Rocksolid Light

Welcome to Rocksolid Light

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

Information is the inverse of entropy.


interests / alt.usage.english / The Expert Language Fallacy

SubjectAuthor
o The Expert Language FallacyStefan Ram

1
The Expert Language Fallacy

<fallacy-20240324121516@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/interests/article-flat.php?id=203950&group=alt.usage.english#203950

  copy link   Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From: ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram)
Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
Subject: The Expert Language Fallacy
Date: 24 Mar 2024 11:16:29 GMT
Organization: Stefan Ram
Lines: 32
Expires: 1 Feb 2025 11:59:58 GMT
Message-ID: <fallacy-20240324121516@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de GmM2lI0PlFfnieKheOg/pgGiuP4PMlSXNe6KCbtybtxp/i
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Ub1otOO68OE8zdv8tPzjM4lq79w= sha256:jbzsUZsaK4M6Y34+fFuUaS07l3A5iJx6TXpgZrHApZ0=
X-Copyright: (C) Copyright 2024 Stefan Ram. All rights reserved.
Distribution through any means other than regular usenet
channels is forbidden. It is forbidden to publish this
article in the Web, to change URIs of this article into links,
and to transfer the body without this notice, but quotations
of parts in other Usenet posts are allowed.
X-No-Archive: Yes
Archive: no
X-No-Archive-Readme: "X-No-Archive" is set, because this prevents some
services to mirror the article in the web. But the article may
be kept on a Usenet archive server with only NNTP access.
X-No-Html: yes
Content-Language: en-US
Accept-Language: de-DE-1901, en-US, it, fr-FR
 by: Stefan Ram - Sun, 24 Mar 2024 11:16 UTC

This actually developed from a thread in another newsgroup, but since
there might be some English-language content, I also post it here:

I asked a chatbot,

|Is there a name for the fallacy that a word must have the
|meaning in general English that it has in some scientific
|terminology?
me (Stefan Ram) asking a chatbot (2024),

he answered:

|Based on the search results, there does not appear to be a
|specific named fallacy for the assumption that a word must
|have the same meaning in general English as it does in some
|scientific terminology. However, this type of fallacy could
|be considered a form of the referential fallacy.
| |The referential fallacy is described as "assuming that all
|words refer to existing things and that the meaning of words
|resides within the words themselves, as opposed to words
|possibly referring to no real object or that the meaning
|comes from how they are used."
| |In the case of a word having a different meaning in
|scientific vs. general usage, the fallacy would be assuming
|that the scientific meaning is the only valid or "real"
|meaning of the word, rather than recognizing that the meaning
|can vary depending on the context. This is a flawed
|assumption about the nature of language and meaning.
| what the chatbot answered (2024).

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor