"KWills" <a@b.c> wrote in message
news:1qnajh1foc8jul1rkm953srqribce56lgb@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 28 Sep 2022 13:17:54 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>message
>>news:q64iehhmlgj07akgj9ujdspegbnemfcann@4ax.com...
>>
>>
>>> In the future, I know I would appreciate it if you would just STFU if
>>> someone posts a review you don't agree with,
>>
>>
>>Just who do you think you are, bub? THIS NEWSGROUP IS FOR EXLORING AND
>>DISCUSSING OPPOSING OPINION'S.
>>
>
> No it's not. It's for the discussion of fast food.

WHICH INCLUDES DISCUSSING OPPOSING OPINION'S.

> The FACT is, Taco Bell is almost always, if not always, PRIVATE
> property.

THE FACT IS, THE PUBLIC ENTERS THE PROPERTY. PERIOD.

On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 13:17:42 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>> The FACT is, Taco Bell is almost always, if not always, PRIVATE
>> property.
>
>THE FACT IS, THE PUBLIC ENTERS THE PROPERTY. PERIOD.

Nobody said they don't.

On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 13:17:42 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KWills" <a@b.c> wrote in message
>news:1qnajh1foc8jul1rkm953srqribce56lgb@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 28 Sep 2022 13:17:54 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>message news:q64iehhmlgj07akgj9ujdspegbnemfcann@4ax.com...
>>>
>>>> In the future, I know I would appreciate it if you would just STFU if
>>>> someone posts a review you don't agree with,
>>>
>>>Just who do you think you are, bub? THIS NEWSGROUP IS FOR EXLORING AND
>>>DISCUSSING OPPOSING OPINION'S.
>>
>> No it's not. It's for the discussion of fast food.
>
>WHICH INCLUDES DISCUSSING OPPOSING OPINION'S.
>

But in contrast to your claim above, it's not the sole purpose.

>> The FACT is, Taco Bell is almost always, if not always, PRIVATE
>> property.
>
>THE FACT IS, THE PUBLIC ENTERS THE PROPERTY. PERIOD.
>

That you waited over a year to offer your deception, doesn't
reduce the deception.
The LEGAL definitions of public and private property have been
posted many times. You running away from the truth you HATE so much
will never result in the truth being altered.

--
A small number of the documented lies of Jerry "Jenny" Sauk.
http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/

On Tue, 03 Oct 2023 11:58:01 -0700, KlausSchadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 13:17:42 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>> The FACT is, Taco Bell is almost always, if not always, PRIVATE
>>> property.
>>
>>THE FACT IS, THE PUBLIC ENTERS THE PROPERTY. PERIOD.
>
>Nobody said they don't.

Jenny is trying to claim that the public being allowed access
means it's public property. He KNOWS this is not so. Jenny KNOWS the
truth, but has a very real NEED to lie.

--
You might be a king or a little street sweeper,
but sooner or later you dance with the reaper.

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9uoohitcgeqtgth0v4otp1aik4smrrnj3i@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
> On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 13:17:42 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>>> The FACT is, Taco Bell is almost always, if not always, PRIVATE
>>> property.
>>
>>THE FACT IS, THE PUBLIC ENTERS THE PROPERTY. PERIOD.
>
> Nobody said they don't.

Thank you for admitting that Taco Bell is public property.

On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 10:03:36 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:9uoohitcgeqtgth0v4otp1aik4smrrnj3i@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>> On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 13:17:42 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>> The FACT is, Taco Bell is almost always, if not always, PRIVATE
>>>> property.
>>>
>>>THE FACT IS, THE PUBLIC ENTERS THE PROPERTY. PERIOD.
>>
>> Nobody said they don't.
>
>Thank you for admitting that Taco Bell is public property.
>

This has already been explained to you.

Public enters the private property.

Public enters public property.

Who enters doesn't determine what kind of property it is.

Ownership determines what kind of property it is.

99% of Taco Bells are private property.

Now, it's time for you to run away from this again:

Here is the definition of private property:

http://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/private-property
something, especially land or buildings, that belongs to a particular
person or company, rather than to a government.

Now all you have to do is answer a simple yes or no question:
Is this definition correct?

[ ] Yes
[ ] No

If your answer is no, supply a verifiable citation from another
dictionary which refutes this definition.

If you don't, we'll assume none exists, and you now admit that
restaurants are NOT owned by the government and are, therefore,
private property.

Put your verifiable cite here ----->

On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 10:03:36 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:9uoohitcgeqtgth0v4otp1aik4smrrnj3i@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>> On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 13:17:42 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> The FACT is, Taco Bell is almost always, if not always, PRIVATE
>>>> property.
>>>
>>>THE FACT IS, THE PUBLIC ENTERS THE PROPERTY. PERIOD.
>>
>> Nobody said they don't.
>
>Thank you for admitting that Taco Bell is public property.

Again you PROVE you really do NEED to lie.
The proper, LEGAL definition of both public and private property
have been posted many times. There is no way you do not know each. You
simply MUST lie. Your mental illness will not allow you to be honest.

--
A small number of the documented lies of Jerry "Jenny" Sauk.
http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/?i=2

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:bdavkidva3oeesoedarlbp839dqcm0a1l5@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
> On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 10:03:36 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>message
>>news:9uoohitcgeqtgth0v4otp1aik4smrrnj3i@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>>> On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 13:17:42 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> The FACT is, Taco Bell is almost always, if not always, PRIVATE
>>>>> property.
>>>>
>>>>THE FACT IS, THE PUBLIC ENTERS THE PROPERTY. PERIOD.
>>>
>>> Nobody said they don't.
>>
>>Thank you for admitting that Taco Bell is public property.
>>
>
> This has already been explained to you.
>
> Public enters the private property.

But if the public entered private property, then it really wouldn't be
private at all, would it?

Do you see klous how your argument's make no sense at all?

On Sun, 11 Feb 2024 04:39:19 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:bdavkidva3oeesoedarlbp839dqcm0a1l5@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>> On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 10:03:36 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>message
>>>news:9uoohitcgeqtgth0v4otp1aik4smrrnj3i@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>>>> On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 13:17:42 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> The FACT is, Taco Bell is almost always, if not always, PRIVATE
>>>>>> property.
>>>>>
>>>>>THE FACT IS, THE PUBLIC ENTERS THE PROPERTY. PERIOD.
>>>>
>>>> Nobody said they don't.
>>>
>>>Thank you for admitting that Taco Bell is public property.
>>
>> This has already been explained to you.
>>
>> Public enters the private property.
>
>But if the public entered private property, then it really wouldn't be
>private at all, would it?
>
>Do you see klous how your argument's make no sense at all?
>

What is it with you and all the lying? I really do want to know.
The legal definition of public and private property has been posted
enough that there is no way you don't know the truth. You are simply
lying. Explain why you have such a deep NEED to lie.

[Cue avoidance from Jenny.]

--
A small number of the documented lies of Jerry "Jenny" Sauk.
http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/?i=2

On Sun, 11 Feb 2024 04:39:19 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:bdavkidva3oeesoedarlbp839dqcm0a1l5@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>> On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 10:03:36 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>message
>>>news:9uoohitcgeqtgth0v4otp1aik4smrrnj3i@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>>>> On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 13:17:42 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> The FACT is, Taco Bell is almost always, if not always, PRIVATE
>>>>>> property.
>>>>>
>>>>>THE FACT IS, THE PUBLIC ENTERS THE PROPERTY. PERIOD.
>>>>
>>>> Nobody said they don't.
>>>
>>>Thank you for admitting that Taco Bell is public property.
>>>
>>
>> This has already been explained to you.
>>
>> Public enters the private property.
>
>But if the public entered private property, then it really wouldn't be
>private at all, would it?

====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========
====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========

[ ] Provide the Message ID proving your claim
[x] You are lying, as usual
[x] This has already been explained to you ad infinitum
[ ] Repeat your statement using standard, American English, please
[x ] Yes, it *is* private property
[ ] Yes, McDonald's says salt and pepper *are* ingredients
[ ] You have zero authority anywhere on Usenet
[x] I'm not paying much attention to your lame, months old responses

======= END STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE ==========
======= END STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE ==========

On Sun, 11 Feb 2024 03:58:18 -0800, K Wills <kw19@kw.kw> wrote:

>On Sun, 11 Feb 2024 04:39:19 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
><jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:bdavkidva3oeesoedarlbp839dqcm0a1l5@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>>> On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 10:03:36 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>message
>>>>news:9uoohitcgeqtgth0v4otp1aik4smrrnj3i@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>>>>> On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 13:17:42 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> The FACT is, Taco Bell is almost always, if not always, PRIVATE
>>>>>>> property.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>THE FACT IS, THE PUBLIC ENTERS THE PROPERTY. PERIOD.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nobody said they don't.
>>>>
>>>>Thank you for admitting that Taco Bell is public property.
>>>
>>> This has already been explained to you.
>>>
>>> Public enters the private property.
>>
>>But if the public entered private property, then it really wouldn't be
>>private at all, would it?
>>
>>Do you see klous how your argument's make no sense at all?
>>
>
> What is it with you and all the lying? I really do want to know.
>The legal definition of public and private property has been posted
>enough that there is no way you don't know the truth. You are simply
>lying. Explain why you have such a deep NEED to lie.
>
>[Cue avoidance from Jenny.]

His need is so deep, he feels he has to go back to last year and
beyond to use any opportunities to lie that he may have missed.

"KWills" <fun@home.new> wrote in message
news:l2g1li9r7hbdqa28t2knren1cjocs4skfe@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 10:03:36 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>message
>>news:9uoohitcgeqtgth0v4otp1aik4smrrnj3i@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>>> On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 13:17:42 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>> The FACT is, Taco Bell is almost always, if not always, PRIVATE
>>>>> property.
>>>>
>>>>THE FACT IS, THE PUBLIC ENTERS THE PROPERTY. PERIOD.
>>>
>>> Nobody said they don't.
>>
>>Thank you for admitting that Taco Bell is public property.
>
> Again you PROVE you really do NEED to lie.

Yawn.

On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 13:08:17 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2023 04:09:37 -0800

Again you PROVE you're so retarded you have to wait MONTHS to reply.

>"KWills" <fun@home.new> wrote in message
>news:l2g1li9r7hbdqa28t2knren1cjocs4skfe@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 10:03:36 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>message
>>>news:9uoohitcgeqtgth0v4otp1aik4smrrnj3i@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>>>> On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 13:17:42 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
>>>> <jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> The FACT is, Taco Bell is almost always, if not always, PRIVATE
>>>>>> property.
>>>>>
>>>>>THE FACT IS, THE PUBLIC ENTERS THE PROPERTY. PERIOD.
>>>>
>>>> Nobody said they don't.
>>>
>>>Thank you for admitting that Taco Bell is public property.
>>
>> Again you PROVE you really do NEED to lie.
>
>Yawn.

Ibid.

[Cue avoidance from Jenny.]

--
A small number of the documented lies of Jerry "Jenny" Sauk.
http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/?i=2

"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message

>>But if the public entered private property, then it really wouldn't be
>>private at all, would it?
>
> ====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========
> ====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========
>
> [x] You are lying, as usual
> [x] This has already been explained to you ad infinitum
> [x] I'm not paying much attention to your lame, months old responses

So is that a yes or a no?

"K Wills" <kw19@kw.kw> wrote in message
news:1idhsi11vpn7io9b7uoh9p7uco27qmkf45@4ax.com...

> What is it with you and all the lying? I really do want to know.
> The legal definition of public and private property has been posted
> enough that there is no way you don't know the truth.

No it hasn't. What klous has posted many time's, is not the legal
defination but the DICTIONARY defination, of a British dictionary which does
not apply to the US.

On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 13:14:54 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"K Wills" <kw19@kw.kw> wrote in message
>news:1idhsi11vpn7io9b7uoh9p7uco27qmkf45@4ax.com...
>
>> What is it with you and all the lying? I really do want to know.
>> The legal definition of public and private property has been posted
>> enough that there is no way you don't know the truth.
>
>No it hasn't. What klous has posted many time's, is not the legal
>defination but the DICTIONARY defination, of a British dictionary which does
>not apply to the US.
>

Yes, Jenny, it applies to the United States. We speak English here.

Well, you don't. But we do.

Meanwhile, you have posted ZERO definitions to support your lie.

Why?

Because definitions that support your lie don't exist.

Cornell University
LII Wex public property
public property
Public property refers to property owned by the government (or its
agency), rather than by a private individual or a company. It belongs
to the public at large.

private property
Primary tabs
Private property refers to the ownership of property by private
parties - essentially anyone or anything other than the government.

Once again, Jenny will lie and say he didn't see this.

[crickets]

On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 13:15:51 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
>>>But if the public entered private property, then it really wouldn't be
>>>private at all, would it?

Yes, Jenny, it would still be private property if the public entered
it.

>> ====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========
>> ====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY RESPONSE =========
>>
>> [x] You are lying, as usual
>> [x] This has already been explained to you ad infinitum
>> [x] I'm not paying much attention to your lame, months old responses
>
>So is that a yes or a no?
>

[x] This has already been explained to you ad infinitum

On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 13:14:54 -0500, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2024 03:58:18 -0800

What do you think you gain by waiting over two months to PROVE you
really due NEED to lie?

[Crickets.]

>"K Wills" <kw19@kw.kw> wrote in message
>news:1idhsi11vpn7io9b7uoh9p7uco27qmkf45@4ax.com...
>
>> What is it with you and all the lying? I really do want to know.
>> The legal definition of public and private property has been posted
>> enough that there is no way you don't know the truth.
>
>No it hasn't.

THEY have. Private and public are separate things.
Your profound learning disability aside, the definition of both
have been posted many times. I know. I posted them. No amount of your
lying will alter this truth.

>What klous

Who is Klous?

>has posted many time's,

What does time own?

>is not the legal
>defination

What is "defination?"

>but the DICTIONARY defination,

Ibid.

>of a British dictionary which does
>not apply to the US.

I am not Klaus, or the Klous your NEED to lie makes you claim
posted. And I posted the LEGAL definitions. I even linked to the legal
definition from Black's Law Dictionary. You ran away from the truth
you HATE each and every time.
Please get the professional mental health care you need for your
lying. I'm being very serious.

[Cue avoidance from Jenny.]

--
A small number of the documented lies of Jerry "Jenny" Sauk.
http://jerrylies.byethost22.com/?i=2