Rocksolid Light

Welcome to Rocksolid Light

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

All programmers are playwrights and all computers are lousy actors.


computers / comp.os.vms / Re: Microkernels

SubjectAuthor
* MicrokernelsSimon Clubley
+- Re: MicrokernelsArne Vajhøj
`* Re: MicrokernelsLawrence D'Oliveiro
 `* Re: MicrokernelsScott Dorsey
  `- Re: MicrokernelsLawrence D'Oliveiro

1
Microkernels

<unguvl$1hu29$3@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/computers/article-flat.php?id=32760&group=comp.os.vms#32760

  copy link   Newsgroups: comp.os.vms
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP (Simon Clubley)
Newsgroups: comp.os.vms
Subject: Microkernels
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 13:57:09 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <unguvl$1hu29$3@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 13:57:09 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="b239b4fe7e285e6cb1e15aecc8426104";
logging-data="1636425"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/lsziLB3jk8DdO9D8mbEaJ737UHaOHQn8="
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (VMS/Multinet)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:3xLHa+a8215AMzg0qQUIr9AnbYY=
 by: Simon Clubley - Mon, 8 Jan 2024 13:57 UTC

On 2024-01-05, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
>
> That can be blamed on the limitations of Mach. People still seem to think
> microkernels are somehow a good idea, but they really don?t help much, do
> they?
>

The seL4 and QNX users would probably disagree with you. Strongly.

Microkernels offer excellent security and isolation benefits that
monolithic kernels cannot provide.

It really is a pity Linux didn't go down the microkernel route. I suspect
many of the kernel-level vulnerabilities would be far less severe in such
an environment.

In case you are unaware BTW, the monolithic versus microkernel design was
a _major_ debating point in the early days of Linux.

Simon.

--
Simon Clubley, clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP
Walking destinations on a map are further away than they appear.

Re: Microkernels

<unh1v0$1ijdp$2@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/computers/article-flat.php?id=32763&group=comp.os.vms#32763

  copy link   Newsgroups: comp.os.vms
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: arne@vajhoej.dk (Arne Vajhøj)
Newsgroups: comp.os.vms
Subject: Re: Microkernels
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 09:48:00 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <unh1v0$1ijdp$2@dont-email.me>
References: <unguvl$1hu29$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 14:48:01 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="724513311a71846c49fefef10b94a8a6";
logging-data="1658297"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/1Hp/9DTV0j5cyfTOGVBq/Ae5QAYs5I7c="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:8HSQp/pznfXamTSOWwJK+c7ot1A=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <unguvl$1hu29$3@dont-email.me>
 by: Arne Vajhøj - Mon, 8 Jan 2024 14:48 UTC

On 1/8/2024 8:57 AM, Simon Clubley wrote:
> Microkernels offer excellent security and isolation benefits that
> monolithic kernels cannot provide.

That is sort of by definition.

And there are use cases where that requirement is
everything.

But for traditional server and desktop it seems like
either monolith or hybrid is the preference.

Key question must be whether that is just for historic
reasons or there is a technical reason - aka that a
pure microkernel design does not perform good enough.

Arne

Re: Microkernels

<uni7mb$1o066$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/computers/article-flat.php?id=32810&group=comp.os.vms#32810

  copy link   Newsgroups: comp.os.vms
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: ldo@nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Newsgroups: comp.os.vms
Subject: Re: Microkernels
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 01:31:55 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <uni7mb$1o066$1@dont-email.me>
References: <unguvl$1hu29$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 01:31:55 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="bc215059836e1a1aefafe98b9533fc3f";
logging-data="1835206"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/yS7gTmhZ9LnoySeAGiXg4"
User-Agent: Pan/0.155 (Kherson; fc5a80b8)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:GAiLlAiSLltgQMhS1GozC0GAxWU=
 by: Lawrence D'Oliv - Tue, 9 Jan 2024 01:31 UTC

On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 13:57:09 -0000 (UTC), Simon Clubley wrote:

> It really is a pity Linux didn't go down the microkernel route.

Andy Tanenbaum already had an argument with Linus Torvalds about that, and
lost.

Today, Tanenbaum has (unsuccessfully) been trying to commercialize MINIX,
while Linux essentially dominates the computing world.

Re: Microkernels

<unjmn6$6sm$1@panix2.panix.com>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/computers/article-flat.php?id=32833&group=comp.os.vms#32833

  copy link   Newsgroups: comp.os.vms
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.panix2.panix.com!panix2.panix.com!not-for-mail
From: kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey)
Newsgroups: comp.os.vms
Subject: Re: Microkernels
Date: 9 Jan 2024 14:54:30 -0000
Organization: Former users of Netcom shell (1989-2000)
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <unjmn6$6sm$1@panix2.panix.com>
References: <unguvl$1hu29$3@dont-email.me> <uni7mb$1o066$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="panix2.panix.com:166.84.1.2";
logging-data="4136"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com"
 by: Scott Dorsey - Tue, 9 Jan 2024 14:54 UTC

In article <uni7mb$1o066$1@dont-email.me>,
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
>On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 13:57:09 -0000 (UTC), Simon Clubley wrote:
>
>> It really is a pity Linux didn't go down the microkernel route.
>
>Andy Tanenbaum already had an argument with Linus Torvalds about that, and
>lost.
>
>Today, Tanenbaum has (unsuccessfully) been trying to commercialize MINIX,
>while Linux essentially dominates the computing world.

Although at the same time QNX continues plugging along with a small but
dedicated customer base.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

Re: Microkernels

<unk99k$24p45$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/computers/article-flat.php?id=32843&group=comp.os.vms#32843

  copy link   Newsgroups: comp.os.vms
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: ldo@nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Newsgroups: comp.os.vms
Subject: Re: Microkernels
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 20:11:32 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <unk99k$24p45$1@dont-email.me>
References: <unguvl$1hu29$3@dont-email.me> <uni7mb$1o066$1@dont-email.me>
<unjmn6$6sm$1@panix2.panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 20:11:32 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a8cae4a0970931ae7e1da1d8c5fcc01b";
logging-data="2253957"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/S83AqROiQgUmmkFGmCZWb"
User-Agent: Pan/0.155 (Kherson; fc5a80b8)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:wP8rkt7+FNLuj9srk9OzObgRqjI=
 by: Lawrence D'Oliv - Tue, 9 Jan 2024 20:11 UTC

On 9 Jan 2024 14:54:30 -0000, Scott Dorsey wrote:

> In article <uni7mb$1o066$1@dont-email.me>,
> Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
>
>>Today, Tanenbaum has (unsuccessfully) been trying to commercialize
>>MINIX, while Linux essentially dominates the computing world.
>
> Although at the same time QNX continues plugging along with a small but
> dedicated customer base.

So, would you say that microkernels have a better than 50% success rate,
or not?

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor