Message-ID:

Anybody with money to burn will easily find someone to tend the fire.

interests / rec.woodworking / Re: Squares

Re: Squares

<HYLOM.38940$_Lv6.17767@fx12.iad>

https://news.novabbs.org/interests/article-flat.php?id=9126&group=rec.woodworking#9126

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx12.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.woodworking
Subject: Re: Squares
From: puckdropper@yahoo.com (Puckdropper)
References: <5a14d434-f12e-4c32-9adb-cfe9885aa841n@googlegroups.com>
Organization: Your Company
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <HYLOM.38940$_Lv6.17767@fx12.iad>
X-Complaints-To: https://www.astraweb.com/aup
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 00:17:43 UTC
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 00:17:43 GMT
X-Received-Bytes: 1051

by: Puckdropper - Thu, 21 Sep 2023 00:17 UTC

JayPique <mwskaneateles@gmail.com> wrote in news:5a14d434-f12e-4c32-9adb-
cfe9885aa841n@googlegroups.com:

> Is a square square still square even if it's not a Woodpeckers?
>

So you've got square^square and you're asking if it's equal to square?

No, unless you call the square root symbol a woodpecker--I guess you can
kinda see a beak if you look at the right angle...

So yes,
square=woodpecker(square^square)

So in answer to your question, I have proven empirically that a square
square isn't a square unless a woodpecker is involved.

Puckdropper, allegedly

Re: Squares

<af76858c-c81d-4af1-8bc1-f67ddf56a46an@googlegroups.com>

copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/interests/article-flat.php?id=9127&group=rec.woodworking#9127

copy link Newsgroups: rec.woodworking

X-Received: by 2002:ac8:4e8d:0:b0:417:b902:6f93 with SMTP id 13-20020ac84e8d000000b00417b9026f93mr69271qtp.4.1695256681865;
Wed, 20 Sep 2023 17:38:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6871:6a8f:b0:1d6:98ed:4317 with SMTP id
zf15-20020a0568716a8f00b001d698ed4317mr1454664oab.8.1695256681652; Wed, 20
Sep 2023 17:38:01 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.woodworking
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 17:38:01 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <HYLOM.38940$_Lv6.17767@fx12.iad>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=68.84.241.232; posting-account=vwyX3woAAADQJhXbAKFnvLHnBhIr5NVr
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.84.241.232
References: <5a14d434-f12e-4c32-9adb-cfe9885aa841n@googlegroups.com> <HYLOM.38940$_Lv6.17767@fx12.iad>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <af76858c-c81d-4af1-8bc1-f67ddf56a46an@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Squares
From: mwskaneateles@gmail.com (JayPique)
Injection-Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 00:38:01 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 20

by: JayPique - Thu, 21 Sep 2023 00:38 UTC

On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 8:17:49 PM UTC-4, Puckdropper wrote:
> JayPique <mwskan...@gmail.com> wrote in news:5a14d434-f12e-4c32-9adb-
> cfe988...@googlegroups.com:
> > Is a square square still square even if it's not a Woodpeckers?
> >
> So you've got square^square and you're asking if it's equal to square?
>
> No, unless you call the square root symbol a woodpecker--I guess you can
> kinda see a beak if you look at the right angle...
>
> So yes,
> square=woodpecker(square^square)
>
> So in answer to your question, I have proven empirically that a square
> square isn't a square unless a woodpecker is involved.
>
> Puckdropper, allegedly

Ed Bennett and Steve Strickland would disagree.

Subject	Author
Re: Squares	Puckdropper
Re: Squares	JayPique