Regarding the original topic:

I had a good laugh today. I read something how one of the subjects of
the original Dunning-Kruger research was a would-be bank robber in the
1990s. He went into a bank demanding money, with no mask or any other
visible attempt to hide his face. He even deliberately smiled for the
security cameras. He was totally confounded when later that day, the FBI
showed up at his house and arrested him. He said "But I used the juice!"

It turns out "the juice" was lemon juice. He smeared his face with lemon
juice. Lemon juice can be used as a form of invisible ink. He thought
that covering his face with lemon juice made him invisible!

I'm trying to decide if any of our own Dunning-Kruger examples here, who
all think they're smarter than all the physicists over the last 100+
years by claiming relativity is wrong, is actually dumber than the bank
robber. Sure they're all dumb, but are any that dumb?

On Wednesday, 23 August 2023 at 04:08:29 UTC+2, Volney wrote:
> Regarding the original topic:
>
> I had a good laugh today. I read something how one of the subjects of

And do you still believe that 9 192 631 770 ISO idiocy
is some "Newton mode"? You're such an agnorant idiot,
stupid Mike, even considering the standards of your
moronic religion.

On 2023-08-23 02:08:21 +0000, Volney said:

> Regarding the original topic:
>
> I had a good laugh today. I read something how one of the subjects of
> the original Dunning-Kruger research was a would-be bank robber in the
> 1990s. He went into a bank demanding money, with no mask or any other
> visible attempt to hide his face. He even deliberately smiled for the
> security cameras. He was totally confounded when later that day, the
> FBI showed up at his house and arrested him. He said "But I used the
> juice!"

I remember that story.
>
> It turns out "the juice" was lemon juice. He smeared his face with
> lemon juice. Lemon juice can be used as a form of invisible ink. He
> thought that covering his face with lemon juice made him invisible!

You'd think he would have checked by looking in a mirror. However, if
he was as stupid as some of our contributors here he might not have
thought of that.
>
> I'm trying to decide if any of our own Dunning-Kruger examples here,
> who all think they're smarter than all the physicists over the last
> 100+ years by claiming relativity is wrong, is actually dumber than the
> bank robber. Sure they're all dumb, but are any that dumb?

--
athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots

Volney wrote:

> Regarding the original topic:
> I had a good laugh today. I read something how one of the subjects of
> the original Dunning-Kruger research was a would-be bank robber in the
> 1990s.

not true. Dr. Mitch Raemesh is the most intelligent of everybody. Beyond
Ohm's Law you know nothing worth noting. Suck my tongue. You don't even
know what an oscilloscope is. You look in the manual to find out what it
is.

true fact is that the stinking khazar 𝗦𝗺𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗸𝘆 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗲𝘀 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗺𝗼𝗻𝗲𝘆 𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀
𝘄𝗮𝗿, than the bidona of america. Which is not acceptable by the
𝗰𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲_𝘄𝗲𝘀𝘁.

𝗨𝗸𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗲_𝗰𝗮𝗻’𝘁_𝗱𝗲𝗳𝗲𝗮𝘁_𝗥𝘂𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗮_–_𝗲𝘅-𝗡𝗔𝗧𝗢_𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗹
https://r%74.com/rus%73ia/581685-ukraine-talks-italy-nato/

Reading between the lines, what he is really saying is 𝗡𝗔𝗧𝗢 𝗰𝗮𝗻𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗱𝗲𝗳𝗲𝗮𝘁
𝗥𝘂𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗮, which is why 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗿𝗼𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗺.

Negotiate what?? 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗵𝗮𝘀 𝗮𝗹𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱𝘆 𝗯𝗲𝗲𝗻 𝗻𝗲𝗴𝗼𝘁𝗶𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗯𝗮𝗰𝗸 𝗶𝗻 2014 and the
outcome was the Minsk agreements. So basically they want a timeout to
strengthen Ukraine again and probably even try to bring it into NATO.

The reason the war began cannot be overlooked: 𝗡𝗔𝗧𝗢 𝗼𝗰𝗰𝘂𝗽𝗶𝗲𝗱 𝗨𝗸𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗲 10 𝘆𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘀
𝗮𝗴𝗼 to use as a battering ram against Russia and plant nukes near Moscow 𝗶𝗻
𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗽𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗥𝘂𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗮 𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗽𝗽𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗿 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝗔𝘀𝗶𝗮 𝗶𝗻 𝗦𝘆𝗿𝗶𝗮. {{{lol}}}

𝗕𝘂𝘁 𝗶𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗡𝗔𝗧𝗢 𝘄𝗮𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘄𝗮𝗿 𝗼𝗻 𝗥𝘂𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗮 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗨𝗸𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗳𝗹𝗮𝗴. If it was "only
Ukraine" the war 𝘄𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝗻 𝗙𝗲𝗯𝗿𝘂𝗮𝗿𝘆 2022 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝘂𝗻𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝘀𝘂𝗿𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿
𝗯𝘆 𝗨𝗸𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗲. Actually there 𝘄𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻 𝗯𝗲𝗲𝗻 𝗮 𝘄𝗮𝗿 𝗶𝗳 𝗡𝗔𝗧𝗢 𝗻𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗼𝗰𝗰𝘂𝗽𝗶𝗲𝗱
𝗨𝗸𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗲 in the first place.