But this time it's dimocrats so nothing to see here.

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/scandal-hit-america-bigger-watergate
--
(Space holder for future brilliant signature line)

On Thursday, May 25, 2023 at 8:32:15 AM UTC-7, George Anthony wrote:
> But this time it's dimocrats so nothing to see here.
>
> https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/scandal-hit-america-bigger-watergate
> --
> (Space holder for future brilliant signature line)

lol, I'm sure you don't know anything more about this than what Fakes News feeds you. You don't have the ability or the inclination to learn anything further. But, for anyone, who, for whatever crazy reasons would like to know more about the Durham "investigation" I would suggest this link:

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/05/durham-report-fbi-trump-russia/674088/

Naturally, there are many other summaries available. We're likely to see a lot of propaganda based on it. Here's the bottom line for our jive ass clumsy dodger.

"As a legal text, the Durham report is limp and meager. As a history of recent events, it is misleading. But don’t dismiss its significance because of its intellectual defects. The Durham report is already proving to be a huge success as a prop and support for the bitterest partisan rancor. And its fullest import may yet lie ahead: as a rationalization for abuses of power by Trump-legacy administrations of the future."

TB

On 5/25/2023 11:37 AM, Technobarbarian wrote:
> On Thursday, May 25, 2023 at 8:32:15 AM UTC-7, George Anthony wrote:
>> But this time it's dimocrats so nothing to see here.
>>
>> https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/scandal-hit-america-bigger-watergate
>> --
>> (Space holder for future brilliant signature line)
>
> lol, I'm sure you don't know anything more about this than what Fakes News feeds you. You don't have the ability or the inclination to learn anything further. But, for anyone, who, for whatever crazy reasons would like to know more about the Durham "investigation" I would suggest this link:
>
> https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/05/durham-report-fbi-trump-russia/674088/
>
> Naturally, there are many other summaries available. We're likely to see a lot of propaganda based on it. Here's the bottom line for our jive ass clumsy dodger.
>
> "As a legal text, the Durham report is limp and meager. As a history of recent events, it is misleading. But don’t dismiss its significance because of its intellectual defects. The Durham report is already proving to be a huge success as a prop and support for the bitterest partisan rancor. And its fullest import may yet lie ahead: as a rationalization for abuses of power by Trump-legacy administrations of the future."
>
> TB
>
>
>
"...or the inclination to learn anything further". There you go again
with your cloudy crystal ball. I know more about it than you purport to
know. I am just not into posting tomes of information people can find
for themselves. In other words, the links just serve as catalysts to get
a reaction started from naysayers like yourself. At any rate, as far as
accountability for their criminal actions, it will be after hell freezes
over.
--
(Space holder for future brilliant signature line)

On 5/25/2023 11:37 AM, Technobarbarian wrote:
> On Thursday, May 25, 2023 at 8:32:15 AM UTC-7, George Anthony wrote:
>> But this time it's dimocrats so nothing to see here.
>>
>> https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/scandal-hit-america-bigger-watergate
>> --
>> (Space holder for future brilliant signature line)
>
> lol, I'm sure you don't know anything more about this than what Fakes News feeds you.

Ha! Talk about pot kettle black. You will believe anything the leftist
media presents to you.

> You don't have the ability or the inclination to learn anything further. But, for anyone, who, for whatever crazy reasons would like to know more about the Durham "investigation" I would suggest this link:
>
> https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/05/durham-report-fbi-trump-russia/674088/
>
> Naturally, there are many other summaries available. We're likely to see a lot of propaganda based on it. Here's the bottom line for our jive ass clumsy dodger.
>
> "As a legal text, the Durham report is limp and meager. As a history of recent events, it is misleading. But don’t dismiss its significance because of its intellectual defects. The Durham report is already proving to be a huge success as a prop and support for the bitterest partisan rancor. And its fullest import may yet lie ahead: as a rationalization for abuses of power by Trump-legacy administrations of the future."

The only people taking the author, swamp creature David Frum serious
these days are his viewers on his paid appearances on MSDNC, and you.
This idiot Never-Trumper would literally say anything to sell a book and
try and maintain some sort of relevance. He has to go the the left side
of the media to get it, even though he claims he's a conservative.

Your quote of the article is a perfect example of his hypocrisy. Of all
the damning findings of the investigation, he instead twists it into an
attack on Trump. Never mind all the people, and it goes all the way to
the top, who actually did terrible things and put the country through an
unwarranted hell. He's an idiot.

BTW, I *have* actually read the report. In the executive summary, he
outlines the scope of the investigation which included a review of the
previous investigations, as well as an additional five questions, which
I'll summarize as regarding the nature of the FBI's involvement in the
Crossfire Hurricane and evidence presented to the FISA Court. Here's
his response:
"Our findings and conclusions regarding these and related questions are
sobering."

Then this:
"As set forth in greater detail in Section IV.A.3 .b, before the initial
receipt by FBI Headquarters of information from Australia on July 28,
2016 concerning comments reportedly made in a tavern on May 6, 2016 by
George Papadopoulos, an unpaid foreign policy advisor to the Trump
campaign, the government possessed no verified intelligence reflecting
that Trump or the Trump campaign was involved in a conspiracy or
collaborative relationship with officials of the Russian government.
Indeed, based on the evidence gathered in the multiple exhaustive
21 and costly federal investigations of these matters, including the
instant investigation, neither U.S. law enforcement nor the Intelligence
Community appears to have possessed any actual evidence of collusion in
their holdings at the commencement of the Crossfire Hurricane
investigation."

There was never anything there. Sensible people knew this at the time.
But it certainly worked in fucking up the Trump years in office with one
hoax after another. Because the left is evil and laws don't apply to
them. So, go ahead and read your left wing propaganda. I prefer to
read the actual report. It speaks for itself.

On Thursday, May 25, 2023 at 10:40:19 AM UTC-7, sticks wrote:
> On 5/25/2023 11:37 AM, Technobarbarian wrote:
> > On Thursday, May 25, 2023 at 8:32:15 AM UTC-7, George Anthony wrote:
> >> But this time it's dimocrats so nothing to see here.
> >>
> >> https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/scandal-hit-america-bigger-watergate
> >> --
> >> (Space holder for future brilliant signature line)
> >
> > lol, I'm sure you don't know anything more about this than what Fakes News feeds you.
> Ha! Talk about pot kettle black. You will believe anything the leftist
> media presents to you.
> > You don't have the ability or the inclination to learn anything further.. But, for anyone, who, for whatever crazy reasons would like to know more about the Durham "investigation" I would suggest this link:
> >
> > https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/05/durham-report-fbi-trump-russia/674088/
> >
> > Naturally, there are many other summaries available. We're likely to see a lot of propaganda based on it. Here's the bottom line for our jive ass clumsy dodger.
> >
> > "As a legal text, the Durham report is limp and meager. As a history of recent events, it is misleading. But don’t dismiss its significance because of its intellectual defects. The Durham report is already proving to be a huge success as a prop and support for the bitterest partisan rancor. And its fullest import may yet lie ahead: as a rationalization for abuses of power by Trump-legacy administrations of the future."
> The only people taking the author, swamp creature David Frum serious
> these days are his viewers on his paid appearances on MSDNC, and you.
> This idiot Never-Trumper would literally say anything to sell a book and
> try and maintain some sort of relevance. He has to go the the left side
> of the media to get it, even though he claims he's a conservative.
>
> Your quote of the article is a perfect example of his hypocrisy. Of all
> the damning findings of the investigation, he instead twists it into an
> attack on Trump. Never mind all the people, and it goes all the way to
> the top, who actually did terrible things and put the country through an
> unwarranted hell. He's an idiot.
>
> BTW, I *have* actually read the report. In the executive summary, he
> outlines the scope of the investigation which included a review of the
> previous investigations, as well as an additional five questions, which
> I'll summarize as regarding the nature of the FBI's involvement in the
> Crossfire Hurricane and evidence presented to the FISA Court. Here's
> his response:
> "Our findings and conclusions regarding these and related questions are
> sobering."
>
> Then this:
> "As set forth in greater detail in Section IV.A.3 .b, before the initial
> receipt by FBI Headquarters of information from Australia on July 28,
> 2016 concerning comments reportedly made in a tavern on May 6, 2016 by
> George Papadopoulos, an unpaid foreign policy advisor to the Trump
> campaign, the government possessed no verified intelligence reflecting
> that Trump or the Trump campaign was involved in a conspiracy or
> collaborative relationship with officials of the Russian government.
> Indeed, based on the evidence gathered in the multiple exhaustive
> 21 and costly federal investigations of these matters, including the
> instant investigation, neither U.S. law enforcement nor the Intelligence
> Community appears to have possessed any actual evidence of collusion in
> their holdings at the commencement of the Crossfire Hurricane
> investigation."
>
> There was never anything there. Sensible people knew this at the time.
> But it certainly worked in fucking up the Trump years in office with one
> hoax after another. Because the left is evil and laws don't apply to
> them. So, go ahead and read your left wing propaganda. I prefer to
> read the actual report. It speaks for itself.

Being a lapdog you should eat more IAms it helps developing your brain

On 5/25/2023 4:51 PM, robert caprel wrote:
> On Thursday, May 25, 2023 at 10:40:19 AM UTC-7, sticks wrote:
>> On 5/25/2023 11:37 AM, Technobarbarian wrote:
>>> On Thursday, May 25, 2023 at 8:32:15 AM UTC-7, George Anthony wrote:
>>>> But this time it's dimocrats so nothing to see here.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/scandal-hit-america-bigger-watergate
>>>> --
>>>> (Space holder for future brilliant signature line)
>>>
>>> lol, I'm sure you don't know anything more about this than what Fakes News feeds you.
>> Ha! Talk about pot kettle black. You will believe anything the leftist
>> media presents to you.
>>> You don't have the ability or the inclination to learn anything further. But, for anyone, who, for whatever crazy reasons would like to know more about the Durham "investigation" I would suggest this link:
>>>
>>> https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/05/durham-report-fbi-trump-russia/674088/
>>>
>>> Naturally, there are many other summaries available. We're likely to see a lot of propaganda based on it. Here's the bottom line for our jive ass clumsy dodger.
>>>
>>> "As a legal text, the Durham report is limp and meager. As a history of recent events, it is misleading. But don’t dismiss its significance because of its intellectual defects. The Durham report is already proving to be a huge success as a prop and support for the bitterest partisan rancor. And its fullest import may yet lie ahead: as a rationalization for abuses of power by Trump-legacy administrations of the future."
>> The only people taking the author, swamp creature David Frum serious
>> these days are his viewers on his paid appearances on MSDNC, and you.
>> This idiot Never-Trumper would literally say anything to sell a book and
>> try and maintain some sort of relevance. He has to go the the left side
>> of the media to get it, even though he claims he's a conservative.
>>
>> Your quote of the article is a perfect example of his hypocrisy. Of all
>> the damning findings of the investigation, he instead twists it into an
>> attack on Trump. Never mind all the people, and it goes all the way to
>> the top, who actually did terrible things and put the country through an
>> unwarranted hell. He's an idiot.
>>
>> BTW, I *have* actually read the report. In the executive summary, he
>> outlines the scope of the investigation which included a review of the
>> previous investigations, as well as an additional five questions, which
>> I'll summarize as regarding the nature of the FBI's involvement in the
>> Crossfire Hurricane and evidence presented to the FISA Court. Here's
>> his response:
>> "Our findings and conclusions regarding these and related questions are
>> sobering."
>>
>> Then this:
>> "As set forth in greater detail in Section IV.A.3 .b, before the initial
>> receipt by FBI Headquarters of information from Australia on July 28,
>> 2016 concerning comments reportedly made in a tavern on May 6, 2016 by
>> George Papadopoulos, an unpaid foreign policy advisor to the Trump
>> campaign, the government possessed no verified intelligence reflecting
>> that Trump or the Trump campaign was involved in a conspiracy or
>> collaborative relationship with officials of the Russian government.
>> Indeed, based on the evidence gathered in the multiple exhaustive
>> 21 and costly federal investigations of these matters, including the
>> instant investigation, neither U.S. law enforcement nor the Intelligence
>> Community appears to have possessed any actual evidence of collusion in
>> their holdings at the commencement of the Crossfire Hurricane
>> investigation."
>>
>> There was never anything there. Sensible people knew this at the time.
>> But it certainly worked in fucking up the Trump years in office with one
>> hoax after another. Because the left is evil and laws don't apply to
>> them. So, go ahead and read your left wing propaganda. I prefer to
>> read the actual report. It speaks for itself.
>
> Being a lapdog you should eat more IAms it helps developing your brain

Just wondering if little Bobby here has ever written anything
intelligent, or is stupid shit like this all he ever does?