(corrected re-post to fix annoying mistake
where I said "a meter is 39.37 inches which
is 3.7 inches over a yard" & should've said
it's 3.37 inches over a yard)

Link to all of the information in my first 2
posts in this thread:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.sports.football.pro.dallas-cowboys/c/MvnFsGytuUk/m/mfmu93f5DgAJ

Funny thing, when searching for quantum over
many days, much of what I found is either con-
troversial & disputed, heavily criticized (for ex-
ample, a theory that posits consciousness to
be a fundamentally quantum-mechanical phe-
nomenon), or so difficult to relate to as let's ...

.... face it, despite all the promotions of quantum
this or that being the basis of all reality & the core
of a huge number of technological advances, the
fact is all of quantum realm is invisible & counter-
intuitive & contrary to how everything we can see ...

.... behaves & it's all so unimaginably teeny-tiny-
unfathomably miniscule in size, along with the
annoying fact that almost the entire array of dis-
cussions about quantum sizes are deeply steeped
in the friggin' metric system. I can only convert all
that metric teeny-tiny stuff to stuff I'm familiar ...

.... with & when doing so the quantum stuff is so
teeny-tiny that HUGE tiny measurements using
trillionths & smaller, the claimed tiniest being the
Planck length, smaller than one-undecillionth of
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Names_of_large_numbers
for tiny numbers simply add 'th' to the end,
https://www.google.com/search?q=Planck+Length
1.6 x 10-35 meters] ... a meter; a meter is 39.37 ...

.... inches which is 3.37 inches over a yard, & a hun-
dredth of a meter is a little over 1/3rd of an inch.

YIKEs, it's no wonder that all of the quantum stuff
falls so far outside of human experience that one
might as well admit that there's actually very little
about it that most humans can reasonably relate
to on any meaningfully helpful level.

“I think I can safely say that nobody
understands quantum mechanics.” It
is one of the most repeated quotes of
Richard Feynman (1918–1988) [1965
nobel prize winner], and is undoubtedly
an unusual phrase coming from ... a
physicist.
https://www.google.com/search?q=richard+feynman+quantum+mechanics
https://tinyurl.com/Graphic-Famous-Feynman-Quote

Brief discussion of Richard Feynman,
including his 1965 Nobel Prize
https://www.famousscientists.org/richard-feynman/

~~~

Despite all of that, I made a claim in the title &
here are some videos which attempt to fulfill
that task (futilely, for the most part):

If You Don't Understand
Quantum Physics, Try This!
https://youtu.be/Usu9xZfabPM

Quantum Physics for 7 Year Olds
https://youtu.be/ARWBdfWpDyc

Quantum Mechanics for Dummies
https://youtu.be/JP9KP-fwFhk

Quantum Entanglement Explained
- How does it really work?
https://youtu.be/unb_yoj1Usk?

Quantum Entanglement:
2022 Nobel Prize in Physics
https://youtu.be/Sk_0QM_UA4I

Seeing the Smallest Thing
in the Universe
https://youtu.be/6IeeshkVATY

Quantum Reality: Space, Time,
and Entanglement
https://youtu.be/BFrBr8oUVXU

--- --- ---

---
February 4 2019

What is quantum biology?
https://royalsociety.org/blog/2019/02/the-future-of-quantum-biology/

Quantum biology is the field of study that
investigates processes in living organisms
that cannot be accurately described by the
classical laws of physics. This means that
quantum theory has to be applied to under-
stand those processes.
---

---
May 20 2023

Quantum Physics Could Explain Nearly All
the Mysteries of How Life Works

Scientists have made incredible progress in
understanding and manipulating biological
systems at increasingly small scales.
https://www.inverse.com/health/quantum-physics-explain-mysteries-how-life-work
---

---
May 21 2023

Quantum Biology: Unlocking the Mysteries
of How Life Works
https://scitechdaily.com/quantum-biology-unlocking-the-mysteries-of-how-life-works/
---

~~~

Comment: Just as the quantum areas discussed
below are difficult to grasp, all that goes on in the
underlying nature of life that may involve the quan-
tum realm are just as difficult to comprehend, a
huge volume of mystery remains, & it remains to
be seen how much comprehensible understanding ...

.... will eventually transpire. Nevertheless, the arti-
cles linked to above have (overly?) optimistic per-
spectives on all of that.

On Sunday, May 21, 2023 at 10:59:56 PM UTC-5, observer wrote:

..> (corrected re-post to fix annoying mistake
..> where I said "a meter is 39.37 inches which
..> is 3.7 inches over a yard" & should've said
..> it's 3.37 inches over a yard)
..>
..> Link to all of the information in my first 2
..> posts in this thread:
..> https://groups.google.com/g/alt.sports.football.pro.dallas-cowboys/c/MvnFsGytuUk/m/mfmu93f5DgAJ
..>
..> Funny thing, when searching for quantum over
..> many days, much of what I found is either con-
..> troversial & disputed, heavily criticized (for ex-
..> ample, a theory that posits consciousness to
..> be a fundamentally quantum-mechanical phe-
..> nomenon), or so difficult to relate to as let's ...
..>
..> ... face it, despite all the promotions of quantum
..> this or that being the basis of all reality & the core
..> of a huge number of technological advances, the
..> fact is all of quantum realm is invisible & counter-
..> intuitive & contrary to how everything we can see ...
..>
..> ... behaves & it's all so unimaginably teeny-tiny-
..> unfathomably miniscule in size, along with the
..> annoying fact that almost the entire array of dis-
..> cussions about quantum sizes are deeply steeped
..> in the friggin' metric system. I can only convert all
..> that metric teeny-tiny stuff to stuff I'm familiar ...
..>
..> ... with & when doing so the quantum stuff is so
..> teeny-tiny that HUGE tiny measurements using
..> trillionths & smaller, the claimed tiniest being the
..> Planck length, smaller than one-undecillionth of
..> [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Names_of_large_numbers
..> for tiny numbers simply add 'th' to the end,
..> https://www.google.com/search?q=Planck+Length
..> 1.6 x 10-35 meters] ... a meter; a meter is 39.37 ...
..>
..> ... inches which is 3.37 inches over a yard, & a hun-
..> dredth of a meter is a little over 1/3rd of an inch.
..>
..> YIKEs, it's no wonder that all of the quantum stuff
..> falls so far outside of human experience that one
..> might as well admit that there's actually very little
..> about it that most humans can reasonably relate
..> to on any meaningfully helpful level.
..>
..> “I think I can safely say that nobody
..> understands quantum mechanics.” It
..> is one of the most repeated quotes of
..> Richard Feynman (1918–1988) [1965
..> nobel prize winner], and is undoubtedly
..> an unusual phrase coming from ... a
..> physicist.
..> https://www.google.com/search?q=richard+feynman+quantum+mechanics
..> https://tinyurl.com/Graphic-Famous-Feynman-Quote
..>
..> Brief discussion of Richard Feynman,
..> including his 1965 Nobel Prize
..> https://www.famousscientists.org/richard-feynman/
..>
..> ~~~
..>
..> Despite all of that, I made a claim in the title &
..> here are some videos which attempt to fulfill
..> that task (futilely, for the most part):
..>
..> If You Don't Understand
..> Quantum Physics, Try This!
..> https://youtu.be/Usu9xZfabPM
..>
..> Quantum Physics for 7 Year Olds
..> https://youtu.be/ARWBdfWpDyc
..>
..> Quantum Mechanics for Dummies
..> https://youtu.be/JP9KP-fwFhk
..>
..> Quantum Entanglement Explained
..> - How does it really work?
..> https://youtu.be/unb_yoj1Usk?
..>
..> Quantum Entanglement:
..> 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics
..> https://youtu.be/Sk_0QM_UA4I
..>
..> Seeing the Smallest Thing
..> in the Universe
..> https://youtu.be/6IeeshkVATY
..>
..> Quantum Reality: Space, Time,
..> and Entanglement
..> https://youtu.be/BFrBr8oUVXU
..>
..> \*---~---~---*/