Rocksolid Light

Welcome to Rocksolid Light

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

"An open mind has but one disadvantage: it collects dirt." -- a saying at RPI


tech / sci.physics.relativity / Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science

SubjectAuthor
* The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceLaurence Clark Crossen
+* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceTom Roberts
|+* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceLaurence Clark Crossen
||`* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceTom Roberts
|| +* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceMaciej Wozniak
|| |`* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceChris M. Thomasson
|| | `* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceVolney
|| |  +- Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceChris M. Thomasson
|| |  +* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceRichard Hertz
|| |  |`* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceLaurence Clark Crossen
|| |  | +- Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceLaurence Clark Crossen
|| |  | `* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceVolney
|| |  |  +* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted SciencePaul Alsing
|| |  |  |+* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceTom Roberts
|| |  |  ||+- Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceMaciej Wozniak
|| |  |  ||+* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceLaurence Clark Crossen
|| |  |  |||`* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceChris M. Thomasson
|| |  |  ||| `* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceLaurence Clark Crossen
|| |  |  |||  +* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceChris M. Thomasson
|| |  |  |||  |+* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceMaciej Wozniak
|| |  |  |||  ||`- Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceChris M. Thomasson
|| |  |  |||  |+* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceVolney
|| |  |  |||  ||+- Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceRichard Hertz
|| |  |  |||  ||`* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceChris M. Thomasson
|| |  |  |||  || `* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceChris M. Thomasson
|| |  |  |||  ||  `* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceVolney
|| |  |  |||  ||   `* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceChris M. Thomasson
|| |  |  |||  ||    +- Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceChris M. Thomasson
|| |  |  |||  ||    `* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceVolney
|| |  |  |||  ||     +* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceVolney
|| |  |  |||  ||     |`- Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceZachariah Dobrenkov Bakhmatoff
|| |  |  |||  ||     +- Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceMaciej Wozniak
|| |  |  |||  ||     `* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceChris M. Thomasson
|| |  |  |||  ||      `* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceVolney
|| |  |  |||  ||       +* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceChris M. Thomasson
|| |  |  |||  ||       |`- Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceChris M. Thomasson
|| |  |  |||  ||       `- Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceChris M. Thomasson
|| |  |  |||  |`* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceLaurence Clark Crossen
|| |  |  |||  | `* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceVolney
|| |  |  |||  |  +* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceLaurence Clark Crossen
|| |  |  |||  |  |`* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceVolney
|| |  |  |||  |  | `* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Sciencewhodat
|| |  |  |||  |  |  +- Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceLaurence Clark Crossen
|| |  |  |||  |  |  `* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceVolney
|| |  |  |||  |  |   `- Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Sciencewhodat
|| |  |  |||  |  +* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceRichard Hertz
|| |  |  |||  |  |+- Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceVolney
|| |  |  |||  |  |`- Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceLaurence Clark Crossen
|| |  |  |||  |  `- Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceMaciej Wozniak
|| |  |  |||  `- Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceVolney
|| |  |  ||+- Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceLaurence Clark Crossen
|| |  |  ||`- Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceLaurence Clark Crossen
|| |  |  |+* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceLaurence Clark Crossen
|| |  |  ||`* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceVolney
|| |  |  || `* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceChris M. Thomasson
|| |  |  ||  `* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceVolney
|| |  |  ||   `- Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceChris M. Thomasson
|| |  |  |`- Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceVolney
|| |  |  +* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceRichard Hertz
|| |  |  |+* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceVolney
|| |  |  ||+* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceKimanee Jamaletdinov Baboshin
|| |  |  |||`- Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted SciencePhysfitfreak
|| |  |  ||`- Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceMaciej Wozniak
|| |  |  |`* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted SciencePaul B. Andersen
|| |  |  | `- Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceMaciej Wozniak
|| |  |  +* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceEmanuele Harlashenkov Balabuha
|| |  |  |`* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted SciencePhysfitfreak
|| |  |  | `- Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceThurston Zheleznov Bakatin
|| |  |  `* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceChris M. Thomasson
|| |  |   +* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceLaurence Clark Crossen
|| |  |   |+* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceVolney
|| |  |   ||+* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceMaciej Wozniak
|| |  |   |||`- Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceChris M. Thomasson
|| |  |   ||`- Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceChris M. Thomasson
|| |  |   |`- Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceChris M. Thomasson
|| |  |   `* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceRichard Hertz
|| |  |    +* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceRichard Hertz
|| |  |    |`- Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceChris M. Thomasson
|| |  |    +- Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceChris M. Thomasson
|| |  |    `* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceVolney
|| |  |     `* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Sciencewhodat
|| |  |      `* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceVolney
|| |  |       +- Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceThomas Heger
|| |  |       `* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Sciencewhodat
|| |  |        `- Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceThomas Heger
|| |  `* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceHerlen Ablesimoff Bibin
|| |   +* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceChris M. Thomasson
|| |   |`- Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceBrennan Gastello
|| |   `* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted SciencePhysfitfreak
|| |    `* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceFiezal Guio
|| |     `- Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted SciencePhysfitfreak
|| +- Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceRichard Hertz
|| +- Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceLaurence Clark Crossen
|| +* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceVolney
|| |+* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceLaurence Clark Crossen
|| ||`* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceVolney
|| || `- Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceGiovanni Dikson Muzhkaterov
|| |+* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceLaurence Clark Crossen
|| ||`* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceVolney
|| || `- Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted SciencePatricia Derman
|| |+* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceMonday Vaginov
|| |`- Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceLaurence Clark Crossen
|| `- Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceLaurence Clark Crossen
|+- Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceLaurence Clark Crossen
|`- Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceThomas Heger
+* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceChris M. Thomasson
+- Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceLaurence Clark Crossen
+- Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceLaurence Clark Crossen
+* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceLaurence Clark Crossen
+- Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceLaurence Clark Crossen
`* Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted ScienceLaurence Clark Crossen

Pages:12345
Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science

<ktmgt2F1j5uU2@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/tech/article-flat.php?id=128631&group=sci.physics.relativity#128631

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: whodaat@void.nowgre.com (whodat)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2023 13:12:25 -0600
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <ktmgt2F1j5uU2@mid.individual.net>
References: <16b7d8f3-7297-4b78-a3a9-3d8f09265024n@googlegroups.com>
<jO-dnfF_rPWuwvP4nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com>
<55baaef6-33c6-4f40-b6fc-6c36b626190an@googlegroups.com>
<3t-dncS9iI_6XfP4nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com>
<f635b7d2-6307-4f01-a8cd-e02a93e03fc8n@googlegroups.com>
<ukofad$el2l$4@dont-email.me> <ukofs8$er25$1@dont-email.me>
<54f7572d-14ad-491e-b6be-2f5975d398c1n@googlegroups.com>
<d0457a2c-14f7-44c4-a74d-55bc1c481625n@googlegroups.com>
<ukud9v$1l989$1@dont-email.me>
<3816a033-6316-4c03-81a7-0aeac2a33a2cn@googlegroups.com>
<d76dndB0Hvdy2-74nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com>
<3f52c87f-15a7-4247-8954-97fec6338f81n@googlegroups.com>
<ul0mum$233na$6@dont-email.me>
<55e2b62b-090d-45ce-b211-10b3530e92a8n@googlegroups.com>
<ul0p32$23fli$1@dont-email.me>
<52370bb5-3c1d-4817-9b91-c5c137c6f8a5n@googlegroups.com>
<ul2vcc$2d0ie$1@dont-email.me>
<b8bf34e3-f345-4389-a846-ae11c8b250den@googlegroups.com>
<ul4toa$2ooec$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net MdRj0tcMuHlAcnADQrM0jwQmguBUanYn0scWu3wAKg9SnG9M2/
Cancel-Lock: sha1:3ndSG8TWMUsMubYCYFvk30BBl5A= sha256:TaGb0916wOu6A42hWL43+HkmFjs5Tkhywpy7Pg3mfb0=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <ul4toa$2ooec$1@dont-email.me>
 by: whodat - Sun, 10 Dec 2023 19:12 UTC

On 12/10/2023 11:50 AM, Volney wrote:
> On 12/9/2023 7:31 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote:

> You're ineducable.

Kudos to Uncle Al.

Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science

<5b17b0e4-e823-45b8-86e1-836d7d039f41n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/tech/article-flat.php?id=128637&group=sci.physics.relativity#128637

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:464c:0:b0:41c:e3ab:1606 with SMTP id f12-20020ac8464c000000b0041ce3ab1606mr25866qto.10.1702250116394;
Sun, 10 Dec 2023 15:15:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:b605:b0:1fb:25d2:cda6 with SMTP id
cm5-20020a056870b60500b001fb25d2cda6mr4169919oab.11.1702250114589; Sun, 10
Dec 2023 15:15:14 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2023 15:15:14 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <ktmgt2F1j5uU2@mid.individual.net>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=73.92.46.134; posting-account=AZtzIAoAAABqtlvuXL6ZASWM0fV9f6PZ
NNTP-Posting-Host: 73.92.46.134
References: <16b7d8f3-7297-4b78-a3a9-3d8f09265024n@googlegroups.com>
<jO-dnfF_rPWuwvP4nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com> <55baaef6-33c6-4f40-b6fc-6c36b626190an@googlegroups.com>
<3t-dncS9iI_6XfP4nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com> <f635b7d2-6307-4f01-a8cd-e02a93e03fc8n@googlegroups.com>
<ukofad$el2l$4@dont-email.me> <ukofs8$er25$1@dont-email.me>
<54f7572d-14ad-491e-b6be-2f5975d398c1n@googlegroups.com> <d0457a2c-14f7-44c4-a74d-55bc1c481625n@googlegroups.com>
<ukud9v$1l989$1@dont-email.me> <3816a033-6316-4c03-81a7-0aeac2a33a2cn@googlegroups.com>
<d76dndB0Hvdy2-74nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com> <3f52c87f-15a7-4247-8954-97fec6338f81n@googlegroups.com>
<ul0mum$233na$6@dont-email.me> <55e2b62b-090d-45ce-b211-10b3530e92a8n@googlegroups.com>
<ul0p32$23fli$1@dont-email.me> <52370bb5-3c1d-4817-9b91-c5c137c6f8a5n@googlegroups.com>
<ul2vcc$2d0ie$1@dont-email.me> <b8bf34e3-f345-4389-a846-ae11c8b250den@googlegroups.com>
<ul4toa$2ooec$1@dont-email.me> <ktmgt2F1j5uU2@mid.individual.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <5b17b0e4-e823-45b8-86e1-836d7d039f41n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science
From: l.c.crossen@hotmail.com (Laurence Clark Crossen)
Injection-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2023 23:15:16 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 by: Laurence Clark Cross - Sun, 10 Dec 2023 23:15 UTC

On Sunday, December 10, 2023 at 11:12:39โ€ฏAM UTC-8, whodat wrote:
> On 12/10/2023 11:50 AM, Volney wrote:
> > On 12/9/2023 7:31 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote:
>
> > You're ineducable.
>
> Kudos to Uncle Al.
Long time no see! That's what they say in Soviet education camps!

Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science

<ul5v85$31a31$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/tech/article-flat.php?id=128658&group=sci.physics.relativity#128658

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: volney@invalid.invalid (Volney)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2023 22:21:41 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 63
Message-ID: <ul5v85$31a31$1@dont-email.me>
References: <16b7d8f3-7297-4b78-a3a9-3d8f09265024n@googlegroups.com>
<jO-dnfF_rPWuwvP4nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com>
<55baaef6-33c6-4f40-b6fc-6c36b626190an@googlegroups.com>
<3t-dncS9iI_6XfP4nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com>
<f635b7d2-6307-4f01-a8cd-e02a93e03fc8n@googlegroups.com>
<ukofad$el2l$4@dont-email.me> <ukofs8$er25$1@dont-email.me>
<54f7572d-14ad-491e-b6be-2f5975d398c1n@googlegroups.com>
<d0457a2c-14f7-44c4-a74d-55bc1c481625n@googlegroups.com>
<ukud9v$1l989$1@dont-email.me> <ukvuer$1s121$4@dont-email.me>
<d9b4c475-fe63-4fb0-adb2-2d1feb5f9bc0n@googlegroups.com>
<ul4t5g$2onab$1@dont-email.me> <ktmgn3F1j5uU1@mid.individual.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 03:21:42 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d16213a124774bdb16c13bfc3664d969";
logging-data="3188833"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/7LBE/bDuKuCVEUrrlbLuC"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:n9a50xomYYCLmiHcbj5rmmEoRD0=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <ktmgn3F1j5uU1@mid.individual.net>
 by: Volney - Mon, 11 Dec 2023 03:21 UTC

On 12/10/2023 2:09 PM, whodat wrote:
> On 12/10/2023 11:39 AM, Volney wrote:
>> On 12/8/2023 6:21 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:
>>> On Friday, December 8, 2023 at 5:31:28โ€ฏPM UTC-3, Chris M. Thomasson
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>>> Everywhere and nowhere? ;^) Let me throw out a point wrt unit sphere
>>>> centered at (0, 0, 0):
>>>>
>>>> (1, 0, 0) this is on the surface, however is it the center? What
>>>> about point (-1, 0, 0)? lol.
>>>>
>>>> :^)
>>>
>>> Be an arbitrary sphere, having a radius "1" be centered at (xโ‚,yโ‚,zโ‚)
>>> in a Euclidean 3D space.
>>>
>>> It's mathematically TRUE that the infinite collection of (x,y,z)
>>> points that verify (x-xโ‚)ยฒ + (y-yโ‚)ยฒ + (z-zโ‚)ยฒ = 1
>>> form part of a surface equidistant to the center (xโ‚,yโ‚,zโ‚).
>>>
>>> The volume of the sphere is centered in (xโ‚,yโ‚,zโ‚), as well as THE
>>> SHELL OF THE SPHERE (outer layer of infinitesimal thickness) is
>>> centered in (xโ‚,yโ‚,zโ‚).
>>>
>>> Think of the Earth, or the Sun.
>>>
>>> Can't believe how deranged people have become. So ignorant, so
>>> clueless, without any visualization power at all.
>>>
>>> I blame relativism, which has converted their adherents into drooling
>>> mutant cretins!
>>>
>>> For instance, the points
>>>
>>> xโ‚ ยฑ 1, yโ‚, zโ‚
>>> xโ‚, yโ‚ ยฑ 1, zโ‚
>>> xโ‚, yโ‚, zโ‚ ยฑ 1
>>>
>>> are three points contained in such surface, out of an infinite number
>>> of 3D points.
>>>
>>> I have to ask myself: 1) Did you take your medications? ; 2) Did you
>>> really go to HS?; 3) Have you procreated?
>>>
>>>
>> 1) It certainly appears you didn't take your medicine, at least not
>> the antipsychotics.
>> 2) I can't be sure but you didn't manage to get a high school
>> education in sciences.
>> 3) I hope you didn't!
>
> The problem concerning a high school science education has to do with
> those who think the only aspects worthy of learning are the ones that
> directly impact the narrow subdiscipline that interests them. They take
> up space in the room and more or less pay attention where the topic of
> the day sounds as though it may have something to do with their
> interest (these days usually some subdiscipline of electronics.)
>
This sounds like a variant of what Odd Bodkin and others noted: Why are
so many cranks electrical engineers?

Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science

<ul60bs$31a31$2@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/tech/article-flat.php?id=128659&group=sci.physics.relativity#128659

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: volney@invalid.invalid (Volney)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2023 22:40:44 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 50
Message-ID: <ul60bs$31a31$2@dont-email.me>
References: <16b7d8f3-7297-4b78-a3a9-3d8f09265024n@googlegroups.com>
<jO-dnfF_rPWuwvP4nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com>
<55baaef6-33c6-4f40-b6fc-6c36b626190an@googlegroups.com>
<3t-dncS9iI_6XfP4nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com>
<f635b7d2-6307-4f01-a8cd-e02a93e03fc8n@googlegroups.com>
<ukofad$el2l$4@dont-email.me> <ukofs8$er25$1@dont-email.me>
<54f7572d-14ad-491e-b6be-2f5975d398c1n@googlegroups.com>
<d0457a2c-14f7-44c4-a74d-55bc1c481625n@googlegroups.com>
<ukud9v$1l989$1@dont-email.me>
<3816a033-6316-4c03-81a7-0aeac2a33a2cn@googlegroups.com>
<d76dndB0Hvdy2-74nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com>
<3f52c87f-15a7-4247-8954-97fec6338f81n@googlegroups.com>
<ul0mum$233na$6@dont-email.me>
<55e2b62b-090d-45ce-b211-10b3530e92a8n@googlegroups.com>
<ul0p32$23fli$1@dont-email.me> <ul28ck$29hgg$2@dont-email.me>
<ul3mq8$2jdst$1@dont-email.me> <ul3pak$2jogm$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 03:40:45 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d16213a124774bdb16c13bfc3664d969";
logging-data="3188833"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Yq4PcvFe3dtMcEKbYpESx"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:87UVbQWZ7vIBI7NfcxhcSNn7Jh0=
In-Reply-To: <ul3pak$2jogm$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
 by: Volney - Mon, 11 Dec 2023 03:40 UTC

On 12/10/2023 2:28 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 12/9/2023 10:45 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> On 12/9/2023 9:33 AM, Volney wrote:
>>> On 12/8/2023 11:05 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> [...]
>>>> The fun part is that any observer on the surface of a sphere might
>>>> think its at the center. Or, well, think about the great attractor,
>>>> in space...
>>>
>>> Exactly. No matter where you are on the surface of a sphere, it LOOKS
>>> like you are at the center.
>>>
>>> Same with the 3D universe. No matter where you are, it LOOKS like
>>> you're at the center.
>>
>> Another point... Think of a 3d point in a 4d system where any "true"
>> 3d point has a w component of zero, ala:
>>
>> (x, y, z, w), fine... vec4, okay:
>>
>> vec4 point_4d = { 1, 1, 1, 0 };
>>
>> Is a "pure" 3d point. However:
>>
>> vec4 point_4d_oddball = { 1, 1, 1, 0.000000001 };
>>
>> is not a "pure" 3d point at all, not in any way shape or form! A 4d
>> observer at that point with a non-zero w component, would be able to
>> look at the 3d world as a sort of alpha blend, in a sense. It could
>> see right through things, and walk right through walls... Eve ones
>> made of lead. ;^)
>>
>> Too much pondering here? lol. :^)
>
> In a land far far away... The 4d observer, with a non-zero w point in
> its 4-ary vector, would be able to stand on the surface of a planet,
> look down and see right through said planet into space on the other
> side... Everything looks like an alpha channel/blend of sorts, it would
> be able to see things akin to a 3d person drawing 2d plans. It would be
> able to walk right through walls that exist in points that have zero for
> a 4d component, w = 0... It would be able to see in every room, see
> inside of people, look down and see space look up and see more space...
> Sorry, I wrote that for fun. Try not to call me a 100% kook? ;^) lol.

I like the description of what it would look like if a 1 meter diameter
4D hypersphere with its x,y,z coordinates of its center were in the room
you are and its w coordinate going from negative to zero to positive.
First you'd see a point which rapidly would grow into a sphere, continue
growing but slower until it was 1 meter diameter, then it would shrink
to a point and wink out of existence.

Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science

<ul60g2$31a31$3@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/tech/article-flat.php?id=128660&group=sci.physics.relativity#128660

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: volney@invalid.invalid (Volney)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2023 22:42:58 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <ul60g2$31a31$3@dont-email.me>
References: <16b7d8f3-7297-4b78-a3a9-3d8f09265024n@googlegroups.com>
<jO-dnfF_rPWuwvP4nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com>
<55baaef6-33c6-4f40-b6fc-6c36b626190an@googlegroups.com>
<3t-dncS9iI_6XfP4nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com>
<f635b7d2-6307-4f01-a8cd-e02a93e03fc8n@googlegroups.com>
<ukofad$el2l$4@dont-email.me> <ukofs8$er25$1@dont-email.me>
<54f7572d-14ad-491e-b6be-2f5975d398c1n@googlegroups.com>
<d0457a2c-14f7-44c4-a74d-55bc1c481625n@googlegroups.com>
<ukud9v$1l989$1@dont-email.me>
<3816a033-6316-4c03-81a7-0aeac2a33a2cn@googlegroups.com>
<d76dndB0Hvdy2-74nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com>
<3f52c87f-15a7-4247-8954-97fec6338f81n@googlegroups.com>
<ul0mum$233na$6@dont-email.me>
<55e2b62b-090d-45ce-b211-10b3530e92a8n@googlegroups.com>
<ul0p32$23fli$1@dont-email.me>
<52370bb5-3c1d-4817-9b91-c5c137c6f8a5n@googlegroups.com>
<ul2vcc$2d0ie$1@dont-email.me>
<b8bf34e3-f345-4389-a846-ae11c8b250den@googlegroups.com>
<ul4toa$2ooec$1@dont-email.me> <ktmgt2F1j5uU2@mid.individual.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 03:42:58 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d16213a124774bdb16c13bfc3664d969";
logging-data="3188833"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/OtexRAxAv4zz0Mfe7yr+u"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:602JK/Vw71QC7eG8uLRsJWzxIeQ=
In-Reply-To: <ktmgt2F1j5uU2@mid.individual.net>
Content-Language: en-US
 by: Volney - Mon, 11 Dec 2023 03:42 UTC

On 12/10/2023 2:12 PM, whodat wrote:
> On 12/10/2023 11:50 AM, Volney wrote:
>> On 12/9/2023 7:31 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote:
>
>> You're ineducable.
>
> Kudos to Uncle Al.
>
Maybe his famous rant about Archie Plutonium needs to be modified to be
about Laurence. He would post a rant about him if he was here to do so.

Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science

<ktnmntF9sp1U1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/tech/article-flat.php?id=128662&group=sci.physics.relativity#128662

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!paganini.bofh.team!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news-2.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: ttt_heg@web.de (Thomas Heger)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 07:01:36 +0100
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <ktnmntF9sp1U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <16b7d8f3-7297-4b78-a3a9-3d8f09265024n@googlegroups.com> <jO-dnfF_rPWuwvP4nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com> <55baaef6-33c6-4f40-b6fc-6c36b626190an@googlegroups.com> <3t-dncS9iI_6XfP4nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com> <f635b7d2-6307-4f01-a8cd-e02a93e03fc8n@googlegroups.com> <ukofad$el2l$4@dont-email.me> <ukofs8$er25$1@dont-email.me> <54f7572d-14ad-491e-b6be-2f5975d398c1n@googlegroups.com> <d0457a2c-14f7-44c4-a74d-55bc1c481625n@googlegroups.com> <ukud9v$1l989$1@dont-email.me> <ukvuer$1s121$4@dont-email.me> <d9b4c475-fe63-4fb0-adb2-2d1feb5f9bc0n@googlegroups.com> <ul4t5g$2onab$1@dont-email.me> <ktmgn3F1j5uU1@mid.individual.net> <ul5v85$31a31$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net 4D/HsN0pOEIrR3iUn61+aQ7nOI3BBVY1BvcIlu2Id3faFs6S/C
Cancel-Lock: sha1:+onY8VYab2LosCeIfES9l5WHh2w= sha256:nZtUQC6x+6TvLNHVaaapn8z8rywvvUCHpMwE+/SRN1g=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
In-Reply-To: <ul5v85$31a31$1@dont-email.me>
 by: Thomas Heger - Mon, 11 Dec 2023 06:01 UTC

Am 11.12.2023 um 04:21 schrieb Volney:

>>>> I have to ask myself: 1) Did you take your medications? ; 2) Did you
>>>> really go to HS?; 3) Have you procreated?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> 1) It certainly appears you didn't take your medicine, at least not
>>> the antipsychotics.
>>> 2) I can't be sure but you didn't manage to get a high school
>>> education in sciences.
>>> 3) I hope you didn't!
>>
>> The problem concerning a high school science education has to do with
>> those who think the only aspects worthy of learning are the ones that
>> directly impact the narrow subdiscipline that interests them. They
>> take up space in the room and more or less pay attention where the
>> topic of
>> the day sounds as though it may have something to do with their
>> interest (these days usually some subdiscipline of electronics.)
>>
> This sounds like a variant of what Odd Bodkin and others noted: Why are
> so many cranks electrical engineers?

This is so, because electrical engineers have a MUCH better
understanding of magnetism and electricity than usual physicists.

Since everybody who dares to criticise mainstream physics is called
'crank' (or: psycho, Nazi, crackpot, nutcase...), physicists call all
electrical enigineers 'crank'.

But much worse than the electrical cranks are the other variants of
engineers (like e.g. myself), who simply refuse to accept illogic nonsense.

TH

Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science

<ktojp7Fgu35U1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/tech/article-flat.php?id=128665&group=sci.physics.relativity#128665

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!news.hispagatos.org!news.nntp4.net!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news.szaf.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: whodaat@void.nowgre.com (whodat)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 08:13:49 -0600
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <ktojp7Fgu35U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <16b7d8f3-7297-4b78-a3a9-3d8f09265024n@googlegroups.com>
<55baaef6-33c6-4f40-b6fc-6c36b626190an@googlegroups.com>
<3t-dncS9iI_6XfP4nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com>
<f635b7d2-6307-4f01-a8cd-e02a93e03fc8n@googlegroups.com>
<ukofad$el2l$4@dont-email.me> <ukofs8$er25$1@dont-email.me>
<54f7572d-14ad-491e-b6be-2f5975d398c1n@googlegroups.com>
<d0457a2c-14f7-44c4-a74d-55bc1c481625n@googlegroups.com>
<ukud9v$1l989$1@dont-email.me>
<3816a033-6316-4c03-81a7-0aeac2a33a2cn@googlegroups.com>
<d76dndB0Hvdy2-74nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com>
<3f52c87f-15a7-4247-8954-97fec6338f81n@googlegroups.com>
<ul0mum$233na$6@dont-email.me>
<55e2b62b-090d-45ce-b211-10b3530e92a8n@googlegroups.com>
<ul0p32$23fli$1@dont-email.me>
<52370bb5-3c1d-4817-9b91-c5c137c6f8a5n@googlegroups.com>
<ul2vcc$2d0ie$1@dont-email.me>
<b8bf34e3-f345-4389-a846-ae11c8b250den@googlegroups.com>
<ul4toa$2ooec$1@dont-email.me> <ktmgt2F1j5uU2@mid.individual.net>
<ul60g2$31a31$3@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net 4CaUo8ZTGHUFIyUo6GtKkwjaZroEvddjExLDTdKcZiDTP6a1mW
Cancel-Lock: sha1:9Oh5exiVl9fvpp28jire1vBrv6I= sha256:EmaxtQol6s0X+n00y84dYGk3MTbn5B7yYSI0jqwNy8M=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <ul60g2$31a31$3@dont-email.me>
 by: whodat - Mon, 11 Dec 2023 14:13 UTC

On 12/10/2023 9:42 PM, Volney wrote:
> On 12/10/2023 2:12 PM, whodat wrote:
>> On 12/10/2023 11:50 AM, Volney wrote:
>>> On 12/9/2023 7:31 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote:
>>
>>> You're ineducable.
>>
>> Kudos to Uncle Al.
>>
> Maybe his famous rant about Archie Plutonium needs to be modified to be
> about Laurence. He would post a rant about him if he was here to do so.

That would prove irresistible!

Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science

<ktok1iFgu35U2@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/tech/article-flat.php?id=128666&group=sci.physics.relativity#128666

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!rocksolid2!news.neodome.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: whodaat@void.nowgre.com (whodat)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 08:18:16 -0600
Lines: 70
Message-ID: <ktok1iFgu35U2@mid.individual.net>
References: <16b7d8f3-7297-4b78-a3a9-3d8f09265024n@googlegroups.com>
<jO-dnfF_rPWuwvP4nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com>
<55baaef6-33c6-4f40-b6fc-6c36b626190an@googlegroups.com>
<3t-dncS9iI_6XfP4nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com>
<f635b7d2-6307-4f01-a8cd-e02a93e03fc8n@googlegroups.com>
<ukofad$el2l$4@dont-email.me> <ukofs8$er25$1@dont-email.me>
<54f7572d-14ad-491e-b6be-2f5975d398c1n@googlegroups.com>
<d0457a2c-14f7-44c4-a74d-55bc1c481625n@googlegroups.com>
<ukud9v$1l989$1@dont-email.me> <ukvuer$1s121$4@dont-email.me>
<d9b4c475-fe63-4fb0-adb2-2d1feb5f9bc0n@googlegroups.com>
<ul4t5g$2onab$1@dont-email.me> <ktmgn3F1j5uU1@mid.individual.net>
<ul5v85$31a31$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net 8rpqQrZfUE/Krw5s8X7iHQG2hAa0HIKK0THlXvdKyQA2j2AigV
Cancel-Lock: sha1:rdialXbsrtrkeHvm5Rmtq1DMVRA= sha256:gTphNCjTybs1bDxmSvNWpEgUumnwSA95GPoDsvj4wBI=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <ul5v85$31a31$1@dont-email.me>
 by: whodat - Mon, 11 Dec 2023 14:18 UTC

On 12/10/2023 9:21 PM, Volney wrote:
> On 12/10/2023 2:09 PM, whodat wrote:
>> On 12/10/2023 11:39 AM, Volney wrote:
>>> On 12/8/2023 6:21 PM, Richard Hertz wrote:
>>>> On Friday, December 8, 2023 at 5:31:28โ€ฏPM UTC-3, Chris M. Thomasson
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> <snip>
>>>>
>>>>> Everywhere and nowhere? ;^) Let me throw out a point wrt unit
>>>>> sphere centered at (0, 0, 0):
>>>>>
>>>>> (1, 0, 0) this is on the surface, however is it the center? What
>>>>> about point (-1, 0, 0)? lol.
>>>>>
>>>>> :^)
>>>>
>>>> Be an arbitrary sphere, having a radius "1" be centered at
>>>> (xโ‚,yโ‚,zโ‚) in a Euclidean 3D space.
>>>>
>>>> It's mathematically TRUE that the infinite collection of (x,y,z)
>>>> points that verify (x-xโ‚)ยฒ + (y-yโ‚)ยฒ + (z-zโ‚)ยฒ = 1
>>>> form part of a surface equidistant to the center (xโ‚,yโ‚,zโ‚).
>>>>
>>>> The volume of the sphere is centered in (xโ‚,yโ‚,zโ‚), as well as THE
>>>> SHELL OF THE SPHERE (outer layer of infinitesimal thickness) is
>>>> centered in (xโ‚,yโ‚,zโ‚).
>>>>
>>>> Think of the Earth, or the Sun.
>>>>
>>>> Can't believe how deranged people have become. So ignorant, so
>>>> clueless, without any visualization power at all.
>>>>
>>>> I blame relativism, which has converted their adherents into
>>>> drooling mutant cretins!
>>>>
>>>> For instance, the points
>>>>
>>>> xโ‚ ยฑ 1, yโ‚, zโ‚
>>>> xโ‚, yโ‚ ยฑ 1, zโ‚
>>>> xโ‚, yโ‚, zโ‚ ยฑ 1
>>>>
>>>> are three points contained in such surface, out of an infinite
>>>> number of 3D points.
>>>>
>>>> I have to ask myself: 1) Did you take your medications? ; 2) Did you
>>>> really go to HS?; 3) Have you procreated?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> 1) It certainly appears you didn't take your medicine, at least not
>>> the antipsychotics.
>>> 2) I can't be sure but you didn't manage to get a high school
>>> education in sciences.
>>> 3) I hope you didn't!
>>
>> The problem concerning a high school science education has to do with
>> those who think the only aspects worthy of learning are the ones that
>> directly impact the narrow subdiscipline that interests them. They
>> take up space in the room and more or less pay attention where the
>> topic of
>> the day sounds as though it may have something to do with their
>> interest (these days usually some subdiscipline of electronics.)
>>
> This sounds like a variant of what Odd Bodkin and others noted: Why are
> so many cranks electrical engineers?

In my father's day (early 20th century) The most popular discipline was
mechanical engineering. I predict that rocket science will be next, of
course I won't be around to see it.

Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science

<ktqbnsFs6ikU2@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/tech/article-flat.php?id=128686&group=sci.physics.relativity#128686

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!news.samoylyk.net!news.szaf.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: ttt_heg@web.de (Thomas Heger)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 07:12:17 +0100
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <ktqbnsFs6ikU2@mid.individual.net>
References: <16b7d8f3-7297-4b78-a3a9-3d8f09265024n@googlegroups.com> <jO-dnfF_rPWuwvP4nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com> <55baaef6-33c6-4f40-b6fc-6c36b626190an@googlegroups.com> <3t-dncS9iI_6XfP4nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com> <f635b7d2-6307-4f01-a8cd-e02a93e03fc8n@googlegroups.com> <ukofad$el2l$4@dont-email.me> <ukofs8$er25$1@dont-email.me> <54f7572d-14ad-491e-b6be-2f5975d398c1n@googlegroups.com> <d0457a2c-14f7-44c4-a74d-55bc1c481625n@googlegroups.com> <ukud9v$1l989$1@dont-email.me> <ukvuer$1s121$4@dont-email.me> <d9b4c475-fe63-4fb0-adb2-2d1feb5f9bc0n@googlegroups.com> <ul4t5g$2onab$1@dont-email.me> <ktmgn3F1j5uU1@mid.individual.net> <ul5v85$31a31$1@dont-email.me> <ktok1iFgu35U2@mid.individual.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net g1xCq6z3ncXbxIwNHTu2vQOvlDKrTu3td/vq/fvz9LwvJaaxrq
Cancel-Lock: sha1:FkjMZ/7jy6LwRF8c9ru7QYkU/EI= sha256:paDyUMIsiiXOZaN2ObxLGEStnR0nHhF6hge0Vfhb50U=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
In-Reply-To: <ktok1iFgu35U2@mid.individual.net>
 by: Thomas Heger - Tue, 12 Dec 2023 06:12 UTC

Am 11.12.2023 um 15:18 schrieb whodat:

>> This sounds like a variant of what Odd Bodkin and others noted: Why
>> are so many cranks electrical engineers?
>
> In my father's day (early 20th century) The most popular discipline was
> mechanical engineering. I predict that rocket science will be next, of
> course I won't be around to see it.
>

No, the 'Next Big Thing' will be 'Flying Saucers'.

Rockets are a thing from the past.

TH

Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science

<ktqc7qFsavbU1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/tech/article-flat.php?id=128688&group=sci.physics.relativity#128688

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: ttt_heg@web.de (Thomas Heger)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 07:20:46 +0100
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <ktqc7qFsavbU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <16b7d8f3-7297-4b78-a3a9-3d8f09265024n@googlegroups.com> <jO-dnfF_rPWuwvP4nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net xE8lM8XKDDSztxFSrsY9Xwco46uhfFfiDQX+/6vK9cSZsZxtUc
Cancel-Lock: sha1:IltZdXUKcgoZHdPaJQX05q4ppfk= sha256:rSpC/swTwGYf5j4W0Pdh6AawtjfMSmFoukWer0LSYtc=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
In-Reply-To: <jO-dnfF_rPWuwvP4nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com>
 by: Thomas Heger - Tue, 12 Dec 2023 06:20 UTC

Am 05.12.2023 um 00:22 schrieb Tom Roberts:
> On 12/4/23 3:10 PM, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote:
>> The Big Bang and the Center of the Universe The velocity-distance
>> relationship interprets the redshift-distance relationship as caused
>> by the Doppler shift of starlight. This relationship is the same in
>> every direction from Earth. This requires we are at the center of
>> the universe.
>
> Nope! In a homogeneous and isotropic universe this would hold at any
> location, and THERE IS NO "CENTER".

The center is me (or you).

The reason: as we see 'the universe' this universe is not universal, but
identical to what relativity calls 'past light cone'.

This past light cone is always the past light cone of the observer in
question and that is me (or you or whoever else).

'The universe' is actually a picture we receive from the past.

And what we see is a set of events, which didn't happen at the same
time, but the longer ago the further away.

That IS (!!!!) the set of of events located on our own past light cone.

This is actually a picture and does not reflect any kind of reality.

So our picture from the past has a center, which we call 'big bang'. And
from there it does expand in all directions (and so forth).

But that's no big deal, because it is not real anyhow.

....

TH

Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science

<ul8u2r$3if5m$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/tech/article-flat.php?id=128690&group=sci.physics.relativity#128690

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com (Chris M. Thomasson)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 22:20:10 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 62
Message-ID: <ul8u2r$3if5m$1@dont-email.me>
References: <16b7d8f3-7297-4b78-a3a9-3d8f09265024n@googlegroups.com>
<jO-dnfF_rPWuwvP4nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com>
<55baaef6-33c6-4f40-b6fc-6c36b626190an@googlegroups.com>
<3t-dncS9iI_6XfP4nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com>
<f635b7d2-6307-4f01-a8cd-e02a93e03fc8n@googlegroups.com>
<ukofad$el2l$4@dont-email.me> <ukofs8$er25$1@dont-email.me>
<54f7572d-14ad-491e-b6be-2f5975d398c1n@googlegroups.com>
<d0457a2c-14f7-44c4-a74d-55bc1c481625n@googlegroups.com>
<ukud9v$1l989$1@dont-email.me>
<3816a033-6316-4c03-81a7-0aeac2a33a2cn@googlegroups.com>
<d76dndB0Hvdy2-74nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com>
<3f52c87f-15a7-4247-8954-97fec6338f81n@googlegroups.com>
<ul0mum$233na$6@dont-email.me>
<55e2b62b-090d-45ce-b211-10b3530e92a8n@googlegroups.com>
<ul0p32$23fli$1@dont-email.me> <ul28ck$29hgg$2@dont-email.me>
<ul3mq8$2jdst$1@dont-email.me> <ul3pak$2jogm$1@dont-email.me>
<ul60bs$31a31$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 06:20:11 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="23d5b978bf91b8a6165d34ef4bea246f";
logging-data="3751094"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/Mw+Ww5BpEe9nXCCJ0QUVoDFdMWXFsaco="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:2/XmopLvk5lOYdmUBG6t32JV+g8=
In-Reply-To: <ul60bs$31a31$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
 by: Chris M. Thomasson - Tue, 12 Dec 2023 06:20 UTC

On 12/10/2023 7:40 PM, Volney wrote:
> On 12/10/2023 2:28 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> On 12/9/2023 10:45 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>> On 12/9/2023 9:33 AM, Volney wrote:
>>>> On 12/8/2023 11:05 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>>> The fun part is that any observer on the surface of a sphere might
>>>>> think its at the center. Or, well, think about the great attractor,
>>>>> in space...
>>>>
>>>> Exactly. No matter where you are on the surface of a sphere, it
>>>> LOOKS like you are at the center.
>>>>
>>>> Same with the 3D universe. No matter where you are, it LOOKS like
>>>> you're at the center.
>>>
>>> Another point... Think of a 3d point in a 4d system where any "true"
>>> 3d point has a w component of zero, ala:
>>>
>>> (x, y, z, w), fine... vec4, okay:
>>>
>>> vec4 point_4d = { 1, 1, 1, 0 };
>>>
>>> Is a "pure" 3d point. However:
>>>
>>> vec4 point_4d_oddball = { 1, 1, 1, 0.000000001 };
>>>
>>> is not a "pure" 3d point at all, not in any way shape or form! A 4d
>>> observer at that point with a non-zero w component, would be able to
>>> look at the 3d world as a sort of alpha blend, in a sense. It could
>>> see right through things, and walk right through walls... Eve ones
>>> made of lead. ;^)
>>>
>>> Too much pondering here? lol. :^)
>>
>> In a land far far away... The 4d observer, with a non-zero w point in
>> its 4-ary vector, would be able to stand on the surface of a planet,
>> look down and see right through said planet into space on the other
>> side... Everything looks like an alpha channel/blend of sorts, it
>> would be able to see things akin to a 3d person drawing 2d plans. It
>> would be able to walk right through walls that exist in points that
>> have zero for a 4d component, w = 0... It would be able to see in
>> every room, see inside of people, look down and see space look up and
>> see more space... Sorry, I wrote that for fun. Try not to call me a
>> 100% kook? ;^) lol.
>
> I like the description of what it would look like if a 1 meter diameter
> 4D hypersphere with its x,y,z coordinates of its center were in the room
> you are and its w coordinate going from negative to zero to positive.
> First you'd see a point which rapidly would grow into a sphere, continue
> growing but slower until it was 1 meter diameter, then it would shrink
> to a point and wink out of existence.

Well, so far, that is how some of my 4-ary vector field experiments
actually look/act like! The problem is that I am having trouble
visualizing points that have a w component that is non-zero. My n-ary
vector field helps! But its still strange. I can see how a "ghost" point
with a non-zero w component effect points in the 3d world, but its still
odd to me. I actually have no idea where to plot a 4d point that has
zero x, y, z components, and a non-zero w! Say,

(0, 0, 0, 1) ? Where do I plot that sucker!

Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science

<ul91o9$3iu73$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/tech/article-flat.php?id=128692&group=sci.physics.relativity#128692

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!news.hispagatos.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com (Chris M. Thomasson)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 23:22:48 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 69
Message-ID: <ul91o9$3iu73$1@dont-email.me>
References: <16b7d8f3-7297-4b78-a3a9-3d8f09265024n@googlegroups.com>
<jO-dnfF_rPWuwvP4nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com>
<55baaef6-33c6-4f40-b6fc-6c36b626190an@googlegroups.com>
<3t-dncS9iI_6XfP4nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com>
<f635b7d2-6307-4f01-a8cd-e02a93e03fc8n@googlegroups.com>
<ukofad$el2l$4@dont-email.me> <ukofs8$er25$1@dont-email.me>
<54f7572d-14ad-491e-b6be-2f5975d398c1n@googlegroups.com>
<d0457a2c-14f7-44c4-a74d-55bc1c481625n@googlegroups.com>
<ukud9v$1l989$1@dont-email.me>
<3816a033-6316-4c03-81a7-0aeac2a33a2cn@googlegroups.com>
<d76dndB0Hvdy2-74nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com>
<3f52c87f-15a7-4247-8954-97fec6338f81n@googlegroups.com>
<ul0mum$233na$6@dont-email.me>
<55e2b62b-090d-45ce-b211-10b3530e92a8n@googlegroups.com>
<ul0p32$23fli$1@dont-email.me> <ul28ck$29hgg$2@dont-email.me>
<ul3mq8$2jdst$1@dont-email.me> <ul3pak$2jogm$1@dont-email.me>
<ul60bs$31a31$2@dont-email.me> <ul8u2r$3if5m$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 07:22:49 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="23d5b978bf91b8a6165d34ef4bea246f";
logging-data="3766499"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18pnZcW4MoPRNsenxG0aK92QXR5yGzAloU="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:9suIO0lY/HzfCx8P43C925srMxE=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <ul8u2r$3if5m$1@dont-email.me>
 by: Chris M. Thomasson - Tue, 12 Dec 2023 07:22 UTC

On 12/11/2023 10:20 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 12/10/2023 7:40 PM, Volney wrote:
>> On 12/10/2023 2:28 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>> On 12/9/2023 10:45 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>> On 12/9/2023 9:33 AM, Volney wrote:
>>>>> On 12/8/2023 11:05 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>> [...]
>>>>>> The fun part is that any observer on the surface of a sphere might
>>>>>> think its at the center. Or, well, think about the great
>>>>>> attractor, in space...
>>>>>
>>>>> Exactly. No matter where you are on the surface of a sphere, it
>>>>> LOOKS like you are at the center.
>>>>>
>>>>> Same with the 3D universe. No matter where you are, it LOOKS like
>>>>> you're at the center.
>>>>
>>>> Another point... Think of a 3d point in a 4d system where any "true"
>>>> 3d point has a w component of zero, ala:
>>>>
>>>> (x, y, z, w), fine... vec4, okay:
>>>>
>>>> vec4 point_4d = { 1, 1, 1, 0 };
>>>>
>>>> Is a "pure" 3d point. However:
>>>>
>>>> vec4 point_4d_oddball = { 1, 1, 1, 0.000000001 };
>>>>
>>>> is not a "pure" 3d point at all, not in any way shape or form! A 4d
>>>> observer at that point with a non-zero w component, would be able to
>>>> look at the 3d world as a sort of alpha blend, in a sense. It could
>>>> see right through things, and walk right through walls... Eve ones
>>>> made of lead. ;^)
>>>>
>>>> Too much pondering here? lol. :^)
>>>
>>> In a land far far away... The 4d observer, with a non-zero w point in
>>> its 4-ary vector, would be able to stand on the surface of a planet,
>>> look down and see right through said planet into space on the other
>>> side... Everything looks like an alpha channel/blend of sorts, it
>>> would be able to see things akin to a 3d person drawing 2d plans. It
>>> would be able to walk right through walls that exist in points that
>>> have zero for a 4d component, w = 0... It would be able to see in
>>> every room, see inside of people, look down and see space look up and
>>> see more space... Sorry, I wrote that for fun. Try not to call me a
>>> 100% kook? ;^) lol.
>>
>> I like the description of what it would look like if a 1 meter
>> diameter 4D hypersphere with its x,y,z coordinates of its center were
>> in the room you are and its w coordinate going from negative to zero
>> to positive. First you'd see a point which rapidly would grow into a
>> sphere, continue growing but slower until it was 1 meter diameter,
>> then it would shrink to a point and wink out of existence.
>
> Well, so far, that is how some of my 4-ary vector field experiments
> actually look/act like! The problem is that I am having trouble
> visualizing points that have a w component that is non-zero. My n-ary
> vector field helps! But its still strange. I can see how a "ghost" point
> with a non-zero w component effect points in the 3d world, but its still
> odd to me. I actually have no idea where to plot a 4d point that has
> zero x, y, z components, and a non-zero w! Say,
>
> (0, 0, 0, 1) ? Where do I plot that sucker!

Thinking of that type of plotting makes me want to listen to strange music:

https://youtu.be/OCjGzFBckIw?t=8587

;^)

Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science

<ulbheu$239b$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/tech/article-flat.php?id=128707&group=sci.physics.relativity#128707

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: volney@invalid.invalid (Volney)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 01:03:10 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 71
Message-ID: <ulbheu$239b$1@dont-email.me>
References: <16b7d8f3-7297-4b78-a3a9-3d8f09265024n@googlegroups.com>
<jO-dnfF_rPWuwvP4nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com>
<55baaef6-33c6-4f40-b6fc-6c36b626190an@googlegroups.com>
<3t-dncS9iI_6XfP4nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com>
<f635b7d2-6307-4f01-a8cd-e02a93e03fc8n@googlegroups.com>
<ukofad$el2l$4@dont-email.me> <ukofs8$er25$1@dont-email.me>
<54f7572d-14ad-491e-b6be-2f5975d398c1n@googlegroups.com>
<d0457a2c-14f7-44c4-a74d-55bc1c481625n@googlegroups.com>
<ukud9v$1l989$1@dont-email.me>
<3816a033-6316-4c03-81a7-0aeac2a33a2cn@googlegroups.com>
<d76dndB0Hvdy2-74nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com>
<3f52c87f-15a7-4247-8954-97fec6338f81n@googlegroups.com>
<ul0mum$233na$6@dont-email.me>
<55e2b62b-090d-45ce-b211-10b3530e92a8n@googlegroups.com>
<ul0p32$23fli$1@dont-email.me> <ul28ck$29hgg$2@dont-email.me>
<ul3mq8$2jdst$1@dont-email.me> <ul3pak$2jogm$1@dont-email.me>
<ul60bs$31a31$2@dont-email.me> <ul8u2r$3if5m$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 06:03:10 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d93c9a7b46adf1b67cba7c814181307e";
logging-data="68907"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19qI240W5U5rIawfMgTIrs6"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:hIsSqQw1OKbIHjrNi3E3dOFKDq4=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <ul8u2r$3if5m$1@dont-email.me>
 by: Volney - Wed, 13 Dec 2023 06:03 UTC

On 12/12/2023 1:20 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 12/10/2023 7:40 PM, Volney wrote:
>> On 12/10/2023 2:28 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>> On 12/9/2023 10:45 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>> On 12/9/2023 9:33 AM, Volney wrote:
>>>>> On 12/8/2023 11:05 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>> [...]
>>>>>> The fun part is that any observer on the surface of a sphere might
>>>>>> think its at the center. Or, well, think about the great
>>>>>> attractor, in space...
>>>>>
>>>>> Exactly. No matter where you are on the surface of a sphere, it
>>>>> LOOKS like you are at the center.
>>>>>
>>>>> Same with the 3D universe. No matter where you are, it LOOKS like
>>>>> you're at the center.
>>>>
>>>> Another point... Think of a 3d point in a 4d system where any "true"
>>>> 3d point has a w component of zero, ala:
>>>>
>>>> (x, y, z, w), fine... vec4, okay:
>>>>
>>>> vec4 point_4d = { 1, 1, 1, 0 };
>>>>
>>>> Is a "pure" 3d point. However:
>>>>
>>>> vec4 point_4d_oddball = { 1, 1, 1, 0.000000001 };
>>>>
>>>> is not a "pure" 3d point at all, not in any way shape or form! A 4d
>>>> observer at that point with a non-zero w component, would be able to
>>>> look at the 3d world as a sort of alpha blend, in a sense. It could
>>>> see right through things, and walk right through walls... Eve ones
>>>> made of lead. ;^)
>>>>
>>>> Too much pondering here? lol. :^)
>>>
>>> In a land far far away... The 4d observer, with a non-zero w point in
>>> its 4-ary vector, would be able to stand on the surface of a planet,
>>> look down and see right through said planet into space on the other
>>> side... Everything looks like an alpha channel/blend of sorts, it
>>> would be able to see things akin to a 3d person drawing 2d plans. It
>>> would be able to walk right through walls that exist in points that
>>> have zero for a 4d component, w = 0... It would be able to see in
>>> every room, see inside of people, look down and see space look up and
>>> see more space... Sorry, I wrote that for fun. Try not to call me a
>>> 100% kook? ;^) lol.
>>
>> I like the description of what it would look like if a 1 meter
>> diameter 4D hypersphere with its x,y,z coordinates of its center were
>> in the room you are and its w coordinate going from negative to zero
>> to positive. First you'd see a point which rapidly would grow into a
>> sphere, continue growing but slower until it was 1 meter diameter,
>> then it would shrink to a point and wink out of existence.
>
> Well, so far, that is how some of my 4-ary vector field experiments
> actually look/act like! The problem is that I am having trouble
> visualizing points that have a w component that is non-zero. My n-ary
> vector field helps! But its still strange. I can see how a "ghost" point
> with a non-zero w component effect points in the 3d world, but its still
> odd to me. I actually have no idea where to plot a 4d point that has
> zero x, y, z components, and a non-zero w! Say,
>
> (0, 0, 0, 1) ? Where do I plot that sucker!

Only points with w=0 can be observed by 3D beings. In my example, the
hypersphere with a diameter of 1 will be nonexistent until its center
coordinate becomes w = -1. At that time a single point (with w=0)
hypersurface appears. As w of the center increases, the number of points
with w=0 and thus "real" increases. When the center is at w=0, the
hypersurface is at a maximum and appears as a sphere with diameter 1. As
w increases the sphere shrinks and when w=1 it is a point and then vanishes.

Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science

<ulbi2v$239b$2@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/tech/article-flat.php?id=128708&group=sci.physics.relativity#128708

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!nntp.comgw.net!paganini.bofh.team!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: volney@invalid.invalid (Volney)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 01:13:51 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 76
Message-ID: <ulbi2v$239b$2@dont-email.me>
References: <16b7d8f3-7297-4b78-a3a9-3d8f09265024n@googlegroups.com>
<jO-dnfF_rPWuwvP4nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com>
<55baaef6-33c6-4f40-b6fc-6c36b626190an@googlegroups.com>
<3t-dncS9iI_6XfP4nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com>
<f635b7d2-6307-4f01-a8cd-e02a93e03fc8n@googlegroups.com>
<ukofad$el2l$4@dont-email.me> <ukofs8$er25$1@dont-email.me>
<54f7572d-14ad-491e-b6be-2f5975d398c1n@googlegroups.com>
<d0457a2c-14f7-44c4-a74d-55bc1c481625n@googlegroups.com>
<ukud9v$1l989$1@dont-email.me>
<3816a033-6316-4c03-81a7-0aeac2a33a2cn@googlegroups.com>
<d76dndB0Hvdy2-74nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com>
<3f52c87f-15a7-4247-8954-97fec6338f81n@googlegroups.com>
<ul0mum$233na$6@dont-email.me>
<55e2b62b-090d-45ce-b211-10b3530e92a8n@googlegroups.com>
<ul0p32$23fli$1@dont-email.me> <ul28ck$29hgg$2@dont-email.me>
<ul3mq8$2jdst$1@dont-email.me> <ul3pak$2jogm$1@dont-email.me>
<ul60bs$31a31$2@dont-email.me> <ul8u2r$3if5m$1@dont-email.me>
<ulbheu$239b$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 06:13:51 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d93c9a7b46adf1b67cba7c814181307e";
logging-data="68907"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19BC3WM1R6sNqPjnk6Q9ZMD"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:eu6/sXC0+LYqRGx34m4GEzCl14k=
In-Reply-To: <ulbheu$239b$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
 by: Volney - Wed, 13 Dec 2023 06:13 UTC

On 12/13/2023 1:03 AM, Volney wrote:
> On 12/12/2023 1:20 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> On 12/10/2023 7:40 PM, Volney wrote:
>>> On 12/10/2023 2:28 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>> On 12/9/2023 10:45 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>> On 12/9/2023 9:33 AM, Volney wrote:
>>>>>> On 12/8/2023 11:05 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>> The fun part is that any observer on the surface of a sphere
>>>>>>> might think its at the center. Or, well, think about the great
>>>>>>> attractor, in space...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Exactly. No matter where you are on the surface of a sphere, it
>>>>>> LOOKS like you are at the center.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Same with the 3D universe. No matter where you are, it LOOKS like
>>>>>> you're at the center.
>>>>>
>>>>> Another point... Think of a 3d point in a 4d system where any
>>>>> "true" 3d point has a w component of zero, ala:
>>>>>
>>>>> (x, y, z, w), fine... vec4, okay:
>>>>>
>>>>> vec4 point_4d = { 1, 1, 1, 0 };
>>>>>
>>>>> Is a "pure" 3d point. However:
>>>>>
>>>>> vec4 point_4d_oddball = { 1, 1, 1, 0.000000001 };
>>>>>
>>>>> is not a "pure" 3d point at all, not in any way shape or form! A 4d
>>>>> observer at that point with a non-zero w component, would be able
>>>>> to look at the 3d world as a sort of alpha blend, in a sense. It
>>>>> could see right through things, and walk right through walls... Eve
>>>>> ones made of lead. ;^)
>>>>>
>>>>> Too much pondering here? lol. :^)
>>>>
>>>> In a land far far away... The 4d observer, with a non-zero w point
>>>> in its 4-ary vector, would be able to stand on the surface of a
>>>> planet, look down and see right through said planet into space on
>>>> the other side... Everything looks like an alpha channel/blend of
>>>> sorts, it would be able to see things akin to a 3d person drawing 2d
>>>> plans. It would be able to walk right through walls that exist in
>>>> points that have zero for a 4d component, w = 0... It would be able
>>>> to see in every room, see inside of people, look down and see space
>>>> look up and see more space... Sorry, I wrote that for fun. Try not
>>>> to call me a 100% kook? ;^) lol.
>>>
>>> I like the description of what it would look like if a 1 meter
>>> diameter 4D hypersphere with its x,y,z coordinates of its center were
>>> in the room you are and its w coordinate going from negative to zero
>>> to positive. First you'd see a point which rapidly would grow into a
>>> sphere, continue growing but slower until it was 1 meter diameter,
>>> then it would shrink to a point and wink out of existence.
>>
>> Well, so far, that is how some of my 4-ary vector field experiments
>> actually look/act like! The problem is that I am having trouble
>> visualizing points that have a w component that is non-zero. My n-ary
>> vector field helps! But its still strange. I can see how a "ghost"
>> point with a non-zero w component effect points in the 3d world, but
>> its still odd to me. I actually have no idea where to plot a 4d point
>> that has zero x, y, z components, and a non-zero w! Say,
>>
>> (0, 0, 0, 1) ? Where do I plot that sucker!
>
> Only points with w=0 can be observed by 3D beings. In my example, the
> hypersphere with a diameter of 1 will be nonexistent until its center
> coordinate becomes w = -1. At that time a single point (with w=0)
> hypersurface appears. As w of the center increases, the number of points
> with w=0 and thus "real" increases. When the center is at w=0, the
> hypersurface is at a maximum and appears as a sphere with diameter 1. As
> w increases the sphere shrinks and when w=1 it is a point and then
> vanishes.

I see I was inconsistent. In my replies replace "diameter" with "radius"
everywhere.

Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science

<c3ed7705-1da2-43bf-8409-fe98dec67097n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/tech/article-flat.php?id=128709&group=sci.physics.relativity#128709

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:190f:b0:77f:288e:c340 with SMTP id bj15-20020a05620a190f00b0077f288ec340mr52262qkb.14.1702452412677;
Tue, 12 Dec 2023 23:26:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:201f:b0:3b9:d04c:4166 with SMTP id
q31-20020a056808201f00b003b9d04c4166mr7066195oiw.1.1702452412050; Tue, 12 Dec
2023 23:26:52 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!news.niel.me!glou.org!news.glou.org!usenet-fr.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 23:26:51 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <ulbheu$239b$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=112.134.224.255; posting-account=I3DWzAoAAACOmZUdDcZ-C0PqAZGVsbW0
NNTP-Posting-Host: 112.134.224.255
References: <16b7d8f3-7297-4b78-a3a9-3d8f09265024n@googlegroups.com>
<jO-dnfF_rPWuwvP4nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com> <55baaef6-33c6-4f40-b6fc-6c36b626190an@googlegroups.com>
<3t-dncS9iI_6XfP4nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com> <f635b7d2-6307-4f01-a8cd-e02a93e03fc8n@googlegroups.com>
<ukofad$el2l$4@dont-email.me> <ukofs8$er25$1@dont-email.me>
<54f7572d-14ad-491e-b6be-2f5975d398c1n@googlegroups.com> <d0457a2c-14f7-44c4-a74d-55bc1c481625n@googlegroups.com>
<ukud9v$1l989$1@dont-email.me> <3816a033-6316-4c03-81a7-0aeac2a33a2cn@googlegroups.com>
<d76dndB0Hvdy2-74nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com> <3f52c87f-15a7-4247-8954-97fec6338f81n@googlegroups.com>
<ul0mum$233na$6@dont-email.me> <55e2b62b-090d-45ce-b211-10b3530e92a8n@googlegroups.com>
<ul0p32$23fli$1@dont-email.me> <ul28ck$29hgg$2@dont-email.me>
<ul3mq8$2jdst$1@dont-email.me> <ul3pak$2jogm$1@dont-email.me>
<ul60bs$31a31$2@dont-email.me> <ul8u2r$3if5m$1@dont-email.me> <ulbheu$239b$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <c3ed7705-1da2-43bf-8409-fe98dec67097n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science
From: maluwozniak@gmail.com (Maciej Wozniak)
Injection-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 07:26:52 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
 by: Maciej Wozniak - Wed, 13 Dec 2023 07:26 UTC

On Wednesday 13 December 2023 at 07:03:14 UTC+1, Volney wrote:
> On 12/12/2023 1:20 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> > On 12/10/2023 7:40 PM, Volney wrote:
> >> On 12/10/2023 2:28 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >>> On 12/9/2023 10:45 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >>>> On 12/9/2023 9:33 AM, Volney wrote:
> >>>>> On 12/8/2023 11:05 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >>>> [...]
> >>>>>> The fun part is that any observer on the surface of a sphere might
> >>>>>> think its at the center. Or, well, think about the great
> >>>>>> attractor, in space...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Exactly. No matter where you are on the surface of a sphere, it
> >>>>> LOOKS like you are at the center.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Same with the 3D universe. No matter where you are, it LOOKS like
> >>>>> you're at the center.
> >>>>
> >>>> Another point... Think of a 3d point in a 4d system where any "true"
> >>>> 3d point has a w component of zero, ala:
> >>>>
> >>>> (x, y, z, w), fine... vec4, okay:
> >>>>
> >>>> vec4 point_4d = { 1, 1, 1, 0 };
> >>>>
> >>>> Is a "pure" 3d point. However:
> >>>>
> >>>> vec4 point_4d_oddball = { 1, 1, 1, 0.000000001 };
> >>>>
> >>>> is not a "pure" 3d point at all, not in any way shape or form! A 4d
> >>>> observer at that point with a non-zero w component, would be able to
> >>>> look at the 3d world as a sort of alpha blend, in a sense. It could
> >>>> see right through things, and walk right through walls... Eve ones
> >>>> made of lead. ;^)
> >>>>
> >>>> Too much pondering here? lol. :^)
> >>>
> >>> In a land far far away... The 4d observer, with a non-zero w point in
> >>> its 4-ary vector, would be able to stand on the surface of a planet,
> >>> look down and see right through said planet into space on the other
> >>> side... Everything looks like an alpha channel/blend of sorts, it
> >>> would be able to see things akin to a 3d person drawing 2d plans. It
> >>> would be able to walk right through walls that exist in points that
> >>> have zero for a 4d component, w = 0... It would be able to see in
> >>> every room, see inside of people, look down and see space look up and
> >>> see more space... Sorry, I wrote that for fun. Try not to call me a
> >>> 100% kook? ;^) lol.
> >>
> >> I like the description of what it would look like if a 1 meter
> >> diameter 4D hypersphere with its x,y,z coordinates of its center were
> >> in the room you are and its w coordinate going from negative to zero
> >> to positive. First you'd see a point which rapidly would grow into a
> >> sphere, continue growing but slower until it was 1 meter diameter,
> >> then it would shrink to a point and wink out of existence.
> >
> > Well, so far, that is how some of my 4-ary vector field experiments
> > actually look/act like! The problem is that I am having trouble
> > visualizing points that have a w component that is non-zero. My n-ary
> > vector field helps! But its still strange. I can see how a "ghost" point
> > with a non-zero w component effect points in the 3d world, but its still
> > odd to me. I actually have no idea where to plot a 4d point that has
> > zero x, y, z components, and a non-zero w! Say,
> >
> > (0, 0, 0, 1) ? Where do I plot that sucker!
> Only points with w=0 can be observed by 3D beings. In my example, the

Stop fucking, stupid Mike, and tell us how many
observers on Earth have observed/concluded
that Earth has no center. Have you?

Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science

<ulcdes$3dgv9$3@paganini.bofh.team>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/tech/article-flat.php?id=128715&group=sci.physics.relativity#128715

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity sci.physics sci.math
Followup: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!paganini.bofh.team!not-for-mail
From: earz@rhvzahhb.az (Zachariah Dobrenkov Bakhmatoff)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math
Subject: Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science
Followup-To: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 14:01:01 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: To protect and to server
Message-ID: <ulcdes$3dgv9$3@paganini.bofh.team>
References: <16b7d8f3-7297-4b78-a3a9-3d8f09265024n@googlegroups.com>
<jO-dnfF_rPWuwvP4nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com>
<55baaef6-33c6-4f40-b6fc-6c36b626190an@googlegroups.com>
<3t-dncS9iI_6XfP4nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com>
<f635b7d2-6307-4f01-a8cd-e02a93e03fc8n@googlegroups.com>
<ukofad$el2l$4@dont-email.me> <ukofs8$er25$1@dont-email.me>
<54f7572d-14ad-491e-b6be-2f5975d398c1n@googlegroups.com>
<d0457a2c-14f7-44c4-a74d-55bc1c481625n@googlegroups.com>
<ukud9v$1l989$1@dont-email.me>
<3816a033-6316-4c03-81a7-0aeac2a33a2cn@googlegroups.com>
<d76dndB0Hvdy2-74nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com>
<3f52c87f-15a7-4247-8954-97fec6338f81n@googlegroups.com>
<ul0mum$233na$6@dont-email.me>
<55e2b62b-090d-45ce-b211-10b3530e92a8n@googlegroups.com>
<ul0p32$23fli$1@dont-email.me> <ul28ck$29hgg$2@dont-email.me>
<ul3mq8$2jdst$1@dont-email.me> <ul3pak$2jogm$1@dont-email.me>
<ul60bs$31a31$2@dont-email.me> <ul8u2r$3if5m$1@dont-email.me>
<ulbheu$239b$1@dont-email.me> <ulbi2v$239b$2@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 14:01:01 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: paganini.bofh.team; logging-data="3589097"; posting-host="/WL6fTVlFjcY0jR6RVgNEA.user.paganini.bofh.team"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@bofh.team"; posting-account="9dIQLXBM7WM9KzA+yjdR4A";
User-Agent: MacSOUP/2.8.5 (ea919cf118) (Mac OS 10.10.5)
Cancel-Lock: sha256://iR8nUYC4lVcSXZVsO+NePSX2PVHkGEcKckePOW7wo=
X-Face: )vkvbN&Jo!d_^(IoDoSChANlB[/2unt*h9&[M:CAayYy8{m^qI9XtdZ0vnCe^Ak(
N_Xg^B3R4vBam,fe(@v{{&O9N\~p2c'@nI(0xiSpA\U0;KPz%SuoJ=IEA>RN!H&uC}H=5jP
5cxN1d'"joR+>9a$QhWqGA[VQsz\m814wV!hg5PHfG8RtxNf[:D0pO6q(Q6,&du~K|^rdw"
F--,"TTpx!Pq)6SjT|M"_/OsZ:zy'6,dM5rfz#!poDx-bh&w;8g&_*<A%c4)\|BIf<,#mGl
5gC+O=:x
Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAGFBMVEUoGwvgplXi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X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.3
 by: Zachariah Dobrenkov - Wed, 13 Dec 2023 14:01 UTC

Volney wrote:

>> hypersurface is at a maximum and appears as a sphere with diameter 1.
>> As w increases the sphere shrinks and when w=1 it is a point and then
>> vanishes.
> I see I was inconsistent. In my replies replace "diameter" with "radius"
> everywhere.

so true indeed. The ๐—ธ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜‡๐—ฎ๐—ฟ_๐—ด๐—ผ๐˜†๐˜€ of america and the ๐—ธ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜‡๐—ฎ๐—ฟ_๐—ด๐—ผ๐˜†๐˜€ of ukurina
killed people and destroyed countries, just ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ฒ_"๐—ฎ_๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—น๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด_๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜". I'm not
trying to convince ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚, I'm not trying to convince anybody.

๐—จ๐—ธ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ_๐˜„๐—ฎ๐˜€_๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ_๐—ด๐—ผ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด_๐˜๐—ผ_๐˜„๐—ถ๐—ป_โ€“_๐—จ๐—ฆ_๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฟ
Tommy Tuberville has also dismissed the notion that Russia would invade
Europe, suggesting it was just ๐—ฎ_โ€œ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—น๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด_๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜โ€
https://r%74.com/news/588986-ukraine-never-win-senator/

moreover, these corrupt guys of europe were thinking they remain prime
ministers the rest of their fucking life. Not they are taken out, for
treason, by their own people.

๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ_"๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ด_๐—ด๐—น๐—ผ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐—น_๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€"_๐—ผ๐—ณ_๐—ช๐—˜๐—™
Emmanuel Macron President of France,
Volodoymr Zelensky President of Ukraine,
Jacinda Ardern, former Prime Minister of New Zealand,
Sanna Marin Prime Minister of Finland,
Alexander De Croo Prime Minister of Belgium,
Leo Varadkar Tรกnaiste of Ireland,
Annalena Baerbock Foreign Minister of Germany,
Rishi Sunak, Prime Minister of the United Kingdom,
Mark Rutte, Prime Minister of the Netherlands,
Sebastian Kurz, former Chancellor of Austria

Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science

<uld69n$10946$2@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/tech/article-flat.php?id=128730&group=sci.physics.relativity#128730

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com (Chris M. Thomasson)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 13:04:55 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 90
Message-ID: <uld69n$10946$2@dont-email.me>
References: <16b7d8f3-7297-4b78-a3a9-3d8f09265024n@googlegroups.com>
<jO-dnfF_rPWuwvP4nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com>
<55baaef6-33c6-4f40-b6fc-6c36b626190an@googlegroups.com>
<3t-dncS9iI_6XfP4nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com>
<f635b7d2-6307-4f01-a8cd-e02a93e03fc8n@googlegroups.com>
<ukofad$el2l$4@dont-email.me> <ukofs8$er25$1@dont-email.me>
<54f7572d-14ad-491e-b6be-2f5975d398c1n@googlegroups.com>
<d0457a2c-14f7-44c4-a74d-55bc1c481625n@googlegroups.com>
<ukud9v$1l989$1@dont-email.me>
<3816a033-6316-4c03-81a7-0aeac2a33a2cn@googlegroups.com>
<d76dndB0Hvdy2-74nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com>
<3f52c87f-15a7-4247-8954-97fec6338f81n@googlegroups.com>
<ul0mum$233na$6@dont-email.me>
<55e2b62b-090d-45ce-b211-10b3530e92a8n@googlegroups.com>
<ul0p32$23fli$1@dont-email.me> <ul28ck$29hgg$2@dont-email.me>
<ul3mq8$2jdst$1@dont-email.me> <ul3pak$2jogm$1@dont-email.me>
<ul60bs$31a31$2@dont-email.me> <ul8u2r$3if5m$1@dont-email.me>
<ulbheu$239b$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 21:04:56 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c728c8a5e20b861dda10596491e3f784";
logging-data="1057926"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/oQFiOjsBDuxPQ2+BpDiZZ8FS3wsp22e4="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:25vCnh3H3dmRBNajDDXeUGdX1Dg=
In-Reply-To: <ulbheu$239b$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
 by: Chris M. Thomasson - Wed, 13 Dec 2023 21:04 UTC

On 12/12/2023 10:03 PM, Volney wrote:
> On 12/12/2023 1:20 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> On 12/10/2023 7:40 PM, Volney wrote:
>>> On 12/10/2023 2:28 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>> On 12/9/2023 10:45 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>> On 12/9/2023 9:33 AM, Volney wrote:
>>>>>> On 12/8/2023 11:05 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>> The fun part is that any observer on the surface of a sphere
>>>>>>> might think its at the center. Or, well, think about the great
>>>>>>> attractor, in space...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Exactly. No matter where you are on the surface of a sphere, it
>>>>>> LOOKS like you are at the center.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Same with the 3D universe. No matter where you are, it LOOKS like
>>>>>> you're at the center.
>>>>>
>>>>> Another point... Think of a 3d point in a 4d system where any
>>>>> "true" 3d point has a w component of zero, ala:
>>>>>
>>>>> (x, y, z, w), fine... vec4, okay:
>>>>>
>>>>> vec4 point_4d = { 1, 1, 1, 0 };
>>>>>
>>>>> Is a "pure" 3d point. However:
>>>>>
>>>>> vec4 point_4d_oddball = { 1, 1, 1, 0.000000001 };
>>>>>
>>>>> is not a "pure" 3d point at all, not in any way shape or form! A 4d
>>>>> observer at that point with a non-zero w component, would be able
>>>>> to look at the 3d world as a sort of alpha blend, in a sense. It
>>>>> could see right through things, and walk right through walls... Eve
>>>>> ones made of lead. ;^)
>>>>>
>>>>> Too much pondering here? lol. :^)
>>>>
>>>> In a land far far away... The 4d observer, with a non-zero w point
>>>> in its 4-ary vector, would be able to stand on the surface of a
>>>> planet, look down and see right through said planet into space on
>>>> the other side... Everything looks like an alpha channel/blend of
>>>> sorts, it would be able to see things akin to a 3d person drawing 2d
>>>> plans. It would be able to walk right through walls that exist in
>>>> points that have zero for a 4d component, w = 0... It would be able
>>>> to see in every room, see inside of people, look down and see space
>>>> look up and see more space... Sorry, I wrote that for fun. Try not
>>>> to call me a 100% kook? ;^) lol.
>>>
>>> I like the description of what it would look like if a 1 meter
>>> diameter 4D hypersphere with its x,y,z coordinates of its center were
>>> in the room you are and its w coordinate going from negative to zero
>>> to positive. First you'd see a point which rapidly would grow into a
>>> sphere, continue growing but slower until it was 1 meter diameter,
>>> then it would shrink to a point and wink out of existence.
>>
>> Well, so far, that is how some of my 4-ary vector field experiments
>> actually look/act like! The problem is that I am having trouble
>> visualizing points that have a w component that is non-zero. My n-ary
>> vector field helps! But its still strange. I can see how a "ghost"
>> point with a non-zero w component effect points in the 3d world, but
>> its still odd to me. I actually have no idea where to plot a 4d point
>> that has zero x, y, z components, and a non-zero w! Say,
>>
>> (0, 0, 0, 1) ? Where do I plot that sucker!
>
> Only points with w=0 can be observed by 3D beings. In my example, the
> hypersphere with a diameter of 1 will be nonexistent until its center
> coordinate becomes w = -1. At that time a single point (with w=0)
> hypersurface appears. As w of the center increases, the number of points
> with w=0 and thus "real" increases. When the center is at w=0, the
> hypersurface is at a maximum and appears as a sphere with diameter 1. As
> w increases the sphere shrinks and when w=1 it is a point and then
> vanishes.

Still not sure if an 3d observer could see a 4d object with a non-zero
w. Afaict, it seems like you are taking w on a range of -1...1. Say:

x = 0
y = 0
z = 0
w = -1...0...1

When w is at the center and is actually equal to zero, 3d observers can
finally see it. A fun part is that a 4d observer would be able to see
the 4d object moving, and it would be able to see completely inside the
3d realm (aka alpha blend) its moving through wrt its (x, y, z) components.

I sometimes wonder if the w component can be very small yet non-zero to
a point where a 3d object might be able to notice something, akin to
paranormal activity wrt the 3d object. That is a fun one to ponder on... :^)

Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science

<ule3sv$18qtr$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/tech/article-flat.php?id=128748&group=sci.physics.relativity#128748

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.network!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: volney@invalid.invalid (Volney)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 00:30:06 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 102
Message-ID: <ule3sv$18qtr$1@dont-email.me>
References: <16b7d8f3-7297-4b78-a3a9-3d8f09265024n@googlegroups.com>
<jO-dnfF_rPWuwvP4nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com>
<55baaef6-33c6-4f40-b6fc-6c36b626190an@googlegroups.com>
<3t-dncS9iI_6XfP4nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com>
<f635b7d2-6307-4f01-a8cd-e02a93e03fc8n@googlegroups.com>
<ukofad$el2l$4@dont-email.me> <ukofs8$er25$1@dont-email.me>
<54f7572d-14ad-491e-b6be-2f5975d398c1n@googlegroups.com>
<d0457a2c-14f7-44c4-a74d-55bc1c481625n@googlegroups.com>
<ukud9v$1l989$1@dont-email.me>
<3816a033-6316-4c03-81a7-0aeac2a33a2cn@googlegroups.com>
<d76dndB0Hvdy2-74nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com>
<3f52c87f-15a7-4247-8954-97fec6338f81n@googlegroups.com>
<ul0mum$233na$6@dont-email.me>
<55e2b62b-090d-45ce-b211-10b3530e92a8n@googlegroups.com>
<ul0p32$23fli$1@dont-email.me> <ul28ck$29hgg$2@dont-email.me>
<ul3mq8$2jdst$1@dont-email.me> <ul3pak$2jogm$1@dont-email.me>
<ul60bs$31a31$2@dont-email.me> <ul8u2r$3if5m$1@dont-email.me>
<ulbheu$239b$1@dont-email.me> <uld69n$10946$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 05:30:07 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4689ce7f36891ee50b3c3ba10d8385b6";
logging-data="1338299"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19QRGBT2+S6S2zTnicRfHDv"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:/r6jdZfM03DePbHKNEFopiOiMtA=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <uld69n$10946$2@dont-email.me>
 by: Volney - Thu, 14 Dec 2023 05:30 UTC

On 12/13/2023 4:04 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 12/12/2023 10:03 PM, Volney wrote:
>> On 12/12/2023 1:20 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>> On 12/10/2023 7:40 PM, Volney wrote:
>>>> On 12/10/2023 2:28 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>> On 12/9/2023 10:45 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>> On 12/9/2023 9:33 AM, Volney wrote:
>>>>>>> On 12/8/2023 11:05 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>> The fun part is that any observer on the surface of a sphere
>>>>>>>> might think its at the center. Or, well, think about the great
>>>>>>>> attractor, in space...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Exactly. No matter where you are on the surface of a sphere, it
>>>>>>> LOOKS like you are at the center.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Same with the 3D universe. No matter where you are, it LOOKS like
>>>>>>> you're at the center.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Another point... Think of a 3d point in a 4d system where any
>>>>>> "true" 3d point has a w component of zero, ala:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (x, y, z, w), fine... vec4, okay:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> vec4 point_4d = { 1, 1, 1, 0 };
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is a "pure" 3d point. However:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> vec4 point_4d_oddball = { 1, 1, 1, 0.000000001 };
>>>>>>
>>>>>> is not a "pure" 3d point at all, not in any way shape or form! A
>>>>>> 4d observer at that point with a non-zero w component, would be
>>>>>> able to look at the 3d world as a sort of alpha blend, in a sense.
>>>>>> It could see right through things, and walk right through walls...
>>>>>> Eve ones made of lead. ;^)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Too much pondering here? lol. :^)
>>>>>
>>>>> In a land far far away... The 4d observer, with a non-zero w point
>>>>> in its 4-ary vector, would be able to stand on the surface of a
>>>>> planet, look down and see right through said planet into space on
>>>>> the other side... Everything looks like an alpha channel/blend of
>>>>> sorts, it would be able to see things akin to a 3d person drawing
>>>>> 2d plans. It would be able to walk right through walls that exist
>>>>> in points that have zero for a 4d component, w = 0... It would be
>>>>> able to see in every room, see inside of people, look down and see
>>>>> space look up and see more space... Sorry, I wrote that for fun.
>>>>> Try not to call me a 100% kook? ;^) lol.
>>>>
>>>> I like the description of what it would look like if a 1 meter
>>>> diameter 4D hypersphere with its x,y,z coordinates of its center
>>>> were in the room you are and its w coordinate going from negative to
>>>> zero to positive. First you'd see a point which rapidly would grow
>>>> into a sphere, continue growing but slower until it was 1 meter
>>>> diameter, then it would shrink to a point and wink out of existence.
>>>
>>> Well, so far, that is how some of my 4-ary vector field experiments
>>> actually look/act like! The problem is that I am having trouble
>>> visualizing points that have a w component that is non-zero. My n-ary
>>> vector field helps! But its still strange. I can see how a "ghost"
>>> point with a non-zero w component effect points in the 3d world, but
>>> its still odd to me. I actually have no idea where to plot a 4d point
>>> that has zero x, y, z components, and a non-zero w! Say,
>>>
>>> (0, 0, 0, 1) ? Where do I plot that sucker!
>>
>> Only points with w=0 can be observed by 3D beings. In my example, the
>> hypersphere with a diameter of 1 will be nonexistent until its center
>> coordinate becomes w = -1. At that time a single point (with w=0)
>> hypersurface appears. As w of the center increases, the number of
>> points with w=0 and thus "real" increases. When the center is at w=0,
>> the hypersurface is at a maximum and appears as a sphere with diameter
>> 1. As w increases the sphere shrinks and when w=1 it is a point and
>> then vanishes.
>
> Still not sure if an 3d observer could see a 4d object with a non-zero
> w. Afaict, it seems like you are taking w on a range of -1...1. Say:
>
> x = 0
> y = 0
> z = 0
> w = -1...0...1
>
> When w is at the center and is actually equal to zero, 3d observers can
> finally see it. A fun part is that a 4d observer would be able to see
> the 4d object moving, and it would be able to see completely inside the
> 3d realm (aka alpha blend) its moving through wrt its (x, y, z) components.
>
> I sometimes wonder if the w component can be very small yet non-zero to
> a point where a 3d object might be able to notice something, akin to
> paranormal activity wrt the 3d object. That is a fun one to ponder on...
> :^)

The hypersphere is moving in the w dimension and has a finite radius in
all dimensions including w, of 1. When its center is at w= -1, a single
point at w=1 (relative to the center) is visible. As w of the center
increases but is still negative, parts of the hypersphere have w=0 and
become visible as a sphere. For example, when the center is at w= -0.5,
parts of the hypersphere with w=0.5 (total w=0) are visible. When the
center is at w=0, a sphere with radius 1 is visible. As w becomes
positive the reverse happens. At w=1 only a single point (w = -1
relative to the center) is possible, after which (w>1) it vanishes.

Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science

<ulgd95$1kf4i$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/tech/article-flat.php?id=128763&group=sci.physics.relativity#128763

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!paganini.bofh.team!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com (Chris M. Thomasson)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 18:22:28 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 128
Message-ID: <ulgd95$1kf4i$1@dont-email.me>
References: <16b7d8f3-7297-4b78-a3a9-3d8f09265024n@googlegroups.com>
<55baaef6-33c6-4f40-b6fc-6c36b626190an@googlegroups.com>
<3t-dncS9iI_6XfP4nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com>
<f635b7d2-6307-4f01-a8cd-e02a93e03fc8n@googlegroups.com>
<ukofad$el2l$4@dont-email.me> <ukofs8$er25$1@dont-email.me>
<54f7572d-14ad-491e-b6be-2f5975d398c1n@googlegroups.com>
<d0457a2c-14f7-44c4-a74d-55bc1c481625n@googlegroups.com>
<ukud9v$1l989$1@dont-email.me>
<3816a033-6316-4c03-81a7-0aeac2a33a2cn@googlegroups.com>
<d76dndB0Hvdy2-74nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com>
<3f52c87f-15a7-4247-8954-97fec6338f81n@googlegroups.com>
<ul0mum$233na$6@dont-email.me>
<55e2b62b-090d-45ce-b211-10b3530e92a8n@googlegroups.com>
<ul0p32$23fli$1@dont-email.me> <ul28ck$29hgg$2@dont-email.me>
<ul3mq8$2jdst$1@dont-email.me> <ul3pak$2jogm$1@dont-email.me>
<ul60bs$31a31$2@dont-email.me> <ul8u2r$3if5m$1@dont-email.me>
<ulbheu$239b$1@dont-email.me> <uld69n$10946$2@dont-email.me>
<ule3sv$18qtr$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 02:22:30 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="513d149cab1ad625e0aa2a5d5251a9a6";
logging-data="1719442"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18OzEaoWAsZs87dQIq/oBczKZnlQsxxcYU="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:1S47QUWs9P3bA5lZmdXygslbKN8=
In-Reply-To: <ule3sv$18qtr$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
 by: Chris M. Thomasson - Fri, 15 Dec 2023 02:22 UTC

On 12/13/2023 9:30 PM, Volney wrote:
> On 12/13/2023 4:04 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> On 12/12/2023 10:03 PM, Volney wrote:
>>> On 12/12/2023 1:20 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>> On 12/10/2023 7:40 PM, Volney wrote:
>>>>> On 12/10/2023 2:28 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>> On 12/9/2023 10:45 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>>> On 12/9/2023 9:33 AM, Volney wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 12/8/2023 11:05 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>>> The fun part is that any observer on the surface of a sphere
>>>>>>>>> might think its at the center. Or, well, think about the great
>>>>>>>>> attractor, in space...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Exactly. No matter where you are on the surface of a sphere, it
>>>>>>>> LOOKS like you are at the center.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Same with the 3D universe. No matter where you are, it LOOKS
>>>>>>>> like you're at the center.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Another point... Think of a 3d point in a 4d system where any
>>>>>>> "true" 3d point has a w component of zero, ala:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (x, y, z, w), fine... vec4, okay:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> vec4 point_4d = { 1, 1, 1, 0 };
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is a "pure" 3d point. However:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> vec4 point_4d_oddball = { 1, 1, 1, 0.000000001 };
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> is not a "pure" 3d point at all, not in any way shape or form! A
>>>>>>> 4d observer at that point with a non-zero w component, would be
>>>>>>> able to look at the 3d world as a sort of alpha blend, in a
>>>>>>> sense. It could see right through things, and walk right through
>>>>>>> walls... Eve ones made of lead. ;^)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Too much pondering here? lol. :^)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In a land far far away... The 4d observer, with a non-zero w point
>>>>>> in its 4-ary vector, would be able to stand on the surface of a
>>>>>> planet, look down and see right through said planet into space on
>>>>>> the other side... Everything looks like an alpha channel/blend of
>>>>>> sorts, it would be able to see things akin to a 3d person drawing
>>>>>> 2d plans. It would be able to walk right through walls that exist
>>>>>> in points that have zero for a 4d component, w = 0... It would be
>>>>>> able to see in every room, see inside of people, look down and see
>>>>>> space look up and see more space... Sorry, I wrote that for fun.
>>>>>> Try not to call me a 100% kook? ;^) lol.
>>>>>
>>>>> I like the description of what it would look like if a 1 meter
>>>>> diameter 4D hypersphere with its x,y,z coordinates of its center
>>>>> were in the room you are and its w coordinate going from negative
>>>>> to zero to positive. First you'd see a point which rapidly would
>>>>> grow into a sphere, continue growing but slower until it was 1
>>>>> meter diameter, then it would shrink to a point and wink out of
>>>>> existence.
>>>>
>>>> Well, so far, that is how some of my 4-ary vector field experiments
>>>> actually look/act like! The problem is that I am having trouble
>>>> visualizing points that have a w component that is non-zero. My
>>>> n-ary vector field helps! But its still strange. I can see how a
>>>> "ghost" point with a non-zero w component effect points in the 3d
>>>> world, but its still odd to me. I actually have no idea where to
>>>> plot a 4d point that has zero x, y, z components, and a non-zero w!
>>>> Say,
>>>>
>>>> (0, 0, 0, 1) ? Where do I plot that sucker!
>>>
>>> Only points with w=0 can be observed by 3D beings. In my example, the
>>> hypersphere with a diameter of 1 will be nonexistent until its center
>>> coordinate becomes w = -1. At that time a single point (with w=0)
>>> hypersurface appears. As w of the center increases, the number of
>>> points with w=0 and thus "real" increases. When the center is at w=0,
>>> the hypersurface is at a maximum and appears as a sphere with
>>> diameter 1. As w increases the sphere shrinks and when w=1 it is a
>>> point and then vanishes.
>>
>> Still not sure if an 3d observer could see a 4d object with a non-zero
>> w. Afaict, it seems like you are taking w on a range of -1...1. Say:
>>
>> x = 0
>> y = 0
>> z = 0
>> w = -1...0...1
>>
>> When w is at the center and is actually equal to zero, 3d observers
>> can finally see it. A fun part is that a 4d observer would be able to
>> see the 4d object moving, and it would be able to see completely
>> inside the 3d realm (aka alpha blend) its moving through wrt its (x,
>> y, z) components.
>>
>> I sometimes wonder if the w component can be very small yet non-zero
>> to a point where a 3d object might be able to notice something, akin
>> to paranormal activity wrt the 3d object. That is a fun one to ponder
>> on... :^)
>
> The hypersphere is moving in the w dimension and has a finite radius in
> all dimensions including w, of 1. When its center is at w= -1, a single
> point at w=1 (relative to the center) is visible. As w of the center
> increases but is still negative, parts of the hypersphere have w=0 and
> become visible as a sphere. For example, when the center is at w= -0.5,
> parts of the hypersphere with w=0.5 (total w=0) are visible. When the
> center is at w=0, a sphere with radius 1 is visible. As w becomes
> positive the reverse happens. At w=1 only a single point (w = -1
> relative to the center) is possible, after which (w>1) it vanishes.

Afaict, its as if you are using the w component as the radii of the
sphere where the radius goes from 0...1...0? Where the middle has a w =
0? Think of a 4d unit sphere moving from p0 to p1, all x, y, z
components are zero, so it is a "pure" 4d object:

p0 = (0, 0, 0, -1)
p1 = (0, 0, 0, 1)

dif = p1 - p0

mid = p0 + dif / 2

At the mid point it should be at point (0, 0, 0, 0) Which should be
visible to the 3d world as a unit sphere. Say the unit is one meter,
just for now... ;^)

I think as soon as the w component of the origin of the sphere is zero,
it can be visually observed by 3d observers, aka their w = 0.

Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science

<ulgq91$1q01t$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/tech/article-flat.php?id=128774&group=sci.physics.relativity#128774

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com (Chris M. Thomasson)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 22:04:15 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 140
Message-ID: <ulgq91$1q01t$1@dont-email.me>
References: <16b7d8f3-7297-4b78-a3a9-3d8f09265024n@googlegroups.com>
<55baaef6-33c6-4f40-b6fc-6c36b626190an@googlegroups.com>
<3t-dncS9iI_6XfP4nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com>
<f635b7d2-6307-4f01-a8cd-e02a93e03fc8n@googlegroups.com>
<ukofad$el2l$4@dont-email.me> <ukofs8$er25$1@dont-email.me>
<54f7572d-14ad-491e-b6be-2f5975d398c1n@googlegroups.com>
<d0457a2c-14f7-44c4-a74d-55bc1c481625n@googlegroups.com>
<ukud9v$1l989$1@dont-email.me>
<3816a033-6316-4c03-81a7-0aeac2a33a2cn@googlegroups.com>
<d76dndB0Hvdy2-74nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com>
<3f52c87f-15a7-4247-8954-97fec6338f81n@googlegroups.com>
<ul0mum$233na$6@dont-email.me>
<55e2b62b-090d-45ce-b211-10b3530e92a8n@googlegroups.com>
<ul0p32$23fli$1@dont-email.me> <ul28ck$29hgg$2@dont-email.me>
<ul3mq8$2jdst$1@dont-email.me> <ul3pak$2jogm$1@dont-email.me>
<ul60bs$31a31$2@dont-email.me> <ul8u2r$3if5m$1@dont-email.me>
<ulbheu$239b$1@dont-email.me> <uld69n$10946$2@dont-email.me>
<ule3sv$18qtr$1@dont-email.me> <ulgd95$1kf4i$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 06:04:17 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="513d149cab1ad625e0aa2a5d5251a9a6";
logging-data="1900605"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+S487qRvSOP8UVzYQKdpOjCRY1M1YpvKg="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:bG622VZheljTv1viM9h6gKHRLCA=
In-Reply-To: <ulgd95$1kf4i$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
 by: Chris M. Thomasson - Fri, 15 Dec 2023 06:04 UTC

On 12/14/2023 6:22 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 12/13/2023 9:30 PM, Volney wrote:
>> On 12/13/2023 4:04 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>> On 12/12/2023 10:03 PM, Volney wrote:
>>>> On 12/12/2023 1:20 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>> On 12/10/2023 7:40 PM, Volney wrote:
>>>>>> On 12/10/2023 2:28 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>>> On 12/9/2023 10:45 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 12/9/2023 9:33 AM, Volney wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 12/8/2023 11:05 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>>>> The fun part is that any observer on the surface of a sphere
>>>>>>>>>> might think its at the center. Or, well, think about the great
>>>>>>>>>> attractor, in space...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Exactly. No matter where you are on the surface of a sphere, it
>>>>>>>>> LOOKS like you are at the center.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Same with the 3D universe. No matter where you are, it LOOKS
>>>>>>>>> like you're at the center.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Another point... Think of a 3d point in a 4d system where any
>>>>>>>> "true" 3d point has a w component of zero, ala:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (x, y, z, w), fine... vec4, okay:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> vec4 point_4d = { 1, 1, 1, 0 };
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Is a "pure" 3d point. However:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> vec4 point_4d_oddball = { 1, 1, 1, 0.000000001 };
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> is not a "pure" 3d point at all, not in any way shape or form! A
>>>>>>>> 4d observer at that point with a non-zero w component, would be
>>>>>>>> able to look at the 3d world as a sort of alpha blend, in a
>>>>>>>> sense. It could see right through things, and walk right through
>>>>>>>> walls... Eve ones made of lead. ;^)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Too much pondering here? lol. :^)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In a land far far away... The 4d observer, with a non-zero w
>>>>>>> point in its 4-ary vector, would be able to stand on the surface
>>>>>>> of a planet, look down and see right through said planet into
>>>>>>> space on the other side... Everything looks like an alpha
>>>>>>> channel/blend of sorts, it would be able to see things akin to a
>>>>>>> 3d person drawing 2d plans. It would be able to walk right
>>>>>>> through walls that exist in points that have zero for a 4d
>>>>>>> component, w = 0... It would be able to see in every room, see
>>>>>>> inside of people, look down and see space look up and see more
>>>>>>> space... Sorry, I wrote that for fun. Try not to call me a 100%
>>>>>>> kook? ;^) lol.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I like the description of what it would look like if a 1 meter
>>>>>> diameter 4D hypersphere with its x,y,z coordinates of its center
>>>>>> were in the room you are and its w coordinate going from negative
>>>>>> to zero to positive. First you'd see a point which rapidly would
>>>>>> grow into a sphere, continue growing but slower until it was 1
>>>>>> meter diameter, then it would shrink to a point and wink out of
>>>>>> existence.
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, so far, that is how some of my 4-ary vector field experiments
>>>>> actually look/act like! The problem is that I am having trouble
>>>>> visualizing points that have a w component that is non-zero. My
>>>>> n-ary vector field helps! But its still strange. I can see how a
>>>>> "ghost" point with a non-zero w component effect points in the 3d
>>>>> world, but its still odd to me. I actually have no idea where to
>>>>> plot a 4d point that has zero x, y, z components, and a non-zero w!
>>>>> Say,
>>>>>
>>>>> (0, 0, 0, 1) ? Where do I plot that sucker!
>>>>
>>>> Only points with w=0 can be observed by 3D beings. In my example,
>>>> the hypersphere with a diameter of 1 will be nonexistent until its
>>>> center coordinate becomes w = -1. At that time a single point (with
>>>> w=0) hypersurface appears. As w of the center increases, the number
>>>> of points with w=0 and thus "real" increases. When the center is at
>>>> w=0, the hypersurface is at a maximum and appears as a sphere with
>>>> diameter 1. As w increases the sphere shrinks and when w=1 it is a
>>>> point and then vanishes.
>>>
>>> Still not sure if an 3d observer could see a 4d object with a
>>> non-zero w. Afaict, it seems like you are taking w on a range of
>>> -1...1. Say:
>>>
>>> x = 0
>>> y = 0
>>> z = 0
>>> w = -1...0...1
>>>
>>> When w is at the center and is actually equal to zero, 3d observers
>>> can finally see it. A fun part is that a 4d observer would be able to
>>> see the 4d object moving, and it would be able to see completely
>>> inside the 3d realm (aka alpha blend) its moving through wrt its (x,
>>> y, z) components.
>>>
>>> I sometimes wonder if the w component can be very small yet non-zero
>>> to a point where a 3d object might be able to notice something, akin
>>> to paranormal activity wrt the 3d object. That is a fun one to ponder
>>> on... :^)
>>
>> The hypersphere is moving in the w dimension and has a finite radius
>> in all dimensions including w, of 1. When its center is at w= -1, a
>> single point at w=1 (relative to the center) is visible. As w of the
>> center increases but is still negative, parts of the hypersphere have
>> w=0 and become visible as a sphere. For example, when the center is at
>> w= -0.5, parts of the hypersphere with w=0.5 (total w=0) are visible.
>> When the center is at w=0, a sphere with radius 1 is visible. As w
>> becomes positive the reverse happens. At w=1 only a single point (w =
>> -1 relative to the center) is possible, after which (w>1) it vanishes.
>
> Afaict, its as if you are using the w component as the radii of the
> sphere where the radius goes from 0...1...0? Where the middle has a w =
> 0?

Ummm, the middle of 0...1...0 would be w = 1, sorry for that damn typo!!!

YIKES! ;^o

Think of a 4d unit sphere moving from p0 to p1, all x, y, z
> components are zero, so it is a "pure" 4d object:
>
> p0 = (0, 0, 0, -1)
> p1 = (0, 0, 0, 1)
>
> dif = p1 - p0
>
> mid = p0 + dif / 2
>
> At the mid point it should be at point (0, 0, 0, 0) Which should be
> visible to the 3d world as a unit sphere. Say the unit is one meter,
> just for now... ;^)
>
> I think as soon as the w component of the origin of the sphere is zero,
> it can be visually observed by 3d observers, aka their w = 0.
>
>
>

Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science

<ulgqht$1q01t$2@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/tech/article-flat.php?id=128775&group=sci.physics.relativity#128775

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com (Chris M. Thomasson)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 22:08:59 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 115
Message-ID: <ulgqht$1q01t$2@dont-email.me>
References: <16b7d8f3-7297-4b78-a3a9-3d8f09265024n@googlegroups.com>
<55baaef6-33c6-4f40-b6fc-6c36b626190an@googlegroups.com>
<3t-dncS9iI_6XfP4nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com>
<f635b7d2-6307-4f01-a8cd-e02a93e03fc8n@googlegroups.com>
<ukofad$el2l$4@dont-email.me> <ukofs8$er25$1@dont-email.me>
<54f7572d-14ad-491e-b6be-2f5975d398c1n@googlegroups.com>
<d0457a2c-14f7-44c4-a74d-55bc1c481625n@googlegroups.com>
<ukud9v$1l989$1@dont-email.me>
<3816a033-6316-4c03-81a7-0aeac2a33a2cn@googlegroups.com>
<d76dndB0Hvdy2-74nZ2dnZfqlJxj4p2d@giganews.com>
<3f52c87f-15a7-4247-8954-97fec6338f81n@googlegroups.com>
<ul0mum$233na$6@dont-email.me>
<55e2b62b-090d-45ce-b211-10b3530e92a8n@googlegroups.com>
<ul0p32$23fli$1@dont-email.me> <ul28ck$29hgg$2@dont-email.me>
<ul3mq8$2jdst$1@dont-email.me> <ul3pak$2jogm$1@dont-email.me>
<ul60bs$31a31$2@dont-email.me> <ul8u2r$3if5m$1@dont-email.me>
<ulbheu$239b$1@dont-email.me> <uld69n$10946$2@dont-email.me>
<ule3sv$18qtr$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 06:09:01 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="513d149cab1ad625e0aa2a5d5251a9a6";
logging-data="1900605"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/EhHy21INR/EPQ2DTDQt5zEW2wOZbqq4E="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:d5afFPxhnVdC3zEh4HJC/DkG58Q=
In-Reply-To: <ule3sv$18qtr$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
 by: Chris M. Thomasson - Fri, 15 Dec 2023 06:08 UTC

On 12/13/2023 9:30 PM, Volney wrote:
> On 12/13/2023 4:04 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> On 12/12/2023 10:03 PM, Volney wrote:
>>> On 12/12/2023 1:20 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>> On 12/10/2023 7:40 PM, Volney wrote:
>>>>> On 12/10/2023 2:28 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>> On 12/9/2023 10:45 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>>> On 12/9/2023 9:33 AM, Volney wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 12/8/2023 11:05 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>>> The fun part is that any observer on the surface of a sphere
>>>>>>>>> might think its at the center. Or, well, think about the great
>>>>>>>>> attractor, in space...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Exactly. No matter where you are on the surface of a sphere, it
>>>>>>>> LOOKS like you are at the center.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Same with the 3D universe. No matter where you are, it LOOKS
>>>>>>>> like you're at the center.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Another point... Think of a 3d point in a 4d system where any
>>>>>>> "true" 3d point has a w component of zero, ala:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (x, y, z, w), fine... vec4, okay:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> vec4 point_4d = { 1, 1, 1, 0 };
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is a "pure" 3d point. However:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> vec4 point_4d_oddball = { 1, 1, 1, 0.000000001 };
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> is not a "pure" 3d point at all, not in any way shape or form! A
>>>>>>> 4d observer at that point with a non-zero w component, would be
>>>>>>> able to look at the 3d world as a sort of alpha blend, in a
>>>>>>> sense. It could see right through things, and walk right through
>>>>>>> walls... Eve ones made of lead. ;^)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Too much pondering here? lol. :^)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In a land far far away... The 4d observer, with a non-zero w point
>>>>>> in its 4-ary vector, would be able to stand on the surface of a
>>>>>> planet, look down and see right through said planet into space on
>>>>>> the other side... Everything looks like an alpha channel/blend of
>>>>>> sorts, it would be able to see things akin to a 3d person drawing
>>>>>> 2d plans. It would be able to walk right through walls that exist
>>>>>> in points that have zero for a 4d component, w = 0... It would be
>>>>>> able to see in every room, see inside of people, look down and see
>>>>>> space look up and see more space... Sorry, I wrote that for fun.
>>>>>> Try not to call me a 100% kook? ;^) lol.
>>>>>
>>>>> I like the description of what it would look like if a 1 meter
>>>>> diameter 4D hypersphere with its x,y,z coordinates of its center
>>>>> were in the room you are and its w coordinate going from negative
>>>>> to zero to positive. First you'd see a point which rapidly would
>>>>> grow into a sphere, continue growing but slower until it was 1
>>>>> meter diameter, then it would shrink to a point and wink out of
>>>>> existence.
>>>>
>>>> Well, so far, that is how some of my 4-ary vector field experiments
>>>> actually look/act like! The problem is that I am having trouble
>>>> visualizing points that have a w component that is non-zero. My
>>>> n-ary vector field helps! But its still strange. I can see how a
>>>> "ghost" point with a non-zero w component effect points in the 3d
>>>> world, but its still odd to me. I actually have no idea where to
>>>> plot a 4d point that has zero x, y, z components, and a non-zero w!
>>>> Say,
>>>>
>>>> (0, 0, 0, 1) ? Where do I plot that sucker!
>>>
>>> Only points with w=0 can be observed by 3D beings. In my example, the
>>> hypersphere with a diameter of 1 will be nonexistent until its center
>>> coordinate becomes w = -1. At that time a single point (with w=0)
>>> hypersurface appears. As w of the center increases, the number of
>>> points with w=0 and thus "real" increases. When the center is at w=0,
>>> the hypersurface is at a maximum and appears as a sphere with
>>> diameter 1. As w increases the sphere shrinks and when w=1 it is a
>>> point and then vanishes.
>>
>> Still not sure if an 3d observer could see a 4d object with a non-zero
>> w. Afaict, it seems like you are taking w on a range of -1...1. Say:
>>
>> x = 0
>> y = 0
>> z = 0
>> w = -1...0...1
>>
>> When w is at the center and is actually equal to zero, 3d observers
>> can finally see it. A fun part is that a 4d observer would be able to
>> see the 4d object moving, and it would be able to see completely
>> inside the 3d realm (aka alpha blend) its moving through wrt its (x,
>> y, z) components.
>>
>> I sometimes wonder if the w component can be very small yet non-zero
>> to a point where a 3d object might be able to notice something, akin
>> to paranormal activity wrt the 3d object. That is a fun one to ponder
>> on... :^)
>
> The hypersphere is moving in the w dimension and has a finite radius in
> all dimensions including w, of 1. When its center is at w= -1, a single
> point at w=1 (relative to the center) is visible. As w of the center
> increases but is still negative, parts of the hypersphere have w=0 and
> become visible as a sphere. For example, when the center is at w= -0.5,
> parts of the hypersphere with w=0.5 (total w=0) are visible. When the
> center is at w=0, a sphere with radius 1 is visible. As w becomes
> positive the reverse happens. At w=1 only a single point (w = -1
> relative to the center) is possible, after which (w>1) it vanishes.

You perplexed me a bit here. When a sphere has a non-zero w component it
is not visible to a 3d observer that has a w component of zero. Okay,
however, what happens if a 3d observer might be able to notice a 4d
object when its (the 4d objects) w component is _very_ close to zero,
but not exactly zero... Say, .00000000000000001, ect... The 3d object
with w at zero might be able to "notice" the 4d object and blame it on
some paranormal activity? Is is way too far out there? Deep in the heart
of kookville? It's all in good fun and interesting thoughts for sure.


tech / sci.physics.relativity / Re: The Universe is not "Well Understood" by Accepted Science

Pages:12345
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor