Rocksolid Light

Welcome to Rocksolid Light

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

Any given program will expand to fill available memory.


computers / alt.comp.os.windows-10 / Re: Are zips really uncrackable?

SubjectAuthor
* Are zips really uncrackable?Brian Gregory
`* Are zips really uncrackable?J. J. Lodder
 `- Are zips really uncrackable?Commander Kinsey

1
Re: Are zips really uncrackable?

<k7pthdFpbu2U1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/computers/article-flat.php?id=76060&group=alt.comp.os.windows-10#76060

  copy link   Newsgroups: alt.comp.os.windows-10 alt.comp.os.windows-11 alt.computer.workshop uk.comp.sys.mac
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.szaf.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: void-invalid-dead-dontuse@email.invalid (Brian Gregory)
Newsgroups: alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11,alt.computer.workshop,uk.comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Are zips really uncrackable?
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 02:08:45 +0000
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <k7pthdFpbu2U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <op.10c2vhuzmvhs6z@ryzen.home>
<tsj46l$2uk5m$1@toylet.eternal-september.org>
<V1UHL.517252$t5W7.226206@fx13.iad>
<tsqk6q$17os$1@toylet.eternal-september.org>
<5G7IL.619112$gGD7.66540@fx11.iad> <tsu9ea$h397$1@dont-email.me>
<z6o6ruilh1n1$.dlg@example1357.net>
<1q6gdh9.1yk3pxkctcxtnN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl>
<rXLIL.1483539$GNG9.362346@fx18.iad>
<1q6gy5q.1fuccml6gve0bN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net yiV2+Q8nBTlxMQRL6xgc3wd6NSy4g7l6GN1XQJIjjdo+y/wDN8
Cancel-Lock: sha1:TS9+cbJ0Z3CHKUluO0QT+lgX5b8=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/102.9.0
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <1q6gy5q.1fuccml6gve0bN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl>
 by: Brian Gregory - Mon, 20 Mar 2023 02:08 UTC

On 20/02/2023 20:04, J. J. Lodder wrote:
> Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2023-02-20 07:33, J. J. Lodder wrote:
>>> mechanic <mechanic@example.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 19 Feb 2023 22:56:10 -0000 (UTC), Chris wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> As long as people need to type in passwords they aren't going to
>>>>> use long and complicated strings.
>>>>
>>>> No excuse!
>>>
>>> And long passwords need not be difficult.
>>> 1RoseByAnyOtherNameWillSmellAsSweet!
>>> will be just fine,
>>
>> Good, but insert a few numbers/spec chars in the middle too ... along
>> with a misspelled word and caps in the "wrong" places ... and it will be
>> as good as random where a dictionary+brute force attack occurs.
>
> Most sites insist nowadays on at least one digit,
> one capitalised letter, and one special sign.
> My example complies,

I often seem to manage to pick the one special character that isn't
allowed! Then the website doesn't tell me what's wrong, it just repeats
what it already told me, something like "your password must include at
least 8 characters including one lowercase letter, one uppercase letter,
one digit, and one special character or punctuation symbol".

--
Brian Gregory (in England).

Re: Are zips really uncrackable?

<1q7wbfk.193f7aa1e5alg3N%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/computers/article-flat.php?id=76062&group=alt.comp.os.windows-10#76062

  copy link   Newsgroups: alt.comp.os.windows-10 alt.comp.os.windows-11 alt.computer.workshop uk.comp.sys.mac
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder)
Newsgroups: alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11,alt.computer.workshop,uk.comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Are zips really uncrackable?
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 14:51:31 +0100
Organization: De Ster
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <1q7wbfk.193f7aa1e5alg3N%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl>
References: <op.10c2vhuzmvhs6z@ryzen.home> <tsj46l$2uk5m$1@toylet.eternal-september.org> <V1UHL.517252$t5W7.226206@fx13.iad> <tsqk6q$17os$1@toylet.eternal-september.org> <5G7IL.619112$gGD7.66540@fx11.iad> <tsu9ea$h397$1@dont-email.me> <z6o6ruilh1n1$.dlg@example1357.net> <1q6gdh9.1yk3pxkctcxtnN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <rXLIL.1483539$GNG9.362346@fx18.iad> <1q6gy5q.1fuccml6gve0bN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <k7pthdFpbu2U1@mid.individual.net>
Reply-To: jjlax32@xs4all.nl (J. J. Lodder)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="171d8edfdcd352a500196c8a0de65a9e";
logging-data="3741939"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+cGVnerbE7d9A+4gZe+eeV+9TaIQovuu8="
User-Agent: MacSOUP/2.8.5 (ea919cf118) (Mac OS 10.12.6)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:OJGo1xjxhEmsCzKYUz7sP0DSrFg=
 by: J. J. Lodder - Mon, 20 Mar 2023 13:51 UTC

Brian Gregory <void-invalid-dead-dontuse@email.invalid> wrote:

> On 20/02/2023 20:04, J. J. Lodder wrote:
> > Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 2023-02-20 07:33, J. J. Lodder wrote:
> >>> mechanic <mechanic@example.net> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On Sun, 19 Feb 2023 22:56:10 -0000 (UTC), Chris wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> As long as people need to type in passwords they aren't going to
> >>>>> use long and complicated strings.
> >>>>
> >>>> No excuse!
> >>>
> >>> And long passwords need not be difficult.
> >>> 1RoseByAnyOtherNameWillSmellAsSweet!
> >>> will be just fine,
> >>
> >> Good, but insert a few numbers/spec chars in the middle too ... along
> >> with a misspelled word and caps in the "wrong" places ... and it will be
> >> as good as random where a dictionary+brute force attack occurs.
> >
> > Most sites insist nowadays on at least one digit,
> > one capitalised letter, and one special sign.
> > My example complies,
>
>
> I often seem to manage to pick the one special character that isn't
> allowed! Then the website doesn't tell me what's wrong, it just repeats
> what it already told me, something like "your password must include at
> least 8 characters including one lowercase letter, one uppercase letter,
> one digit, and one special character or punctuation symbol".

I've found some sites don't accept the question mark,

Jan

Re: Are zips really uncrackable?

<op.12mdt3ormvhs6z@ryzen.home>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/computers/article-flat.php?id=76112&group=alt.comp.os.windows-10#76112

  copy link   Newsgroups: alt.comp.os.windows-10 alt.comp.os.windows-11 alt.computer.workshop uk.comp.sys.mac
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.uzoreto.com!peer03.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!peer01.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!fx12.ams1.POSTED!not-for-mail
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Subject: Re: Are zips really uncrackable?
Newsgroups: alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11,alt.computer.workshop,uk.comp.sys.mac
References: <op.10c2vhuzmvhs6z@ryzen.home>
<tsj46l$2uk5m$1@toylet.eternal-september.org>
<V1UHL.517252$t5W7.226206@fx13.iad>
<tsqk6q$17os$1@toylet.eternal-september.org>
<5G7IL.619112$gGD7.66540@fx11.iad> <tsu9ea$h397$1@dont-email.me>
<z6o6ruilh1n1$.dlg@example1357.net>
<1q6gdh9.1yk3pxkctcxtnN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl>
<rXLIL.1483539$GNG9.362346@fx18.iad>
<1q6gy5q.1fuccml6gve0bN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl>
<k7pthdFpbu2U1@mid.individual.net>
<1q7wbfk.193f7aa1e5alg3N%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: CK1@nospam.com (Commander Kinsey)
Message-ID: <op.12mdt3ormvhs6z@ryzen.home>
User-Agent: Opera Mail/1.0 (Win32)
Lines: 43
X-Complaints-To: abuse(at)newshosting.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 12:47:54 UTC
Organization: Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 13:47:53 +0100
X-Received-Bytes: 3578
 by: Commander Kinsey - Thu, 30 Mar 2023 12:47 UTC

On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 13:51:31 -0000, J. J. Lodder <nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> wrote:

> Brian Gregory <void-invalid-dead-dontuse@email.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On 20/02/2023 20:04, J. J. Lodder wrote:
>> > Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 2023-02-20 07:33, J. J. Lodder wrote:
>> >>> mechanic <mechanic@example.net> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> On Sun, 19 Feb 2023 22:56:10 -0000 (UTC), Chris wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> As long as people need to type in passwords they aren't going to
>> >>>>> use long and complicated strings.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> No excuse!
>> >>>
>> >>> And long passwords need not be difficult.
>> >>> 1RoseByAnyOtherNameWillSmellAsSweet!
>> >>> will be just fine,
>> >>
>> >> Good, but insert a few numbers/spec chars in the middle too ... along
>> >> with a misspelled word and caps in the "wrong" places ... and it will be
>> >> as good as random where a dictionary+brute force attack occurs.
>> >
>> > Most sites insist nowadays on at least one digit,
>> > one capitalised letter, and one special sign.
>> > My example complies,
>>
>>
>> I often seem to manage to pick the one special character that isn't
>> allowed! Then the website doesn't tell me what's wrong, it just repeats
>> what it already told me, something like "your password must include at
>> least 8 characters including one lowercase letter, one uppercase letter,
>> one digit, and one special character or punctuation symbol".
>
> I've found some sites don't accept the question mark,

I've never had symbols denied. I have had a space in my username denied though.

To pick a password, I tap the shift key with one hand, while mashing the letters and numbers with the other, so I get something like E^J*4^JHd6u.

Then when I go to copy and paste it from my text file of passwords, I come back to the website and find a red marker saying I'm an idiot for not entering the password. Either that or I fill in the form in the order I think of things, and it gets very upset saying I forgot the other thing, just because I dared to enter my name first. Or I fill everything in, press ok, then it complains the captcha which hadn't loaded yet hadn't been filled in, then it removes the password I entered, so when I fill in the captcha, it's still annoyed. Web designers are morons.


computers / alt.comp.os.windows-10 / Re: Are zips really uncrackable?

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor