On Friday, February 9, 2024 at 2:36:58 AM UTC-8, zen cycle wrote:
> On 2/5/2024 3:49 PM, Tom Kunich wrote:
> > On Monday, February 5, 2024 at 10:37:01 AM UTC-8, Zen Cycle wrote:
> >> On 1/31/2024 5:14 PM, Tom Kunich wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, January 31, 2024 at 2:47:39 AM UTC-8, zen cycle wrote:
> >>>> On 1/30/2024 10:56 AM, Tom Kunich wrote:
> >>>>> On Monday, January 29, 2024 at 11:02:45 AM UTC-8, Zen Cycle wrote:
> >>>>>> On 1/29/2024 1:15 PM, floriduh dumbass wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 12:37:59 -0500, Frank Krygowski
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> So I've read the ramblings from the Florida tricycle rider. He's
> >>>>>>>> desperate to defend his usual position, which is that any research
> >>>>>>>> findings that violate his prejudices must be fake.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Krygowski likes to argue against his own words that he falsely
> >>>>>>> contributes to people he's afraid to deal with directly.
> >>>>>> no one's afraid to deal with you, you narcissistic piece of shit.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> (Which, come to think of it, sounds a lot like "Any election my
> >>>>>>>> candidate lost must be stolen.")
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> More of the above... Is his narcissism the reason he demands
> >>>>>>> information from other people?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> So a question for him, for John, for Tom: Suppose you were a medical
> >>>>>>>> researcher who really, honestly wanted to find out if political
> >>>>>>>> leanings for _either_ party were correlated with bad COVID outcomes. How
> >>>>>>>> would you go about determining that?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> First of all, I can't imagine why I'd want to do that.
> >>>>>> Proud willful ignorance duly noted.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Don't slither away from the question. Give us a procedure that could
> >>>>>>>> give us good results in the real world.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Even if I did have an answer, it'd be none of Krygowski's business.
> >>>>>> whiner.
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Add xx to reply
> >>>>> Whining and crying that you are too an EE when you couldn/t read a simple program.
> >>>>
> >>>> Funny, I seem to be able to understand your program better than you do -
> >>>> I noticed you had no response when I showed your silly little project
> >>>> had an external A/D after you claimed it didn't. Why is it I understand
> >>>> you program better than you do?
> >>>>
> >>>> https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/c/mKhS2lPQY_A/m/twbRAH9LAgAJ
> >>>>
> >>>> "/*SuperSnoop Dectector Board
> >>>> Operation of the Detector:
> >>>> 1. Via a Detector wand the board detects current
> >>>> flow through the water. The current flow is via an AC source from the
> >>>> Generator Board. This current flow is detected via the voltage drop
> >>>> through the medium's resistance. It is measure with the 24 bit ADC
> >>>> (U4) LTC 2440 and passed to the MPU via the Serial Data mechanism on
> >>>> the C Port of the MPU."
> >>>>
> >>>> At least I had a university professor give me a top rating recommendation.
> >>>>
> >>>> "those who can do, those who can't teach"- tom kunich....now all of a
> >>>> sudden a university professor is a credible source?
> >>>>
> >>>> What do you have?
> >>>>
> >>>> real credibility, and the work history that proves it.
> >>>>
> >>>> You sound just like your President.
> >>>> https://babylonbee.com/news/biden-says-texas-has-till-end-of-day-to-remove-razor-wire-or-else-frinlerbagsuzzit-dorblelerg
> >>>>
> >>>> LOL...tommy thinks babylon bee is a news source...which explains a lot.
> >>> Exactly why do you think that I designed that hardware when I said that the hardware was designed by a world famous, analog designer. It is always interesting that you are trying to tell everyone how dumb I am when you are too stupid to actually know that I wrote the software and you couldn't even read the part that only flashed the lights so that the Red and Green LED's would turn yellow as the battery charge got low.
> >>>
> >>> Now about you second guessing a man with an Oscar for making a sound system for the Grateful Dead that didn't echo off of the surrounding terrain. At what point in your professional career did you accomplish anything? You are nothing more than a paper shuffler who has never designed anything. Explain to me again how You know so much more that Charlie Butten (https://www.installation-international.com/people/founding-father-of-intercoms-to-be-inducted-into-scn-hall-of-fame). While working with Charlie I designed the "belt pack" which allowed people on movie sets to direct their intercom calls to different people on the set. I didn't consider that to be worth noting but that would have been the highlight of your career and you'd still be bragging about it. The fact is that you don't know anything except how to run your mouth off. Charlie INVENTED the intercom. Charlie INVENTED non-echoing sound systems. You dare to criticize his designs because you're so stupid you don't know any better.
> >>>
> >>> I have a good reason for not remembering what you're blathering about.. What is your reason for not know what you're blathering about?
> >> lol
> >>
> >> Just for the floriduh dumbasses benefit, the above rant from kunich is
> >> an example of 'triggered'.
> >>
> >> That aside, tommy's answer to being proven wrong yet again is 'why
> >> should I know that when I didn't design the hardware'. But tommy, you're
> >> a world class designer, remember? you didn't happen to notice the
> >> hardware flaws? You didn't check the scaling of the ADC to make sure the
> >> lights would actually work as intended? Some designer you are.
> >>
> >> And agin, no matter how many times you claim I couldn't understand your
> >> silly program, it will never become true.
> >>
> >> As for Charlie Butten - A notable and respectable designer and
> >> businessman for sure. Too bad none of it rubbed off on you.
> >>
> >> However, had I been given that design to work on, I would have
> >> questioned the used of the external ADC. Striving to understand the
> >> design of a system is something a good engineer does. Blindly accepting
> >> it without questions is just plain sloppy - of course, I guess we should
> >> expect sloppy from someone that can't figure out how to tighten a carbon
> >> handlebar.
> >> --
> >> Add xx to reply
> >
> > Too bad Flunky is so full of bullshit that no one believes him any more..
> Should we takwe a poll to see who's more beleiveable in this forum?
> People may not like me here <yawn> but I'm pretty sure it isn't due to
> credibility except from you and the floriduh dumbass.
> > Between him an Krygowski, the whole world looks on in wonder when he vlais that he could read that stupid C series and couldn't. HE was so far in the dark that he never even made one comment. He never even tried to make a comment.
> And of course that's a lie as well. I commented when you originally
> posted it as well as afterwards when you claimed I didn't comment. The
> issue here is that you never responded to _my_ comment, indicating that
> you had no answer. When you post a snippet of code that describes the
> hardware, then you deny that the hardware was as described in the code,
> it belies your complete lack of credibility.
> > Flunky, are you even aware what people think about you?
> As long as they don't think about me like they think about you, I'm all set.
> > You actually talked about bicycles and surprised everyone because it was intelligent and cogent. Everyone had to agree with you one that point. So why did you then turn around and make yet another mindless and stupid statement?
> Please list the 'mindless and stupid statement' you claim I made. Odds
> are it's not nearly on the same level as 'my shifting problems went away
> when I started using special campagnolo non-stretch shifting cable', or
> 'light lines are a common term for fiber optics in telecommunications',
> or 'the dent in my top tube popped out from riding the bike'....or any
> of the other brain-dead comments you make on a daily basis.
Flunky we already know you, "Boo hoo, I]m too stupid to know how to use a search engine so it is your fault."

On 2/10/2024 10:26 AM, Tom Kunich wrote:
> On Friday, February 9, 2024 at 2:36:58 AM UTC-8, zen cycle wrote:
>> On 2/5/2024 3:49 PM, Tom Kunich wrote:
>>> On Monday, February 5, 2024 at 10:37:01 AM UTC-8, Zen Cycle wrote:
>>>> On 1/31/2024 5:14 PM, Tom Kunich wrote:
>>>>> On Wednesday, January 31, 2024 at 2:47:39 AM UTC-8, zen cycle wrote:
>>>>>> On 1/30/2024 10:56 AM, Tom Kunich wrote:
>>>>>>> On Monday, January 29, 2024 at 11:02:45 AM UTC-8, Zen Cycle wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 1/29/2024 1:15 PM, floriduh dumbass wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 12:37:59 -0500, Frank Krygowski
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So I've read the ramblings from the Florida tricycle rider. He's
>>>>>>>>>> desperate to defend his usual position, which is that any research
>>>>>>>>>> findings that violate his prejudices must be fake.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Krygowski likes to argue against his own words that he falsely
>>>>>>>>> contributes to people he's afraid to deal with directly.
>>>>>>>> no one's afraid to deal with you, you narcissistic piece of shit.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> (Which, come to think of it, sounds a lot like "Any election my
>>>>>>>>>> candidate lost must be stolen.")
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> More of the above... Is his narcissism the reason he demands
>>>>>>>>> information from other people?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So a question for him, for John, for Tom: Suppose you were a medical
>>>>>>>>>> researcher who really, honestly wanted to find out if political
>>>>>>>>>> leanings for _either_ party were correlated with bad COVID outcomes. How
>>>>>>>>>> would you go about determining that?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> First of all, I can't imagine why I'd want to do that.
>>>>>>>> Proud willful ignorance duly noted.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Don't slither away from the question. Give us a procedure that could
>>>>>>>>>> give us good results in the real world.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Even if I did have an answer, it'd be none of Krygowski's business.
>>>>>>>> whiner.
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Add xx to reply
>>>>>>> Whining and crying that you are too an EE when you couldn/t read a simple program.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Funny, I seem to be able to understand your program better than you do -
>>>>>> I noticed you had no response when I showed your silly little project
>>>>>> had an external A/D after you claimed it didn't. Why is it I understand
>>>>>> you program better than you do?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/c/mKhS2lPQY_A/m/twbRAH9LAgAJ
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "/*SuperSnoop Dectector Board
>>>>>> Operation of the Detector:
>>>>>> 1. Via a Detector wand the board detects current
>>>>>> flow through the water. The current flow is via an AC source from the
>>>>>> Generator Board. This current flow is detected via the voltage drop
>>>>>> through the medium's resistance. It is measure with the 24 bit ADC
>>>>>> (U4) LTC 2440 and passed to the MPU via the Serial Data mechanism on
>>>>>> the C Port of the MPU."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> At least I had a university professor give me a top rating recommendation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "those who can do, those who can't teach"- tom kunich....now all of a
>>>>>> sudden a university professor is a credible source?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What do you have?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> real credibility, and the work history that proves it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You sound just like your President.
>>>>>> https://babylonbee.com/news/biden-says-texas-has-till-end-of-day-to-remove-razor-wire-or-else-frinlerbagsuzzit-dorblelerg
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LOL...tommy thinks babylon bee is a news source...which explains a lot.
>>>>> Exactly why do you think that I designed that hardware when I said that the hardware was designed by a world famous, analog designer. It is always interesting that you are trying to tell everyone how dumb I am when you are too stupid to actually know that I wrote the software and you couldn't even read the part that only flashed the lights so that the Red and Green LED's would turn yellow as the battery charge got low.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now about you second guessing a man with an Oscar for making a sound system for the Grateful Dead that didn't echo off of the surrounding terrain. At what point in your professional career did you accomplish anything? You are nothing more than a paper shuffler who has never designed anything. Explain to me again how You know so much more that Charlie Butten (https://www.installation-international.com/people/founding-father-of-intercoms-to-be-inducted-into-scn-hall-of-fame). While working with Charlie I designed the "belt pack" which allowed people on movie sets to direct their intercom calls to different people on the set. I didn't consider that to be worth noting but that would have been the highlight of your career and you'd still be bragging about it. The fact is that you don't know anything except how to run your mouth off. Charlie INVENTED the intercom. Charlie INVENTED non-echoing sound systems. You dare to criticize his designs because you're so stupid you don't know any better.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have a good reason for not remembering what you're blathering about. What is your reason for not know what you're blathering about?
>>>> lol
>>>>
>>>> Just for the floriduh dumbasses benefit, the above rant from kunich is
>>>> an example of 'triggered'.
>>>>
>>>> That aside, tommy's answer to being proven wrong yet again is 'why
>>>> should I know that when I didn't design the hardware'. But tommy, you're
>>>> a world class designer, remember? you didn't happen to notice the
>>>> hardware flaws? You didn't check the scaling of the ADC to make sure the
>>>> lights would actually work as intended? Some designer you are.
>>>>
>>>> And agin, no matter how many times you claim I couldn't understand your
>>>> silly program, it will never become true.
>>>>
>>>> As for Charlie Butten - A notable and respectable designer and
>>>> businessman for sure. Too bad none of it rubbed off on you.
>>>>
>>>> However, had I been given that design to work on, I would have
>>>> questioned the used of the external ADC. Striving to understand the
>>>> design of a system is something a good engineer does. Blindly accepting
>>>> it without questions is just plain sloppy - of course, I guess we should
>>>> expect sloppy from someone that can't figure out how to tighten a carbon
>>>> handlebar.
>>>> --
>>>> Add xx to reply
>>>
>>> Too bad Flunky is so full of bullshit that no one believes him any more.
>> Should we takwe a poll to see who's more beleiveable in this forum?
>> People may not like me here <yawn> but I'm pretty sure it isn't due to
>> credibility except from you and the floriduh dumbass.
>>> Between him an Krygowski, the whole world looks on in wonder when he vlais that he could read that stupid C series and couldn't. HE was so far in the dark that he never even made one comment. He never even tried to make a comment.
>> And of course that's a lie as well. I commented when you originally
>> posted it as well as afterwards when you claimed I didn't comment. The
>> issue here is that you never responded to _my_ comment, indicating that
>> you had no answer. When you post a snippet of code that describes the
>> hardware, then you deny that the hardware was as described in the code,
>> it belies your complete lack of credibility.
>>> Flunky, are you even aware what people think about you?
>> As long as they don't think about me like they think about you, I'm all set.
>>> You actually talked about bicycles and surprised everyone because it was intelligent and cogent. Everyone had to agree with you one that point. So why did you then turn around and make yet another mindless and stupid statement?
>> Please list the 'mindless and stupid statement' you claim I made. Odds
>> are it's not nearly on the same level as 'my shifting problems went away
>> when I started using special campagnolo non-stretch shifting cable', or
>> 'light lines are a common term for fiber optics in telecommunications',
>> or 'the dent in my top tube popped out from riding the bike'....or any
>> of the other brain-dead comments you make on a daily basis.
> Flunky we already know you, "Boo hoo, I]m too stupid to know how to use a search engine so it is your fault."

Click here to read the complete article