oh this is cool!

i really not specialist about unicode. i know about it just a few things:

single character may have up to 15 bytes of code

in theory - unicode may implement ANY KIND of language including speach and writes

there is some unicodes thats determinate the type and method of sounds generated by human's .... mmm... an output interface devices)))) like mouth, lips, tooths, breathes and etc

however - i have some picture - let's look it at https://github.com/digics/gawklib/blob/main/1252_scheme.png

this table is the result of little research that i was performed about twelve years ago.
it's covers amount of encodings that are was been actually reduced to cover Windows-125x / ISO 8859-x

the blue lines surrounds local alpha characters that ARE local alpha characters in all encodings.
the green lines surrounds characters that are exist in all covered encodings.

i think that this make you a fun =)

Digi <cosmogen@gmail.com> writes:
> oh this is cool!
>
> i really not specialist about unicode. i know about it just a few
> things:
>
> single character may have up to 15 bytes of code

No. Unicode just specifies an integer value for each character. The
highest allocated value is 0x10FFFD, which fits in 21 bits.

There are several *representations* of Unicode. The most common is
UTF-8, which can encode all Unicode characters in no more than 4 bytes.
There's nothing that would reqiure 15 bytes in any encoding I'm aware
of (unless you want to invent something silly like UTF-5).

> in theory - unicode may implement ANY KIND of language including
> speach and writes
>
> there is some unicodes thats determinate the type and method of sounds
> generated by human's .... mmm... an output interface devices)))) like
> mouth, lips, tooths, breathes and etc

If by "some unicodes" you mean "some unicode characters", I don't
believe that's correct.

[...]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicode

--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
Working, but not speaking, for Philips
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */

Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> writes:

> Digi <cosmogen@gmail.com> writes:
<cut>
>> in theory - unicode may implement ANY KIND of language including
>> speach and writes
>>
>> there is some unicodes thats determinate the type and method of sounds
>> generated by human's .... mmm... an output interface devices)))) like
>> mouth, lips, tooths, breathes and etc
>
> If by "some unicodes" you mean "some unicode characters", I don't
> believe that's correct.

Maybe he or she is talking about the IPA characters?

--
Ben.

On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 3:25:37 PM UTC-4, Ben wrote:
> Keith Thompson <Keith.S.T...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Digi <cosm...@gmail.com> writes:
> <cut>
> >> in theory - unicode may implement ANY KIND of language including
> >> speach and writes
> >>
> >> there is some unicodes thats determinate the type and method of sounds
> >> generated by human's .... mmm... an output interface devices)))) like
> >> mouth, lips, tooths, breathes and etc
> >
> > If by "some unicodes" you mean "some unicode characters", I don't
> > believe that's correct.
> Maybe he or she is talking about the IPA characters?
>
> --
> Ben.

i think what it was is that gnu-od defaulted 16 columns, but since the octals of eerily look like first column in reverse order, so maybe he excluded that and counted 15 ?