On Friday, 28 December 2018 at 21:59:17 UTC+5:30, Ilya Tarasov wrote:
> Trying to reproduce 40-years old approach with Forth, we are really going to nowhere. However, why we need to do it? I mean why we need to write OS, smartphone applications, GUI etc. There are a lot of applications where key Forth features as scripting, language flexibility and compactness may be used.
>
> I cannot agreed there is no Forth for <technology name>. We can script TensorFlow, OpenCV or something like this. We can deal with API with a help of Forth shell. The only questions is are we really need Forth features, or it is just an attempt to highlight well-known technology? As I can see, agressive pushing Forth has almost zero productivity, with predictable answers (or just laughing). As a glueware or embedded tool, Forth is a good approach and will be alive for a long time.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCgobzHAPlW3lu6CR_TNNeyA

The Fitness Idea schrieb am Sonntag, 8. Oktober 2023 um 16:53:47 UTC+2:
> On Friday, 28 December 2018 at 21:59:17 UTC+5:30, Ilya Tarasov wrote:
> > Trying to reproduce 40-years old approach with Forth, we are really going to nowhere. However, why we need to do it? I mean why we need to write OS, smartphone applications, GUI etc. There are a lot of applications where key Forth features as scripting, language flexibility and compactness may be used.
> >
> > I cannot agreed there is no Forth for <technology name>. We can script TensorFlow, OpenCV or something like this. We can deal with API with a help of Forth shell. The only questions is are we really need Forth features, or it is just an attempt to highlight well-known technology? As I can see, agressive pushing Forth has almost zero productivity, with predictable answers (or just laughing). As a glueware or embedded tool, Forth is a good approach and will be alive for a long time.

You forgot the world of MCUs and embedded devices, that surpass the
PC world by order of magnitudes, and wherein Forth really shines.

> > > I cannot agreed there is no Forth for <technology name>. We can script TensorFlow, OpenCV or something like this. We can deal with API with a help of Forth shell. The only questions is are we really need Forth features, or it is just an attempt to highlight well-known technology? As I can see, agressive pushing Forth has almost zero productivity, with predictable answers (or just laughing). As a glueware or embedded tool, Forth is a good approach and will be alive for a long time.
> You forgot the world of MCUs and embedded devices, that surpass the
> PC world by order of magnitudes, and wherein Forth really shines.

It's just a spammer (both posts before yours) who found new way
of posting his spam: instead of creating new thread — chaining to
exisiting ones.

On 10/10/2023 12:57 am, Zbig wrote:
>>>> I cannot agreed there is no Forth for <technology name>. We can script TensorFlow, OpenCV or something like this. We can deal with API with a help of Forth shell. The only questions is are we really need Forth features, or it is just an attempt to highlight well-known technology? As I can see, agressive pushing Forth has almost zero productivity, with predictable answers (or just laughing). As a glueware or embedded tool, Forth is a good approach and will be alive for a long time.
>> You forgot the world of MCUs and embedded devices, that surpass the
>> PC world by order of magnitudes, and wherein Forth really shines.
>
> It's just a spammer (both posts before yours) who found new way
> of posting his spam: instead of creating new thread — chaining to
> exisiting ones.

Sad. Even spammers end up here.

> Sad. Even spammers end up here.

But at least „the G” (don't write that name to not summon him
even by accident) somehow gave up. ;)

The idea that "Forth is the programming language of the future" presents an intriguing perspective on the evolution of programming languages. Forth, with its minimalist approach and emphasis on direct hardware control, indeed offers a stark contrast to more contemporary languages like Go, which prioritize ease of use and extensive standard libraries.

Forth's philosophy of providing a blank slate, free of predefined standards and libraries, empowers developers with unparalleled freedom. This environment encourages a deep, fundamental understanding of programming principles and hardware interaction. It's a throwback to the roots of computing, where programmers had to intimately understand every aspect of their machines.

However, the high degree of control and flexibility comes at the cost of accessibility. For newcomers, the steep learning curve and the lack of readily available resources can be daunting. This is where the concept of structured programming assistance becomes crucial. For those intrigued by the potential of Forth but unsure where to start, or for seasoned programmers looking to deepen their expertise, having access to a supportive community and expert guidance can make all the difference.

Our platform, https://assignmentoverflow.com, is designed to bridge this gap. We provide comprehensive support and resources for a wide range of programming challenges and languages, including niche ones like Forth. Whether you're tackling a complex Forth project, venturing into programming for the first time, or looking to expand your skill set, we offer personalized assistance to help you achieve your goals.

In embracing Forth's philosophy, we recognize the value of mastering the fundamentals and pushing the boundaries of what's possible. But we also understand the importance of accessibility and support in fostering innovation and growth in the programming community. As we look to the future, blending Forth's pioneering spirit with the collaborative, resource-rich environment of platforms like ours might just be the key to unlocking new technological frontiers.

Never thought that chatgpt was that bad..

minforth wrote:

> Never thought that chatgpt was that bad..

According to https://www.zerogpt.com/ : "Your Text is AI/GPT Generated : 86.27%"

-marcel