Rocksolid Light

Welcome to Rocksolid Light

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

Mathematicians practice absolute freedom. -- Henry Adams

tech / sci.physics.relativity / Anti-SRT answer is most highly recommended for this question on researchgate. Why?

SubjectAuthor
* Anti-SRT answer is most highly recommended for this question onLEO_MMX
+* Re: Anti-SRT answer is most highly recommended for this question onLEO_MMX
|`* Re: Anti-SRT answer is most highly recommended for this question onDono.
| `* Re: Anti-SRT answer is most highly recommended for this question onJanPB
|  `- Re: Anti-SRT answer is most highly recommended for this question onMaciej Wozniak
`* Re: Anti-SRT answer is most highly recommended for this question onLaurence Clark Crossen
 `* Re: Anti-SRT answer is most highly recommended for this question onDono.
  `* Re: Anti-SRT answer is most highly recommended for this question onMaciej Wozniak
   `* Re: Anti-SRT answer is most highly recommended for this question onPython
    `- Re: Anti-SRT answer is most highly recommended for this question onMaciej Wozniak

1
Anti-SRT answer is most highly recommended for this question on researchgate. Why?

<c524e5c1-efd2-4669-b1ca-92d38faa1771n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/tech/article-flat.php?id=122935&group=sci.physics.relativity#122935

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:1924:b0:649:f255:e486 with SMTP id es4-20020a056214192400b00649f255e486mr269qvb.2.1692287996851;
Thu, 17 Aug 2023 08:59:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a63:931d:0:b0:566:9d:c651 with SMTP id b29-20020a63931d000000b00566009dc651mr919997pge.7.1692287996468;
Thu, 17 Aug 2023 08:59:56 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 08:59:55 -0700 (PDT)
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=71.127.243.59; posting-account=Q3CakQoAAAAs9dj-ExWx2883XkK4QEPe
NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.127.243.59
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <c524e5c1-efd2-4669-b1ca-92d38faa1771n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Anti-SRT answer is most highly recommended for this question on
researchgate. Why?
From: ned.marsen@gmail.com (LEO_MMX)
Injection-Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 15:59:56 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 1498
 by: LEO_MMX - Thu, 17 Aug 2023 15:59 UTC

This question (asked over two years ago) on researchgate lists a pro-ether, anti-SRT answer as the *only* popular and also the most recommended answer out of 134. How can this be? I challenge all SRT supporters to turn this around... Get your dancing shoes on and good luck to you.

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Can_the_Sagnac_effect_be_considered_a_disproof_of_Special_Relativity_Theory

Cheers, LEO_MMX

Re: Anti-SRT answer is most highly recommended for this question on researchgate. Why?

<d5597e61-3fe4-4f3a-9cc5-eefd4a4a9b4fn@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/tech/article-flat.php?id=122936&group=sci.physics.relativity#122936

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1995:b0:405:5657:2510 with SMTP id u21-20020a05622a199500b0040556572510mr801qtc.0.1692288398194;
Thu, 17 Aug 2023 09:06:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:2da3:b0:687:5434:bd19 with SMTP id
fb35-20020a056a002da300b006875434bd19mr2622080pfb.4.1692288397880; Thu, 17
Aug 2023 09:06:37 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.hasname.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 09:06:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <c524e5c1-efd2-4669-b1ca-92d38faa1771n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=71.127.243.59; posting-account=Q3CakQoAAAAs9dj-ExWx2883XkK4QEPe
NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.127.243.59
References: <c524e5c1-efd2-4669-b1ca-92d38faa1771n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <d5597e61-3fe4-4f3a-9cc5-eefd4a4a9b4fn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Anti-SRT answer is most highly recommended for this question on
researchgate. Why?
From: ned.marsen@gmail.com (LEO_MMX)
Injection-Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 16:06:38 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 1818
 by: LEO_MMX - Thu, 17 Aug 2023 16:06 UTC

On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 11:59:58 AM UTC-4, LEO_MMX wrote:
> This question (asked over two years ago) on researchgate lists a pro-ether, anti-SRT answer as the *only* popular and also the most recommended answer out of 134. How can this be? I challenge all SRT supporters to turn this around... Get your dancing shoes on and good luck to you.
>
> https://www.researchgate.net/post/Can_the_Sagnac_effect_be_considered_a_disproof_of_Special_Relativity_Theory
>
> Cheers, LEO_MMX

Answer the question. Why is Jim Marsen's answer the popular answer?

Re: Anti-SRT answer is most highly recommended for this question on researchgate. Why?

<0cac2a92-04f4-47bd-8cf9-80f69fa97225n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/tech/article-flat.php?id=122938&group=sci.physics.relativity#122938

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:3ac2:b0:767:7de5:85cb with SMTP id ss2-20020a05620a3ac200b007677de585cbmr1474qkn.8.1692290023505;
Thu, 17 Aug 2023 09:33:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:f542:b0:1bb:cd10:823f with SMTP id
h2-20020a170902f54200b001bbcd10823fmr2305681plf.5.1692290022880; Thu, 17 Aug
2023 09:33:42 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 09:33:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <d5597e61-3fe4-4f3a-9cc5-eefd4a4a9b4fn@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=69.181.75.9; posting-account=vma-PgoAAABrctSmMdefNKZ-c5S8buvP
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.181.75.9
References: <c524e5c1-efd2-4669-b1ca-92d38faa1771n@googlegroups.com> <d5597e61-3fe4-4f3a-9cc5-eefd4a4a9b4fn@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <0cac2a92-04f4-47bd-8cf9-80f69fa97225n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Anti-SRT answer is most highly recommended for this question on
researchgate. Why?
From: eggy20011951@gmail.com (Dono.)
Injection-Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 16:33:43 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 2049
 by: Dono. - Thu, 17 Aug 2023 16:33 UTC

On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 9:06:40 AM UTC-7, LEO_MMX wrote:
> On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 11:59:58 AM UTC-4, LEO_MMX wrote:
> > This question (asked over two years ago) on researchgate lists a pro-ether, anti-SRT answer as the *only* popular and also the most recommended answer out of 134. How can this be? I challenge all SRT supporters to turn this around... Get your dancing shoes on and good luck to you.
> >
> > https://www.researchgate.net/post/Can_the_Sagnac_effect_be_considered_a_disproof_of_Special_Relativity_Theory
> >
> > Cheers, LEO_MMX
> Answer the question. Why is Jim Marsen's answer the popular answer?

Science is not a popularity contest. Cranks like Marsen tend to yell louder..

Re: Anti-SRT answer is most highly recommended for this question on researchgate. Why?

<ff5c70b5-aba6-485d-a3ba-0ef6e1895ce4n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/tech/article-flat.php?id=122954&group=sci.physics.relativity#122954

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:a07:b0:635:e5ff:b4b7 with SMTP id dw7-20020a0562140a0700b00635e5ffb4b7mr5236qvb.3.1692298913681;
Thu, 17 Aug 2023 12:01:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:d486:b0:1bb:a78c:7a3e with SMTP id
c6-20020a170902d48600b001bba78c7a3emr87684plg.3.1692298913277; Thu, 17 Aug
2023 12:01:53 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 12:01:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <0cac2a92-04f4-47bd-8cf9-80f69fa97225n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=162.195.247.210; posting-account=Y2v6DQoAAACGpOrX04JGhSdsTevCdArN
NNTP-Posting-Host: 162.195.247.210
References: <c524e5c1-efd2-4669-b1ca-92d38faa1771n@googlegroups.com>
<d5597e61-3fe4-4f3a-9cc5-eefd4a4a9b4fn@googlegroups.com> <0cac2a92-04f4-47bd-8cf9-80f69fa97225n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <ff5c70b5-aba6-485d-a3ba-0ef6e1895ce4n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Anti-SRT answer is most highly recommended for this question on
researchgate. Why?
From: filmart@gmail.com (JanPB)
Injection-Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 19:01:53 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 by: JanPB - Thu, 17 Aug 2023 19:01 UTC

On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 9:33:44 AM UTC-7, Dono. wrote:
> On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 9:06:40 AM UTC-7, LEO_MMX wrote:
> > On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 11:59:58 AM UTC-4, LEO_MMX wrote:
> > > This question (asked over two years ago) on researchgate lists a pro-ether, anti-SRT answer as the *only* popular and also the most recommended answer out of 134. How can this be? I challenge all SRT supporters to turn this around... Get your dancing shoes on and good luck to you.
> > >
> > > https://www.researchgate.net/post/Can_the_Sagnac_effect_be_considered_a_disproof_of_Special_Relativity_Theory
> > >
> > > Cheers, LEO_MMX
> > Answer the question. Why is Jim Marsen's answer the popular answer?
>
> Science is not a popularity contest. Cranks like Marsen tend to yell louder.

"Do you know why the bell is loud?
Because it's empty inside."

-Ignacy Krasicki [late 1700s]

--
Jan

Re: Anti-SRT answer is most highly recommended for this question on researchgate. Why?

<9ddd3fbc-1e1a-4bd2-9ccd-ea0c6d29f92dn@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/tech/article-flat.php?id=122957&group=sci.physics.relativity#122957

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5916:0:b0:40f:dc70:fddb with SMTP id 22-20020ac85916000000b0040fdc70fddbmr7236qty.10.1692299689366;
Thu, 17 Aug 2023 12:14:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:e74f:b0:1b3:e4f1:1b3f with SMTP id
p15-20020a170902e74f00b001b3e4f11b3fmr105689plf.2.1692299689078; Thu, 17 Aug
2023 12:14:49 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!news.1d4.us!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 12:14:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <ff5c70b5-aba6-485d-a3ba-0ef6e1895ce4n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=89.206.14.16; posting-account=I3DWzAoAAACOmZUdDcZ-C0PqAZGVsbW0
NNTP-Posting-Host: 89.206.14.16
References: <c524e5c1-efd2-4669-b1ca-92d38faa1771n@googlegroups.com>
<d5597e61-3fe4-4f3a-9cc5-eefd4a4a9b4fn@googlegroups.com> <0cac2a92-04f4-47bd-8cf9-80f69fa97225n@googlegroups.com>
<ff5c70b5-aba6-485d-a3ba-0ef6e1895ce4n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <9ddd3fbc-1e1a-4bd2-9ccd-ea0c6d29f92dn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Anti-SRT answer is most highly recommended for this question on
researchgate. Why?
From: maluwozniak@gmail.com (Maciej Wozniak)
Injection-Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 19:14:49 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 2567
 by: Maciej Wozniak - Thu, 17 Aug 2023 19:14 UTC

On Thursday, 17 August 2023 at 21:01:55 UTC+2, JanPB wrote:
> On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 9:33:44 AM UTC-7, Dono. wrote:
> > On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 9:06:40 AM UTC-7, LEO_MMX wrote:
> > > On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 11:59:58 AM UTC-4, LEO_MMX wrote:
> > > > This question (asked over two years ago) on researchgate lists a pro-ether, anti-SRT answer as the *only* popular and also the most recommended answer out of 134. How can this be? I challenge all SRT supporters to turn this around... Get your dancing shoes on and good luck to you.
> > > >
> > > > https://www.researchgate.net/post/Can_the_Sagnac_effect_be_considered_a_disproof_of_Special_Relativity_Theory
> > > >
> > > > Cheers, LEO_MMX
> > > Answer the question. Why is Jim Marsen's answer the popular answer?
> >
> > Science is not a popularity contest. Cranks like Marsen tend to yell louder.
> "Do you know why the bell is loud?
> Because it's empty inside."

Unlike poor idiot Jan, which is so loud because of
being full of magnificient wisdom and knowledge
(that syntax shmyntax).

Re: Anti-SRT answer is most highly recommended for this question on researchgate. Why?

<2a81c366-f37a-4f00-981c-181be7c95b81n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/tech/article-flat.php?id=123019&group=sci.physics.relativity#123019

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:480e:b0:76a:f46f:a04f with SMTP id eb14-20020a05620a480e00b0076af46fa04fmr12020qkb.6.1692328345141;
Thu, 17 Aug 2023 20:12:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:244d:b0:1bc:6f8c:7c15 with SMTP id
l13-20020a170903244d00b001bc6f8c7c15mr577904pls.7.1692328344819; Thu, 17 Aug
2023 20:12:24 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 20:12:24 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <c524e5c1-efd2-4669-b1ca-92d38faa1771n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:646:100:e6a0:e496:2d0c:6635:d0e1;
posting-account=AZtzIAoAAABqtlvuXL6ZASWM0fV9f6PZ
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2601:646:100:e6a0:e496:2d0c:6635:d0e1
References: <c524e5c1-efd2-4669-b1ca-92d38faa1771n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2a81c366-f37a-4f00-981c-181be7c95b81n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Anti-SRT answer is most highly recommended for this question on
researchgate. Why?
From: l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com (Laurence Clark Crossen)
Injection-Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 03:12:25 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 by: Laurence Clark Cross - Fri, 18 Aug 2023 03:12 UTC

On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 8:59:58 AM UTC-7, LEO_MMX wrote:
> This question (asked over two years ago) on researchgate lists a pro-ether, anti-SRT answer as the *only* popular and also the most recommended answer out of 134. How can this be? I challenge all SRT supporters to turn this around... Get your dancing shoes on and good luck to you.
>
> https://www.researchgate.net/post/Can_the_Sagnac_effect_be_considered_a_disproof_of_Special_Relativity_Theory
>
> Cheers, LEO_MMX
Considering that the Sagnac effect is perfectly explained with ordinary velocity addition, it does not require relativity to explain.

Re: Anti-SRT answer is most highly recommended for this question on researchgate. Why?

<938c67f9-d885-484d-8805-8057854d966an@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/tech/article-flat.php?id=123022&group=sci.physics.relativity#123022

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:8e3:b0:64a:64a3:d018 with SMTP id dr3-20020a05621408e300b0064a64a3d018mr12834qvb.8.1692330030517;
Thu, 17 Aug 2023 20:40:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:df0e:b0:26b:3a8f:c328 with SMTP id
gp14-20020a17090adf0e00b0026b3a8fc328mr324945pjb.3.1692330030040; Thu, 17 Aug
2023 20:40:30 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 20:40:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2a81c366-f37a-4f00-981c-181be7c95b81n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=69.181.75.9; posting-account=vma-PgoAAABrctSmMdefNKZ-c5S8buvP
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.181.75.9
References: <c524e5c1-efd2-4669-b1ca-92d38faa1771n@googlegroups.com> <2a81c366-f37a-4f00-981c-181be7c95b81n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <938c67f9-d885-484d-8805-8057854d966an@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Anti-SRT answer is most highly recommended for this question on
researchgate. Why?
From: eggy20011951@gmail.com (Dono.)
Injection-Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 03:40:30 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 2190
 by: Dono. - Fri, 18 Aug 2023 03:40 UTC

On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 8:12:26 PM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote:
> On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 8:59:58 AM UTC-7, LEO_MMX wrote:
> > This question (asked over two years ago) on researchgate lists a pro-ether, anti-SRT answer as the *only* popular and also the most recommended answer out of 134. How can this be? I challenge all SRT supporters to turn this around... Get your dancing shoes on and good luck to you.
> >
> > https://www.researchgate.net/post/Can_the_Sagnac_effect_be_considered_a_disproof_of_Special_Relativity_Theory
> >
> > Cheers, LEO_MMX
> Considering that the Sagnac effect is perfectly explained with ordinary velocity addition, it does not require relativity to explain.

False

Sagnac effect in refractive media (as in fiberoptics gyros) can only be explained by SR. You keep repeating your idiocies.

Re: Anti-SRT answer is most highly recommended for this question on researchgate. Why?

<9b902883-85a6-47d9-bb33-b6418da3dffcn@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/tech/article-flat.php?id=123029&group=sci.physics.relativity#123029

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:1866:b0:63f:c14d:fac4 with SMTP id eh6-20020a056214186600b0063fc14dfac4mr16685qvb.2.1692332144740;
Thu, 17 Aug 2023 21:15:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:2d94:b0:688:731b:71d0 with SMTP id
fb20-20020a056a002d9400b00688731b71d0mr755141pfb.4.1692332143784; Thu, 17 Aug
2023 21:15:43 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!news.niel.me!glou.org!news.glou.org!usenet-fr.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 21:15:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <938c67f9-d885-484d-8805-8057854d966an@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=89.206.14.16; posting-account=I3DWzAoAAACOmZUdDcZ-C0PqAZGVsbW0
NNTP-Posting-Host: 89.206.14.16
References: <c524e5c1-efd2-4669-b1ca-92d38faa1771n@googlegroups.com>
<2a81c366-f37a-4f00-981c-181be7c95b81n@googlegroups.com> <938c67f9-d885-484d-8805-8057854d966an@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <9b902883-85a6-47d9-bb33-b6418da3dffcn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Anti-SRT answer is most highly recommended for this question on
researchgate. Why?
From: maluwozniak@gmail.com (Maciej Wozniak)
Injection-Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 04:15:44 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 by: Maciej Wozniak - Fri, 18 Aug 2023 04:15 UTC

On Friday, 18 August 2023 at 05:40:32 UTC+2, Dono. wrote:
> On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 8:12:26 PM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote:
> > On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 8:59:58 AM UTC-7, LEO_MMX wrote:
> > > This question (asked over two years ago) on researchgate lists a pro-ether, anti-SRT answer as the *only* popular and also the most recommended answer out of 134. How can this be? I challenge all SRT supporters to turn this around... Get your dancing shoes on and good luck to you.
> > >
> > > https://www.researchgate.net/post/Can_the_Sagnac_effect_be_considered_a_disproof_of_Special_Relativity_Theory
> > >
> > > Cheers, LEO_MMX
> > Considering that the Sagnac effect is perfectly explained with ordinary velocity addition, it does not require relativity to explain.
> False
>
> Sagnac effect in refractive media (as in fiberoptics gyros) can only be explained by SR. You keep repeating your idiocies.

Just another impudent lie from a fanatic idiot.

Re: Anti-SRT answer is most highly recommended for this question on researchgate. Why?

<ubmrd1$4ffn$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/tech/article-flat.php?id=123030&group=sci.physics.relativity#123030

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: python@invalid.org (Python)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Anti-SRT answer is most highly recommended for this question on
researchgate. Why?
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 06:17:37 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <ubmrd1$4ffn$1@dont-email.me>
References: <c524e5c1-efd2-4669-b1ca-92d38faa1771n@googlegroups.com>
<2a81c366-f37a-4f00-981c-181be7c95b81n@googlegroups.com>
<938c67f9-d885-484d-8805-8057854d966an@googlegroups.com>
<9b902883-85a6-47d9-bb33-b6418da3dffcn@googlegroups.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 04:17:37 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d7107722d1207bbb82d0907db49d43b8";
logging-data="146935"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/nk+XQ9ldudxZHOMFYWwIf"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/102.3.3
Cancel-Lock: sha1:m7yBTp5vW7ZCh07XVlezTpfXwj8=
In-Reply-To: <9b902883-85a6-47d9-bb33-b6418da3dffcn@googlegroups.com>
Content-Language: en-US
 by: Python - Fri, 18 Aug 2023 04:17 UTC

Old fart, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> On Friday, 18 August 2023 at 05:40:32 UTC+2, Dono. wrote:
>> On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 8:12:26 PM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote:
>>> On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 8:59:58 AM UTC-7, LEO_MMX wrote:
>>>> This question (asked over two years ago) on researchgate lists a pro-ether, anti-SRT answer as the *only* popular and also the most recommended answer out of 134. How can this be? I challenge all SRT supporters to turn this around... Get your dancing shoes on and good luck to you.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.researchgate.net/post/Can_the_Sagnac_effect_be_considered_a_disproof_of_Special_Relativity_Theory
>>>>
>>>> Cheers, LEO_MMX
>>> Considering that the Sagnac effect is perfectly explained with ordinary velocity addition, it does not require relativity to explain.
>> False
>>
>> Sagnac effect in refractive media (as in fiberoptics gyros) can only be explained by SR. You keep repeating your idiocies.
>
> Just another impudent lie from a fanatic idiot.

You've produced a self-referencing post, Wozniak.

Re: Anti-SRT answer is most highly recommended for this question on researchgate. Why?

<047fa5ba-56d1-43bc-81f5-c6ae807c6e1an@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/tech/article-flat.php?id=123035&group=sci.physics.relativity#123035

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:5990:0:b0:63f:be4f:160a with SMTP id ek16-20020ad45990000000b0063fbe4f160amr13760qvb.3.1692334492451;
Thu, 17 Aug 2023 21:54:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ce8f:b0:1ba:ff36:e0d7 with SMTP id
f15-20020a170902ce8f00b001baff36e0d7mr564705plg.12.1692334491518; Thu, 17 Aug
2023 21:54:51 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!panix!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 21:54:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <ubmrd1$4ffn$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=89.206.14.16; posting-account=I3DWzAoAAACOmZUdDcZ-C0PqAZGVsbW0
NNTP-Posting-Host: 89.206.14.16
References: <c524e5c1-efd2-4669-b1ca-92d38faa1771n@googlegroups.com>
<2a81c366-f37a-4f00-981c-181be7c95b81n@googlegroups.com> <938c67f9-d885-484d-8805-8057854d966an@googlegroups.com>
<9b902883-85a6-47d9-bb33-b6418da3dffcn@googlegroups.com> <ubmrd1$4ffn$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <047fa5ba-56d1-43bc-81f5-c6ae807c6e1an@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Anti-SRT answer is most highly recommended for this question on
researchgate. Why?
From: maluwozniak@gmail.com (Maciej Wozniak)
Injection-Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 04:54:52 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 2879
 by: Maciej Wozniak - Fri, 18 Aug 2023 04:54 UTC

On Friday, 18 August 2023 at 06:17:41 UTC+2, Python wrote:
> Old fart, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> > On Friday, 18 August 2023 at 05:40:32 UTC+2, Dono. wrote:
> >> On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 8:12:26 PM UTC-7, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote:
> >>> On Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 8:59:58 AM UTC-7, LEO_MMX wrote:
> >>>> This question (asked over two years ago) on researchgate lists a pro-ether, anti-SRT answer as the *only* popular and also the most recommended answer out of 134. How can this be? I challenge all SRT supporters to turn this around... Get your dancing shoes on and good luck to you.
> >>>>
> >>>> https://www.researchgate.net/post/Can_the_Sagnac_effect_be_considered_a_disproof_of_Special_Relativity_Theory
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers, LEO_MMX
> >>> Considering that the Sagnac effect is perfectly explained with ordinary velocity addition, it does not require relativity to explain.
> >> False
> >>
> >> Sagnac effect in refractive media (as in fiberoptics gyros) can only be explained by SR. You keep repeating your idiocies.
> >
> > Just another impudent lie from a fanatic idiot.
> You've produced a self-referencing post, Wozniak.

See, poor halfbrain - I've proven the mumble of your idiot
guru to be inconsistent, and you can do nothing about it
apart of spitting and insulting. So you are spitting and
insulting, together with your fellow idiots.

tech / sci.physics.relativity / Anti-SRT answer is most highly recommended for this question on researchgate. Why?

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor