Rocksolid Light

Welcome to Rocksolid Light

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

To be wise, the only thing you really need to know is when to say "I don't know."


interests / soc.genealogy.medieval / Re: Is this royal line for William1 Hoskins of Plymouth correct?

SubjectAuthor
* Is this royal line for William1 Hoskins of Plymouth correct?JBrand
`* Is this royal line for William1 Hoskins of Plymouth correct?JBrand
 `* Is this royal line for William1 Hoskins of Plymouth correct?JBrand
  `* Is this royal line for William1 Hoskins of Plymouth correct?Johnny Brananas
   `- Re: Is this royal line for William1 Hoskins of Plymouth correct?Johnny Brananas

1
Is this royal line for William1 Hoskins of Plymouth correct?

<be07ee4d-2692-4fcf-8090-40e170ae4951n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/interests/article-flat.php?id=8129&group=soc.genealogy.medieval#8129

  copy link   Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:3ac7:b0:77b:c680:21de with SMTP id ss7-20020a05620a3ac700b0077bc68021demr447446qkn.10.1701303480803;
Wed, 29 Nov 2023 16:18:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:3045:0:b0:d9a:4421:6ec5 with SMTP id
w66-20020a253045000000b00d9a44216ec5mr624082ybw.3.1701303480558; Wed, 29 Nov
2023 16:18:00 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 16:18:00 -0800 (PST)
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2600:1700:f860:7d60:39c0:343f:ecfc:b871;
posting-account=i1SuLQkAAAAV1QWu8as8ZxRZ8EzG2iIL
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2600:1700:f860:7d60:39c0:343f:ecfc:b871
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <be07ee4d-2692-4fcf-8090-40e170ae4951n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Is this royal line for William1 Hoskins of Plymouth correct?
From: starbuck95@hotmail.com (JBrand)
Injection-Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 00:18:00 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 by: JBrand - Thu, 30 Nov 2023 00:18 UTC

The second _Great Migration_ series by R.C. Anderson, 3:414-20, contains a sketch of this immigrant, stating his parents were Henry and Anne (Winthrop) Hoskins of Ireland -- the mother was a cousin of the Winthrops who went to New England. Anderson quotes from a letter in the Winthrop papers in which Anne Hoskins writes from Ireland to the Governor in New England asking for news of her son.

Anne's mother (wife or mistress of her father John Winthrop of Aghadown, Ireland) is shown in this pedigree as Elizabeth daughter of Thomas Powlden:

https://www.google.com/books/edition/Evidences_of_the_Winthrops_of_Groton/XPc7AAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=hoskins

Unsure why _Evidences of the Winthrops_ doubts the validity of the Winthrop-Powlden marriage. It seems the father's divorced first wife also remarried (to Reynold Braunch).

Just wanted to point out that Geni contains links which permit the following pedigree for Elizabeth (Powlden) (Winthrop) Nott, apparent mother of Anne (Winthrop) Hoskins:

Robert Wingfield = Elizabeth Goushill

Anne Wingfield = John Fremingham/ Framlingham
https://www.geni.com/people/Lady-Anne-Wingfield/6000000000462683105

Sir James Framlingham = Alice Walworth

Elizabeth Framlingham = Thomas Roberts of Cranbrook, Kent
https://www.geni.com/people/Elizabeth-Roberts/6000000000462711148
Mary Roberts = Thomas Cheney of Woodhey

Dorothy Cheney = Thomas Polden/ Powlden of Rathgogan, Ireland
https://www.geni.com/people/Dorothy-Polden/6000000003649717135

I had independently come to the conclusion that Elizabeth Powlden's apparent father Thomas Powlden of Rathgogan had a son Morgan Powlden or Polden. See ...

https://www.google.com/books/edition/Journal_of_the_Cork_Historical_and_Archa/t9x-AAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22thomas+polden%22+rathgogan&pg=RA1-PA216-IA62&printsec=frontcover

Notice that the Geni account states that a 1644 petition by Morgan Polden named his parents "as Thomas Polden of Iwerne Minster, Dorset & Dorothy Cheney of Woodhay, Berkshire [daughter of Thomas Cheney, of Woodhay, Berkshire].." Geni states Thomas Powlden or Polden was son of an earlier Morgan Polden in Dorsetshire, so the name "Morgan" for his own son makes sense.

One of the Berkshire Visitations shows Dorothy (Cheney), wife of Thomas Polden one generation further down in the Cheney pedigree, though still retaining the descent from the Roberts family.

https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Four_Visitations_of_Berkshire_Made_a/NcFCAAAAYAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=polden

I realize it could be the case, given the possible uncertainty of the Powlden-Winthrop marriage, that Anne Hoskins was John Winthrop's daughter by another relationship.

But does anyone see anything else obviously wrong with the line?

Re: Is this royal line for William1 Hoskins of Plymouth correct?

<8d96428c-7351-4795-91d6-9874e29d5553n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/interests/article-flat.php?id=8130&group=soc.genealogy.medieval#8130

  copy link   Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:5b86:0:b0:67a:161e:b881 with SMTP id 6-20020ad45b86000000b0067a161eb881mr709433qvp.1.1701305004936;
Wed, 29 Nov 2023 16:43:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:d604:0:b0:db5:3b5e:3925 with SMTP id
n4-20020a25d604000000b00db53b5e3925mr1864ybg.12.1701305004704; Wed, 29 Nov
2023 16:43:24 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 16:43:24 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <be07ee4d-2692-4fcf-8090-40e170ae4951n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2600:1700:f860:7d60:39c0:343f:ecfc:b871;
posting-account=i1SuLQkAAAAV1QWu8as8ZxRZ8EzG2iIL
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2600:1700:f860:7d60:39c0:343f:ecfc:b871
References: <be07ee4d-2692-4fcf-8090-40e170ae4951n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <8d96428c-7351-4795-91d6-9874e29d5553n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Is this royal line for William1 Hoskins of Plymouth correct?
From: starbuck95@hotmail.com (JBrand)
Injection-Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 00:43:24 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 5244
 by: JBrand - Thu, 30 Nov 2023 00:43 UTC

On Wednesday, November 29, 2023 at 7:18:02 PM UTC-5, JBrand wrote:
> The second _Great Migration_ series by R.C. Anderson, 3:414-20, contains a sketch of this immigrant, stating his parents were Henry and Anne (Winthrop) Hoskins of Ireland -- the mother was a cousin of the Winthrops who went to New England. Anderson quotes from a letter in the Winthrop papers in which Anne Hoskins writes from Ireland to the Governor in New England asking for news of her son.
>
> Anne's mother (wife or mistress of her father John Winthrop of Aghadown, Ireland) is shown in this pedigree as Elizabeth daughter of Thomas Powlden:
>
> https://www.google.com/books/edition/Evidences_of_the_Winthrops_of_Groton/XPc7AAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=hoskins
>
> Unsure why _Evidences of the Winthrops_ doubts the validity of the Winthrop-Powlden marriage. It seems the father's divorced first wife also remarried (to Reynold Braunch).
>
> Just wanted to point out that Geni contains links which permit the following pedigree for Elizabeth (Powlden) (Winthrop) Nott, apparent mother of Anne (Winthrop) Hoskins:
>
> Robert Wingfield = Elizabeth Goushill
>
> Anne Wingfield = John Fremingham/ Framlingham
> https://www.geni.com/people/Lady-Anne-Wingfield/6000000000462683105
>
> Sir James Framlingham = Alice Walworth
>
> Elizabeth Framlingham = Thomas Roberts of Cranbrook, Kent
> https://www.geni.com/people/Elizabeth-Roberts/6000000000462711148
>
> Mary Roberts = Thomas Cheney of Woodhey
>
> Dorothy Cheney = Thomas Polden/ Powlden of Rathgogan, Ireland
> https://www.geni.com/people/Dorothy-Polden/6000000003649717135
>
> I had independently come to the conclusion that Elizabeth Powlden's apparent father Thomas Powlden of Rathgogan had a son Morgan Powlden or Polden. See ...
>
> https://www.google.com/books/edition/Journal_of_the_Cork_Historical_and_Archa/t9x-AAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22thomas+polden%22+rathgogan&pg=RA1-PA216-IA62&printsec=frontcover
>
> Notice that the Geni account states that a 1644 petition by Morgan Polden named his parents "as Thomas Polden of Iwerne Minster, Dorset & Dorothy Cheney of Woodhay, Berkshire [daughter of Thomas Cheney, of Woodhay, Berkshire]." Geni states Thomas Powlden or Polden was son of an earlier Morgan Polden in Dorsetshire, so the name "Morgan" for his own son makes sense.
>
> One of the Berkshire Visitations shows Dorothy (Cheney), wife of Thomas Polden one generation further down in the Cheney pedigree, though still retaining the descent from the Roberts family.
>
> https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Four_Visitations_of_Berkshire_Made_a/NcFCAAAAYAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=polden
>
> I realize it could be the case, given the possible uncertainty of the Powlden-Winthrop marriage, that Anne Hoskins was John Winthrop's daughter by another relationship.
>
> But does anyone see anything else obviously wrong with the line?

Oh, I guess these help some:

"In 1644, a Petition by Morgan Polden to establish his right to his Cheney inheritance, establishes that Thomas Polden [his father] was originally of Iwerne Minster, Dorset and married to Dorothy Cheney of Woodhay, Berkshire [Morgan Polden's mother]."
....
"1616 In the Surrey Archives, dated 2nd Feb 1616, is a "Deed of Covenant to Levy Fine" as follows: "1) Thomas Notte of Long Ditton, Esq., Robert de la Hay of Lincoln's Inn, Middlesex, gent, and George French of Furnivale's Inn, Middlesex, gent 2) Morgan Polden of Kiltoe [Kilcoe] Castle, Carbery, Cork, gent, and John Polden Closse of New Sarum, Wiltshire 1) to 2) on marriage of Thomas Notte and Elizabeth, daughter of Thomas Polden and sister of Morgan Polden".

from...
https://www.geni.com/people/Thomas-Polden-Powlden/6000000003210378458

Re: Is this royal line for William1 Hoskins of Plymouth correct?

<12bcd130-c65f-4c38-bf8d-906c148c6bc7n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/interests/article-flat.php?id=8131&group=soc.genealogy.medieval#8131

  copy link   Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:c205:0:b0:67a:27d5:327a with SMTP id l5-20020a0cc205000000b0067a27d5327amr400149qvh.13.1701314951216;
Wed, 29 Nov 2023 19:29:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:8092:b0:1f9:df50:5883 with SMTP id
q18-20020a056870809200b001f9df505883mr666097oab.5.1701314950925; Wed, 29 Nov
2023 19:29:10 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 19:29:10 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <8d96428c-7351-4795-91d6-9874e29d5553n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2600:1700:f860:7d60:39c0:343f:ecfc:b871;
posting-account=i1SuLQkAAAAV1QWu8as8ZxRZ8EzG2iIL
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2600:1700:f860:7d60:39c0:343f:ecfc:b871
References: <be07ee4d-2692-4fcf-8090-40e170ae4951n@googlegroups.com> <8d96428c-7351-4795-91d6-9874e29d5553n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <12bcd130-c65f-4c38-bf8d-906c148c6bc7n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Is this royal line for William1 Hoskins of Plymouth correct?
From: starbuck95@hotmail.com (JBrand)
Injection-Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 03:29:11 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 5965
 by: JBrand - Thu, 30 Nov 2023 03:29 UTC

On Wednesday, November 29, 2023 at 7:43:26 PM UTC-5, JBrand wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 29, 2023 at 7:18:02 PM UTC-5, JBrand wrote:
> > The second _Great Migration_ series by R.C. Anderson, 3:414-20, contains a sketch of this immigrant, stating his parents were Henry and Anne (Winthrop) Hoskins of Ireland -- the mother was a cousin of the Winthrops who went to New England. Anderson quotes from a letter in the Winthrop papers in which Anne Hoskins writes from Ireland to the Governor in New England asking for news of her son.
> >
> > Anne's mother (wife or mistress of her father John Winthrop of Aghadown, Ireland) is shown in this pedigree as Elizabeth daughter of Thomas Powlden:
> >
> > https://www.google.com/books/edition/Evidences_of_the_Winthrops_of_Groton/XPc7AAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=hoskins
> >
> > Unsure why _Evidences of the Winthrops_ doubts the validity of the Winthrop-Powlden marriage. It seems the father's divorced first wife also remarried (to Reynold Braunch).
> >
> > Just wanted to point out that Geni contains links which permit the following pedigree for Elizabeth (Powlden) (Winthrop) Nott, apparent mother of Anne (Winthrop) Hoskins:
> >
> > Robert Wingfield = Elizabeth Goushill
> >
> > Anne Wingfield = John Fremingham/ Framlingham
> > https://www.geni.com/people/Lady-Anne-Wingfield/6000000000462683105
> >
> > Sir James Framlingham = Alice Walworth
> >
> > Elizabeth Framlingham = Thomas Roberts of Cranbrook, Kent
> > https://www.geni.com/people/Elizabeth-Roberts/6000000000462711148
> >
> > Mary Roberts = Thomas Cheney of Woodhey
> >
> > Dorothy Cheney = Thomas Polden/ Powlden of Rathgogan, Ireland
> > https://www.geni.com/people/Dorothy-Polden/6000000003649717135
> >
> > I had independently come to the conclusion that Elizabeth Powlden's apparent father Thomas Powlden of Rathgogan had a son Morgan Powlden or Polden.. See ...
> >
> > https://www.google.com/books/edition/Journal_of_the_Cork_Historical_and_Archa/t9x-AAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22thomas+polden%22+rathgogan&pg=RA1-PA216-IA62&printsec=frontcover
> >
> > Notice that the Geni account states that a 1644 petition by Morgan Polden named his parents "as Thomas Polden of Iwerne Minster, Dorset & Dorothy Cheney of Woodhay, Berkshire [daughter of Thomas Cheney, of Woodhay, Berkshire]." Geni states Thomas Powlden or Polden was son of an earlier Morgan Polden in Dorsetshire, so the name "Morgan" for his own son makes sense.
> >
> > One of the Berkshire Visitations shows Dorothy (Cheney), wife of Thomas Polden one generation further down in the Cheney pedigree, though still retaining the descent from the Roberts family.
> >
> > https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Four_Visitations_of_Berkshire_Made_a/NcFCAAAAYAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=polden
> >
> > I realize it could be the case, given the possible uncertainty of the Powlden-Winthrop marriage, that Anne Hoskins was John Winthrop's daughter by another relationship.
> >
> > But does anyone see anything else obviously wrong with the line?
> Oh, I guess these help some:
>
> "In 1644, a Petition by Morgan Polden to establish his right to his Cheney inheritance, establishes that Thomas Polden [his father] was originally of Iwerne Minster, Dorset and married to Dorothy Cheney of Woodhay, Berkshire [Morgan Polden's mother]."
> ...
> "1616 In the Surrey Archives, dated 2nd Feb 1616, is a "Deed of Covenant to Levy Fine" as follows: "1) Thomas Notte of Long Ditton, Esq., Robert de la Hay of Lincoln's Inn, Middlesex, gent, and George French of Furnivale's Inn, Middlesex, gent 2) Morgan Polden of Kiltoe [Kilcoe] Castle, Carbery, Cork, gent, and John Polden Closse of New Sarum, Wiltshire 1) to 2) on marriage of Thomas Notte and Elizabeth, daughter of Thomas Polden and sister of Morgan Polden".
>
> from...
> https://www.geni.com/people/Thomas-Polden-Powlden/6000000003210378458

"Winthorpe, John of Aghedowne, gent 26 June 1611... the use of himself & Eliz: Paulden his wife for life; rem[ain]d[e]r to Eliz: Wife of Peregrine Baniste Esq. & to Anne Wife of Henry Hoskins, Gent, Daughters of the said Eliz: Paulden, and their Heirs - After the decease of the said Winthorpe & Wife, the said Bannister & Wife [conveyed their portion on] 19 Oct[obe]r 1631...."

https://www.geni.com/people/Elizabeth-Banister/6000000003077571221

Re: Is this royal line for William1 Hoskins of Plymouth correct?

<8dbffca6-2ab6-434e-bc9a-5278cb495a43n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/interests/article-flat.php?id=8135&group=soc.genealogy.medieval#8135

  copy link   Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7e86:0:b0:41c:d559:4ea with SMTP id w6-20020ac87e86000000b0041cd55904eamr909257qtj.6.1701359278724;
Thu, 30 Nov 2023 07:47:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:2281:b0:1cc:6684:4ee0 with SMTP id
b1-20020a170903228100b001cc66844ee0mr4786684plh.2.1701359278339; Thu, 30 Nov
2023 07:47:58 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer01.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 07:47:57 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <12bcd130-c65f-4c38-bf8d-906c148c6bc7n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=129.252.86.129; posting-account=3HoCXgoAAABz6-UpwKiosjBmkEzofcr6
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.252.86.129
References: <be07ee4d-2692-4fcf-8090-40e170ae4951n@googlegroups.com>
<8d96428c-7351-4795-91d6-9874e29d5553n@googlegroups.com> <12bcd130-c65f-4c38-bf8d-906c148c6bc7n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <8dbffca6-2ab6-434e-bc9a-5278cb495a43n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Is this royal line for William1 Hoskins of Plymouth correct?
From: ravinmaven2001@yahoo.com (Johnny Brananas)
Injection-Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 15:47:58 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 7241
 by: Johnny Brananas - Thu, 30 Nov 2023 15:47 UTC

On Wednesday, November 29, 2023 at 10:29:12 PM UTC-5, JBrand wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 29, 2023 at 7:43:26 PM UTC-5, JBrand wrote:
> > On Wednesday, November 29, 2023 at 7:18:02 PM UTC-5, JBrand wrote:
> > > The second _Great Migration_ series by R.C. Anderson, 3:414-20, contains a sketch of this immigrant, stating his parents were Henry and Anne (Winthrop) Hoskins of Ireland -- the mother was a cousin of the Winthrops who went to New England. Anderson quotes from a letter in the Winthrop papers in which Anne Hoskins writes from Ireland to the Governor in New England asking for news of her son.
> > >
> > > Anne's mother (wife or mistress of her father John Winthrop of Aghadown, Ireland) is shown in this pedigree as Elizabeth daughter of Thomas Powlden:
> > >
> > > https://www.google.com/books/edition/Evidences_of_the_Winthrops_of_Groton/XPc7AAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=hoskins
> > >
> > > Unsure why _Evidences of the Winthrops_ doubts the validity of the Winthrop-Powlden marriage. It seems the father's divorced first wife also remarried (to Reynold Braunch).
> > >
> > > Just wanted to point out that Geni contains links which permit the following pedigree for Elizabeth (Powlden) (Winthrop) Nott, apparent mother of Anne (Winthrop) Hoskins:
> > >
> > > Robert Wingfield = Elizabeth Goushill
> > >
> > > Anne Wingfield = John Fremingham/ Framlingham
> > > https://www.geni.com/people/Lady-Anne-Wingfield/6000000000462683105
> > >
> > > Sir James Framlingham = Alice Walworth
> > >
> > > Elizabeth Framlingham = Thomas Roberts of Cranbrook, Kent
> > > https://www.geni.com/people/Elizabeth-Roberts/6000000000462711148
> > >
> > > Mary Roberts = Thomas Cheney of Woodhey
> > >
> > > Dorothy Cheney = Thomas Polden/ Powlden of Rathgogan, Ireland
> > > https://www.geni.com/people/Dorothy-Polden/6000000003649717135
> > >
> > > I had independently come to the conclusion that Elizabeth Powlden's apparent father Thomas Powlden of Rathgogan had a son Morgan Powlden or Polden. See ...
> > >
> > > https://www.google.com/books/edition/Journal_of_the_Cork_Historical_and_Archa/t9x-AAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22thomas+polden%22+rathgogan&pg=RA1-PA216-IA62&printsec=frontcover
> > >
> > > Notice that the Geni account states that a 1644 petition by Morgan Polden named his parents "as Thomas Polden of Iwerne Minster, Dorset & Dorothy Cheney of Woodhay, Berkshire [daughter of Thomas Cheney, of Woodhay, Berkshire]." Geni states Thomas Powlden or Polden was son of an earlier Morgan Polden in Dorsetshire, so the name "Morgan" for his own son makes sense.
> > >
> > > One of the Berkshire Visitations shows Dorothy (Cheney), wife of Thomas Polden one generation further down in the Cheney pedigree, though still retaining the descent from the Roberts family.
> > >
> > > https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Four_Visitations_of_Berkshire_Made_a/NcFCAAAAYAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=polden
> > >
> > > I realize it could be the case, given the possible uncertainty of the Powlden-Winthrop marriage, that Anne Hoskins was John Winthrop's daughter by another relationship.
> > >
> > > But does anyone see anything else obviously wrong with the line?
> > Oh, I guess these help some:
> >
> > "In 1644, a Petition by Morgan Polden to establish his right to his Cheney inheritance, establishes that Thomas Polden [his father] was originally of Iwerne Minster, Dorset and married to Dorothy Cheney of Woodhay, Berkshire [Morgan Polden's mother]."
> > ...
> > "1616 In the Surrey Archives, dated 2nd Feb 1616, is a "Deed of Covenant to Levy Fine" as follows: "1) Thomas Notte of Long Ditton, Esq., Robert de la Hay of Lincoln's Inn, Middlesex, gent, and George French of Furnivale's Inn, Middlesex, gent 2) Morgan Polden of Kiltoe [Kilcoe] Castle, Carbery, Cork, gent, and John Polden Closse of New Sarum, Wiltshire 1) to 2) on marriage of Thomas Notte and Elizabeth, daughter of Thomas Polden and sister of Morgan Polden".
> >
> > from...
> > https://www.geni.com/people/Thomas-Polden-Powlden/6000000003210378458
> "Winthorpe, John of Aghedowne, gent 26 June 1611... the use of himself & Eliz: Paulden his wife for life; rem[ain]d[e]r to Eliz: Wife of Peregrine Baniste Esq. & to Anne Wife of Henry Hoskins, Gent, Daughters of the said Eliz: Paulden, and their Heirs - After the decease of the said Winthorpe & Wife, the said Bannister & Wife [conveyed their portion on] 19 Oct[obe]r 1631...."
>
> https://www.geni.com/people/Elizabeth-Banister/6000000003077571221

There is an extant funeral certificate for Elizabeth's second husband:

"Casey index volume 7 has the following; Page 1875. Funeral Certificates in Ireland in the British Museum., presented by Rev R Pocock. Notte, Thomas of Archadown, Co Cork. Gent and heir of Anthony Notte of Surrey. He married Elizabeth Olden, daughter of Thomas Olden of Rogagan, Co Cork, Gent, & widow of John Winthropp of Gratten [Groton] in England. Had issue, 4 daughters; Elizabeth Notte married Henry Beecher of Archadown, Frances Notte, Mary Notte, Anne Notte. Thomas Notte died at Bruffe. Recorded Ulster office March 24, 1636. Testified by Elizabeth and Frances Notte."

Note that her name is given incorrectly (Olden, rather than Polden); and that she had daughters named Anne and Elizabeth by both husbands. (... Unless there was an earlier wife for Thomas Notte, unmentioned in this document.)

https://www.geni.com/people/Thomas-Notte/6000000032099611669

Re: Is this royal line for William1 Hoskins of Plymouth correct?

<52e341b8-a77e-4d09-a988-11120b4aa469n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/interests/article-flat.php?id=8251&group=soc.genealogy.medieval#8251

  copy link   Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:19ea:b0:681:318b:cbad with SMTP id q10-20020a05621419ea00b00681318bcbadmr1101601qvc.10.1705432346786;
Tue, 16 Jan 2024 11:12:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:2f4a:0:b0:dc2:1f69:87d5 with SMTP id
v71-20020a252f4a000000b00dc21f6987d5mr841155ybv.12.1705432346465; Tue, 16 Jan
2024 11:12:26 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer03.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer03.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.medieval
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 11:12:26 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <8dbffca6-2ab6-434e-bc9a-5278cb495a43n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=129.252.33.200; posting-account=3HoCXgoAAABz6-UpwKiosjBmkEzofcr6
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.252.33.200
References: <be07ee4d-2692-4fcf-8090-40e170ae4951n@googlegroups.com>
<8d96428c-7351-4795-91d6-9874e29d5553n@googlegroups.com> <12bcd130-c65f-4c38-bf8d-906c148c6bc7n@googlegroups.com>
<8dbffca6-2ab6-434e-bc9a-5278cb495a43n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <52e341b8-a77e-4d09-a988-11120b4aa469n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Is this royal line for William1 Hoskins of Plymouth correct?
From: ravinmaven2001@yahoo.com (Johnny Brananas)
Injection-Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 19:12:26 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 8311
 by: Johnny Brananas - Tue, 16 Jan 2024 19:12 UTC

On Thursday, November 30, 2023 at 10:48:00 AM UTC-5, Johnny Brananas wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 29, 2023 at 10:29:12 PM UTC-5, JBrand wrote:
> > On Wednesday, November 29, 2023 at 7:43:26 PM UTC-5, JBrand wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, November 29, 2023 at 7:18:02 PM UTC-5, JBrand wrote:
> > > > The second _Great Migration_ series by R.C. Anderson, 3:414-20, contains a sketch of this immigrant, stating his parents were Henry and Anne (Winthrop) Hoskins of Ireland -- the mother was a cousin of the Winthrops who went to New England. Anderson quotes from a letter in the Winthrop papers in which Anne Hoskins writes from Ireland to the Governor in New England asking for news of her son.
> > > >
> > > > Anne's mother (wife or mistress of her father John Winthrop of Aghadown, Ireland) is shown in this pedigree as Elizabeth daughter of Thomas Powlden:
> > > >
> > > > https://www.google.com/books/edition/Evidences_of_the_Winthrops_of_Groton/XPc7AAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=hoskins
> > > >
> > > > Unsure why _Evidences of the Winthrops_ doubts the validity of the Winthrop-Powlden marriage. It seems the father's divorced first wife also remarried (to Reynold Braunch).
> > > >
> > > > Just wanted to point out that Geni contains links which permit the following pedigree for Elizabeth (Powlden) (Winthrop) Nott, apparent mother of Anne (Winthrop) Hoskins:
> > > >
> > > > Robert Wingfield = Elizabeth Goushill
> > > >
> > > > Anne Wingfield = John Fremingham/ Framlingham
> > > > https://www.geni.com/people/Lady-Anne-Wingfield/6000000000462683105
> > > >
> > > > Sir James Framlingham = Alice Walworth
> > > >
> > > > Elizabeth Framlingham = Thomas Roberts of Cranbrook, Kent
> > > > https://www.geni.com/people/Elizabeth-Roberts/6000000000462711148
> > > >
> > > > Mary Roberts = Thomas Cheney of Woodhey
> > > >
> > > > Dorothy Cheney = Thomas Polden/ Powlden of Rathgogan, Ireland
> > > > https://www.geni.com/people/Dorothy-Polden/6000000003649717135
> > > >
> > > > I had independently come to the conclusion that Elizabeth Powlden's apparent father Thomas Powlden of Rathgogan had a son Morgan Powlden or Polden. See ...
> > > >
> > > > https://www.google.com/books/edition/Journal_of_the_Cork_Historical_and_Archa/t9x-AAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22thomas+polden%22+rathgogan&pg=RA1-PA216-IA62&printsec=frontcover
> > > >
> > > > Notice that the Geni account states that a 1644 petition by Morgan Polden named his parents "as Thomas Polden of Iwerne Minster, Dorset & Dorothy Cheney of Woodhay, Berkshire [daughter of Thomas Cheney, of Woodhay, Berkshire]." Geni states Thomas Powlden or Polden was son of an earlier Morgan Polden in Dorsetshire, so the name "Morgan" for his own son makes sense.
> > > >
> > > > One of the Berkshire Visitations shows Dorothy (Cheney), wife of Thomas Polden one generation further down in the Cheney pedigree, though still retaining the descent from the Roberts family.
> > > >
> > > > https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Four_Visitations_of_Berkshire_Made_a/NcFCAAAAYAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=polden
> > > >
> > > > I realize it could be the case, given the possible uncertainty of the Powlden-Winthrop marriage, that Anne Hoskins was John Winthrop's daughter by another relationship.
> > > >
> > > > But does anyone see anything else obviously wrong with the line?
> > > Oh, I guess these help some:
> > >
> > > "In 1644, a Petition by Morgan Polden to establish his right to his Cheney inheritance, establishes that Thomas Polden [his father] was originally of Iwerne Minster, Dorset and married to Dorothy Cheney of Woodhay, Berkshire [Morgan Polden's mother]."
> > > ...
> > > "1616 In the Surrey Archives, dated 2nd Feb 1616, is a "Deed of Covenant to Levy Fine" as follows: "1) Thomas Notte of Long Ditton, Esq., Robert de la Hay of Lincoln's Inn, Middlesex, gent, and George French of Furnivale's Inn, Middlesex, gent 2) Morgan Polden of Kiltoe [Kilcoe] Castle, Carbery, Cork, gent, and John Polden Closse of New Sarum, Wiltshire 1) to 2) on marriage of Thomas Notte and Elizabeth, daughter of Thomas Polden and sister of Morgan Polden".
> > >
> > > from...
> > > https://www.geni.com/people/Thomas-Polden-Powlden/6000000003210378458
> > "Winthorpe, John of Aghedowne, gent 26 June 1611... the use of himself & Eliz: Paulden his wife for life; rem[ain]d[e]r to Eliz: Wife of Peregrine Baniste Esq. & to Anne Wife of Henry Hoskins, Gent, Daughters of the said Eliz: Paulden, and their Heirs - After the decease of the said Winthorpe & Wife, the said Bannister & Wife [conveyed their portion on] 19 Oct[obe]r 1631..."
> >
> > https://www.geni.com/people/Elizabeth-Banister/6000000003077571221
> There is an extant funeral certificate for Elizabeth's second husband:
>
> "Casey index volume 7 has the following; Page 1875. Funeral Certificates in Ireland in the British Museum., presented by Rev R Pocock. Notte, Thomas of Archadown, Co Cork. Gent and heir of Anthony Notte of Surrey. He married Elizabeth Olden, daughter of Thomas Olden of Rogagan, Co Cork, Gent, & widow of John Winthropp of Gratten [Groton] in England. Had issue, 4 daughters; Elizabeth Notte married Henry Beecher of Archadown, Frances Notte, Mary Notte, Anne Notte. Thomas Notte died at Bruffe. Recorded Ulster office March 24, 1636. Testified by Elizabeth and Frances Notte."
>
> Note that her name is given incorrectly (Olden, rather than Polden); and that she had daughters named Anne and Elizabeth by both husbands. (... Unless there was an earlier wife for Thomas Notte, unmentioned in this document..)
>
> https://www.geni.com/people/Thomas-Notte/6000000032099611669

The link between generations 3 and 4 seems to be verified in one of the _Early Chancery Proceedings_.

--Thomas Robers and Elizabeth, his wife, Richard Osborne and Clement, his wife, and William Kyrkeby and Dorothy, his wife. [Plaintiffs]
--John Garnysshe of Kenton, feoffee to uses. [Defendant]
--Refusal to maintain complainants' rights in the manors of Skottnettes, Hawghe, and Newclose in Debenham [Suff.], late of James Framyngham and Alice, his wife, parents of the said Elizabeth, Clement, and Dorothy, against Anne, his second wife.

https://www.google.com/books/edition/Lists_and_Indexes/t44CoPQWu8cC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=fram+yngham+debenham+robers&pg=RA1-PA499&printsec=frontcover

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor