mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:

> On Monday, February 5, 2024 at 11:57:00 AM UTC-8, Jim Burns wrote:
>> WM's proof that the smallest unit.fraction exists is that it must
>> exist.
>>
>> That it has contradictory properties is proof that it is a
>> non.unit.fraction unit.fraction.
>
> Inverse infinity is a smallest fraction.
> Calculus believes in that infinitesimal math.

this is the same error they are doing in relativity, where the big
physicists are thing *_a_very_big_number_*, regarding infinity. Which
displays they neither understand science, math nor relativity.

infinity is NOT a very big number.

On 02/05/2024 02:29 PM, Barbaro Xin wrote:
> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> On Monday, February 5, 2024 at 11:57:00 AM UTC-8, Jim Burns wrote:
>>> WM's proof that the smallest unit.fraction exists is that it must
>>> exist.
>>>
>>> That it has contradictory properties is proof that it is a
>>> non.unit.fraction unit.fraction.
>>
>> Inverse infinity is a smallest fraction.
>> Calculus believes in that infinitesimal math.
>
> this is the same error they are doing in relativity, where the big
> physicists are thing *_a_very_big_number_*, regarding infinity. Which
> displays they neither understand science, math nor relativity.
>
> infinity is NOT a very big number.
>

It's in this book:
https://www.weiserantiquarian.com/pages/books/45954/wang-chu-chi-compilers/english-chinese-dictionary-of-mathematical-terms
, "Infinity".

https://www.weiserantiquarian.com/pages/books/45954/wang-chu-chi-compilers/english-chinese-dictionary-of-mathematical-terms

What you need is "continuum mechanics" about the "infinitely divisible".

Einstein doesn't mind infinities so much as long as they're not
singularities that are non-removable discontinuities, because
Einstein thinks that the law of physics is governed by a
differential-system and parameterized by a continuous quantity called
"time",
of a continuous manifold of Space-Time.

Quantum mechanics don't mind infinities if it results the propagation
equations are still well-defined.

Mathematics actually _owes_ physics the mathematics of infinity.

Which is very large in numbers, ....

On 2/5/2024 4:48 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
> On 02/05/2024 02:29 PM, Barbaro Xin wrote:
>> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> On Monday, February 5, 2024 at 11:57:00 AM UTC-8, Jim Burns wrote:
>>>> WM's proof that the smallest unit.fraction exists is that it must
>>>> exist.
>>>>
>>>> That it has contradictory properties is proof that it is a
>>>> non.unit.fraction unit.fraction.
>>>
>>> Inverse infinity is a smallest fraction.
>>> Calculus believes in that infinitesimal math.
>>
>> this is the same error they are doing in relativity, where the big
>> physicists are thing *_a_very_big_number_*, regarding infinity. Which
>> displays they neither understand science, math nor relativity.
>>
>> infinity is NOT a very big number.
>>
>
> It's in this book:
> https://www.weiserantiquarian.com/pages/books/45954/wang-chu-chi-compilers/english-chinese-dictionary-of-mathematical-terms , "Infinity".
>
>
> https://www.weiserantiquarian.com/pages/books/45954/wang-chu-chi-compilers/english-chinese-dictionary-of-mathematical-terms
>
>
>
> What you need is "continuum mechanics" about the "infinitely divisible".
>
> Einstein doesn't mind infinities so much as long as they're not
> singularities that are non-removable discontinuities, because
> Einstein thinks that the law of physics is governed by a
> differential-system and parameterized by a continuous quantity called
> "time",
> of a continuous manifold of Space-Time.
>
> Quantum mechanics don't mind infinities if it results the propagation
> equations are still well-defined.
>
> Mathematics actually _owes_ physics the mathematics of infinity.

Math had infinity before human physics... ;^)

>
> Which is very large in numbers, ....
>

mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:

>> > Mathematics actually _owes_ physics the mathematics of infinity.
>> Math had infinity before human physics... ;^)
>> > Which is very large in numbers, ....
>>
> Math is before man. That makes it God.. Not the mathematician playing
> God.

sure, why not.

Macron is another comedy dwarf hero just like zelensky. He is gonna have
his ass so fucked. He likes it. The Macron would do 𝘀𝗺𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗸𝘆 anytime
anywhere.

𝗥𝘂𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗮_𝘀𝗹𝗮𝗺𝘀_𝗙𝗿𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲’𝘀_‘𝗱𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗿𝗼𝘂𝘀’_𝗨𝗸𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗲_𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲
Paris should not turn a blind eye to French weapons being used by Kiev to
target civilians, the foreign ministry in Moscow warned
https://r%74.com/news/591960-france-ukraine-zakharova-mercenaries/

They are just crying because they lost Africa to Russia. lol

they wanted to kill Russia, since before 2014. These disgusting 𝗸𝗵𝗮𝘇𝗮𝗿_𝗴𝗼𝘆𝘀.
Without shame or fear for legal repercussions. Saying it openly. And
proceed with severe 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗲_𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗿𝗼𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗺 arming the nazis of ukrein. They bombed the
energy pipelines to europe, these nazi 𝗸𝗵𝗮𝘇𝗮𝗿_𝗴𝗼𝘆𝘀. Friendo. If not fake,
here is the proof.

𝗕𝗔𝗟𝗧𝗢𝗣𝗦22_(𝗕𝗮𝗹𝘁𝗶𝗰_𝗢𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀_2022)
These countries will exercise a myriad of capabilities, demonstrating the
inherent flexibility 𝙤𝙛_𝙢𝙖𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙢𝙚_𝙛𝙤𝙧𝙘𝙚𝙨. Exercise scenarios include 𝙖𝙢𝙥𝙝𝙞𝙗𝙞𝙤𝙪𝙨,
𝙜𝙪𝙣𝙣𝙚𝙧𝙮, 𝙖𝙣𝙩𝙞-𝙨𝙪𝙗𝙢𝙖𝙧𝙞𝙣𝙚, 𝙖𝙞𝙧_𝙙𝙚𝙛𝙚𝙣𝙨𝙚, and 𝙢𝙞𝙣𝙚_𝙘𝙡𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙖𝙣𝙘𝙚_𝙤𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣𝙨, as well as
𝙚𝙭𝙥𝙡𝙤𝙨𝙞𝙫𝙚_𝙤𝙧𝙙𝙣𝙖𝙣𝙘𝙚_𝙙𝙞𝙨𝙥𝙤𝙨𝙖𝙡, unmanned 𝙪𝙣𝙙𝙚𝙧𝙬𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙧_𝙖𝙣𝙙_𝙨𝙪𝙧𝙛𝙖𝙘𝙚_𝙫𝙚𝙝𝙞𝙘𝙡𝙚_𝙚𝙭𝙚𝙧𝙘𝙞𝙨𝙚𝙨, and
medical responses.
https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2023/06/baltops-2023-exercise-kicks-
off-in-the-baltic-sea/