On Wednesday, February 22, 2023 at 1:54:44 AM UTC-8, Foos Research wrote:
> On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 1:50:01 AM UTC+7, Johni Luzzatto wrote:
> > Richard Hertz wrote:
> >
> > > I reproduce here my reply to prokariotic, because I think it deserves to
> > > have a dedicated thread. It's related to the title of the P&R 1960
> > > paper,
> Why bother with photons? You're right, there is no mass and no photons, only hv. Einstein wasn't an imbecile, he was a clever fake. As for the difference in g between two heights, Einstein's phony relativity formula that claims to have adjusted for it cannot be just an error, but only one of many fakeries. Do you NOT recognize the simple act of integrating g over the distance in question to obtain an averaged value of g? I see nobody who pretends to understand Einstein and is yet so adept at juggling complex formulas is able to recognize this and other fake formulas or the simple math problem required to find the right answer. Sheez, boys, did you forget freshman calculus? Did you ever solve for Einstein's formula? It falls outside the range of g for fractional frequencies for upper and lower levels over distance h, not that any idiot can't see it won't work. But you're wrong about time dilation. I hate such misleading terms. Right, you don't need the Pound-Rebka experiment or atomic clocks or fancy theories to figure that out. Just ponder the definition of a meter until the light dawns. But why do I bother?
Foos doesn't accept time dilation. He does everything with length contraction, another reification fallacy.