What are email headers?
(By Harry Bone)
Last update on June 30, 2023

"Email headers are the hidden part of emails containing vital
information to identify and authenticate messages. Learn how to read
them to spot spam and stay secure."

https://proton.me/blog/what-are-email-headers

--
David

On Fri, 4 Aug 2023 14:12:35 +0100, David Brooks wrote:
> What are email headers?
> (By Harry Bone)
> Last update on June 30, 2023
>
> "Email headers are the hidden part of emails containing vital
> information to identify and authenticate messages. Learn how to read
> them to spot spam and stay secure."
>
> https://proton.me/blog/what-are-email-headers

Interesting. I already knew much of what was there, but a few tidbits
are new to me, and I had no idea there were header analyzers out
there. I've bookmarked it.

--
Stan Brown, Tehachapi, California, USA https://BrownMath.com/
Shikata ga nai...

On 11/08/2023 06:18, Gremlin wrote:
> David Brooks <David.B@nomail.afraid.org>
> news:7P6zM.39499$KIcf.4351@fx07.iad Fri, 04 Aug 2023 13:12:35 GMT in
> alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
>
>> What are email headers?
>> (By Harry Bone)
>> Last update on June 30, 2023
>>
>> "Email headers are the hidden part of emails containing vital
>> information to identify and authenticate messages. Learn how to read
>> them to spot spam and stay secure."
>>
>> https://proton.me/blog/what-are-email-headers
>
> David, aside from yourself, Snit is the only person who posts here that
> could benefit from your shares. So why not just email him the urls? He's
> the only masters IT degree holding, n00b I've ever met. And that's only
> because, as I'm sure you know, he didn't do the work for the degree
> himself! He's *proven* beyond any possible doubt that he doesn't have the
> knowledge, or the mental capacity at any point in time to have been able
> to earn the degree on his own.
>
> It's much more likely, that his wife, or another 3rd party did the graded
> work on his behalf. And at the time he supposedly earned the degree, it was
> *easy* for another person to claim to be you to do the actual work. Nobody
> really verified that you were actually doing your own work. This has
> become quite evident by snits repeated inability to discuss tech at any
> length without going into lala land with no chance of escape.
>
> I think it's especially funny how he snowed you several times. Razzle
> Dazzled you into thinking he knows considerably more than he actually does;
> WHILE TRYING TO PIVOT AND PROJECT that very issue he has, ONTO ME. And you
> bought it, hook line and sinker, you bought it.
>
> Multiple times now, David, you fell for snits bullshit. He did a great job
> with the cloning discussion. Played you like a fucking piano, and you
> asked for more and more! *all of the regulars here* with technical
> backgrounds called him out for trying to bullshit you, and continued to
> call him out when he tried to bs you concerning my knowledge of the
> subject.
>
> One went so far as to absolutely tell him not only that he was wrong, but
> the person also knows for a fact I already did know the subject matter in
> question; Snit was wrong again when he claimed I didn't, and when he
> claimed he'd taught me about it.
>
> The only reason you support pcbutts, snit, and others like them when they
> write bullshit about me David is because you have a childish personal
> issue with me. And you somehow think the bullshit you encourage them to
> spread about me is going to make us even in any possible way. It's not,
> it's never going to. The issue you have with me is one of your own doing,
> though. You tried to 'make friends' with me under very false pretenses and
> you attacked me on usenet, tried to dox me several times on usenet,etc.
> That's why I see you as pondscum, and I've always been very clear about
> that.
>
> You're an authentic net kook, David. Snit is perfect for you.

I'm guessing that it was YOU who these kind folk met on the towpath!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbm1lQrHSfI