"The concepts of time (spacetime) in quantum theory and GR are thus drastically different and cannot both be fundamentally true." http://hindawi.com/journals/isrn/2013/509316/

So one is false but theoretical physicists would not discard it - rather, they reconcile it with the true one (in Big Brother's world theoreticians reconcile 2+2=5 and 2+2=4):

Natalie Wolchover: "The effort to unify quantum mechanics and general relativity means reconciling totally different notions of time. In quantum mechanics, time is universal and absolute; its steady ticks dictate the evolving entanglements between particles. But in general relativity (Albert Einstein's theory of gravity), time is relative and dynamical, a dimension that's inextricably interwoven with directions X, Y and Z into a four-dimensional "space-time" fabric." https://www.quantamagazine.org/quantum-gravitys-time-problem-20161201/

Perimeter Institute: "Quantum mechanics has one thing, time, which is absolute. But general relativity tells us that space and time are both dynamical so there is a big contradiction there. So the question is, can quantum gravity be formulated in a context where quantum mechanics still has absolute time?" https://www2.perimeterinstitute.ca/fr/research/conferences/convergence/roundtable-discussion-questions/what-are-lessons-quantum

Pentcho Valev https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

On 2023-08-07 09:37:09 +0000, Pentcho Valev said:

> "The concepts of time (spacetime) in quantum theory and GR are thus
> drastically different and cannot both be fundamentally true."
> http://hindawi.com/journals/isrn/2013/509316/

You realize, of course (no, I correct myself, you probably don't
realize any such thing), that Hindawi journals are mainly junk journals
for crackpots, and that few serious scientists would dream of
publishing in them.
>
> So one is false but theoretical physicists would not discard it -
> rather, they reconcile it with the true one (in Big Brother's world
> theoreticians reconcile 2+2=5 and 2+2=4):
>
> Natalie Wolchover: "The effort to unify quantum mechanics and general
> relativity means reconciling totally different notions of time. In
> quantum mechanics, time is universal and absolute; its steady ticks
> dictate the evolving entanglements between particles. But in general
> relativity (Albert Einstein's theory of gravity), time is relative and
> dynamical, a dimension that's inextricably interwoven with directions
> X, Y and Z into a four-dimensional "space-time" fabric."
> https://www.quantamagazine.org/quantum-gravitys-time-problem-20161201/
>
> Perimeter Institute: "Quantum mechanics has one thing, time, which is
> absolute. But general relativity tells us that space and time are both
> dynamical so there is a big contradiction there. So the question is,
> can quantum gravity be formulated in a context where quantum mechanics
> still has absolute time?"
> https://www2.perimeterinstitute.ca/fr/research/conferences/convergence/roundtable-discussion-questions/what-are-lessons-quantum
>
>
> Pentcho Valev https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

--
Athel -- French and British, living in Marseilles for 36 years; mainly
in England until 1987.

On Monday, 7 August 2023 at 11:48:49 UTC+2, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
> On 2023-08-07 09:37:09 +0000, Pentcho Valev said:
>
> > "The concepts of time (spacetime) in quantum theory and GR are thus
> > drastically different and cannot both be fundamentally true."
> > http://hindawi.com/journals/isrn/2013/509316/
> You realize, of course (no, I correct myself, you probably don't
> realize any such thing), that Hindawi journals are mainly junk journals
> for crackpots, and that few serious scientists would dream of
> publishing in them.

You realize, of course (no, I correct myself, you probably don't
realize any such thing), that your "serious scientists" are mostly
just arrogant, mumbling morons?

Maciej Wozniak wrote:

> On Monday, 7 August 2023 at 11:48:49 UTC+2, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
>> probably don't realize any such thing), that Hindawi journals are
>> mainly junk journals for crackpots, and that few serious scientists
>> would dream of publishing in them.
>
> You realize, of course (no, I correct myself, you probably don't realize
> any such thing), that your "serious scientists" are mostly just
> arrogant, mumbling morons?

america is a LGBTQ+ country. Go there and parade, explaining how you like
stranger be men fucking you deep into your polaker ass. Just go there an
parade. For instance, the parading "president"

𝗭𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗸𝘆_𝗮𝗱𝘃𝗶𝘀𝗲𝗿_𝗰𝗮𝘀𝘁𝘀_𝗱𝗼𝘂𝗯𝘁_𝗼𝗻_𝗳𝘂𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲_𝗿𝗲𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀_𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵_𝗣𝗼𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗱
https://r%74.com/russia/580914-poland-ukraine-friendship-end/

𝗗𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘇𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻_𝗼𝗳_𝗨.𝗦._𝗕𝗿𝗮𝘃𝗮𝗱𝗼_𝗜𝗻_𝗨𝗸𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗲
https://bi%74%63hute.com/video/jpY9Q44fC3yR

𝗡𝗲𝘄𝘀_𝗥𝗲𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁_𝗢𝗻_𝗥𝘂𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗮'𝘀_𝗘𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗼𝗺𝘆_𝗦𝘂𝗿𝗽𝗮𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴_𝗚𝗲𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗻𝘆_𝗙𝗼𝗿_#5_𝗣𝗼𝘀𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻
https://bi%74%63hute.com/video/krar8jX435m6/

this is great.
𝗟𝘁._𝗚𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗹_𝗔𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗹𝘆_𝗣𝘂𝗹𝗶𝗸𝗼𝘃𝘀𝗸𝘆_𝗗𝗲𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲𝘀_𝗧𝗵𝗲_𝗙𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗹_𝗣𝗵𝗮𝘀𝗲_𝗼𝗳_𝗨𝗸𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗮𝗻_𝗗𝗲𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻
https://bi%74%63hute.com/video/dQBeoEH9uVMv

this great too. The khazar goym, fake moon landing america, is going to be
fucked up by Africa.
𝗔𝗳𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗻_𝗠𝗮𝗻_𝗘𝘅𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘀_𝗪𝗵𝘆_𝗣𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗻_𝗜𝘀_𝗞𝗶𝗻𝗴
https://bi%74%63hute.com/video/zvNCeIqenhFd

Why would 2+2=4 be any better than "for any right
triangle a^2+b^2=c^2", which is not valid in modern
physics?

On Monday, August 7, 2023 at 11:48:49 AM UTC+2, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
> On 2023-08-07 09:37:09 +0000, Pentcho Valev said:
>
> > "The concepts of time (spacetime) in quantum theory and GR are thus
> > drastically different and cannot both be fundamentally true."
> > http://hindawi.com/journals/isrn/2013/509316/
> You realize, of course (no, I correct myself, you probably don't
> realize any such thing), that Hindawi journals are mainly junk journals
> for crackpots, and that few serious scientists would dream of
> publishing in them.

Here is the author: https://www.thp.uni-koeln.de/gravitation/mitarbeiter/kiefer.html

On Monday, August 7, 2023 at 2:37:11 AM UTC-7, Pentcho Valev wrote:
> "The concepts of time (spacetime) in quantum theory and GR are thus drastically different and cannot both be fundamentally true." http://hindawi.com/journals/isrn/2013/509316/
>
> So one is false but theoretical physicists would not discard it - rather, they reconcile it with the true one (in Big Brother's world theoreticians reconcile 2+2=5 and 2+2=4):
>
> Natalie Wolchover: "The effort to unify quantum mechanics and general relativity means reconciling totally different notions of time. In quantum mechanics, time is universal and absolute; its steady ticks dictate the evolving entanglements between particles. But in general relativity (Albert Einstein's theory of gravity), time is relative and dynamical, a dimension that's inextricably interwoven with directions X, Y and Z into a four-dimensional "space-time" fabric." https://www.quantamagazine.org/quantum-gravitys-time-problem-20161201/
>
> Perimeter Institute: "Quantum mechanics has one thing, time, which is absolute. But general relativity tells us that space and time are both dynamical so there is a big contradiction there. So the question is, can quantum gravity be formulated in a context where quantum mechanics still has absolute time?" https://www2.perimeterinstitute.ca/fr/research/conferences/convergence/roundtable-discussion-questions/what-are-lessons-quantum
>
> Pentcho Valev https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev
Those relativists here who want to fob this off as crank junk are ignorant about the matter.

On Monday, August 7, 2023 at 4:38:48 AM UTC-7, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> Why would 2+2=4 be any better than "for any right
> triangle a^2+b^2=c^2", which is not valid in modern
> physics?
Instead of a^2 + b^2= c^2 we must use the Lorentz transformations to impress people.

On 8/7/2023 12:14 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote:
> On Monday, August 7, 2023 at 2:37:11 AM UTC-7, Pentcho Valev wrote:
>> "The concepts of time (spacetime) in quantum theory and GR are thus drastically different and cannot both be fundamentally true." http://hindawi.com/journals/isrn/2013/509316/
>>
>> So one is false but theoretical physicists would not discard it - rather, they reconcile it with the true one (in Big Brother's world theoreticians reconcile 2+2=5 and 2+2=4):
>>
>> Natalie Wolchover: "The effort to unify quantum mechanics and general relativity means reconciling totally different notions of time. In quantum mechanics, time is universal and absolute; its steady ticks dictate the evolving entanglements between particles. But in general relativity (Albert Einstein's theory of gravity), time is relative and dynamical, a dimension that's inextricably interwoven with directions X, Y and Z into a four-dimensional "space-time" fabric." https://www.quantamagazine.org/quantum-gravitys-time-problem-20161201/
>>
>> Perimeter Institute: "Quantum mechanics has one thing, time, which is absolute. But general relativity tells us that space and time are both dynamical so there is a big contradiction there. So the question is, can quantum gravity be formulated in a context where quantum mechanics still has absolute time?" https://www2.perimeterinstitute.ca/fr/research/conferences/convergence/roundtable-discussion-questions/what-are-lessons-quantum

>> Pentcho Valev https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

> Those relativists here who want to fob this off as crank junk are ignorant about the matter.

Sure thing, your idols are better than anything!

On Monday, August 7, 2023 at 2:37:11 AM UTC-7, Pentcho Valev wrote:
> "The concepts of time (spacetime) in quantum theory and GR are thus drastically different and cannot both be fundamentally true." http://hindawi.com/journals/isrn/2013/509316/
>
> So one is false but theoretical physicists would not discard it - rather, they reconcile it with the true one (in Big Brother's world theoreticians reconcile 2+2=5 and 2+2=4):

Pentcho, I just finished reading that book! Orwell describes modern America to a tee. Canada is even farther down that road. Did you know that 10,000 Canadian were euthanized last year? Supposedly by choice. Just like juveniles in this country undergo gender affirming surgery "by choice".

Thanks for juxtaposing Double Speak and SR. Very insightful.
>
> Natalie Wolchover: "The effort to unify quantum mechanics and general relativity means reconciling totally different notions of time. In quantum mechanics, time is universal and absolute; its steady ticks dictate the evolving entanglements between particles. But in general relativity (Albert Einstein's theory of gravity), time is relative and dynamical, a dimension that's inextricably interwoven with directions X, Y and Z into a four-dimensional "space-time" fabric." https://www.quantamagazine.org/quantum-gravitys-time-problem-20161201/
>
> Perimeter Institute: "Quantum mechanics has one thing, time, which is absolute. But general relativity tells us that space and time are both dynamical so there is a big contradiction there. So the question is, can quantum gravity be formulated in a context where quantum mechanics still has absolute time?" https://www2.perimeterinstitute.ca/fr/research/conferences/convergence/roundtable-discussion-questions/what-are-lessons-quantum
>
> Pentcho Valev https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

On 8/7/2023 12:16 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote:
> On Monday, August 7, 2023 at 4:38:48 AM UTC-7, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>> Why would 2+2=4 be any better than "for any right
>> triangle a^2+b^2=c^2", which is not valid in modern
>> physics?
> Instead of a^2 + b^2= c^2 we must use the Lorentz transformations to impress people.

Yes, you idols are so much better than anything.

On Monday, August 7, 2023 at 2:37:11 AM UTC-7, Pentcho Valev wrote:
> "The concepts of time (spacetime) in quantum theory and GR are thus drastically different and cannot both be fundamentally true." http://hindawi.com/journals/isrn/2013/509316/
>
> So one is false but theoretical physicists would not discard it - rather, they reconcile it with the true one (in Big Brother's world theoreticians reconcile 2+2=5 and 2+2=4):
>
> Natalie Wolchover: "The effort to unify quantum mechanics and general relativity means reconciling totally different notions of time. In quantum mechanics, time is universal and absolute; its steady ticks dictate the evolving entanglements between particles. But in general relativity (Albert Einstein's theory of gravity), time is relative and dynamical, a dimension that's inextricably interwoven with directions X, Y and Z into a four-dimensional "space-time" fabric." https://www.quantamagazine.org/quantum-gravitys-time-problem-20161201/
>
> Perimeter Institute: "Quantum mechanics has one thing, time, which is absolute. But general relativity tells us that space and time are both dynamical so there is a big contradiction there. So the question is, can quantum gravity be formulated in a context where quantum mechanics still has absolute time?" https://www2.perimeterinstitute.ca/fr/research/conferences/convergence/roundtable-discussion-questions/what-are-lessons-quantum
>
> Pentcho Valev https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

The idiot's back.

--
Jan

On Monday, 7 August 2023 at 22:41:07 UTC+2, JanPB wrote:
> On Monday, August 7, 2023 at 2:37:11 AM UTC-7, Pentcho Valev wrote:
> > "The concepts of time (spacetime) in quantum theory and GR are thus drastically different and cannot both be fundamentally true." http://hindawi.com/journals/isrn/2013/509316/
> >
> > So one is false but theoretical physicists would not discard it - rather, they reconcile it with the true one (in Big Brother's world theoreticians reconcile 2+2=5 and 2+2=4):
> >
> > Natalie Wolchover: "The effort to unify quantum mechanics and general relativity means reconciling totally different notions of time. In quantum mechanics, time is universal and absolute; its steady ticks dictate the evolving entanglements between particles. But in general relativity (Albert Einstein's theory of gravity), time is relative and dynamical, a dimension that's inextricably interwoven with directions X, Y and Z into a four-dimensional "space-time" fabric." https://www.quantamagazine.org/quantum-gravitys-time-problem-20161201/
> >
> > Perimeter Institute: "Quantum mechanics has one thing, time, which is absolute. But general relativity tells us that space and time are both dynamical so there is a big contradiction there. So the question is, can quantum gravity be formulated in a context where quantum mechanics still has absolute time?" https://www2.perimeterinstitute.ca/fr/research/conferences/convergence/roundtable-discussion-questions/what-are-lessons-quantum
> >
> > Pentcho Valev https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev
> The idiot's back.

You are, indeed.