The most ridiculous science mistake in history.

The null result of MMX disproved the ether.
The Lorentz Transformation would make it possible to keep the ether.
Einstein kept the LT and discarded the ether.

Showing Einstein's utter lack of comprehension of the science.

There is absolutely no other purpose for the Lorentz Transformation.

The LT is the difference in time of the arrival of the two beams in the MMX due to the ether wind.

All three of your posts are incorrect.

Perhaps you should do something you are good at instead.

--
Jan

W dniu 19.03.2024 o 22:15, JanPB pisze:
> All three of your posts are incorrect.

And poor idiot Jan is a queen of England.

Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
> W dniu 19.03.2024 o 22:15, JanPB pisze:
> > All three of your posts are incorrect.
>
> And poor idiot Jan is a queen of England.

if you go to Jan's house she has a big picture on the wall of
herself...in queens atire.

(photoshop of course)

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

How Jan thinks his comments will convince anyone is a mystery.

It certainly won't convince those who say, "My mind is made up,
don't confuse me with the facts."

Gary, your opinion is so worthless to me the only reason I read it this time is because this new forum has so few comments so far. The relativists here haven't said anything ever that would persuade a reasonable person inquiring after the truth about nature. Non-Euclidean geometry is warped. Nothing said by the relativists here even attempts to persuade skeptics.

Larry wrote:
>
> Gary, your opinion is so worthless to me the only reason I read it this time is because
> this new forum has so few comments so far.

Of course it's worthless to you, because you ignore the facts. Your mind is made up and
you don't want to be jarred into reality.

> The relativists here haven't said anything ever that would persuade a reasonable person

Perhaps you're not a "reasonable" person. Ever think of that?

> inquiring after the truth about nature.

But are you really doing that?

> Non-Euclidean geometry is warped.

How so? You're not going to convince a "reasonable" person of that just by saying so.

> Nothing said by the relativists here even attempts to persuade skeptics.

There are two kinds of "skeptics": Those who don't confront the facts and those who do
(those who entertain fictitious" facts and those who face reality). The question is,
what facts aren't you confronting and what fictitious facts are you entertaining?

You have just demonstrated your utter lack of comprehension and your inability to rebut my comments with any substantive statement. The truth is that the LT correctly understood is the difference of arrival times of the two beams in the MMX IF THE ETHER AND ETHER WIND EXIST. Because it was not detected it had to be claimed something exactly negated it hiding it. The LT is just a calculation of that effect. To claim otherwise is utterly stupid and ignorant.

Larry wrote:
>
> You have just demonstrated your utter lack of comprehension and your inability to rebut
> my comments with any substantive statement.

A "comment" is not a valid argument. I asked you to state what you believe are facts about
reality and justify their validity. Your only response is a personal attack. That's what
happens when one doesn't want to face reality.

> The truth is that the LT correctly understood is the difference of arrival times of the
> two beams in the MMX IF THE ETHER AND ETHER WIND EXIST.

The LT is a prediction about reality, which it does very, very well (within its domain of
applicability). There are two different hypothetical theses that lead to the LT. Can you
state them?

> Because it was not detected it had to be claimed something exactly negated it hiding it.
> The LT is just a calculation of that effect. To claim otherwise is utterly stupid and
> ignorant.

Not really. One concept is that moving rods really do contract and moving clocks really
do slow down. This is called the Lorentz Ether Theory. Can you define the other one?
(A theory that predicts reality is neither ignorant nor stupid, so please dispense with
such childishness.)

W dniu 24.03.2024 o 03:59, gharnagel pisze:
> Larry wrote:
>>
>> Gary, your opinion is so worthless to me the only reason I read it
>> this time is because
>> this new forum has so few comments so far.
>
> Of course it's worthless to you, because you ignore the facts.  Your
> mind is made up and
> you don't want to be jarred into reality.

We know your "reality", you had to delete GPS
clocks from it as they didn't want to match
the delusions of your idiot guru.

W dniu 24.03.2024 o 05:45, gharnagel pisze:
> Larry wrote:
>>
>> You have just demonstrated your utter lack of comprehension and your
>> inability to rebut
>> my comments with any substantive statement.
>
> A "comment" is not a valid argument.  I asked you to state what you
> believe are facts about
> reality and justify their validity.  Your only response is a personal
> attack.  That's what
> happens when one doesn't want to face reality.

The only reality you know are your insane
delusions. That's what The Shit is doing
with the brains of its victims.

gharnagel wrote:

> It certainly won't convince those who say, "My mind is made up,
> don't confuse me with the facts."

so true indeed. You can't be there without being Eben Alexander. This is a
fact. So, loosely speaking, if you are there, you must be somebody else.

𝗗𝗺𝗶𝘁𝗿𝘆_𝗧𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗶𝗻:_𝗜𝘁’𝘀_𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗲_𝗳𝗼𝗿_𝗥𝘂𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗮_𝘁𝗼_𝗴𝗶𝘃𝗲_𝘁𝗵𝗲_𝗪𝗲𝘀𝘁_𝗮_𝗻𝘂𝗰𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗿_𝗿𝗲𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿
Washington is waging a proxy war in a bid to inflict a ‘strategic defeat’
on Moscow and a tougher response to this is needed
Dmitry Trenin

By Dmitry Trenin, a research professor at the Higher School of Economics
and a lead research fellow at the Institute of World Economy and
International Relations. He is also a member of the Russian International
Affairs Council (RIAC).
https://www.r%74.com/russia/594811-dmitry-trenin-nuclear-arsenal/

Absolutely yes Russia needs to do this. The West led by the USA is intent
on picking apart Russia piece by piece and they will not stop unless they
face resistance.

Jews are trying to overthrow Russia's government and then divide Russia
into ten Jew States...

gharnagel wrote:

> Larry wrote:
>>
>> Gary, your opinion is so worthless to me the only reason I read it this
>> time is because this new forum has so few comments so far.
>
> Of course it's worthless to you, because you ignore the facts. Your
> mind is made up and you don't want to be jarred into reality.

absolutely, it's illusory, being there, without being Eben Alexander.

𝗨𝗸𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗲_𝗳𝗶𝗿𝗲𝘀_𝗯𝗮𝗿𝗿𝗮𝗴𝗲_𝗼𝗳_𝗺𝗶𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗹𝗲𝘀_𝗮𝘁_𝗖𝗿𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗮_–_𝗴𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗼𝗿
Kiev’s troops have launched multiple projectiles at the city hosting a key
Russian naval base, a top regional official said
https://www.r%74.com/russia/594814-ukraine-fires-crimea-sevastopol/

Ukraine wants the people of Crimea to return to Ukraine but Ukraine is
killing Crimeans...... so stupid...

Buffer zones, huh? That so original that a moron could have said it. How
about a massive Russian invasion to take total control of Ukraine ?!!

it's clear, the fucking Putin is a traitor, allowing this for so long. The
Black Sea part of the fictitious "ukrein" should be taken from the
beginning, saving lives and more. The fucking Putina is a traitor. A WEF
"𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗴_𝗴𝗹𝗼𝗯𝗮𝗹_𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗿". Case closed.

and you fight the nazis, sending the nazis on paid vacation to Turkey, so
they also be released?? What kind of fucking traitor criminal are you??

Ukraine is trying to hide that they may have been complicit in the attack
on Moscow music festival as this attack comes hours after evidence points
to Ukraine

So much loss of life. All of it avoidable. Macron snarling while he hits a
bag, citizens displaced across the globe. How can any politician in the
right mind think that weapons are the better choice over diplomacy

Can Mexico be allowed to do this nonsense to American? Why is Russia so
calm about this, this wise divide Russia nation soon if they do not act
with iron feet, destroy Ukraine before they destroy you

LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:

> The most ridiculous science mistake in history.
>
> The null result of MMX disproved the ether.

Really? Nobody thought so at the time.

> The Lorentz Transformation would make it possible to keep the ether.

There was no reason for discarding it, at the time.

> Einstein kept the LT and discarded the ether.

A miracle has occurred! You have said something that is correct!

> Showing Einstein's utter lack of comprehension of the science.

As always, the problem is yours,

Jan

On 3/23/2024 10:11 PM, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
> Gary, your opinion is so worthless to me the only reason I read it this
> time is because this new forum has so few comments so far.

This isn't a new forum. It's old fashioned Usenet. The volume is down
substantially because of the Google Groupers who are gone because their
gateway to Usenet is closed.

> The
> relativists here haven't said anything ever that would persuade a
> reasonable person inquiring after the truth about nature. Non-Euclidean
> geometry is warped. Nothing said by the relativists here even attempts
> to persuade skeptics.

Reasonable people who have investigated have been persuaded. The
anti-relativity cranks not persuaded aren't reasonable.

J. J. Lodder wrote:

> LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:
>> Einstein kept the LT and discarded the ether.
>
> A miracle has occurred! You have said something that is correct!
>
>> Showing Einstein's utter lack of comprehension of the science.
>
> As always, the problem is yours, Jan

in order to undrestand more about Jesus, which was not a jew and spoke
arameic.

𝗟𝘂𝗻𝗮𝗿_𝗮𝗻𝗱_𝗦𝗼𝗹𝗮𝗿_𝗘𝗰𝗹𝗶𝗽𝘀𝗲,_𝗗𝗲𝘃𝗶𝗹'𝘀_𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘁,_𝗝𝗲𝘄_𝗪𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱_𝗧𝗮𝗸𝗲𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿
𝗮𝗻𝗱_𝗜𝘀𝗿𝗮𝗵𝗲𝗹𝗹_𝗙𝘂𝗹𝗳𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗴_𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗽𝗵𝗲𝗰𝘆_𝘁𝗼_𝗕𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴
https://bi%74%63%68ute.com/video/60mnwS8EWRdD

On 2024-03-24 16:20:03 +0000, Volney said:

> On 3/23/2024 10:11 PM, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>> Gary, your opinion is so worthless to me the only reason I read it this
>> time is because this new forum has so few comments so far.
>
> This isn't a new forum. It's old fashioned Usenet.

That is one of the many things that LaurenceClarkCrossen doesn't understand.

> The volume is down substantially because of the Google Groupers who
> are gone because their gateway to Usenet is closed.
>
>> The relativists here haven't said anything ever that would persuade a
>> reasonable person inquiring after the truth about nature. Non-Euclidean
>> geometry is warped. Nothing said by the relativists here even attempts
>> to persuade skeptics.
>
> Reasonable people who have investigated have been persuaded. The
> anti-relativity cranks not persuaded aren't reasonable.

--
athel cb : Biochemical Evolution, Garland Science, 2016

W dniu 24.03.2024 o 17:20, Volney pisze:

> Reasonable people who have investigated have been persuaded. The
> anti-relativity cranks not persuaded aren't reasonable.
>

And do you still believe that 9 192 631 770 ISO idiocy
is some "Newton mode"? You're such an agnorant idiot,
stupid Mike, even considering the standards of your
moronic religion.

LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:

> How Jan thinks his comments will convince anyone is a mystery.

I am not here to convince anyone of anything. Your nonsense delusions are
your problem, not mine.

--
Jan

Let me know if he ever says anything of any value...

Look who's talking!

It is the most ridiculous scientific mistake in history.

Einstein took the null result of MMX to disprove the ether.

The Lorentz Transformation would make it possible to keep the ether.

Einstein kept the LT and discarded the ether.

This shows Einstein's(and Jan's) utter lack of comprehension of the science.