Message-ID:

If Machiavelli were a hacker, he'd have worked for the CSSG. -- Phil Lapsley

devel / comp.theory / A property of future computation machine

A property of future computation machine

<uo1fk7$iv4a$1@dont-email.me>

https://news.novabbs.org/devel/article-flat.php?id=51386&group=comp.theory#51386

Path: i2pn2.org!rocksolid2!news.neodome.net!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: wyniijj5@gmail.com (wij)
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: A property of future computation machine
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 04:19:18 +0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <uo1fk7$iv4a$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2024 20:19:19 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="b1e7555b6dfb6e19bf3acde695cfa2c0";
logging-data="621706"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18n6cw1g5Zhb1AED5JMIkZy"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:UKBFzPWgqzD1+v0uZ33kNZmzRYk=
Content-Language: en-US

by: wij - Sun, 14 Jan 2024 20:19 UTC

Abstract: Thanks to olcott, he motivated me to invent General
Undecidable Rule (GUR)
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.theory/c/_tbCYyMox9M/m/XgvkLGOQAwAJ
I now had another idea from the idiot, because a genius may also be an
insight from an idiot, not necessarily on the shoulder of genius like
Newton or Leibniz.

I hereby proudly announce a principle of the future machine:
If computation is based on simulation of something, then the halting
problem would be unsolvable because there will be a 'liar instance'.
Therefore, if we want a computation machine that exceeds TM, that
machine cannot be simulated.

Re: A property of future computation machine

<uo1j90$jh56$1@dont-email.me>

copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/devel/article-flat.php?id=51387&group=comp.theory#51387

copy link Newsgroups: comp.theory

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: wyniijj5@gmail.com (wij)
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: A property of future computation machine
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 05:21:36 +0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <uo1j90$jh56$1@dont-email.me>
References: <uo1fk7$iv4a$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2024 21:21:36 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="b1e7555b6dfb6e19bf3acde695cfa2c0";
logging-data="640166"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19/pWm7SAD5UNZrxlg2oGdn"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:XVL5/8VtsQnkeZBvVItvIJqtCyY=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <uo1fk7$iv4a$1@dont-email.me>

by: wij - Sun, 14 Jan 2024 21:21 UTC

On 1/15/24 04:19, wij wrote:
> Abstract: Thanks to olcott, he motivated me to invent General
> Undecidable Rule (GUR)
> https://groups.google.com/g/comp.theory/c/_tbCYyMox9M/m/XgvkLGOQAwAJ
> I now had another idea from the idiot, because a genius may also be an
> insight from an idiot, not necessarily on the shoulder of genius like
> Newton or Leibniz.
>
> I hereby proudly announce a principle of the future machine:
> If computation is based on simulation of something, then the halting
> problem would be unsolvable because there will be a 'liar instance'.
> Therefore, if we want a computation machine that exceeds TM, that
> machine cannot be simulated.
>

Note: The problem is, by definition, such machine cannot be duplicated.
How for it to exist?

Subject	Author
A property of future computation machine	wij
Re: A property of future computation machine	wij