Hi.

Anyone aware of a CP/M 2.2 ISO or equal image (pre-configured appliance) that will run on virtualbox?

I had found a CP/M 1.1 image but it was too old and didn't support COM files.

I had toyed with RunCPM and Z80Pack but I think under virtualbox you would get closer to the actual "machine".

Thanks.

I too toyed with Virtual Box for CP/M. I have other virtual machines, but never found anything for CP/M.
I decided to go with Simh and it's Altair emulation which allows me to load up CP/M and it works quite well.
I've used Simh for other things before so am familiar with it and it's easy to use. It should be available on Github.

On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 3:42:24 PM UTC-6, KenUnix wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Anyone aware of a CP/M 2.2 ISO or equal image (pre-configured appliance) that will run on virtualbox?
>
> I had found a CP/M 1.1 image but it was too old and didn't support COM files.
>
> I had toyed with RunCPM and Z80Pack but I think under virtualbox you would get closer to the actual "machine".
>
> Thanks.

Well as I said I have used emulators RunCPM and Z80Pack and like RunCPM
the best under Linux 64bit (Ubuntu).

I also got a small box called Minz-C which runs CP/M 2.2 on a real Z-180 CPU.
I have had a couple issues but the maker has been very nice helping me.

Ken

Am I mistaken or doesn't VirtualBox just emulate x86 environments? CPM2.2 is 8 bit.

Randy

On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 4:42:24 PM UTC-5, KenUnix wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Anyone aware of a CP/M 2.2 ISO or equal image (pre-configured appliance) that will run on virtualbox?
>
> I had found a CP/M 1.1 image but it was too old and didn't support COM files.
>
> I had toyed with RunCPM and Z80Pack but I think under virtualbox you would get closer to the actual "machine".
>
> Thanks.
KenUnix

CP/M 1.1? No such beast for 8080. VirtualBox does not support 8 bit systems like 8080 or Z80 ( or 6502).

The CP/M you had was likely CP/M for 8086. That did not support COM (CMD files instead). The earliest CP/M-80
in common use was 1.4 (some 1.3 exists).

On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 10:42:24 PM UTC+1, KenUnix wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Anyone aware of a CP/M 2.2 ISO or equal image (pre-configured appliance) that will run on virtualbox?
>
> I had found a CP/M 1.1 image but it was too old and didn't support COM files.
>
> I had toyed with RunCPM and Z80Pack but I think under virtualbox you would get closer to the actual "machine".

If you do not run directly on Z80/8080 compatible hardware, you need an emulator. VirtualBox does not support emulating other CPU architectures, and I do not recall having seen any mainstream "run another operating system"-product capable of doing so.

So no way around the emulator unfortunately. That is a good thing though, modern machines can emulate a much much faster cpu than ever existed in hardware.

On 1/27/2023 3:17 AM, fridtjof.ma...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 4:42:24 PM UTC-5, KenUnix wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> Anyone aware of a CP/M 2.2 ISO or equal image (pre-configured appliance) that will run on virtualbox?
>>
>> I had found a CP/M 1.1 image but it was too old and didn't support COM files.
>>
>> I had toyed with RunCPM and Z80Pack but I think under virtualbox you would get closer to the actual "machine".
>>
>> Thanks.
> KenUnix
>
> CP/M 1.1? No such beast for 8080. VirtualBox does not support 8 bit systems like 8080 or Z80 ( or 6502).
>
> The CP/M you had was likely CP/M for 8086. That did not support COM (CMD files instead). The earliest CP/M-80
> in common use was 1.4 (some 1.3 exists).

More likely what he had was the CP/M Live 1.1 CD. It boots into
FreeDOS (I think) then runs a z80 emulator and then runs CP/M 2.2.
I have copies of it around here somewhere. I think there may even
be newer versions avaialable.

bill

The file (zip) is CPM-86_vbox_2013-01-01.zip

Virtualbox 6.1.40 can run it.

See also: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UqZbmLqX-Uw

Ken

On Friday, January 27, 2023 at 11:34:51 AM UTC-5, KenUnix wrote:
> The file (zip) is CPM-86_vbox_2013-01-01.zip
>
> Virtualbox 6.1.40 can run it.
>
> See also: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UqZbmLqX-Uw
>
> Ken
Ken

Sounds Good! That is not CP/M 2.2 - and will not run COM files. For CP/M 2.2 to run COM files,
you will need an 8080 / Z80 emulator. I recommend Udo Monks z80pack or RunCP/M. z80pack
is very good, and actually runs CP/M 2.2. RunCP/M runs CP/M 2.2 CCP (the shell), but runs a translation
layer for the rest.

I use RunCP/M and the Altair-Duino. (8080 / Z80 emulation on an Arduino DUE, with blinky lights and
switchs like the original Altair 8800 -- at the speed of the original). RunCP/M is very much faster.

Fridtjof,

Is it possible to run the Altair Clone and RunCPM? Not at the same time.

Ken

FYI CP/M-86 v1.1 was for the IBM PC.

CP/M was made for a few different processors and can be a little confusing.

The original CP/M systems were for 8 bit 8080/Z80 systems, later came 8086, 68000, Z8000 processors.

Randy

Randy,

The 680x0 CPU was used heavily by Northern Telecom. See my library at:

https://www.flickr.com/photos/9479603@N02/albums/72157602824219250/page2

My complete library: https://www.flickr.com/photos/9479603@N02/albums

Ken

On 1/27/2023 4:45 PM, Randy McLaughlin wrote:
> FYI CP/M-86 v1.1 was for the IBM PC.
>
> CP/M was made for a few different processors and can be a little confusing.
>
> The original CP/M systems were for 8 bit 8080/Z80 systems, later came 8086, 68000, Z8000 processors.

Don't forget DEC VAX. :-)

bill

In article <88d4fcb7-266d-42b7-ae22-9ac56badf496n@googlegroups.com>,
Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen <thorbjoern@gmail.com> wrote:
>VirtualBox does not
>support emulating other CPU architectures, and I do not recall having seen any mainstream "run another
>operating system"-product capable of doing so.

www.qemu.org does this, but not for Z80 CPUs.

On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 1:42:24 PM UTC-8, KenUnix wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Anyone aware of a CP/M 2.2 ISO or equal image (pre-configured appliance) that will run on virtualbox?
>
> I had found a CP/M 1.1 image but it was too old and didn't support COM files.
>
> I had toyed with RunCPM and Z80Pack but I think under virtualbox you would get closer to the actual "machine".
>
> Thanks.
Best to run it under DosBox

On Friday, January 27, 2023 at 4:13:43 PM UTC-5, KenUnix wrote:
> Fridtjof,
>
> Is it possible to run the Altair Clone and RunCPM? Not at the same time.
>
>
> Ken
Different purpose. RunCP/M runs CP/M 2.2 software under Linux (and maybe others?). It is not an Altair 8800
"clone" or work-alike The Altair Clone (and the Altair Duino) are meant as Altair 8800 "clones". The "Altair" sits
on my desk and gives me "blinkin lights".

fridtjof,

Thanks for clarifying that I couldn't figure out the blinlin lights in a virtual machine like RunCPM.

Ken

On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 7:39:51 AM UTC-5, KenUnix wrote:
> fridtjof,
>
> Thanks for clarifying that I couldn't figure out the blinlin lights in a virtual machine like RunCPM.
>
> Ken
Ken, I do apologize for "over-explaining". I was trying to make sense of your comment:

"Is it possible to run the Altair Clone and RunCPM? Not at the same time."

Since the hardware I run the Altair Clone on is not capable of running RunCPM, I do run them "at the same
time". Indeed, I run RunCPM on the hardware I use for the terminal emulator for the Altair. So, yes,
almost always "at the same time". In a temporal sense I do. In a "share the hardware" sense. I do not.
(but, that is my confusion for "at the same time").

But, it was hard to estimate your level of knowledge. CP.M 1.1 could not have been CP/M 2.2, and so I
assumed that you had a lack of familiarity. Which then meant that you possibly did not the difference
between the multiple ways of running CP/M (as others have mentioned, CP/M was originally run on an
Intel 8080, and then "ported" to 68000, Z8000 and 8086 -- you would find the 68000 port interesting...
like Unix, it is written in C). Further, I noted that you wanted to run a COM file, and that narrowed it down
to 8080 version, which meant 1.3, 1.4, 2.2 or 3.0. You had mentioned 2.2, and had noted that 1.1 could
not run COM files, but assumed that was "too old". Again, I presume lack of knowledge. CP/M 1.1 is
newer than 2.2! Indeed, CP/M 2.2 was retro-named CP/M-80 2.2 because of the confusion.

I did not mean to disparage you. The LAST machine I used with the blinking lights was the Altair...
I just have it on my desk for nostalgia... And, warm, glowing red comfort.

fridtjof,

Yea, it is like saying Unix is Unix, but it is not... Platform, CPU, etc.

So CP/M 1.1 is newer then CP/M 2.2 !

So CP/M can not run COM or EXE files?

A couple of years ago I ported BWbasic (a very nice basic interpreter) to Linux , DOS, Windows and lately Coherent.
A was toying with the idea of porting it to CP/M but don't know if it is possible. And even if I do would anyone
be interested.

Ken

On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 1:41:21 PM UTC-5, KenUnix wrote:
> fridtjof,
>
> Yea, it is like saying Unix is Unix, but it is not... Platform, CPU, etc.
>
> So CP/M 1.1 is newer then CP/M 2.2 !
>
> So CP/M can not run COM or EXE files?
>
> A couple of years ago I ported BWbasic (a very nice basic interpreter) to Linux , DOS, Windows and lately Coherent.
> A was toying with the idea of porting it to CP/M but don't know if it is possible. And even if I do would anyone
> be interested.
>
> Ken
Ken

It would be interesting to see a BWbasic port to CP/M-80. Remember... you get a total budget of 64Kb for
everything. Turbo Pascal shows that it is possible. You should have a look at MBASIC (Microsoft BASIC) 5.21
(or 5.29) to get an idea of what was considered "state of the art"
: fred@llana ~ $; mbasic

BASIC-80 Rev. 5.21
[CP/M Version]
Copyright 1977-1981 (C) by Microsoft
Created: 28-Jul-81
39480 Bytes free
Ok

(this from RunCPM). MBASIC support integer (16 bit) float (32 bit) double (64 bit) and string (up to 255 characters, with garbage collection).

A BWbasic port won't be faster, probably not smaller (MBASIC even replaced READY with Ok as a prompt... to save
3 bytes!).

HiTech C (which is the one I would recommend) can be used. HiTech only supports 4 byte single precision (no double). This was the ONLY native compiler on CP/M-80 that support prototypes. Here are some of the things I have on Github:

https://github.com/ratboy666/am9511 - this will show you the format of IEEE float, Microsoft float and HiTech float (yes, they are different)
https://github.com/ratboy666/mtrel - convert from HiTech 3.09 object files to source MAC files.
https://github.com/ratboy666/tiny - make the SMALLEST POSSIBLE programs with HiTech C 3.09

Or, you could use cross-compiling...

Have fun!
Fred (thanks for using my Norwegian name, Fred is probably easier to type!)

On Thu, 26 Jan 2023, KenUnix wrote:

> Hi.
>
> Anyone aware of a CP/M 2.2 ISO or equal image (pre-configured appliance) that will run on virtualbox?
>
> I had found a CP/M 1.1 image but it was too old and didn't support COM files.
>
> I had toyed with RunCPM and Z80Pack but I think under virtualbox you would get closer to the actual "machine".
>
> Thanks.
>

CP/M-86 1.1 is CP/M 2.2, but for 8086 instead of 8080/Z80. It's not what
you're looking for.

There are ways to run CP/M-80 apps on CP/M-86 (I know one, but it needs
CP/M-86 3.1 or later), though you might be better emulating CP/M-80
directly instead of emulating it on top of CP/M-86.

-uso.

On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 7:41:21 PM UTC+1, KenUnix wrote:
> fridtjof,
>
> Yea, it is like saying Unix is Unix, but it is not... Platform, CPU, etc.
>
> So CP/M 1.1 is newer then CP/M 2.2 !
>
> So CP/M can not run COM or EXE files?

CP/M-86 1.1. is newer than CP/M-80 2.2. They are not binary compatible as they are for different cpu architectures. The suffix is CMD, not COM, exactly so the files could coexist. EXE is a MS-DOS invention.

The 16-bit port to IBM PC came too late to marked and they could not agree to a deal with IBM, so an impatient programmer created enough of an operating system implementing the CP/M API to do his own porting, which Microsoft then bought and improved and sold cheaper than CP/M-86 and the rest is history.

Later CP/M-86 evolved into Concurrent DOS which you probably would consider to be much more interesting. I used it briefly back then on non-PCs but DOS-compatability was not enough on its own to compete.

Op maandag 30 januari 2023 om 09:10:56 UTC+1 schreef Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen:
> On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 7:41:21 PM UTC+1, KenUnix wrote:
> > fridtjof,
> >
> > Yea, it is like saying Unix is Unix, but it is not... Platform, CPU, etc.
> >
> > So CP/M 1.1 is newer then CP/M 2.2 !
> >
> > So CP/M can not run COM or EXE files?
> CP/M-86 1.1. is newer than CP/M-80 2.2. They are not binary compatible as they are for different cpu architectures. The suffix is CMD, not COM, exactly so the files could coexist. EXE is a MS-DOS invention.
>
> The 16-bit port to IBM PC came too late to marked and they could not agree to a deal with IBM, so an impatient programmer created enough of an operating system implementing the CP/M API to do his own porting, which Microsoft then bought and improved and sold cheaper than CP/M-86 and the rest is history.
>
> Later CP/M-86 evolved into Concurrent DOS which you probably would consider to be much more interesting. I used it briefly back then on non-PCs but DOS-compatability was not enough on its own to compete.

Hi,

I am running Z80MU in DOSBox on Windows 11.
Z80MU uses normal Windows 11 file system.
Works perfectly.