RANDOM : [16, 56, 26, 39, 46, 22, 1, 27, 8, 55, 4, 59, 14, 30, 35, 40, 17, 9, 54, 13, 49, 28, 34, 41]

NIGEL : [56, 26, 39, 46, 22, 1, 27, 8, 55, 4, 59, 14, 30, 35, 40, 17, 9, 54, 13, 49, 28, 34, 41, 16]

"NN" <november.nihal@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:419b967f-9c96-4e47-9b1d-634bfbcf2406n@googlegroups.com...
> RANDOM : [16, 56, 26, 39, 46, 22, 1, 27, 8, 55, 4, 59, 14, 30, 35, 40, 17,
> 9, 54, 13, 49, 28, 34, 41]
>
> NIGEL : [56, 26, 39, 46, 22, 1, 27, 8, 55, 4, 59, 14, 30, 35, 40, 17, 9,
> 54, 13, 49, 28, 34, 41, 16]

Cheers NN.

I'll submit all the entries on one email

Elton:
6 49 27 48 1 36 59 54 51 55 45 56 41 39 42 32 17 34 31 38 15 46 22 16

Jerome:
2 29 5 35 41 1 21 3 43 34 59 23 8 31 19 53 7 37 47 13 17 55 40 11

Jinks
21 18 19 53 25 23 58 30 8 4 47 39 44 37 36 24 14 50 57 26 5 7 11 20

:-)
MJ

[5, 36, 6, 46, 42, 34, 19, 14, 23, 37, 27, 44, 26, 50, 56, 59, 7, 47, 54, 17, 32, 22, 9, 18]

Alphazero
56 14 39 30 8 4 26 46 27 59 17 19 22 1 55 35 40 36 23 37 44 5 6 42
Leela
56 14 39 30 8 4 26 27 46 59 17 19 37 22 1 36 55 21 18 53 25 23 58 47
Nan
56 14 8 39 4 30 27 59 26 46 37 17 36 19 22 55 1 16 35 40 21 18 53 25

It is not clear how much human intelligence plays a role in lottery predictions, as this may be taking place at the quantum level. However, I hope to achieve a better result after several debugging sessions.
Nan

"??? Wang Qianyi (Nan)" <lotteryprediction@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1e924480-e66a-4832-9706-4ab7b1885551n@googlegroups.com...
> It is not clear how much human intelligence plays a role in lottery
> predictions, as this may be taking place at the quantum level. However, I
> hope to achieve a better result after several debugging sessions.
> Nan

At a basic level any human being can make a Lotto prediction ;-)

If you can see that a bias exists in the results - like 86% chance of at
least one number being divisible by 3 coming up in the Lotto numbers drawn,
then you're using human intelligence.

J

在 2023年2月1日星期三 UTC+8 23:42:39，<Jerome Fandor> 写道：
> "??? Wang Qianyi (Nan)" <lotteryp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1e924480-e66a-4832...@googlegroups.com...
> > It is not clear how much human intelligence plays a role in lottery
> > predictions, as this may be taking place at the quantum level. However, I
> > hope to achieve a better result after several debugging sessions.
> > Nan
> At a basic level any human being can make a Lotto prediction ;-)
>
> If you can see that a bias exists in the results - like 86% chance of at
> least one number being divisible by 3 coming up in the Lotto numbers drawn,
> then you're using human intelligence.
>
> J
thanks for sharing ;-

No matter what statistical method is used, the most accurate long-term results will come from the current probability analysis as well as a comprehensive analysis of the probability at a certain point in the future. Short-term accuracy is equivalent to throwing a dice and will ultimately be limited to the quagmire of stubborn probability.

Nevertheless, lottery prediction is not limited to numbers, you can also predict a general ranking category, thus reducing the unreliability of future predictions. The performance of two horses is clearly superior to the performance of the other two based on their history and recent performance, for example. You are not aware of what their final ranking will be, but you can still make a more accurate prediction, which reduces the difficulty of prediction and the range of options available to you.

Nan

Result = [16, 28, 29, 31, 53, 59] + bonus= 34

RANDOM caught: {16, 59, 28} +b ==> score: 40
NN caught: {59} +b ==> score: 9
NIGEL caught: {16, 59, 28} +b ==> score: 19
Nan caught: {16, 59, 53} ==> score: 26
Leela caught: {59, 53} ==> score: 20
Alphazero caught: {59} ==> score: 15
Elton caught: {16, 59, 31} +b ==> score: 25
Jerome caught: {29, 59, 53, 31} +b ==> score: 57
Jinks caught: {53} ==> score: 21
--------------------

NN [23, 59, 72, 79, 28, 40, 45, 0, = 355
Jinks [39, 11, 12, 54, 39, 68, 59, 51, = 354
Random [28, 14, 47, 67, 31, 35, 43, 40, = 345
Nan [36, 18, 33, 55, 24, 38, 61, 32, = 323
Nigel [32, 17, 51, 46, 10, 39, 46, 43, = 303
Leela [28, 4, 43, 30, 19, 48, 64, 30, = 286
Jerome [23, 10, 2, 24, 37, 29, 37, 56, = 275
Alphazero [29, 1, 16, 49, 24, 20, 62, 29, = 245
Elton [56, 51, 15, 23, 12, 38, 18, 6, = 244

Well dont to Jerome and Random.
Jinks looks to take the lead setting a new pace....

NN [23, 59, 72, 79, 28, 40, 45, 0, 9] = 355
Jinks [39, 11, 12, 54, 39, 68, 59, 51, 21] = 354
Random [28, 14, 47, 67, 31, 35, 43, 40, 40] = 345
Nan [36, 18, 33, 55, 24, 38, 61, 32, 26] = 323
Nigel [32, 17, 51, 46, 10, 39, 46, 43, 19] = 303
Leela [28, 4, 43, 30, 19, 48, 64, 30, 20] = 286
Jerome [23, 10, 2, 24, 37, 29, 37, 56, 57] = 275
Alphazero [29, 1, 16, 49, 24, 20, 62, 29, 15] = 245
Elton [56, 51, 15, 23, 12, 38, 18, 6, 25] = 244

>
> Well dont to Jerome and Random.
> Jinks looks to take the lead setting a new pace....

Damn typos !
Well done to Jerome and Random

"NN" <november.nihal@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:712bc7ad-fb4e-45f4-982b-ff7634e6de91n@googlegroups.com...
>
>>
>> Well dont to Jerome and Random.
>> Jinks looks to take the lead setting a new pace....
>
>
> Damn typos !
> Well done to Jerome and Random

Cheers to you :-)

I think we'll find that Jinks won't be able to sustain the pace.

But I'm pleased with the strategy anyway.

MJ

On Thursday, 2 February 2023 at 11:59:48 UTC, Marmaduke Jinks wrote:
> "NN" <novembe...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:712bc7ad-fb4e-45f4...@googlegroups.com...
> >
> >>
> >> Well dont to Jerome and Random.
> >> Jinks looks to take the lead setting a new pace....
> >
> >
> > Damn typos !
> > Well done to Jerome and Random
> Cheers to you :-)
>
> I think we'll find that Jinks won't be able to sustain the pace.
>
> But I'm pleased with the strategy anyway.
>
> MJ

We are almost half way and in the past this is where I have faltered and slipped.
I did change my method of picking but upon reading Nan's wise words I have gone
back and will stick with it and see what happens.

"NN" <november.nihal@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:62d6ab9b-9a0e-400f-a9fe-e3566ae8990fn@googlegroups.com...
> On Thursday, 2 February 2023 at 11:59:48 UTC, Marmaduke Jinks wrote:
>> "NN" <novembe...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:712bc7ad-fb4e-45f4...@googlegroups.com...
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Well dont to Jerome and Random.
>> >> Jinks looks to take the lead setting a new pace....
>> >
>> >
>> > Damn typos !
>> > Well done to Jerome and Random
>> Cheers to you :-)
>>
>> I think we'll find that Jinks won't be able to sustain the pace.
>>
>> But I'm pleased with the strategy anyway.
>>
>> MJ
>
> We are almost half way and in the past this is where I have faltered and
> slipped.
> I did change my method of picking but upon reading Nan's wise words I have
> gone
> back and will stick with it and see what happens.

Aha. Good luck :-)

MJ

NN wrote:

>>Well dont to Jerome and Random.
>>Jinks looks to take the lead setting a new pace....
>
>
>
> Damn typos !
> Well done to Jerome and Random

I'm tempted to change the name of my entry to Robson, so you might end
up saying well done to Robson and Jerome ;-)

"nigel" <useweb@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:FZicncpYptNarEH-nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk...
> NN wrote:
>
>>>Well dont to Jerome and Random. Jinks looks to take the lead setting a
>>>new pace....
>>
>>
>>
>> Damn typos !
>> Well done to Jerome and Random
>
> I'm tempted to change the name of my entry to Robson, so you might end up
> saying well done to Robson and Jerome ;-)
>

What an unchained melody that would be ;-)

J

There will come a time when a highly developed civilization will be destroyed, and its seeds will germinate again. Welcome to the new era of civilization.

Next round's outcome will be determined by the development of NN and JINKS civilizations. It is worth considering whether we should follow the civilization where the latecomers prevail, or stick to the civilization that takes the lead and suffers setbacks.

As with any good score, there are always risks involved. As a result, when the cost of this risk is too high, we need to reconsider whether we have chosen the wrong strategic direction for the innovation at the outset.

God's hand is like no other when it comes to writing a novel through prediction

The story continues.

When two relatively powerful civilizations meet, the neutral civilization prompts itself to reflect on its own predictions of unequal numerical interrelationships and guides itself through balance and learning to process creatively through mutual understanding of numerical weighting relationships and learning.

"??? Wang Qianyi (Nan)" <lotteryprediction@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:283b282e-4ffe-4529-a490-a10620fde916n@googlegroups.com...
> There will come a time when a highly developed civilization will be
> destroyed, and its seeds will germinate again. Welcome to the new era of
> civilization.
>
> Next round's outcome will be determined by the development of NN and JINKS
> civilizations. It is worth considering whether we should follow the
> civilization where the latecomers prevail, or stick to the civilization
> that takes the lead and suffers setbacks.
>
> As with any good score, there are always risks involved. As a result, when
> the cost of this risk is too high, we need to reconsider whether we have
> chosen the wrong strategic direction for the innovation at the outset.
>
> God's hand is like no other when it comes to writing a novel through
> prediction
>
> The story continues.

I'll have whatever he's having ;-)

MJ

王乾懿 Wang Qianyi (Nan) wrote:
>
> God's hand is like no other when it comes to writing a novel through
> prediction
>

So your God isn't a touch typist because they only use one hand ;-)

在 2023年2月6日星期一 UTC+8 18:34:43，<nigel> 写道：
> 王乾懿 Wang Qianyi (Nan) wrote:
> >
> > God's hand is like no other when it comes to writing a novel through
> > prediction
> >
> So your God isn't a touch typist because they only use one hand ;-)
You did figure something out...