Message-ID:

The makers may make and the users may use, but the fixers must fix with but minimal clues

interests / rec.woodworking / Re: best finish for a candle holder (flame resistant)

Re: best finish for a candle holder (flame resistant)

<wZ0aL.27113$8ga9.15678@fx18.iad>

https://news.novabbs.org/interests/article-flat.php?id=8846&group=rec.woodworking#8846

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx18.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.7.0
Subject: Re: best finish for a candle holder (flame resistant)
Content-Language: en-US
Newsgroups: rec.woodworking
References: <ac4a4dc2-444d-4ca4-b027-1703ee3ac599@googlegroups.com>
<4c66973a-0e9c-4df2-bbaf-184a272d285f@googlegroups.com>
<lphljv12b1s@news6.newsguy.com>
<1724cb20abb41734$11$3882287$c3d349d6@news.newsgroupdirect.com>
<jomdmhd1mq44pofced7p374tvmg2c0pfdq@4ax.com>
From: nonegiven@att.net (Bill)
In-Reply-To: <jomdmhd1mq44pofced7p374tvmg2c0pfdq@4ax.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 221106-4, 11/6/2022), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <wZ0aL.27113$8ga9.15678@fx18.iad>
X-Complaints-To: https://www.astraweb.com/aup
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2022 05:47:08 UTC
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 00:47:08 -0500
X-Received-Bytes: 1630

by: Bill - Mon, 7 Nov 2022 05:47 UTC

On 11/5/2022 5:53 PM, Markem618 wrote:
> On Sat, 05 Nov 2022 20:45:03 +0000, Bill Sucks
> <ab50f4ea15b08f98a12c541e59ed928c@example.com> wrote:
>
>> Wow Bill... what a super helpful answer! Problem solved.
>
> So you being judgemental eight years on, maybe it was a sarcastic
> remark.

I went and looked. It was (paraphrased) "Maybe put some finish on a
scrap piece and test it for flammability". Personally, I think it is a
reasonable answer to someone concerned about flammability...
I have no affiliation with "Bill Sucks". In fact, I find the name sort
of offensive... ; )

Re: best finish for a candle holder (flame resistant)

<782424f6-7d8f-4eca-b71e-74a2dd8e298an@googlegroups.com>

copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/interests/article-flat.php?id=8895&group=rec.woodworking#8895

copy link Newsgroups: rec.woodworking

X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:17c4:b0:3a5:c6e3:f1b5 with SMTP id u4-20020a05622a17c400b003a5c6e3f1b5mr14313562qtk.375.1668462730262;
Mon, 14 Nov 2022 13:52:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:ec94:b0:13b:d0c5:826d with SMTP id
eo20-20020a056870ec9400b0013bd0c5826dmr7769672oab.91.1668462730006; Mon, 14
Nov 2022 13:52:10 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.woodworking
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 13:52:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <wZ0aL.27113$8ga9.15678@fx18.iad>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=173.62.173.178; posting-account=Hy9LgAoAAACm8Em5GWkm4kj2b2_LzMVZ
NNTP-Posting-Host: 173.62.173.178
References: <ac4a4dc2-444d-4ca4-b027-1703ee3ac599@googlegroups.com>
<4c66973a-0e9c-4df2-bbaf-184a272d285f@googlegroups.com> <lphljv12b1s@news6.newsguy.com>
<1724cb20abb41734$11$3882287$c3d349d6@news.newsgroupdirect.com>
<jomdmhd1mq44pofced7p374tvmg2c0pfdq@4ax.com> <wZ0aL.27113$8ga9.15678@fx18.iad>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <782424f6-7d8f-4eca-b71e-74a2dd8e298an@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: best finish for a candle holder (flame resistant)
From: bnwelch@gmail.com (Brian Welch)
Injection-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 21:52:10 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 2183

by: Brian Welch - Mon, 14 Nov 2022 21:52 UTC

On Monday, November 7, 2022 at 12:47:13 AM UTC-5, Bill wrote:
> On 11/5/2022 5:53 PM, Markem618 wrote:
> > On Sat, 05 Nov 2022 20:45:03 +0000, Bill Sucks
> > <ab50f4ea15b08f98...@example.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Wow Bill... what a super helpful answer! Problem solved.
> >
> > So you being judgemental eight years on, maybe it was a sarcastic
> > remark.
> I went and looked. It was (paraphrased) "Maybe put some finish on a
> scrap piece and test it for flammability". Personally, I think it is a
> reasonable answer to someone concerned about flammability...
> I have no affiliation with "Bill Sucks". In fact, I find the name sort
> of offensive... ; )
That response may have been to the earlier comment, attributed to Bill...
"Unless you actually light the candle, there should be little risk."

Subject	Author
Re: best finish for a candle holder (flame resistant)	Bill
Re: best finish for a candle holder (flame resistant)	Brian Welch