https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/taco-bell-false-advertising-lawsuit/

...includes photos of ad copy vs. actual product.

--
-Frank 🌭

On Wed, 02 Aug 2023 22:21:24 GMT, Frank <frank@creon.earth> wrote:

>https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/taco-bell-false-advertising-lawsuit/
>
> ...includes photos of ad copy vs. actual product.

Yeah, they need to be sued over that, cheap bastards.

On Wed, 02 Aug 2023 22:21:24 GMT, Frank <frank@creon.earth> wrote:

>https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/taco-bell-false-advertising-lawsuit/
>
> ...includes photos of ad copy vs. actual product.

SOP, really.
I suppose that if customers are willing to wait 30 to 45 minutes
for each item ordered, they products would look like those in the ads.
A legitimate complaint can be made, and defended, regarding the
amount of filling. There is never as much meat, and such, in the end
product as is shown in the ads.

--
Only one shopping day left until tomorrow!

On Thu, 03 Aug 2023 01:46:00 -0700, K Wills wrote:

> On Wed, 02 Aug 2023 22:21:24 GMT, Frank <frank@creon.earth> wrote:
>
>>https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/taco-bell-false-advertising-lawsuit/
>>
>> ...includes photos of ad copy vs. actual product.
>
> SOP, really.
> I suppose that if customers are willing to wait 30 to 45 minutes
> for each item ordered, they products would look like those in the ads.
> A legitimate complaint can be made, and defended, regarding the
> amount of filling. There is never as much meat, and such, in the end
> product as is shown in the ads.

So why is that acceptable?

Maybe it's time they fixed the food.

--
-Frank 🌭

On Thu, 03 Aug 2023 01:46:00 -0700, K Wills <laughing@you.heh> wrote:

>On Wed, 02 Aug 2023 22:21:24 GMT, Frank <frank@creon.earth> wrote:
>
>>https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/taco-bell-false-advertising-lawsuit/
>>
>> ...includes photos of ad copy vs. actual product.
>
> SOP, really.
> I suppose that if customers are willing to wait 30 to 45 minutes
>for each item ordered, they products would look like those in the ads.
> A legitimate complaint can be made, and defended, regarding the
>amount of filling. There is never as much meat, and such, in the end
>product as is shown in the ads.

If the examples shown are the reality, I do think they need to step up
their game a wee bit. I don't know if it would add as much time as you
described, though.

On Thu, 03 Aug 2023 13:42:23 GMT, Frank <frank@creon.earth> wrote:

>On Thu, 03 Aug 2023 01:46:00 -0700, K Wills wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 02 Aug 2023 22:21:24 GMT, Frank <frank@creon.earth> wrote:
>>
>>>https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/taco-bell-false-advertising-lawsuit/
>>>
>>> ...includes photos of ad copy vs. actual product.
>>
>> SOP, really.
>> I suppose that if customers are willing to wait 30 to 45 minutes
>> for each item ordered, they products would look like those in the ads.
>> A legitimate complaint can be made, and defended, regarding the
>> amount of filling. There is never as much meat, and such, in the end
>> product as is shown in the ads.
>
>So why is that acceptable?
>

Because most people don't really care.

>Maybe it's time they fixed the food.

A good idea in theory. But I don't seeing it becoming reality.

--
Bless me, Father, for I have committed an original sin.
I poked a badger with a spoon.

On Thu, 03 Aug 2023 11:43:30 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Thu, 03 Aug 2023 01:46:00 -0700, K Wills <laughing@you.heh> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 02 Aug 2023 22:21:24 GMT, Frank <frank@creon.earth> wrote:
>>
>>>https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/taco-bell-false-advertising-lawsuit/
>>>
>>> ...includes photos of ad copy vs. actual product.
>>
>> SOP, really.
>> I suppose that if customers are willing to wait 30 to 45 minutes
>>for each item ordered, they products would look like those in the ads.
>> A legitimate complaint can be made, and defended, regarding the
>>amount of filling. There is never as much meat, and such, in the end
>>product as is shown in the ads.
>
>If the examples shown are the reality, I do think they need to step up
>their game a wee bit. I don't know if it would add as much time as you
>described, though.

The amount of time required would be unacceptable, of course. But
getting closer to the amount of product would be fairly easy.
Whatever is being advertised must, by law, be what is shown in
the ad. However, there is nothing preventing the "enhancement" of the
product. And it's always *possible* that you'll get something that is
close to what is shown in any given ad. Possible, though not likely.

--
If Mama ain't happy, ain't nobody happy.
If Daddy ain't happy, don't nobody care!

"K Wills" <laughing@you.heh> wrote in message
news:fgipci5bndhrifqpsn00vcjrk7h9s4615l@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 03 Aug 2023 13:42:23 GMT, Frank <frank@creon.earth> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 03 Aug 2023 01:46:00 -0700, K Wills wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 02 Aug 2023 22:21:24 GMT, Frank <frank@creon.earth> wrote:
>>>
>>>>https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/taco-bell-false-advertising-lawsuit/
>>>>
>>>> ...includes photos of ad copy vs. actual product.
>>>
>>> SOP, really.
>>> I suppose that if customers are willing to wait 30 to 45 minutes
>>> for each item ordered, they products would look like those in the ads.
>>> A legitimate complaint can be made, and defended, regarding the
>>> amount of filling. There is never as much meat, and such, in the end
>>> product as is shown in the ads.
>>
>>So why is that acceptable?
>>
>
> Because most people don't really care.

I don't care. Fast food is all about taste, not appearance. However there
was a non-fastfood case recently about reese's peanut butter cup
Jack-O-Lantern's, a woman Sued reese's becouse on teh wrapper the candy's
had a jack-o-lantern face on them, but the actual candy was just a pumpkin,
with no face. Her argument was that she only bought the candy becouse of
the face.

But in fast-food, your going to buy a whopper whether the advertisiment
looks deliciouis, or not.

"Frank" <frank@creon.earth> wrote in message
news:39OyM.422628$AsA.101102@fx18.iad...
> On Thu, 03 Aug 2023 01:46:00 -0700, K Wills wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 02 Aug 2023 22:21:24 GMT, Frank <frank@creon.earth> wrote:
>>
>>>https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/taco-bell-false-advertising-lawsuit/
>>>
>>> ...includes photos of ad copy vs. actual product.
>>
>> SOP, really.
>> I suppose that if customers are willing to wait 30 to 45 minutes
>> for each item ordered, they products would look like those in the ads.
>> A legitimate complaint can be made, and defended, regarding the
>> amount of filling. There is never as much meat, and such, in the end
>> product as is shown in the ads.
>
> So why is that acceptable?
>
> Maybe it's time they fixed the food.

they won't fix the food. Way too time consuming/ expensive. They should
just take picture of the actual food and use it in the ad's. This is
fast-food. people aren't edpecting gournet food anyway.

On Thu, 11 Jan 2024 13:13:48 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"K Wills" <laughing@you.heh> wrote in message
>news:fgipci5bndhrifqpsn00vcjrk7h9s4615l@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 03 Aug 2023 13:42:23 GMT, Frank <frank@creon.earth> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 03 Aug 2023 01:46:00 -0700, K Wills wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 02 Aug 2023 22:21:24 GMT, Frank <frank@creon.earth> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/taco-bell-false-advertising-lawsuit/
>>>>>
>>>>> ...includes photos of ad copy vs. actual product.
>>>>
>>>> SOP, really.
>>>> I suppose that if customers are willing to wait 30 to 45 minutes
>>>> for each item ordered, they products would look like those in the ads.
>>>> A legitimate complaint can be made, and defended, regarding the
>>>> amount of filling. There is never as much meat, and such, in the end
>>>> product as is shown in the ads.
>>>
>>>So why is that acceptable?
>>>
>>
>> Because most people don't really care.
>
>I don't care. Fast food is all about taste, not appearance.

As usual, you are wrong.

>However there
>was a non-fastfood case recently about reese's peanut butter cup
>Jack-O-Lantern's, a woman Sued reese's becouse on teh wrapper the candy's
>had a jack-o-lantern face on them, but the actual candy was just a pumpkin,
>with no face. Her argument was that she only bought the candy becouse of
>the face.
>
>But in fast-food, your going to buy a whopper whether the advertisiment
>looks deliciouis, or not.

People will buy a Whopper because it's been around for almost 70
years.

If Starbucks advertised their brisket sandwiches as looking like this,
nobody would buy one.
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/01/10/13/3C0564A500000578-4105544-One_diner_was_especially_disappointed_with_their_Starbucks_BBQ_B-a-73_1484056695320.jpg

If BK advertised their hot dogs as looking like they actually do,
they'd never sell one
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/01/10/14/3C0564BA00000578-4105544-image-a-86_1484057171207.jpg

But maybe you're the only person in the world who eats his food
without looking at it.

On Thu, 11 Jan 2024 13:13:48 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"K Wills" <laughing@you.heh> wrote in message
>news:fgipci5bndhrifqpsn00vcjrk7h9s4615l@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 03 Aug 2023 13:42:23 GMT, Frank <frank@creon.earth> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 03 Aug 2023 01:46:00 -0700, K Wills wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 02 Aug 2023 22:21:24 GMT, Frank <frank@creon.earth> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/taco-bell-false-advertising-lawsuit/
>>>>>
>>>>> ...includes photos of ad copy vs. actual product.
>>>>
>>>> SOP, really.
>>>> I suppose that if customers are willing to wait 30 to 45 minutes
>>>> for each item ordered, they products would look like those in the ads.
>>>> A legitimate complaint can be made, and defended, regarding the
>>>> amount of filling. There is never as much meat, and such, in the end
>>>> product as is shown in the ads.
>>>
>>>So why is that acceptable?
>>
>> Because most people don't really care.
>
>I don't care.

Very few people will.

>Fast food is all about taste, not appearance. However there
>was a non-fastfood case recently about reese's peanut butter cup
>Jack-O-Lantern's, a woman Sued reese's becouse on teh wrapper the candy's
>had a jack-o-lantern face on them, but the actual candy was just a pumpkin,
>with no face. Her argument was that she only bought the candy becouse of
>the face.
>

So she's never seen the candy before?

>But in fast-food, your going to buy a whopper whether the advertisiment
>looks deliciouis, or not.

If it looks like shit in the ad, people won't buy it.

[Cue avoidance from Jenny.]

--
A small number of the documented lies of Jerry "Jenny" Sauk.
http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/?i=2

On Thu, 11 Jan 2024 16:00:13 -0800, KlausSchadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Thu, 11 Jan 2024 13:13:48 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"K Wills" <laughing@you.heh> wrote in message
>>news:fgipci5bndhrifqpsn00vcjrk7h9s4615l@4ax.com...
>>> On Thu, 03 Aug 2023 13:42:23 GMT, Frank <frank@creon.earth> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 03 Aug 2023 01:46:00 -0700, K Wills wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 02 Aug 2023 22:21:24 GMT, Frank <frank@creon.earth> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/taco-bell-false-advertising-lawsuit/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...includes photos of ad copy vs. actual product.
>>>>>
>>>>> SOP, really.
>>>>> I suppose that if customers are willing to wait 30 to 45 minutes
>>>>> for each item ordered, they products would look like those in the ads.
>>>>> A legitimate complaint can be made, and defended, regarding the
>>>>> amount of filling. There is never as much meat, and such, in the end
>>>>> product as is shown in the ads.
>>>>
>>>>So why is that acceptable?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Because most people don't really care.
>>
>>I don't care. Fast food is all about taste, not appearance.
>
>As usual, you are wrong.
>
>>However there
>>was a non-fastfood case recently about reese's peanut butter cup
>>Jack-O-Lantern's, a woman Sued reese's becouse on teh wrapper the candy's
>>had a jack-o-lantern face on them, but the actual candy was just a pumpkin,
>>with no face. Her argument was that she only bought the candy becouse of
>>the face.
>>
>>But in fast-food, your going to buy a whopper whether the advertisiment
>>looks deliciouis, or not.
>
>People will buy a Whopper because it's been around for almost 70
>years.
>
>If Starbucks advertised their brisket sandwiches as looking like this,
>nobody would buy one.
>https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/01/10/13/3C0564A500000578-4105544-One_diner_was_especially_disappointed_with_their_Starbucks_BBQ_B-a-73_1484056695320.jpg
>
>If BK advertised their hot dogs as looking like they actually do,
>they'd never sell one
>https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/01/10/14/3C0564BA00000578-4105544-image-a-86_1484057171207.jpg
>
>But maybe you're the only person in the world who eats his food
>without looking at it.

Jenny recently made it clear he swallows the food so fast, he
doesn't even have time to taste what he's eating. He stated he doesn't
taste the Big Mac burgers.
Presuming he was being honest, possible if Jenny made a mistake,
it's very probable he doesn't devote enough time to seeing what he's
eating.

--
If the grass if greener on the other side of the fence,
the septic tank probably has a leak.

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:kuv0qit6b65csgpdqe2ta048amtkpjde20@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
> On Thu, 11 Jan 2024 13:13:48 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"K Wills" <laughing@you.heh> wrote in message
>>news:fgipci5bndhrifqpsn00vcjrk7h9s4615l@4ax.com...
>>> On Thu, 03 Aug 2023 13:42:23 GMT, Frank <frank@creon.earth> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 03 Aug 2023 01:46:00 -0700, K Wills wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 02 Aug 2023 22:21:24 GMT, Frank <frank@creon.earth> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/taco-bell-false-advertising-lawsuit/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...includes photos of ad copy vs. actual product.
>>>>>
>>>>> SOP, really.
>>>>> I suppose that if customers are willing to wait 30 to 45 minutes
>>>>> for each item ordered, they products would look like those in the ads.
>>>>> A legitimate complaint can be made, and defended, regarding the
>>>>> amount of filling. There is never as much meat, and such, in the end
>>>>> product as is shown in the ads.
>>>>
>>>>So why is that acceptable?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Because most people don't really care.
>>
>>I don't care. Fast food is all about taste, not appearance.
>
> As usual, you are wrong.
>
>>However there
>>was a non-fastfood case recently about reese's peanut butter cup
>>Jack-O-Lantern's, a woman Sued reese's becouse on teh wrapper the candy's
>>had a jack-o-lantern face on them, but the actual candy was just a
>>pumpkin,
>>with no face. Her argument was that she only bought the candy becouse of
>>the face.
>>
>>But in fast-food, your going to buy a whopper whether the advertisiment
>>looks deliciouis, or not.
>
> People will buy a Whopper because it's been around for almost 70
> years.
>
> If Starbucks advertised their brisket sandwiches as looking like this,
> nobody would buy one.
> https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/01/10/13/3C0564A500000578-4105544-One_diner_was_especially_disappointed_with_their_Starbucks_BBQ_B-a-73_1484056695320.jpg
>
> If BK advertised their hot dogs as looking like they actually do,
> they'd never sell one
> https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/01/10/14/3C0564BA00000578-4105544-image-a-86_1484057171207.jpg

Those are some very nice pictures but you should have posted the as
advertised pics as well, so we could compare the two.

On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 21:19:20 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

[...]

>>>But in fast-food, your going to buy a whopper whether the advertisiment
>>>looks deliciouis, or not.
>>
>> People will buy a Whopper because it's been around for almost 70
>> years.
>>
>> If Starbucks advertised their brisket sandwiches as looking like this,
>> nobody would buy one.
>> https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/01/10/13/3C0564A500000578-4105544-One_diner_was_especially_disappointed_with_their_Starbucks_BBQ_B-a-73_1484056695320.jpg
>>
>> If BK advertised their hot dogs as looking like they actually do,
>> they'd never sell one
>> https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/01/10/14/3C0564BA00000578-4105544-image-a-86_1484057171207.jpg
>
>Those are some very nice pictures but you should have posted the as
>advertised pics as well, so we could compare the two.

That's almost funny. You frequently DEMAND people Google stuff.
Is your hypocrisy an aspect of your dishonesty, or mental illness?

[Cue avoidance from Jenny.]

--
A small number of the documented lies of Jerry "Jenny" Sauk.
http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/?i=2

On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 21:19:20 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:kuv0qit6b65csgpdqe2ta048amtkpjde20@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>> On Thu, 11 Jan 2024 13:13:48 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"K Wills" <laughing@you.heh> wrote in message
>>>news:fgipci5bndhrifqpsn00vcjrk7h9s4615l@4ax.com...
>>>> On Thu, 03 Aug 2023 13:42:23 GMT, Frank <frank@creon.earth> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Thu, 03 Aug 2023 01:46:00 -0700, K Wills wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 02 Aug 2023 22:21:24 GMT, Frank <frank@creon.earth> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/taco-bell-false-advertising-lawsuit/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ...includes photos of ad copy vs. actual product.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> SOP, really.
>>>>>> I suppose that if customers are willing to wait 30 to 45 minutes
>>>>>> for each item ordered, they products would look like those in the ads.
>>>>>> A legitimate complaint can be made, and defended, regarding the
>>>>>> amount of filling. There is never as much meat, and such, in the end
>>>>>> product as is shown in the ads.
>>>>>
>>>>>So why is that acceptable?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Because most people don't really care.
>>>
>>>I don't care. Fast food is all about taste, not appearance.
>>
>> As usual, you are wrong.
>>
>>>However there
>>>was a non-fastfood case recently about reese's peanut butter cup
>>>Jack-O-Lantern's, a woman Sued reese's becouse on teh wrapper the candy's
>>>had a jack-o-lantern face on them, but the actual candy was just a
>>>pumpkin,
>>>with no face. Her argument was that she only bought the candy becouse of
>>>the face.
>>>
>>>But in fast-food, your going to buy a whopper whether the advertisiment
>>>looks deliciouis, or not.
>>
>> People will buy a Whopper because it's been around for almost 70
>> years.
>>
>> If Starbucks advertised their brisket sandwiches as looking like this,
>> nobody would buy one.
>> https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/01/10/13/3C0564A500000578-4105544-One_diner_was_especially_disappointed_with_their_Starbucks_BBQ_B-a-73_1484056695320.jpg
>>
>> If BK advertised their hot dogs as looking like they actually do,
>> they'd never sell one
>> https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/01/10/14/3C0564BA00000578-4105544-image-a-86_1484057171207.jpg
>
>Those are some very nice pictures but you should have posted the as
>advertised pics as well, so we could compare the two.
>

The smart people here have already made the comparison on their own
Jenny.