/29/23 16:59, Jolly Roger wrote:
>> On 2023-10-29, candycanearter07 <no@thanks.net> wrote:
>>> On 10/29/23 11:41, Jolly Roger wrote:
>>>> On 2023-10-29, candycanearter07 <no@thanks.net> wrote:
>>>>> On 10/28/23 22:22, Jolly Roger wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> years-long troll. But then we all know this (except for the extremely
>>>>>> gullible candy eater) because we've seen them before.
>>>>>
>>>>> Candy eater?
>>>>
>>>> Whatever your name is.
>>>
>>> candycanearter07
>>
>> Whatever you say.
>
> ?? I've had this name (or a variation of candycane) for like 4 years now

That's nice for you, I guess.

--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR

On 2023-10-29, candycanearter07 <no@thanks.net> wrote:
> On 10/29/23 17:49, Alan wrote:
>> On 2023-10-29 15:40, candycanearter07 wrote:
>>> On 10/29/23 16:59, Jolly Roger wrote:
>>>> On 2023-10-29, candycanearter07 <no@thanks.net> wrote:
>>>>> On 10/29/23 11:41, Jolly Roger wrote:
>>>>>> On 2023-10-29, candycanearter07 <no@thanks.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 10/28/23 22:22, Jolly Roger wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> years-long troll. But then we all know this (except for the
>>>>>>>> extremely
>>>>>>>> gullible candy eater) because we've seen them before.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Candy eater?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Whatever your name is.
>>>>>
>>>>> candycanearter07
>>>>
>>>> Whatever you say.
>>>>
>>>
>>> ?? I've had this name (or a variation of candycane) for like 4 years now
>>
>> So...
>>
>> ...getting back to the topic, have you seen that evidence you asked for?
>
> They might be asleep.

Nope.

--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR

On 2023-10-29 18:18, candycanearter07 wrote:
> On 10/29/23 20:00, Alan wrote:
>> On 2023-10-29 17:43, Wally J wrote:
>>> candycanearter07 <no@thanks.net> wrote
>>>
>>>>> ...getting back to the topic, have you seen that evidence you asked
>>>>> for?
>>>>
>>>> They might be asleep.
>>>
>>> Do you really think I offered to show the proof and then that I
>>> wouldn't?
>>> Only an iKook would do something that obviously stupid.
>>>
>>> It's bait.
>>> I was waiting for the iKooks to make fools out of themselves.
>>>
>>> Which is what they're doing by brazenly denying every truth about Apple.
>>>
>>> Just like I waited for Snit & Jolly Roger & Alan Baker to do it over
>>> here:
>>>   *It's a fact iOS devices can't even graph Wi-Fi signal strength
>>> over time*
>>>   <https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/PZuec56EWB0>
>>> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/PZuec56EWB0>
>>>
>>>       These Apple apologists _hate_ the truth about Apple products.
>>> They _hate_ what Apple is because Apple isn't what they _thought_ it
>>> was.
>>>       <https://youtu.be/7QaABa6DFIo> iKooks can't even see the fatal
>>> flaw
>>>
>>> In this case they _hate_ that the AppleID is required where if you don't
>>> log into the Apple mothership tracking servers, Apple disables the
>>> account!
>>>
>>> Which means you're logged into Apple mothership tracking servers
>>> every  day
>>> of your life - and - most Apple apps won't work without you logging in.
>>>
>>>   *That means there isn't any privacy ever possible on any Apple device*
>>
>> Weird that you talk about providing proof...
>>
>> ...but then don't provide any.
>
> Actually, I kind of agree. Not to be rude, but you didn't post the
> screenshots about the tracking servers. The wifi thing is extremely
> annoying (especially since they removed the hidden cellular info app)
> but can you post the stuff about the logging in?

Have you seen anything?

Do you think you'll ever see anything?

With respect to Arlen and his credibility...

....have you learned anything?

(BTW, when is Apple supposed to have removed the "hidden cellular info
app"?)

On 10/31/23 10:45, Alan wrote:
> On 2023-10-29 18:18, candycanearter07 wrote:
>> On 10/29/23 20:00, Alan wrote:
>>> Weird that you talk about providing proof...
>>>
>>> ...but then don't provide any.
>>
>> Actually, I kind of agree. Not to be rude, but you didn't post the
>> screenshots about the tracking servers. The wifi thing is extremely
>> annoying (especially since they removed the hidden cellular info app)
>> but can you post the stuff about the logging in?
<snip>
> (BTW, when is Apple supposed to have removed the "hidden cellular info
> app"?)

There was a cool Easter egg in iOS where you could reach a hidden
cellular information app by dialing a special number. Among other
things, it could change the bars icon to numbers until you rebooted,
which was extremely useful and more descriptive, and had tons of useful
info. iOS 14 ruined it, removing the bars icon and arbitrarily locking
out useful info, COMPLETELY gimping the cool feature. At least on my
phone, it only displays about 4 different stats that are completely useless.
https://www.macrumors.com/2020/07/27/ios-14-redesigned-field-test-mode/
--
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

On 2023-10-31 12:52, candycanearter07 wrote:
> On 10/31/23 10:45, Alan wrote:
>> On 2023-10-29 18:18, candycanearter07 wrote:
>>> On 10/29/23 20:00, Alan wrote:
>>>> Weird that you talk about providing proof...
>>>>
>>>> ...but then don't provide any.
>>>
>>> Actually, I kind of agree. Not to be rude, but you didn't post the
>>> screenshots about the tracking servers. The wifi thing is extremely
>>> annoying (especially since they removed the hidden cellular info app)
>>> but can you post the stuff about the logging in?
> <snip>
>> (BTW, when is Apple supposed to have removed the "hidden cellular info
>> app"?)
>
> There was a cool Easter egg in iOS where you could reach a hidden
> cellular information app by dialing a special number. Among other
> things, it could change the bars icon to numbers until you rebooted,
> which was extremely useful and more descriptive, and had tons of useful
> info. iOS 14 ruined it, removing the bars icon and arbitrarily locking
> out useful info, COMPLETELY gimping the cool feature. At least on my
> phone, it only displays about 4 different stats that are completely
> useless.
> https://www.macrumors.com/2020/07/27/ios-14-redesigned-field-test-mode/

I see.

So by "removed the cellular info app", you actually meant "redesigned
the app in a way I don't personally like".

Got it.

:-)

candycanearter07 <no@thanks.net> wrote:
> On 10/29/23 11:41, Jolly Roger wrote:
>> On 2023-10-29, candycanearter07 <no@thanks.net> wrote:
>>> On 10/28/23 22:22, Jolly Roger wrote:
>>>>
>>>> years-long troll. But then we all know this (except for the extremely
>>>> gullible candy eater) because we've seen them before.
>>>
>>> Candy eater?
>>
>> Whatever your name is.
>>
>
> candycanearter07

Which sock are you? I lost track.