Rocksolid Light

Welcome to Rocksolid Light

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

Heisenberg may have been here.


computers / alt.comp.os.windows-10 / Re: Are zips really uncrackable?

SubjectAuthor
o Are zips really uncrackable?Chris

1
Re: Are zips really uncrackable?

<tv95r2$3f0ph$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/computers/article-flat.php?id=76061&group=alt.comp.os.windows-10#76061

  copy link   Newsgroups: alt.comp.os.windows-11 alt.comp.os.windows-10 alt.computer.workshop uk.comp.sys.mac
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: ithinkiam@gmail.com (Chris)
Newsgroups: alt.comp.os.windows-11,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.computer.workshop,uk.comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Are zips really uncrackable?
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 08:34:42 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <tv95r2$3f0ph$1@dont-email.me>
References: <op.10c2vhuzmvhs6z@ryzen.home>
<tsj46l$2uk5m$1@toylet.eternal-september.org>
<V1UHL.517252$t5W7.226206@fx13.iad>
<tsqk6q$17os$1@toylet.eternal-september.org>
<5G7IL.619112$gGD7.66540@fx11.iad>
<tsu9ea$h397$1@dont-email.me>
<z6o6ruilh1n1$.dlg@example1357.net>
<1q6gdh9.1yk3pxkctcxtnN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl>
<rXLIL.1483539$GNG9.362346@fx18.iad>
<1q6gy5q.1fuccml6gve0bN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 08:34:42 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="49ce73badb4de91854ca0c37a98475f1";
logging-data="3638065"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/8cHrYKaaFrjJDXfsT1ZpbdVCA4fZmUlo="
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:sfqz0bUCl8Guevu3torD0XTpODs=
sha1:4+U3ZaXsX88C9svlfbSMLLekcqU=
 by: Chris - Mon, 20 Mar 2023 08:34 UTC

J. J. Lodder <nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> wrote:
> Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2023-02-20 07:33, J. J. Lodder wrote:
>>> mechanic <mechanic@example.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 19 Feb 2023 22:56:10 -0000 (UTC), Chris wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> As long as people need to type in passwords they aren't going to
>>>>> use long and complicated strings.
>>>>
>>>> No excuse!
>>>
>>> And long passwords need not be difficult.
>>> 1RoseByAnyOtherNameWillSmellAsSweet!
>>> will be just fine,
>>
>> Good, but insert a few numbers/spec chars in the middle too ... along
>> with a misspelled word and caps in the "wrong" places ... and it will be
>> as good as random where a dictionary+brute force attack occurs.
>
> Most sites insist nowadays on at least one digit,
> one capitalised letter, and one special sign.
> My example complies,

Many (increasingly?) sites have ridiculously low length limits as well. A
recent one was 8 characters, but often it's around 20. Your example
wouldn't work there.

That's why I gave up on an "internal algorithm" as I had to either have
several or make it as weak as the worst site.

Now I use a password manager.


computers / alt.comp.os.windows-10 / Re: Are zips really uncrackable?

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor